/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>56180352
Link will goes back to $1

>>56180352
day 1 of shartcon probably. they'll let chainshit float to the top of the bowl before flushing it down

>>56180961
total VC genocide when

>BTC to 27k, link to like $7.70
>turbo fud news comes out, BTC rugs to like $24.8k
>Link back to $6.50

>>56180352
First of all, the GME general threads are used to slide important threads from the first page. Second of all:

The house of cards is crumbling, people are starting to wake up. Link was and is shilled to this day by a group called dephi that profits from link’s CEO’s unconcerned attitude towards the price of the token. Advocates are part of this group.

Sergey already made it and left linkies holding the bag. While “people” (shills) tell you that link went to $50 last run (250x since ICO), they ignore to mention that countless other shitcoins did as well, or better than link.

One only needs to as oneself, if link is the future, and Sergey is in talks with all of these massive institutions, why haven’t they all used a minuscule percent of their profits to purchase link?

ANZ made 5 billion in profit in 2022, why not use 5% of their profits to buy chainlink at $7 to get 35 million link? What about all other institutions, why aren’t they doing the same?

More importantly, why they didn’t buy link during its ICO? ANZ could’ve purchased 35% of all LINK’s supply for a measly 1.7% of their annual profits. They invest more in conferences than 1.7%.

Why why why? Because Sergey already made it and banks are just not that interested in link. There are countless other startups that appear in conferences like SIBOS that no one pays attention to because they don’t have a token.

Hyperledger for example was also conceived in SWIFT’s innotribe project, why does no one shill it like link? Because the owners of the project protect the token’s price, whereas Sergey doesn’t.

It’s all a farse, linkers have been subject to delphi psyops long enough, if you don’t wake up you’ll lose another bullrun to these faggots.

>>56181098
It's all so obvious lmao.

What will it be this time?
Binance insolvency? Warrant for cz arrest? Coinbase ceo gers hit by a bus? Covid 20?

>>56181118
>What will it be this time?
Covid 23

>>56181118
>What will it be this time?

>>56181104
>why haven’t they all used a minuscule percent of their profits to purchase link?
>why not use 5% of their profits to buy chainlink
>why they didn’t buy link during its ICO?
>Why why why?
- Because not every business strategy includes focusing on backwards vertical integration.
- Because banks (both commercial banks and investment banks) are not in the business of making money by speculating/investing with their own funds*.
- Because even if they did, they can't just invest in random ERC20s. For starters, most of them don't have the custody aspect worked out (3rd party guarantees or internal infrastructure).

*Their main business is to make money by charging fees, commissions and interest on whatever risk customers take in financial instrument transactions. Prop trading is a thing, yes, but it's a very small fraction of their activity and is not indicative their main business activity.

Get your head out of your ass: Over decades, banks have managed to create a golden sandbox where laws, regulations and barriers to entry allow them to do all sorts of crazy shit to make tons of money with little to no risk (worst case = bailout). Speculating the bank's own funds on illiquid (for them) erc20s from random startups is way outside their golden sandbox comfort zone.

Verification not required.
ps: DR;NS.

>>56181104
Hyperledger isn't a cryptocurrency, FUD refuted

>>56181104
Not even banks, why wouldn’t some retard in the valley hoard supply for speculation? One Chamath or Cuban type could buy 1% of the total supply for $70 million

Smart money knows it’s right where it should be

>>56181467
This makes sense to a layman also. Imagine being a worker at an investment bank and trying to convince your boss with a business case stolen from this hellhole

>>56181098
Every. Single. Time.

>>56181104
This. It becomes even more obvious when you realize chainlink has a critical death spiral error. Everything hinges on the price not crashing so sergey can sell and pay bills. Chainlink makes 0 revenue so if the price dropped too much it would create a negative feedback loop where sergey has to sell increasing quantities of link at lower and lower prices until he cant afford his bills until eventually it becomes bankrupt.
In business this is called a zombie corporation. Link is a ticking time bomb which is why its shilled so mercilessly and shamelessly and puts so much effort into its advocate shill program. They desperately need retail money