/biz/ - Business & Finance

At one point the nopooler guy called Johnny a sandwich fucker. He even accused Johnny of eating the sandwiches after busting loads into them. There was an intense bit of silence while Johnny glared. Beads of sweat formed on his forehead immediately, and his face was flush. He forced a chuckle into the microphone. Then he walked off stage and just out of the room where there was a magazine rack. He was still in full view of everyone through a window. He starts taking these magazines, two and three at a time, and just tearing them to shreds. Sometimes he would pick one up, and try to twist and tear the whole thing at once, but fail, so then he would start ripping out individual pages. He was facing away from everyone, so we never saw his facial expressions, but the jerking of his arms and jiggling of his head as he ripped the magazines suggested he was apoplectic with rage. This went on for two minutes at least. At this point I thought he was totally screwed, and that he had just ruined the reputation of stake.link in one fell swoop. However, he turned around and walked back into the room. He looked completely rejuvinated and full of vigor again. He proceeded to completely btfo nopooling in every way, acting as if nothing out of the ordinary had happened. Afterwards, he even did a little q&a session after the nopooler guy left due to being frustrated from the harsh btfo. Janitorial services were picking up the mess of shredded magazines at this time, and the only acknowledgement Johnny ever made to the mess was when one of the older janitors fell over while leaning to pick up the pieces. He sort of covered his mouth with his hand, clearly holding back laughter. It was bizarre, but with genius comes inevitable personality quirks.

>>55795099
thanks for writing that essay, you care so much

WE ARE NOT ALL IN THIS TOGETHER

ALWAYS OVERESTIMATE THE WEAKNESS OF INDIVIDUAL THOUGHT ESPECIALLY NEGATIVE INDIVIDUAL THOUGHT

THIS SHIT IS GOING TO HIT $0.11 EOY EASILY SO DO NOT TAKE THIS TIME TO NOT VISUALIZE
BREATH WE ARE ALL IN THIS TOGETHER

I AM POOR
I AM GAY
I AM A FAGGOT
LINK HAS STOLEN ME FINITE ABUNDANCE

NAY
WE ARE POOR
WE ARE GAY
WE ARE ALL BETRAYED
LINK HAS STOLEN US FINITE ABUNDANCE

>>55794583
Fuck these scammers

>Tries to larp as Lido
>Scams everyone instead

Don't fall for this obvious scam

>>55794583
How much am I going to earn on staking SDL? Unless its over 5% yield, I see no point in acquiring SDL to stake Link when I can just exchange it in the liquidity pool.

>>55795394
link swap to stlink is a very small market so theres alot of slippage

>>55795240
>>55795348
its not a scam

>>55795368
it is the Lido of the Chainlink network

>>55795240
All caps, so it must be true.

>>55795434
kek

>>55795099
>>55795240

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eZTf2-RgpiQ
4 strength 4 stam leather belt?
AAAA

>>55795671
Its so hilarious how obvious your shilling is. You guys keep getting btfo everyday and then making the thread the next day like we won’t remember. You realize all /biz/ users can be counted on two hands right?

>>55795914
There's at least a few desperate /pol/migrants boating over here every day
But you have no idea what BTFOing means if you feel like SDL has been BTFOed.
stake.link has already outsurvived 1 BUILD partner, how many must it outsurvive for you to consider the first specifically chainlink based project valid?

>>55794583
thanks buying another 5k

>>55795394
with slurp-8 live:
you would get 7 LINK per 25,000 SDL staked
this is with 750,000 capacity in the node operator pool
if sdl secures 5m capacity then that would be 47 LINK
you then also get staking priority
it scales very nicely, it's just speculation about how much capacity sdl can secure and if chainlink moves to reduce its need

>>55794583
And the next SDL shill thread. Maybe it isnt the best idea to start thread after thread when you get BTFO in every single one of them?
Everything regarding SDL was discussed In the prior threads.

TO EVERY NEWFAG:

SDL RUGGED THEIR LAST PROJECT

SDL IS NOT NEEDED TO STAKE LINK

SDL HAS AN HORRENDOUS APY

THE TEAM BEHIND SDL HAS A VERY BAD TRACK RECORD, THEY ARE EITHER INCOMPETENT OR MALICIOUS

HERE ARE THE LAST TWO THREADS WHERE SDL SHILLS WERE UNCOVERED:

>>55767496
>>55736712

>>55796488
>staking priority
not needed because you can just buy stlink over the curve pool
>it scales very nicely
No it does absolutely not. LPL scaled very nicely but the SDL team has cut early supporters out of LPL

>>55796687
it scales nicely as the more staking capacity sdl secures the more money you get as a staker
if they get 15m then it would be around 150 link per year in passive income
a bit less than half the link you get from 7k staked

>>55797105
but currently 25k sdl = 777 link
not a bad gamble

N E V E R migrating my LPL SEETH
E
V
E
R

>>55797105
>>55797118
I wonder if the node operator allotment will increase each time the pool increases

>>55797105
SDL APY looks mediocre at best, even if the platform would succeed.
Also, Johnny will just cut you guys out again when he feels like it.

How can anyone trust a Team that stole money from the community to build linkpool and then cut the early supporters out and tell them they will get an nft instead.

>>55797190
>that stole money
This is a sin, because you know it isn't true. They didn't steal anyones money. They halved our tokens and later gave it back. Most crypto projects have many shitshows, is this your first time here son?

