/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>56164839
I think it’s amazing that biz was… basically right about literally everything

Bullish for xrp

>>56164851
Post your oldest LINK memes boys.

>>56164851
Yep, I can’t believe it actually hit $1k and we’re all filthy rich.

>>56164851
except the only thing that matters, which is the price

truly the cruelest fate

what should terrify anybody still holding link is the fact that the only people who know what's going on behind the scenes, chainlink themselves, are selling tokens as fast as the market can take it.

>>56166316
>muh price
If you bought when biz told you to buy you would have made it

>>56166322
the price will hover around $6.66 for this reason until the team completely drains their wallet which will take another 30 years. So excited for my cup of coffee coin to finally gain some momentum. I’ll be a millionaire eventually

>>56166331
I have no intention of ever buying LINK, sorry.

>>56166377
Then why are you here you worthless cretin

>>56164839
Here’s another comfy thread that’s even older. Linkies we’re right all along:

>>/biz/thread/14200941

>>56166385
you don't get to pick and choose who posts in your threads, stop posting LINK shit on biz and you'll stop getting detractors in the threads.

>>56164851
and yet, poverty :}
funny that

>>56166400
terrible thread but it is interesting that some of these fuddies are actual trannies

>>56166377
you will remember posting in this thread in five years
you can lead a donkey to water

>>56164839
Found some retard who thought it was bullish for xrp kek. When Link moons the xrpees will an hero.

chainlink.chat is where the intelligentsia of biz is moving

>>56166322
Didn't Vitalik sell a lot of ETH sub $1? He's also selling right now. Should that terrify ETH holders?

>>56164839
Was always obvious kek.
t. 2017 marine

Breadcrumbs become baguettes

>>56167861
>WE WERE RIGHT ABOUT EVERYTHING LINK MUHREENS !
hmm let me check the price....
>$6.7
kek

>>56167892
Linkies were quite literally right all along, yes.

>>56167896
cool its going back to $5

If you want lambo then bubblebot.finance is the best choice for you giving passive income to their users don't miss join now

>>56167892
Clocks ticking fuddy. Not to late to empty your saving and grab a cool 50 link for rope insurance. We won't tell anyone.

>>56167915
Doesn't change the fact that Linkies were literally right all along, does it?

>>56164839
>SpamShit thread
herb

Thanks OP, having a nostalgia drive through that thread. Here's a screenshot from it. We never learn, do we?

>>56167954
Keeping the price low after the CCIP release took some effort, but they did it.

>>56167892
I already made it from link :) and you're still stuck fudding

>>56167962
I don't disagree the enemies of CL manipulate the price. In fact, I'm pretty sure that's what's happening, and the $6.66 is a "fuck you" from a whale.
What I don't believe is that this suppression is accumulation and it will just stop for some reason and a pump will begin. I think it's just bad actors trying to starve Sirgay.

>>56167986
>I think it's just bad actors trying to starve Sirgay.
Same.

It's unbelievable how many prominent crypto figures and organisations seem to have an overt bias against Chainlink.
Pic related, that whole Swift thing revolves entirely around Chainlink but Cointelegraph somehow completely forgets to mention it.
This is CNN/Trump-tier suppression.

>>56168013
Gee I wonder why the whole crypto space would hate a WEF coin. It's a mystery.

>>56168013
Gotta appreciate the irony. /biz/ found the one crypto project that isn't a pump and dump and went all in, and then all the PnD shitcoins pumped and dumped LINK didn't, because it wasn't a PnD.
By now it's obvious that LINK should be in top 3 by marketcap, but what's the fair, actual price of bitcoin? Without the manipulation, cartels, gambling dens? How much would ETH be worth without the shitcoin casino?
Perhaps ETH itself is worth less than a dollar. Perhaps Bitcoin has no business being over $10. Perhaps LINK actually bad because crypto bad.

On the first part of the journey
I was looking at all the life
There were dog coins and nfts and boomer rocks and btc
There was the link marines, for me

Then the first thing I met was a crash with a buzz
And the new lows were profound
The heat was hot as the floor wasn't found
And this board had no more sound

I've been through the bear market on a board with no name
It feels good to be out of the rain
In the bear market you can't remember your name
'Cause there ain't no one for to give you no pain

La la la la la la...

>>56168059
kek so why did they mention Swift then? That's a billion times more of a WEF thing than Chainlink.

>>56168059
>institutions bad!
>(but only for Chainlink)

Why not just skip a few stages of grief and skip right ahead to acceptance?
Just say “linkies were right all along” and save yourself some time.

