/biz/ - Business & Finance

Just the usual market manipulation. Something is looking for liquidity in a sandbox where the most liquidity is cat piss

I had to move 0.001% of my funds across chains my bad.

>>56195484
Sergey and his fat finger did this

>>56195484
just checked and i'm getting that too...
I will assume it's a bug?

>>56195484
what are they setting up for SmartCon. Sergey was literally the center of attention at SIBOS, what possible surprises do they even have left for us...

>>56195529
Chris Barret kept saying SIBOS was "the calm before the storm"

They are definitely dropping something fucking BIG at this smartcon.

>>56195552
>dropping something fucking BIG
is Sergey finally gunna whip his dick out?

it's like when this happened... who did what?

ccip gets more and more interesting

>>56195619
>Shitter shill humor
Would you go back and be ignored on shitter. Thanks

>>56195552
>Chris Barret kept saying SIBOS was "the calm before the storm"
Link?

>>56195619
requesting sergey on the train tracks pasta

>>56195619
Hes gonna pull that fucking hog out as we go straight to 1k EOY. WAGMI

>>56195484
>https://dune.com/ericwallach/chainlink-price-feeds
precedent: oracles

$600 usage on the first month, $1500 on the second, $50000 on the third, $2200000 on the fifth
ccip could very well follow such an exponential pattern

if you know you know

>>56195552
ngl this sentiment very big in my village to dear,,

the eth revenue chart isn't showing this. We need some autistic anon to find the transactions, otherwise i'm gonna assume it's a bug in the chart

>>56195721
always assume bugs,,, especially in the night,, bugs big trouble in my village

>>56195721
Go back being ignored on shitter advertising fag and stop spamming

>>56195721
https://etherscan.io/address/0xE561d5E02207fb5eB32cca20a699E0d8919a1476#internaltx

there were 5 transactions on mainnet today. "betswirl", "xtest" and "mootest", and what looks like some random instruction

It’s obviously a fucking big you goddamn morons

>>56195785
why the blind angry?

>>56195792
Shut the fuck up. It’s a BUG

>>56195785
what if it isn't and there's $40,000 revenue tomorrow?

>>56195798
>if
Why the fuck would revenue jump 10x over night for no fucking reason?

>>56195721
>3h ago
refresh it you fucking mong

>>56195829
Because it's happening.

>>56195829

I am become Sneed, the supplier of Seed n' Feed

>>56195851
oh... ur right

>>56195876
sorry i yelled at you

>>56195829
I am become Sneed, seller of Feed and Seed

>>56195857
>Ccip and staking still not on mainnet
>it’s happening
You need to rope yourself

>>56195484
Big if legit

>>56195892
so is it real? Is it fake? Is it real? It's real? It's happening? It's fake?!

>>56195484
Chris Blec farted

>>56196007

>>56195529
>Sergey was literally the center of attention at SIBOS
Was he, or was the content we saw have him as the center? Genuinely curious as I assumed that given all the extra banking related thing there would be way more going on there that we simply were not aware of. Evidently the industry has switched it tune on digital assets and CCIP is core to that change, but it isn't like serg was involved in all of them. Not fudding, but we look at things through the chainlink lens and thinking serg is the center.. might be a bit much.

>>56195484
t. insider, unitonically, here is whats gonna happen at smartcon : they are gonna open ccip with alot of launch partners, real usage will start from smartcon onwards.

screencap this

>>56196099
>Was he the center of SIBOS?
Let me lay out the facts
>Sergey was the literal opening presentation of SIBOS so everyone was watching
>Chainlink had the biggest booth at SIBOS this year
>Chainlink had 3 presentations at SIBOS
I believe they were the center of attention.

>>56196202
Rooftop event too

scam

>>56196202
On the flip side we follow chainlink and we only saw that content because it was presented to us by the link team. From the outside looking in it does appear to be chainlink centric. The only other content we got were the short clips on the SIBOS channel. Obviously it was important.. but maybe not serg being the centre. To your greentext I consider the tone of the yt content SIBOS posted more interesting than serg giving some presentations or a booth. Non-chainlink related entities have gone from being vague (last year) about functionality that required link to being gung ho.

>>56196246
Yes but surely there were other rooftop events, and other events hosted by groups there. Don't get me wrong it was bullish af.