>>55797813
>Linkpool didn't fuck LPL holders over
Yeh great narrative. Good luck dropping that into the public consciousness on here.
Also, fuck Linkpool and fuck you.
>inb4 butthurt cos you lost
I never invested

>>55797841
Read properly. He said they stole from us, they didn't. Screwing us over and then rectifying it is not the same as theft.
>I never invested
1 post by this id

>>55797862
>Did they (likely you) screw people over?
Yes
>Is that the same as theft
As good as, in my book and everyone elses except you with your oily semantics you snake
>1post by this ID
Really? You're using that as a defence? Wow

>>55795432
Can you fuck off with this scam please, no one is going to trust these people ever again. It can be the lido of chainlink all it wants, they've proven that they are willing to straight up steal from investors so they'll probably do it again and anyone who trusts them with their Link is a fool

>>55797895
Who was the guy who had the cocaine fueled rant on twitter that time before quitting Linkpool? That was such a car crash to watch. I would have jumped ship at that point for sure but amazingly few did. I suppose greed can be a bitch. I remember seeing it happen in real time and cringing so much

These guys fucked over their early supporters and still have the nerve to shill this shit on /biz/. Unbelievable lack of self awareness, pure immorality or master trolls.

>>55797931
I believe that was the garden gnome pretending to be a gym junkie. They call him the Last Line of Defence

>>55797885
>As good as, in my book and everyone elses
They literally gave us out half back and made the Tokenomics better.

It was never theft to begin with. Saying it's theft is a lie, and since you know it's not true it would be calumny, a grave sin.

Most crypto projects go through changes to their token. Stop being a dishonest person, if you don't like SDL you have literally no reason to be here. You won't find me in xrp, or ada, or btc, or eth threads, because I don't care about those projects, nor am i invested into them. Even though eth is the biggest scam around due to mev.

>>55797885
>>Did they (likely you) screw people over?
>Yes
This sort of detraction is a sin. You imply I am a team member as if to say I am somehow responsible for how the project goes.

You need to repent from you wicked ways or you will go to hell when you die.

>>55798050
To be fair they should have the kept supply at 100mil from the start and no token cut

>>55797957
The question is why is the same thread word by word being posted everyday

>>55798058
Perhaps you're not a team member. If not then you're one gullible motherfucking retard if you trust these people. I still think you are involved though. Few would be so dumb.

>>55798062
I agree, but the point is that these anons are lying about the situation.
>>55798076
Because they are dishonest and have an agenda. We should pray for them.

>>55798076
The paid shills post a new one as soon as they get exposed in a thread.
>>55798050
>gave us back half and made tokennomics better
Lmao. You either never held lpl or youre a paid shill.
SDL is obviously not the same thing as lpl and thats why i Sold. There is no revenue share with SDL.

What made LPL so interesting was being able to profit of the revenue of one of the biggest chainlink nodes.

SDL doesnt include revenue share anymore. Anyone with two braincells knows that the team absolutely fucked holders.

>>55798132
Were you able to sell the SDL tokens you got at the same value as what the LPL tokens were when they rugged? I'm unclear on it as I never held any LPL

>>55798132
SLURP 8 fixes this problem and incentives the holder to lock up their SDL for longer time periods

some anons have been accumulating this whole time

>>55798151
No i was not, my LPL worth worth around $50k before migration and the SDL i got were worth around $10k.
>>55798156
SLURP 8 absolutely does not fix this problem. There is no revenue share any more. SDL looks mediocre at best even if the platform scales well. Not comparable to the yield LPL would have gotten us.
>>55798196
Thats probably Jonny trying to stop the price from dumping. There are so many red flags with this project, i highly doubt any person that knows about the whole fiasco would dca.

>>55798156
>yes goy, lock up your SDL i promise i won't rug the project this time

>hypes airdrop
>steals my tokens
>crashes price
>destroys project
>changes entire revenue scheme
>rims horses
>"It's technically not stealing"
Yeh it's was just a beautiful song and dance..

>>55798120
Funny how you keep making fun of Jesus after you knowingly just stole from hundreds of people. Kinda like the guilt is eating away at you and you’re begging for some kind of punishment. Maybe get to a psychologist, I bet you shit yourself and check the whole house like a Vietnam vet every time you hear a bump in the night.

>>55797190
Because they didn't steal money and the money I put towards a LINK staking pool is still exactly positioned towards that (if not better because of what the protocol has managed to pull together)

>>55797931
Matt Beale
>tfw a faggot cokehead had the best exit
>tfw linkpool shits where it eats
>tfw its all so tiresome

>>55799119
They did steal money though, i never invested into sdl. I invested into LPL and was kicked out of it and got SDL instead.

>>55799773
>bought LPL

>>55798206
>my LPL worth worth around $50k before migration and the SDL i got were worth around $10k
It really was theft. Imagine taking someone's asset away and handing them some chocolate buttons and claiming innocence because you gave gave them the buttons. What a shower of fucking crooks. I really wish they would fuck tight off. We need to keep reminding everyone until they do.

I bet that one sperglord that got BTFO by Johnny in the Linkpool telegram yesterday before they left is in this thread

The revenue share model was no good moving forward, so they changed it to a liquid staking platform.. no-one stole any money...