IM GOING INSANE AAAAA

WHY ISNT LINK ALREADY AT $50

>>56168133
Oh boy I really rustled some pajeet jimmies! The whole point of crypto is decentralisation for a post-central banking economy. Chainlink represents the opposite, it exists merely to facilitate renewed central banking control of the global economy via linked CBDCs. Institutions can dump as much of their money into btc as they like, it won't give them any more control over it. Institutions absolutely control chainlink and sergey.

>>56168151
Hi Adem

>>56168151
>The whole point of crypto is decentralisation for a post-central banking economy.
>Chainlink represents the opposite
So do ETH and Ripple, but they were ranks 2 and 3 during the 2017 cycle.

But suddenly institutions are bad for Chainlink.

>>56168151
>The whole point of crypto is decentralisation for a post-central banking economy.
Explain ETH then.

>>56168151
>>56168163
>>56168169
Decentralized crypto will still exist. The banks will utilize it in the future through CCIP. Chainlink only accelerates it the eventual adoption of decentralized crypto.

Crypto was always supposed to be a backend improvement, but crypto is stuck at trying to make consumers use dapps with horrible UX. Where is the killer application for users after over a decade? There is none. It might come, but its only speculation bullshit.

What Chainlink does is bring the insitutional users to crypto, while also bringing revenue from private-to-private chain ccip into LINK. For the first time in the history of crypto consumer demand isnt needed, because the banks will pump LINK regardless because of their need to use the internet of contracts

>>56166316
This, LINK is still behind utter dogshit scams like SHIB, TRON or SOL.
The fact we're not back at least over $10 is beyond infuriating, like a cosmic joke.

>>56168399
>like a cosmic joke
It's almost certainly deliberate.

>>56164839
So funny reading XRPlets cope in that thread. Who wrote this? Show yourself retard

>most certainly is not, as you can see the info OP is linking is specifically mentioning what networks it has tried. Those networks, have ties to one major token...XRP. You have to realize, XRP is not the only part of that ecosystem. Flare is there too and can do everything CCIP can do but better and cheaper. XRP already has backing from all over the globe for adoption of its system. Why do you think Flare has been delayed so much? The big tell from the info is that they talk about private vs public ledgers. Do you know what crypto system allows for a private and public ledger to utilize the same gas tokens and be interoperable without any other system? The XRPL. They were designed with this in mind, to allow banks to run their own private ledgers which can connect to the public. This way interbank transactions are private while intrabank transactions are public.

>>56164839
Look at the replies. Happier times, even despite how recently we got mogged. This board was much healthier. The last year of crab has destroyed a lot of minds.

>>56168013
I like how they not only fail to mention Chainlink, but highlight in the second tweet the issue SWIFT is using Chainlink to fix. Like, oh wow, a lack of secure inter-chain interoperability. However are we going to fix that???

>>56167388
He urged the Eth Foundation to sell 70,000 Ethereum lmao

DUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUDE ITSSTHHHHHHHHHHHH A CONSPIRATHY!!!


HAHAHHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

>>56166437
You're so real for admitting you're paid to do this to quell link posts.

>>56168061
Gigabrained take. But you forget that this is clown world and what would be even more silly than a bunch of self defeatist losers being dragged along to wealth whether they thought they deserved it or could attain it or otherwise? The question isnt how high the price goes, just what time skill youre observing on. You will pass down $100k+ link tokens to your children and you will be happy.

>>56167306
>when
Wen indeed sir. It feels close, so close, but it had been a long road

>>56168059
Nigger please

>institutional adoption is now fud
fuddies never fail to amuse me. first it was "chainlink is a crypto shitcoin there's no demand for it in the real world" and now it's "real world demand is bad because the jews". crypto had its chance to be the new frontier of freedom and it sold out. look at all the btc maxis praising the etf and the sec. what happened to becoming the currency of the future? lightning is a complete failure and no one cares. chainlink isn't going to kill crypto. crypto killed itself. chainlink is taking over what's left and giving you the tools to rebuild.

>>56171429
wouldnt someone with a lisp pronounce it conthpirathy?

>>56173526
He’s esl

>>56166400
why couldn't that guy go after XRP or ADA or some shit.

>>56173283
its not about the money, its about sending a message

>>56164839
i wish that mattered. the price is literally going going as I type this. I'm probably going to give is a year and a half more until I kms. probably going to donate whatever link I have to BLM just to fuel globohomo.

>>56166316
>except the only thing that matters, which is the price
This is tied to the singularity. Has this occurred yet?

>>56174594
fuck off crybaby loser faggot