>>56196099
Here’s this year’s programme https://www.sibos.com/conference-programme

Chainlink was definitely NOT the center of it but shills will tell you otherwise. Cardano foundation was also there, you don’t hear shills mention cardano over here

stop derailing, we need to figure out why ccip just made $30k suddenly

>>56195721
just a bug in the blockchain sorry boys, vitalik already pulled it back

>>56196387
Yea but Cardano is a bigger shit coin than link so who the fuck cares…

>>56196414
I care. There were lots of crypto projects on SIBOS. Chainlink is not the main character of crypto, I don’t care if you call this fud you dumb shill

Sorry guys. Not yet…

>>56196387
cardano is vaporware trash fuck off newfaggot retard

>>56195650
Could be nothing but...

https://twitter.com/ChrisBarrett/status/1703810190674456921

>>56196387
ctrl f carda 0

https://youtu.be/l61OniWLxNY?t=72

>>56196432
Thanks

>>56195529
>>56195552
>>56195621
>>56195669
>>56195857
This is why everyone hates linkmarines, you’re all a bunch of retarded niggers high on hopium

>>56196432
it's over...

>>56196432

>>56196414
They’re just saying link was at the center of SIBOS not crypto

>>56196446
nobody cares enough about you to hate you

>>56196445
Why do you lie? I'm beginning to believe the people that say there are (retarded) link shill groups in biz

56196464
Look at this shill begging for a reply from me. Pathetic.

>>56195892
lovely image

>>56196432
FUCKING LMAO

>>56196432
This guy is a fucking retard, what was the error? I hate so many stupid fucking people in this "industry"

>>56196593
>create CCIP dashboard for free
>share it with linkmarines at no cost
>make a mistake
>incel rages at you

I’ll say it again, this is why everyone hates linkmarines, including Sergey

>>56196387
Cardano is trash

>>56196426
>crypto projects on SIBOS
anon it isn't a crypto get together. That was my whole point.

>>56196446
Imagine going into someone else’s place just to tell them how much they trigger you lmao

>>56196533
Who are you replying to?

>>56196653
Lol tough crowd

>>56196811
its alright this is just a preview of what will happen in the near future, large transactions on CCIP signaling institutions going live...i remember when the narrative was when large enterprises start staking, but CCIP has turned into a beast of its own.

>>56196432
>>56196811
so how do I use CCIP to send a cross chain transaction? $30k is peanuts and I feel bad for you nigger dollarlets seeing $300 fees as the epitome and renaissance of CCIP usage

>inb4 you can't

>>56196653
Shut the fuck up tourist

>>56195484
i am tough i got nails like God

>>56196653
The dashboard is shit and has been used for more fudding than anything else. If that was his goal then.. great work?

>>56195704
>>56195734
Kek

Cope, seethe, dilate and touch grass trannyshills. You won’t make anons lose another bullrun to chaincrap.

>>56196778
Yes both link and cardano are

>>56196800
Oh just like you’re going into Wallach’s dashboard to complain? Huh? *closes hand in front of your face*

>>56196805
(You)r mama

>>56196811
Linkcels are parasites in constant need of breadcrumbs and validation. They’re scared about their investment not being as profitable as they think it is. They’ve been brainwashed by 17 anons in a discord group.

>>56196864
>its alright this is just a preview of what will happen in the near future
Holy copium batman!

>>56197074
Truth hurts huh?

>>56197146
>The dashboard is shit and has been used for more fudding than anything else
FUD? Reality is FUD now?

>>56197286
Chris Blec is that your fat retard ass? Where's my doordash boy?

>>56197299
Blec? The guy that made chainlinkgod cower and block him by inviting him for a debate? I’m not him, but he’s based indeed.

>Where's my doordash
You should ask Sergey, his quantitative eating requires lots of calories, he probably stole it

>>56197335
lol it is Chris. You fat fuck. How many hours have you spent and posts have you made tonight loser?

>>56197344
>You fat fuck
Rich, coming from a fatass-worshipping chainlinker

>>56197355
Mentally ill. Just pull the trigger. Nobody cares.

56197375
Shilltranny begging for a reply

Not going to happen

>>56197388
10 pbtid

>>56197335
>I'm not him, but he's thuper awesome!

Yeah you're Chris Blec. No one but Chris Blec would call Chris Blec based. I hope you're ready to be a punchline for decades to come, on par with the pizza btc boy

>>56197401
Oh you mean Laszlo Hanyecz the guy that still has cryptocurrencies that are worth millions?

Oh, you assumed he had sold ALL of his bitcoin for a pizza? Don’t tell me you fell for the narrative in the same way you fell for the shilling of a discord group? Dum dum

56197389
Keep begging boy, I might reply to you someday

>>56197355
>>56197388
>>56197466
Damn, 3 sets of dubs in a row, that’s like one in a million odds of happening. KEK is with you today shilldestroyer

>>56197509
assuming independence its a 1 in 1000
you'd need another 3 to get to 1 in a milly

>>56197561
Rolling to destroy chainlink shills

Captcha: fuck shills

>>56197612
Oh well, close enough

>>56197375
>>56197355
im a linker but i just wanted to say do NOT pull the trigger because Jesus Christ and I care also never underestimate the power of positive thought

Kek he broke his dashboard, now it's not displaying any Ethereum revenue for the entirety of CCIP. Gonna be interesting watching this over the next few days, maybe something went online.