>>55803554
I swapped ~3k link for ~7.5k lpl a couple of months before the switch... I got fucking raped. I will never ever ever see that amount of link back from that trade
>pool's closed
What a crock of shit

>>55802629
So five time down. Have you not seen the rest of the market?

the ones that sold their bags are gonna be on suicide watch.. all you had to do was hold longer and not cry about the price going down...
its crypto

>>55803724
You seem like a smart lady. Tell me your thoughts on this.

>>55803601

Now that the "neets are going to need to run their nodes and be at risk of slashing if they want returns forever" point is finally getting through some people's heads, I think SDL will be more attractive

>>55803601
damn that is rough

>>55804598
When Coinbase Cloud collaboration

>>55794583
As a fucked over 186er I unironically hope it doesn’t

>>55804598
Chainlink is working on an auto delegation system. SDL NOT needed

>>55806103
kek your in for rude surprise, mark my words

>>55803791
how much did you pay to get that chart?

>>55806087
whats 186er mean?

>>55795394
The % could also affect the sustainability of the pool. I've been getting much above that thou in the sylo-wbtc LM pool and has been stable for months now. Staking seems to be keeping many afloat in the bear market.

>>55806701
Chainlink literally said they are working on a platform to delegate the staked link of people to nodes that need collateral. Jonny also confirmed that chainlink Labs will handle the staking part

>>55806710
Way to put yourself as a newfag
>>55795427
If stake.link will succeed then there will be more liquidity and thus even less need for SDL.

>>55806776
Jonny says what he's aloud to say, wait and see what happens

>>55806790
Unironically fucking kill yourself you dirty shill

>>55794583
You poor bastards

Someone needs to compile the last few days' criticisms of these cowboys so we can just post a jpg and not have to go through this shit each day in order to protect people. Anyone good at that stuff? I'm hopeless

>>55806850
>>55806886
>>55806895
definitely sold after the migration and are now bitter as fuck... all you had to do was hold... sorry but your retards

>>55806921
Faggot, i Sold on the migration and could buy my stack back for 1/5th of what i Sold it for.

>>55806921
I only hold link

>>55806964
your wasting your energy in this thread.. why..
buy SDL for a 1/5th of what you bought it for and you'll feel better

>>55806970
and do you think you'll be able to make yield with Chainlinks community pool forever?

>>55807005
no, but chainlink labs will offer node delegation in the future. SDL is in no way needed to stake your link in the future.

>>55807074
..and what does node delegation mean?

>>55806776
They said the community pool could evolve into some form of auto delegation.

>could = not guaranteed
>some form = not letting people migrate 7k to it

They're already giving you layabouts BUILD rewards on top of your staking.chain.link subsidy, you are greedy AND only hear what you want.

>>55797931
Matty boy dumped his LP stack to an illiquid dex, immediately followed by a token split and subsequent 500x. no surprise he still comes here to FUD. I'd be salty too if I traded my retirement for like 100k.
thanks for the exit liquidity, cry babies. next time don't buy the inflooncer pump.

>>55807157
Matt still has a very large stack and is excited for whats coming next

>>55807147
It means they are working on a platform where you can "delegate" (read "stake") your link to nodes based on node reputation etc.
>>55807152
Oh so thats why they include it on their Roadmap to staking v1.0
>you are gready and only hear what you want
HAH! way to describe yourself. You shills are either completely retarded or so narcisstic that you can't see the truth that is in front of your eyes.
>>55807157
>its Matts fault
LMAO

>>55807232
ok.. and with that delegation how much time will it take to "unstake" my LINK?
whats the fee to stake with the node that has the highest reputation?

>>55807232
Auto delegation must have
a. slashing
b. limited space
c. some method of stake decay or a liquid token

Auto delegation can't have
a. free ride forever

>>55807287
a) read the last item on the chart i posted
b) so does stake.link and sdl does NOT guarantee you a spot
c) expand on this please

>>55807437
b. sdl does guarantee you a spot

>>55807437
do you know the rules for the nodes that are delegating?

>>55807536
No you faggot, it does not. Go ask in the Telegram, if only offers priority staking, it does NOT guarantee you a spot in the pool.
>>55807539
How the fuck would i know these rules when its not even out yet you moron

>>55807629
Study economics as a whole, honestly

>>55807629
hahahahahahahahahahaha

>>55807644
>>55807656
Great counter arguments, just like the last 3 threads. You have literally no talking points left and still try to shill this disgusting token.

>>55807667
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha

>>55807232
is reading comprehension not your thing? I don't blame Matt for anything as idgaf what anyone does with their own tokens. I'm just saying his exit was ill-timed.
cry more, though.

>>55807775
>matts exit was ill-timed
This is simply not true, 1 LP share was valued at around 200 ETH when he sold.

>>55807232
>>55807437
>>55807629
>>55807667
>>55807985
The counterpoints to NEET delegated stake are all theoretical, just like the counterpoints to SDL are all theoretical.

And LPL and LP shares or any retards who lost money buying them are not a counter point to the function of the protocol.

Just get a big snuff of mid shelf coke off of your boy's cock, mat

I will never forget the immense joy I felt when the linkpoolies got the rug pulled from under them a day before v0.1 staking. It couldn't have happened to a more deserving group of smug kike shills.

>>55810291
Lol, lmao even
Realism = smugness to coping LINKies, you'll never get infinite returns with no risk like you are currently forever, the world is zero sum and things will eventually fail if that ever existed.
That being said, neither is getting .006 LINK per year per SDL from subsidy rewards, but at least I get a closer seat to the head of the table by being in on it than sitting on the salty OG neet side of the table.

