/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>56227378
Pressing W to Witness.

.

Gentlemen, it's been an honor meming with you tonight.

>>56227405

>>56227395
W

ETH went from $1 to $100 very fast. Link won’t hit $100 for another 7-8 years

>>56227474
Banks uh have a lot of money

>>56227474
>Link won’t hit $100 for another 7-8 years because… look it just won’t ok?

>>56227395
W

>>56227503
all the money. all of it. and they make more money

You will not believe what good things happen for us.

It really feels like it's about to kick off, doesn't it

>>56227594
You will see.

>>56227594
This is honestly the first time I've seen people outside of the small linkie circle actually start to acknowledge/comprehend what is happening.

>>56227578
>>56227623
Is this it? The moment?

>>56227378
>>56227395
W!

>>56227378

W

>>56227578
>>56227623
>This is Sir Gay... changing
>This is LINK... reborn

>>56227640
When most see it, they will be too late. Remember these times where link was below $100. It feels like eternity for some, but when most are priced out, vindication will be had by those of us that saw where this was going.

>>56227711
checked

>>56227708
You got me in trouble for laughing in bed. My wife is trying to sleep, anon.

>>56227378
witness

>>56227532
Then why won't they buy link?

>Inb4 they don't NEED to

The eternal avocado cycle

>>56227378
I seent it

>>56227517
ETH and LINK have different total supplies and therefore it is much more difficult for LINK to hit $100 than it was for ETH

This is like the seventh time this bear market that we get the same pump
Its just that the market is so dead that there are a bunch retards levering up to the tits while sergey prepares to dump

>>56227594
Aye just ah wee bit, lassy.

>>56227503
Most cringe man in crypto, especially the faggot sneakers with a suit and fedora

>>56227517
You know 1000% it won’t come close to that price. $100 billion fully valued kek

>>56227378
now is the time
it's the singularity
>>56227711
checked

>>56227378
what were they saying about regulatory frameworks in asia being ahead/favorable? i didnt bother looking into DTCC until now and it's looking pretty damn good bros

Nice "eth moment" you got there
>September 4, 2020:
LINK: $12.50
BTC: $10,434
ETH: $388
BNB: $20.62
XRP: $0.23
ADA: $0.08
DOGE: $0.002
SOL: $2.71
TRX: $0.03
MATIC: $0.01

>September 4, 2023:
LINK: $5.96
BTC: $25,743
ETH: $1,623
BNB: $214.45
XRP: $0.50
ADA: $0.25
DOGE: $0.063
SOL: $19.36
TRX: $0.07
MATIC: $0.55
Kek baggies

>>56228234
would a bank announcement change that though?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C-hxya9rZ4U&t=640s

>>56228810
I remember a friend told me about Solana when it was $2...and I thought it had already mooned, I would better stick with Chainlink that at $10 at the time had more potential to grow.

Jesus fuck my life. I could have been so rich by now. Solana went to $200, even now is up 9 times from when he told me. Meanwhile this useless link project is down 20% since then. Just fuck me and my stupid life decisions.

>>56228201
>>56228309
>muh supply
Market cap is a meme dumbshits. Anything can happen

Unironically just the pre smartcon pump that'll fizzle back to six bucks. you're showing how new you are

I’m conflicted. I want to drop $500 right now but I also know we are pumping and I don’t want to fomo. But what if this is really “it”

>>56227378
no, stop shilling it. google 'jpm chain link'. it doesnt return any results.

>>56229106
I think it's still in the same $5-$9 range until proven otherwise.

With amazing partnerships with projects like Gravelcoin, Chainlink is really going places.

>>56228994
market cap absolutely matters. but given what eth does, and its current marketcap, and what link will do, the writing is on the wall

>>56229106
Don't break the bank champ with such a massive buy

Ah we dumped again. :( still higher highs...

>>56229194
>market cap absolutely matters.
No it doesn’t newfag

>>56227378

>>56227378
i’m witnessing its dump
good job stinky

>>56227503
token literally not needed

>>56227378
ETH went from 2$ to 1500$ within two years

>>56227711
I approve these numbers.

>>56230244
yeah but that was with miners dumping not stakers staking as per chainlink. checkmate fuddie

>>56227395
Dub-ayou. Checkem.

>>56229106
Just buy and forget you fuckinf retard. This is accumulation. May go up 3% may go down 8%

Do you understand what you're buying? If is does 1/10 of their final goal you will still make bank with that $500

Just get out of poor fag mentality of timing absolute bottoms and swing trading.

Buy and hold, it's that simple

>>56228201
>>56228309
What happens to the market cap when the available supply is cut in half or reduced by 2/3s due to staking required to secure the network once it is fully matured and operational?

>>56230701

This, dude. Just buy. We are near the bottom and in a clear accumulation range. Just keep accumulating steadily. Stress about timing the top when it comes, this part is so easy

>>56227439
SIR PLS DONT U KNOW THAT STAKING IS LIMITED SPACE WE MAKE LESS EARNING IF MORE ARE STAKING U MUST DELETE THIS BECUS 8 NORMIES HAVE ALREADY BOUGHT THE LINK AND WE ARE SPENDING 2 BILLION RUPEES IN FUDDING CONTRACTS. SIR PLS DELETE

>>56228201
Total supply is not the only factor here though. There’s so much more at play. Even with a higher supply, it wouldn’t necessarily be harder for link to moon

>>56228234
>This is like the seventh time this bear market that we get the same pump

The 2018/19 bear was worse

My story with chainlink begins in 2004. Someone told me something on a phone dating Chatline. I feel God will show me a sign when it's time to share my story.

>>56227378
Finally!
Don't be like this guy!

>>56227395
W

did we ever hear what the lockup period is on v .2 staking?

>>56234518
Anon, I can’t wait to hear your story. I believe this will be an important part of LINK lore.

>>56227741
you should be working on impregnating her, anon. deep dick her cervix and fill that uterus with seed

>>56227378
would be nice. but i doubt it.

>>56228700
One of the panelists on the SIBOS Future of Value panel made it clear that regulations-as-a-hurdle was a very "market specific" problem and explicitly said that there were regulators who were ready for what's next.

>>56227395
W

>>56237958
Asia and Europe are ready, US is lagging behind, was the vibe.
Couple that with Sergey in the same talk discussing how "countries that came up through globalisation are very intent on using digital fiat to exchange for foreign liquidity" and you come to the conclusion that China will launch a digital RMB out of Hong Kong that you can use in DeFi.
Imagine a stablecoin with full govt backing, and imagine the chapter in the "Fall of the USA" book about how they completely fucked their first mover advantage with Web3 money because the TBTF banks didn't want to share the pie with DeFi builders, and had too much hubris to see that they weren't killing the market but just passing it over to their biggest competitor.

>>56237991
>Asia and Europe are ready, US is lagging behind
That was definitely how I read it as well. Makes you excited to see what Mr. Chan will have to say at smartcon about the welcoming Web3 hub of Hong Kong.