/biz/ - Business & Finance

Oasis Protocol
Ticker: ROSE

S Y B I L

R E S I S T A N C E

>>56316115
That is a privacy solution, not what I'm talking about. I'm interested in deduplicated identities, where the user owns and is in control of their own data.

>>56316107
Internet computer has the only novel approach that will be adopted. ii, or internet identity is the only way to go my dear friends. Take a moment from your containment thread and do some research into Dfinity and their internet computer protocol. Then you can abandon whatever the fuck this thread thinks it’s about

>>56316123
>>56316116
>>56316111
>>56316107
let’s hear it street shitter, let’s hear what shitcoin you’re advertising so you can stop spamming the board

How can we ensure that only specific people are able to interact with a certain contract?
>>56316138
I'm just posting some images I made with the new bing ai on this imageboard.

Imagine being able to restrict access to protocols based on the DNA of the user.

What about programmable, real world assets? Everyone talks about real world assets, but what are the regulatory requirements? How can we expect to see tokenized stocks and real estate?

What about being able to fractionalise those real world assets? It'd be neat to own a fraction of a stock based on certain circumstances.

How can we ensure fairdrops? How can we make sure that participants in an ecosystem are not posing as multiple users, in an attempt to game the system? How do we achieve that, whilst protecting the user's data?

itt everest shills crawl out of the wood work to promote their dead scam

>>56316183

Can we really expect any, let alone all of the defi protocols to spend millions on kyc, ongoing reporting etc in the next 2 years, so they don't end up getting tornado cash'd?

How can DIDs that are based on credential sharing be compliant? How secure is a protocol really, that relies on a credential sharing based DID? What happens if someone were to steal someone elses credential? What happens if someone were to sell their credential?

AI is fun. What will we do when the AI is so advanced we can no longer distinguish between AI users and human users? It's already getting to that point.

How can we filter through the bots, not only in defi protocols, but legacy social media too?

What if we wanted to share sliced aspects of our personal data through ZKP with others? Defi protocols, government institutions, hospitals etc?

What if all I want to do is cryptographically prove that I am not a Pajeet when using /biz/, without revealing anything else about myself?

That'll do for the ai images for a bit.
>Knobbem Bobbem just linked up with Boob Sneedy --- suck it or fuck it????

>>56316107
Gm, death to noncompliant protocols

>>56316123
What use is "owning" your identity and data if it's not private. The only place this can be done properly currently is on Oasis Protocol, and potentially via Chainlink in the future with DECO.

Anything else is a scam.

>>56317413
DECO does accurate relaying of Identification Data on-chain, but it still needs Identity Confirmation for it's users or Identity Fraud will happen.

It doesn't matter how accurate Alice's Identification Data is if it can't detect it's Alice presenting it.

Everest's Chainlink Oracle can synergize with DECO:
>Prove it's Alice requesting Alice's data
>Prove Alice is both a unique & human user
>DECO is now free to work it's magic and bring Alice's data on-chain
Now you have things like under-collateralized DeFi loans without the fear the KYC'd user is being impersonated to scam the system

>>56317604
No one is going to figure identity out until the government forces them to

>>56319727
>>56317604
Right on time. The everest pajeet bumps his PAJEET scam thread from page 9. You know people can see the time difference right? Inorganic shills

>>56319739
Sir no time to post today...I am busy defending Israel

>>56319766
as you always do street shitter, buy an ad next time you pajeets spam the catalog with your scam

>>56316153
worldcoin. But the tokenomics are trash.

>>56316300
ok, this one made me kek

>>56319915
Worldcoin scans a users identity when they register, but never again when they login. Ie it is not deduplicated/sybil resistant. Worldcoin users were selling accounts on the black market. Good luck being a viable solution for anything with a feature like that, let alone regulatory compliant.
Not to mention the whole concept of the orbs is goddamn retarded. There's what, 63 in the world that can be used to sign up? Wouldn't it make more sense to allow users to sign up with...oh, I don't know... a camera they already have in their pockets?

>>56317413
>Anything else is a scam.

I understand you are in hurry go shove your shit in our faces but there's no way that the only solution out there.

Everest is a pajeet scam. Sorry your bag holding a scam.

Everest is a pajeet scam. Sorry you’re bag holding a scam from 2018. It’s time to stop posting.

>street shitter thinks spam is helpful
I forgot how bad everest shills are

>noooo you cant just post memes

>spams to bump his dead thread
>calls it “memes”
In the options field. As always you live up to being the everest pajeets and shitting in the street

I like this one. It really captures the feeling of these threads.

>2025

>>56322454
There are a lot of them built on avalanche ecosystem which have caught my attention.

>>56323039
I was actually impressed with NexeraID which I believe is the top identity solution in the ecosystem at the moment.

>>56323300
>NexeraID

This is what Bob said in response to being asked about NexeraID:

>By the way in case anyone was curious; for a financial Institution to legally take or use KYC: these 4 attributes MUST be adhered to by law.

>1) The software entity is subject to the SAME obligations for data retention, customer due diligence, that the financial institution they are working with is. This would be according to the laws of each jurisdictional sector. i.e. The software provider must be licensed and regulated by the same laws that the Financial institutions they are working with are beholden to.

>2) Contract of data sharing

>3) Risk of transaction and customer due diligence still must be done by accepting financial institution

>4) Ongoing monitoring still must be done by accepting financial institution

>SOFTWARE SUPPLIERS OF KYC CANNOT DO THE REQUIREMENTS ABOVE

>Everest empowers users, organizations, and projects to utilize True Identity, eKYC, and a full suite of financial services including on/off-ramps for fiat/crypto backed 1:1 by our legal and programmable stablecoin voucher.

>To put this in context, it means that DID and ZKP producers are potential partners, not competitors, of Everest.

>95% of other "KYC" solutions are DOA and are not going to pan out.
>Even if they do they will still need to be compliant and conform to regulations + have a license to Operate.
>And even if they get that far they will need to have a true identity system because a VC just doesn't cut it.
>The bank isn't going to take your reputation based VC.
>However Everest is already working with many financial institutions which not only allow for Everest's KYC -- but are an extension of the Everest Network with things like Bitso, Remittances, and our Stablecoin voucher.

>This enables many other markets like remit, loans, microloans, tokenized stocks, realty, TrueDaos and more.

>>56323335
this is an everest pajeet shill, shoo

>>56316107
Why mountains here?

>>56324165
>pajeet shill can’t even type correctly
who pays you shills to bump your dead scammy threads?

>>56321869
worldcoin can simply implement consecutive pupil scan

>>56325480
>hours later another 1pbti pajeet bumps his scam
very organic street shitter

>>56323300
I have eyes on it as well chad. I'm also in the beta test team for its smart wallet which would enable recovery options for user assets.

>>56326453
The BrillionFi wallet right? It has quite the reputation within the Crypto space.

>>56326695
>>56326453
>more pajeet 1pbti responses
please try harder street shitters

>>56326698
why don't you respond to it instead you lazy f**k