>>55810291
>Pool's clos-ACK

>>55810810
>2024
>staking 1.0 comes out
>Thank you for supporting the Chainlink ecosystem! Your contribution has earned you 1000 LINK of migration space to the NEET node delegation contract!
>every OG now has 6.7k LINK they have nothing to do with
>LINK dumps
You guys do suck

>>55810795
>That being said, neither is getting .006 LINK per year per SDL from subsidy rewards, but at least I get a closer seat to the head of the table by being in on it than sitting on the salty OG neet side of the table.
Lmao the absolute cope. Also youre not getting 0.006 LINK per SDL per year but nice try.

>>55810860
>slurp 8

>>55810884
>just lock your SDL for 4 years goy
>i wont rug you a second time, promise

>>55810900
If you don't think things are different for the Chainlink network as a whole this time around, you're blind

>>55810928
I still hold a lot of link but SDL is a seperate project. There have been too many changes in tokenomics in the past and the team has proven their incompetence more than once. Why would anybody lock their tokens for 4 years?

>>55811015
Because you can sell you locked position as an NFT on OpenPee.

>>55811015
Dude, like, differing risk/reward tolerances?
I'm personally probably only locking up 15% at 4y, increasing percentages laddering down. But I'm at least 15% all in, motherfucker.

>>55811073
Imagine even locking up a single percent of your portfolio after all the shit they did

>>55811402
>imagine not locking up 15% of your portfolio at 8x reward rate because just that 15% would earn as much as your full stack unlocked
Risk reward my dude
I'm ride or die, so far the ride has been pleasant for me as a post-186 LP share buyer.

>>55811493
Imagine actually believing jonny wont change tokennomics again after you locked your tokens

>>55811582
>imagine missing out on the early rewards if he doesn't

>>55811402
>>55811582
there is a governance vote for every big decision thats made now, it will never fuck up again

>>55811402
Kek, more reason why there are a lot of passive income streams to choose from in the space. Just dyor so you don't end up in shit, For me its LP yields for Eth/sylo on Uniswap and Dai on Yearn finance.

>>55812781
Save the financial advice for your village meeting you street shitting faggot.

>>55796136
They are only surviving because they rugged linkpool holders you flaming faggot

>>55813374
Wrong, you dont know shit

>>55813374
Study what rugging is

>>55813035
Head on back to your hole, sub human retarded piece of shit.

>>55812246
One time was enought.

Please people, don't give your money to these scammers

bump

this thread deserves a thread slot more than some of the LINK ones

>>55814881
No it doesn't. This project should be gone like a fart in the wind. Like it actually did, when they scammed everybody.

>>55814881
The LINK fud is extremely evil and annoying. The SDL fud is evil and annoying. It would be nice to have an actual discussion for once. Instead we have to deal with bad actors and people replying to them....

>>55815923
I was a big believer in linkpool.

Fool me once, shame on you.
Fool me twice, shame on me.

These threads are bizarre because you have shills attacking the holders of the token they’re trying to shill towards. Literally last grasps of a dying scammer. Calling people retard niggers is probably not going to work for you guys, just a guess.

>>55816073
I did use some hard R retards in the thread, but cmon the fudders were throwing out hard Rs first I'm just returning fire.

>>55816838
You are a faggot nigger of gargantuan proportion.
>t. 186er

>>55816960
I was one of the 14 who made it in before 200, and at this point I have more concerns of some kind of eventual social credit score than fitting in with people who say those words. I'm just practicing already, sorry dude.

Bump so they dont start a new one

>>55818899
checked and bump and I will get one of my thralls to backlink all of the prior threads and pretend to be an idiot

This is like 2018 all over a again with anons fudding LINK, guess what happened next,
thanks for this thread OP

>>55815967
Funny, you can shit on the street and feel no shame at all.

Staking V1 comes out end of 2024, goodbye community pool, hello liquid staking $$$

Why aren’t any of these mare rape enthusiasts presenting at Smartcon? Least you faggots could do after all the betrayal

>>55795240
You are NOT a MANIAC!

>>55821299
and you are one

you're on to something OP

>>55820068
Probably scared of the backlash. Many OG linkies are very pissed off.
>>55822442
Yes hes on to poverty

>>55822734
When aren't OG LINKies pissed off though
You get a staking contract for 9 months and suddenly you guys are the experts?

Hint, some OG LINKies weren't simply lazy people looking to ride coattails, and had to leave anon and put their faces and work forward to develop this project.

So yeah, no wonder OG LINKies are pissed, but it probably should be at themselves?

>>55824018
>So yeah, no wonder OG LINKies are pissed, but it probably should be at themselves?
*if they're self aware.

>>55824018
Stop playing dumb you stupid Nigger. There is a very clear reason why linkies are pissed of at the sdl team. Because they literally stole our money.

>>55824018
we are pissed off because both projects are not what we signed up for origianlly. The fact that they never finished the first white paper and linkpool rugged should should not make you happy you cuck

>>55824035
>>55824037

>>55824047
chris is this what you do for a job?

>>55824094
Naw dude I'm just some dude, the rampant schizophrenia in OGs is probably not good on their overall mental outlooks.
I smoked a duck yesterday, very good breakfast.

>>55824127
>im just some dude
If you arent getting paid for these threads then youre doing something wrong Nigger.
P.S: these constant shill threads look very desperate.