>>56196445
Holy shit IS that Fink over there on the right?

>>56196446
>13 posts
kek fuddie

>>56197623
I hope you are getting paid to post this garbage otherwise you are mentally ill

obligatory kek fuddie

>>56196387
>Cardano foundation was also there
This, I saw them running a lemonade stand next to the Quant hotdog stand out in the Itchy parking lot.
Seems they linked up.

>>56197286
13 heckin posts of this shit lmao

I unironically believe that these explorers are made to make fun of chainlink.

>>56195914
Bug if Legut

>>56195920
hahahahahahaha

wait wait wait

its
its real isn't it

ALL OF IT ALL OF IT ALL OF IT

>>56196533
look at you giving it

I see my posts have led to lots of seethe. Bring it on tranny shills, keep posting and I shall decide who to reply to. You might be next… if your lucky ;)

>>56196593
Eric Wall (ach) notorious chainlink fudjeet

56198697
You know you can get attention & updoots on reddit right? This seems like the right fit for someone like you

more unusual activity... the eth transaction was scrubbed from the dashboard (that isnt to say it didn't happen) ... now there's a who did it avalanche transaction...

>>56196439
He's referring to the fact the booth isn't open yet

>>56195484
Whatever jeets the manipulation is too much imo it's best to accumulate good alts which has good potential like ONE, TARA, TEL and QANX.
Fuck I'll make it in the upcoming bullrun

>>56198812
WWG1WGA marines trust the plan THE STORM IS COMING TEN DAYS OF DARKNESS 42 SENT ME

transaction value almost $45 million or a dashboard error...

>>56199098
the fee was 6 mill link wtf

>>56199122
honestly, it's Chainlink Labs "burning" LINK through this, because the constant FUD about lack of revenue growth.

They figured out they can simply manipulate these curves, like they do with their token market making.

Everything is fucking fake and I am sick of this retarded space. I had to launch a company in "crypto" to understand how manipulated and fraudulent it is. I used to think that "95% of all projects are shit but there are gems emerging".
No, the truth is, there are no gems, no hope, no "beauty" in the technology, it's all a fucking scam and Gensler is fighting that hard because crypto is fucking cartel platform. maxis are right in the sense that only Bitcoin is real, not necessarily useful or "digital gold", but the rest is just catastrophically not real

>>56199146
Fuck off either this is two similar bugs just happened a few hours between each other when no bug like this has happened before, or a major institution like ANZ or CITI just went live with their ccip intergration.

hope you got ducks in a row

holy redpilled this explains the a-vax shilling and the global forced vaccination campaign!!!

>>56199162
>Fuck off either this is two similar bugs just happened a few hours between each other when no bug like this has happened before, or a major institution like ANZ or CITI just went live with their ccip intergration.
zoom out in your fucking bagholder head and re read what I've wrote.
I am making you a huge favor, take it, or burn it, whatever I don't care dude.
I am holding 10k LINK from $0.7 though, but I know this is a scam token, from A to Z. No need to bullshit myself

>>56199203
>i am holding 10k link
>>56199146
>honestly, it's Chainlink Labs "burning" LINK

fuck off fuddie. you stick out like a sore thumb. you will never get a 10k stack. you will NEVER stake. no matter how much you like to pathetically larp here.

>>56199146
Based Alex Chepurnoy

>>56199098
Assuming a 5% transaction fee, wouldn't that correspond to an 800 million dollar cross chain transfer?

>>56198801
>6 gorillion
g-goyim?

>>56199295
Peanuts for the institutions that ccip will onboard onto crypto. Beyond compare to anything else in the crypto space.

>>56199295
doesn't 5% seem high anon? reckon it's sub 1%... either way, posted it here because would like to understand it too.... but between the fuddies and shills sometimes feels like there's more chance of a reasoned answer alone in the olive tree groves.

>>56199308
why would fucking institutions do "technically risky" cross chain transfers instead of transacting on the same chain, always?

>>56199316
Yeah you're right it would be much lower than 5%

>>56198310
>>56198518
>>56198801
>entire ecosystem metrics relying on the efforts of one man
>he does it for free

>>56199416
>he does it for free
HE DOES IT FOR FREE?
AHAHAHAHAHAHHAAHAHA

>>56199352
Now with the private blockchain of a quantum resistant L1 institutions can do transactions comfortably secure and efficiently.