/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>56186904
You’re dumping right now

>>56186904
Swift isn't using link in any meaningful fashion because tokenized assets aren't that important practically only in theory. It can all be done through private apis which they have to build anyway to onboard assets. It all relies on the idea that they will just use a worse system because somehow it makes linkies more money

>>56186911
There's currently a negative cme gap

>>56186911
>>56186912

>>56186912
FUD!

>>56186904

>>56186986
?

>>56186986
>hexagon logo

>>56186904
swift affiliation is only bullish when it isn't chainlink fuck off

>>56186904
SWIFT provides a messaging standard for making transfers between banks. They don't use blockchains and probably never will because the banking system isn't a blockchain and probably never will be. Banks are private institutions that run their own operations. They don't want to share the same ledger. SWIFT provides the framework for sending money from one bank to another so that their ledgers are coordinated.

Banks want to be able to send assets not just to other banks but also onto blockchains, which aren't banks. Chainlink provides a turnkey solution for that the way SWIFT provides a turnkey solution for sending money to other banks.

SWIFT is not and has never claimed to be replacing its current messaging system with blockchain technology. It is literally just providing a way to connect banks to blockchains and nothing else.

This is extremely bullish. There is a huge market in finance that wants to use blockchains. They just want to use them for real assets and not stupid shitcoins like they are used now.

>>56187130
What is this from? I mean both where the image itself was downloaded from as well as what event this is.

>>56186912
> tokenized assets aren't that important practically only in theory
The financial world, not just BlackRock, disagrees with you on that one.

>>56187256
Someone on /biz/ posted it here a long while back. I believe it was Adelyn giving the presentation. I don't quite remember what the event was called unfortunately.

>>56187273
Thanks, friend. Cheers!

>>56186986
latest review is from 2021. nice grasp kek
https://galaxystore.samsung.com/prepost/000003907881

>>56187285
Unfortunate, nice looking out anon. Here's one of my personal favorites. A bit of LINK in everything and everyone!

Here's a classic 2018 post

>>56187541
damn you guys had it good back then.

>>56186911
Oh no, it's dumping upward.

>>56186904
>What you say and think makes you what you are
Fudders don't understand this at a very basic level.
In their own minds they think there is a strong partition between their inner, smart, balanced self and their outer le epic troll.
But there is no partition. You are just what you do. And if you choose to be a stupid retard on the internet, for attention, then that is fully mixed in and part of yourself.

>>56186904
LINKIES WON

SUBHUMAN SHITSKINS AND VCS AND AND KIKES AND BULGARIANS LOST

TOTAL FUDDER DEATH

>>56186904
Fren you don't think they're actually fudding based on anything real do you? The only idea is to keep out as many people as possible from the citadel.

>>56189495
Yeah just look at that faggot gook uncle

this whole fuddies vs baggies meme is not good for the already crippled mental health of chainlink holders on this board, especially OP.

kek bagies

>>56186912
an asset is something that people want to serve a material need
a token is an abstraction of a thing

tokenized assets have existed since the end of bartering

kek froggies

>>56186904
Old but it gets funnier every day

>>56187322
>he has a chainlink shirt and I dont
life isnt fair bros

>>56187541
>2018
>Bob and Alice
Ari wrote this

>>56191647
>I had to use a scammy chinese exchange to get my first LINKies
The early LINK listing is going to be binance's biggest impact on the crypto sphere someday. screw their shitcoin casino and the energy it wastes that could be moving productively.

>>56195970
And I'll give some benefit of the doubt, maybe Binance just made the shittiest, jeetiest casino chain possible to get it out of the way for the rest of the space.

>>56186904

The revenue one is unbelievable because CCIP literally just started. How do they think literally any business or service starts, other than starting from zero, and gradually increasing? Not to mention that for use cases where a lot of value is secured, anyone serious about security would start small, and wait and watch with any new service before committing major amounts of capital. Oh well, fuck the fudders.

I only managed to accumulate 1500 link am I too late

>>56186904
Nobody cares about your scam token link jeet

>>56196553
You might be able to buy a new Lexus in all cash or something, then back to the wage cage

>>56196553
how does 1.5 million sound?

>>56196553
How does $121,500,000 sound?

>>56197009
you forgot to multiply by 1500

>>56186986
I manifested this coming into reality years ago with my LARP about Samsung devices & appliances such as smart fridges running ChainLink nodes.

>t. the real l.j.

>>56196553
chainlinks marketcap rn is 4b, companies in europe that are of national importance are around 50b.
ASML which is the worlds largest and leading producer of the machines that make semiconducters has a mc of 230b.

Imo, I reallistically see link around 100b to 200b, so around $150 per link in the next 10y

Serious question. So if I buy like $ 5k link now, I can't stake because the pool is full? So I have to wait until a new limited pool is opened up which will also fill right away probably? Wtf is this shit

>>56199740
This shit is you being extremely fucking late. Like turning up to the top restaurant in New York and 7:30 on a Saturday night and throwing a tantrum because it's fully booked.

>>56195986
Binance is normalfag central
Etherdelta was the shit

>>56199750
>being extremely late
>token at -86% of ATH
Whatever you say, broski

>>56199867
>token up 5000%
>not late
It's all relative, I guess.