>>55824141
Don't worry, I get pay myself freelance by reposting good /biz/ things on reddit and selling moons from upvotes lmao.
Already got a couple hundred bucks coming in next distribution, probably better than the village is compensating you to shit on stake.link street.

>>55824157
Anon I earlier in the thread I reminded you that you are a gargantuan faggot. Be advised your posts since have confirmed levels of faggotry that are off the charts.
>won’t own SDLs fuck ups
>posts nigger babies instead of a retort
>takes screens of biz to shill elsewhere

>>55824157
>pay myself freelance
>couple hundred bucks
You smell like poverty, imagine taking financial advice from somebody like you. Tell your mom i said hi when you ever leave her basement

>>55824018
I'm an 'OG Linkie' and I'm not pissed off. On the contrary I'm delighted. I have tens of thousands of Link all staked and I've continued buying more. I'm not interested in competing against the performance of other tokens when I know that Link is going to beat them all in time.
I'm not a gambler and I'm quite happy. I know for a fact there are others like me. It's a simple path to follow; one need only stay upon it.

>>55825209
Thanks for the blogpost but you dont need stake.link to stake tens of thousands of link and you wont ever need stake.link to do that.
You arent a OG linkie if you dont have multiple Adresses that qualified for the 7k allocation.

>>55825243
I completely agree, and that's exactly what I have done. I have multiple community pool wallets. I was countering the anon's comment "When aren't OG LINKies pissed off though"

>>55825165
I have a real job, its my side hustle.
It's better than doordashing like my homies, I guess I'm just a chump for not figuring out how to bot it though, but copy/paste is easy enough.

>>55825243
Thanks for reducing the LINK supply, hope you can stake all of it down the line and don't wind up with 80% of it non-utilized, so you don't just turn into a price anchor at some higher point selling your LINK to fund your life. That's why the price is stuck where it is BTW, neet OGs dying and getting replaced by real money.

>>55825404
Also, isn't LINK designed to shine light on people who want to operate in the shadows? If you do this forever, you'll get fucked out of it by the thing you're investing in.

You're basically an entitled double voter larping as a part of 'decentralization' by using multiple wallets and will likely have additional access be snuffed out someday.

Is there a time limit to convert LPL to SDL or any other time constraint coming up for linkpool?

>>55825438
>thats why the price is stuck where it is
Faggot, the price is stuck where it is because defi was built on the back of link holders. There is no other reason for the price Action being shitty.
Nodes need to sell the link they are getting from sir gay for eth to Cover there gas costs.
Not knowing this absolutely proves that you know nothing and should just shut the hell up.

>>55825540
>nooooo you cant just use multiple wallets
Just kill yourself, please.

>>55825573
Yeah, that 100m+ daily volume is definitely just node rewards bobbling around and not the blood of dead OGs.

>>55825590
You would have admonished double voting in your /pol/ days, at least you recognize that morals can change.

>>55825540
>shining light on people in shadows
>entitled double voter larp
are you on drugs? wtf are you waffling about, man?

>>55825624
How fucking new are you? Most of the volume is as fake as your brain.
Its clear you have not enough mental capacity to realise the implications of FREE price feeds on a network that costs money (a lot sometimes) to send a transaction.
Just take a fucking look at the link/eth chart nigger

>>55825648
>blind when it benefits him
understandable but watch out!

>>55825665
I think you may have mistaken me for someone else in the chat. I have no idea what you're on about. Read up.

>>55825549
You can claim an airdrop if you didnt convert yet and it will double the amount of sdl you get.
There is no time limit to convert but there is a time limit to claim the airdrop but i have no idea what it is.
Protip: just dump everything you get from conversion and airdrop in one go

>>55825861
No, you're one of the ones saying "I circumvented the 7000 LINK limit for initial staking through multiple wallets" and I want you to know that someday that happenstance will not provide you any extra benefits beyond the extra BUILD rewards and the first x years of extra staking.chain.link subsidy.
t. 100 LINK 100 SDL 100 XRP 100 BTC holder

>>55826616
Its a 7k limit per wallet, not per person you fucking tard. Its pretty normal to have access to over 20 wallets when you have been in crypto for some time.
There isnt a rule that says only 7k per person, nobody is "circumventing" anything.

>>55826702
You're a centralized risk and you will be decentralized by choice or the network will find a way to decentralize you by force.

LINK is collateral. If they leave you guys in and it turns out that too much OG LINK is centralized to a slashable pool they'll make an example of it. You need to recover from an failure to prove that you can, after all.

>>55826900
You literally just make stuff up, im going to sleep now. Good night Nigger.

>>55826913
Sincerely hope you're not too far east in europe, my actual bulgarian (nonfudder) homie is only 140 KM from the ukie sitch.

>>55825549
>Users that met the outlined criteria for the 18 April 2023 Community Airdrop as issued in SLURP-3 have until 15 October 2023 to claim their SDL (180 days after airdrop went live).
https://mirror.xyz/stakedotlink.eth/Or7YgknFLyyRj9SW0-2zvbT4OGCNUuTtulxH4IMcUO8

Chainlink will get rid of the community pool end of next year, thats when V1 of staking starts..
Chainlink owns 7.7% of SDL, in just a matter of time we find out why that is.. maybe a liquid staking platform is part of their plan

>>55827386
some of the recent comments by jonny in the telegram are very interesting...

>>55827399
Such as?

>>55827386
>>55827399
Absolute unsubstantiated bullshit, they are not getting rid of the community pool

>>55827411
to be clear, i don't think they will get rid of the community pool as it gives an extra layer of decentralization (essentially further security layer within the staking security layer). but i do think it will be limited in capacity

you will have:

nops
community
"other categories of stakers" (most interesting here would be banks using their devops teams to monitor)

i was just referring to this comment when talking about node delegation in v1:
>Currently, a node operator has a single address for their principle stake. SDL works by node operators providing their stake.link contract address for their address that will send the principle stake.

>In the future, I would expect this to change to two addresses. The principle stake and the delegation stake addresses, it is then up to the node operator to decide where they receive both from. Chainlink Labs builds the underlying staking protocol, just like how Ethereum has its underlying deposit contract.
bullish for sdl

>>55827486
Just shut the fuck up and kill yourself

>>55827658
why so emotional fren?

>>55827486
could you put this in other words for anons to understand better

>>55827658
sold his sdl stack for sure, wrong move

>>55827678
currently, sdl is a bit of an addon as the nops have to give their whole allocation to sdl (obviously they can then fill some of it themselves)
v1 node delegation will allow nodes greater flexibilty as they can fill however much they like and then allocate to sdl or other lsds
this will make chainlink lsds more "official" and sdl is the only one out so far

>>55827838
So Stake.link is the Lido.fi of the Chainlink network?

>>55827883
it has the potential
but let's wait and see how v0.2 plays out and if any of the 15 nops want to get out
some were clearly unhappy with the recent tokenomics changes as it was friendly for retail
then again, team has also mentioned that more nodes want to join so could be bullish too
the other big thing short term will be how big the node operator allocation sdl secures
if it ends up something like 5m then would be very nice (currently 750,000)

>>55827949
So dollar cost averaging each week into SDL until "community pool V0.2" comes out is a good play

>>55794583
since this thread has been up for two weeks I am going to let all the newfags know: don't bother with any of this shit. all you need to do is buy LINK. do not waste your precious time with any other bullshit. stack some BTC or ETH if you like, but DCA LINK from now till mid 3 figs.

>>55827411
>>55827658
>member when LINK was entirely unsubstantiated but we still bought it?

>>55828178
it's high r/r and i would only do if you have a good link stack

>>55828282
thanks anon

>>55828282
Basically this

Any OG LP shares holder should be up on LINK and if he's bemoaning SDL at this point he fucked up here or somewhere else.

Anyone who bought LPL bought it on rent-seeking shilling, not on the premise of being the first people to invest into a theoretical staking pool for a still theoretical at the time network.

Anyone newfags, get your LINK up, you can just buy staked LINK from the platform and there may be other competitor pools you can get in early on someday.

>>55828414
SDL is great buy for high risk, high reward.. but you do need your link stack as the whole point is to make yield off your assets because in this day and age we lose 7% of our purchasing power each year

but the whole reason we invest in crypto is for high risk, high reward otherwise we wouldn't be here

>>55828615
true but chainlink's market cap vs potential is insane, that is enough for many
but if you have a good link stack then sdl is an option as it will give guaranteed staking space and decent rewards on top if adopted

>>55828414
I invested into linkpool to get part of the node revenue faggot. And they just cut holders out after building linkpool with OUR money.
>>55828462
You dont need sdl to stake your link you absolute fag
>>55828720
SDL does absolutely NOT guarantee you staking space retard

>>55827399
He implied in the Telegram that chainlink will only provide the code for staking and compared it to eth staking.

The problem with this is that he doesnt know more than us and that everything is pointing towards chainlink offering a platform to delegate link to nodes.

He literally only tried to shill his retarded token because he is getting desperate. They need sdl to finance their platform and to pay his workers.

The messages from him actually smell like pure desperation.

>>55830511
>>55830724
you are one bitter loser that sold early, i feel sorry for you, all you had to do was wait one year

>>55830783
WTF are you talking about, the price has been in freefall since migration. Most people who sold are up on the trade, myself included.

Also im just pointing out the truth. Jonny is a jewish scammer.

>>55830797
well if you bought back in while you're up you might feel better

>>55830863
in the long run that is

>>55830797
also Jonny isnt a scammer, he made a mistake, which he's aloud to as there is no better person on the planet that knows chainlink staking than him

>>55830863
I cant handle having a single SDL token in my wallet after what Jonny did.
>>55830867
He is a dirty scammer. If it would have been a mistake then he would have rectified it by now.
I was promised a part of the revenue of the Linkpool node and they literally just cut us out.

Why didnt they swap to profit sharing instead?
Why didnt they stop linkpool payments for a few years?

There would have been tons of better options.

>>55830896
Yet here you are, keeping this thread alive

>>55830901
Yup, to warn newfags about what happened to the last project of these disgusting scammers.
I trusted them and they betrayed me, i will never forget what they did.

>>55830511
>This is subject to change as the queue is in active development, but at time of deposit the staking queue will deposit the maximum amount of LINK it can in one deposit. The distribution of stLINK will then be done via a merkle tree and airdrop, so users will be able to claim their stLINK once the deposit and merkle distribution is added.

>The amounts of stLINK each wallet gets is based on the reSDL amount at the time of deposit. If reSDL holders don’t have enough LINK deposited to cover the amount of LINK that needs to be deposited, then remaining access will be given first-come-first-serve to non reSDL holders.
https://talk.stake.link/t/slurp-8-sdl-tokenomics-v2-0/74/
>>55830724
ummm jonny is on the chainlink team, pretty sure he would know

>everything is pointing towards chainlink offering a platform to delegate link to nodes
where is there any evidence of this?

>>55830916
it was a mistake doing revenue share, liquid staking makes more sense moving forward.
if you didn't sell you will get back what you had plus more

>>55830960
>jonny is on the chainlink team
Information is highly compartmentalized and he even confirmed that he does not know more than we do.

>evidence
Pic related and its also in the road map.
>>55830962
Why didnt they swap to profit share then retard? Its obvious they could have handled the situation in some other way but they chose to cut us out completely. And SDL will never get me the amount of passive money LPL would have gotten me. Stop lying.

>>55794583
>200+ replies
Fuddies won't stop SEETHING. Buy high sell low true /biz/nessman

>>55811493
oh yea super pleasant watching your equity dissolve while being forced to swallow tokenomic changes

>>55831404
The people complaining bought LPL and
Not SDL. Thats where the fud is coming from and its not even truly fud.
The concerns about how the situation was handled are legitimate.

>>55831666
checked, its very brand new technology, the team definitely could of handled it better when changing the mechanism, in saying that they are on the right track now getting ready for stardom

>>55831404
great thread, its like old times

>>55831749
What the linkpool Team did has nothing to do with the technology being Brand New.
They hyped a snapshot over weeks and then, ON THE DAY BEFORE STAKING RELEASED, they rugged LPL and forced us to migrate to a new project that has nothing to do with the old project with infinitely worse tokennomics and even cut our holdings in half (2 LPL were 1 SDL).
ONLY A COMPLETE MORON WOULD HAVE THOUGHT THIS WOULD GO OVER WELL.
Then they chose to gaslight us about it (just go to the gym bro) and then proceeded to block every dissenting voice from their Telegram and their Twitter Accounts.
The absolutely proved that they are either
completely retarded and incompetent or malicious actors.

>>55827883
lido didnt ripp of its users,

>>55830511
>traded your money to someone else on the open market for shares
It's not your money after that, dingbat.

>>55833549
>what is equity
Unironically kill yourself.

Bump

>>55833611
You wound up getting a 1:1 ratio on shares via the airdrop if you remained faithful and commited and didn't have your head stuck in the sand. And the token supply returning to 100m means it's the same proportionally.
If you're one of the schizoids who thought they knew better and held onto your LPL and missed out on airdrops, you can still increase your equity by LPing the SDL and earning some bonus? But damn you'd be dumb on that first part.

>>55828216
Price prediction for LINK in the next bull season? Maybe I'd add it to my stash of MATIC, KREST and TOMO which have potential for long term gain.

>>55835232
You should probably stick to the MATIC KREST and TOMO to be quite honest.

>>55835218
>You wound up getting a 1:1 ratio on shares via the airdrop if you remained faithfu
we got robbed and we should remain faithful? thats called stockholm syndrome you fucking cuck. Not to mention the apy is far, far less. Why hold this and lock up for four years when you can buy pepe and get out when the cycle is over

>>55835218
Nobody in their right mind held on to the tokens on migration though, thats why the chart looks as bad as it does.
>didnt have your head stuck in the sand
It was clearly the better choice to dump on migration you retarded fag

>>55832812
This

>>55835643
>we
You
>>55835660
There is still ~1m outstanding LPL, or 1% of the holders are dead, head in the sand, or dumb enough to hold on to them, yeah.

>>55831144
>where community stake
sdl is focused on node operators not the community pool
>>55832812
the third option is that their blog post about their investor deal collapsing is true
when this happened they would have been in crisis and forced to make decisions rapidly, just as chainlink staking was released
obviously they knew that the announcement would go down very badly
the true incompetence was not getting investors on board during 2021 though, when money was everywhere

Thursday.

>>55837305
just bought more

>>55794583
I think you're correct, this year it will moon when staking V0.2 comes out

>>55828615
Idk anon, its best to manage your risk either ways. There are LM pools where decent yields can be earned with security and flexible withdrawals like for DUA and LDO on uniswap.

>>55838394
uniswap is a great dao, but i like the
'little engine that could' sdl has great potential, why not get a small bag to go with my link stack

Bump

>>55832812
i fear that johnny is a liable to future bad decisions like this and that sdl is fundamentally not needed and just a bone thrown to early lpl investors, however i've come to far now being an OG LPL buyer... I once had 2 mm worth of lpl and now have 100k I just hope that johnny knows something good that we don't

>>55838454
>why not get a bag
Because of this >>55832812

>>55841916
>>55832812 reads like some good old 2017 LINK fud
>callout
>buzzword buzzword BUZZWORD rugged token buzzwords disinfo
>DENIGRATE
>cult callout
>denigrate
>denigrate

>>55843027
>hello my fellow 4channel niggers
>this is just like link! lulz
Whole thread is an inorganic shill that should have died 2 weeks ago
also I saged

>>55843027
Lmao keep trying you stupid Nigger. Your shill tactic wont work because its well known in the link community that linkpool rugged early holders.

It really seems desperate trying to paint what that anon wrote as fud or disinfo, because it literally happened like that.

>>55843242
Why didn't you leave LINK when sergey was 'rugging' the LINK token with his 700k binance dumps?
we're in the early stages of an ecosystem and I'm glad that the energy I put into LP shares didn't go extinct. It has never been rugged, it's a stupid term to use in this situation.

>>55844240
Thats a completely different situation retard.

>>55844899
Whatever keeps you comfortable with your market position, at least you're in the best LINK related thread.

>>55830916
You sound like a naive pussy, it's crypto FFS, do you realise how stupid it is saying you trusted some crypto Devs? Worse yet, you're so butt hurt you obsess over it in threads when you sold everything a long time ago, let it go bro and get on with your life, other people's financial well being isn't your problem

>>55840681
of course he knows, theres a reason why Chainlink owns 7.7% of the SDL supply

>>55841916
all you had to do was be patient, the project is evolving to what its meant to be.
Chainlink will need SDL down the line at some point

>>55844899
Chainlink did change their white paper also, you're the retard

I'm getting my 10k stack today boys

>>55797813
>>55797862
You think playing these kinds of semantic word games is going make people trust these scammers again? lol

>>55847362
they aren't scammers, you're just an inpatient retard

>>55847531
>they aren't scammers
lol

>>55847541
lol stay poor

>>55847574
You're using the lowest of the low shill tactics. Congrats retard.

>>55847602
thanks for effort of replying

>>55847633
>another 1 post by this id shill
lol, you guys are such amateurs

>>55847642
did you sell your stack?

>>55847664
that has no bearing on their status as scammers

>>55847680
answer the question

>>55847680
you clearly sold and are bitter about it, all you had do was wait

Best comment ever

>>55847698
>just engage in the shill's game of deflection
nah

>>55847739
>more low IQ deflection
Why are you shilling for these scammers exactly?

>>55847756
why are you fudding these developers of new exciting tech exactly?

>>55847780
What tech? Chainlink is the "exciting new tech"

>>55847840
yeah and they own 7.7% of stake.link....

>>55847904
Who does?

>>55847929
Chainlink

Chainlink are 'ecosystem partners' of stake.link, stake.link helps power the chainlink network

stake.link is for layman that want to earn yield(stake) off their asset(LINK)

This is going to be like bancor isn't it? Everyone knew bancor was a jewish scam back in 2018.... then the bullrun started up, newfag tourists came in, they got shilled, and they bought in. I can see the same thing happening here, newfags won't even know what linkpool is/was, will get shilled SDL, and you'll see retards with triple and even double digit link stacks wasting their time buying SDL. Its inevitable, isn't it? Also mods are working overtime to keep this thread alive, I got warned for another post I made, so fuck you guys for infiltrating the /biz/ mods as well.

>>55847965
wrong, the team have already made the mistake, they have now fixed it and are ready to reach for the stars

>>55848000
Checked. Accumulated heavy bag for the past month. I am expecting profit from the work of others

>>55847936
Source?

>>55848078
https://talk.stake.link/t/slurp-8-sdl-tokenomics-v2-0/74

>>55848041
thats what investing is all about

>>55848041
>>55848000
>>55847961
>>55847952
>>55847780
Hello sar, do you want some Curry? Please invest into SDL dear.

>>55849515
Im Italian, guess were all the best quality stuff comes from.. what sort of coffee did you have this morning..?

wait... link shitcoiners named a new token SDL even though there's already a SDL?
normalfag tier mistake

>>55850040
Saddle finance is closing shop.. there can only be one SDL and thats stake.link

alright I got my bag. If this hit 1b mc I'm a millionaire

>>55850394
Why would you post such an easily disprovable lie? There hasnt been a 10k SDL buy these last days.

You shills seem more and more desperate.

>>55850448
I didn't buy all at once retard

>>55850448
sold early and is bitter

>>55850470
https://etherscan.io/address/0x4735F2b4B36C9D29f0a2188Df8f513f160088ADE
Is this your Adress, poorfag?

>>55835232
my price prediction is irrelevant, just like those other shitcoins you mentioned.

>>55851111
checked, always add a little or shave a little off your numbers if you're trying to flex off of them.

But for a ~100 day newfag address, I think 1500 LINK 10k SDL is smarter than 1750 LINK. He do need some gas tho

>>55852136
>>55851111
This just proves that people buying SDL are newfags who have absolutely no idea what they are doing and would be better served to listen to the OG faggots.

Imagine having a $10k Adress and giving financial advice. Have fun getting rugged you stupid fag.

>>55852205
Damn, I have $1 of SDL and $.50 in LINK, you've found me out!

>>55794583
>another 50k SDL sell
OH NONONO SADDLE SISTERS, HOW CAN IT BE THAT BIG HOLDERS ARE SELLING AND ONLY LITTLE JEETS ARE BUYING???


>>55852305
I meant >>55850470 him, not you.

>>55852545
That addy that sold 50k has 1.8m SDL staked though, it could be that he's simply playing both sides.

>>55853478
>whale starts selling
>still has almost 2 Million sdl
>B-but this is bullish, b-because uh ummm because it just is
Do us a favor an kill yourself

>>55853478
Hahahahahahaha game over for sdl cucks

>>55853636
>>55855634
>sergey starts selling 700k to binance weekly
>still has 300m LINK
>B-but ths is bullish, b-because uh ummm because it just is
You'll be the one roping someday
>>55855634
It is over you don't sound like a soifed so I'll agree with you.

>>55852545
he's doing it to give a cheaper price for people wanting to get into SDL

the price will only stay this low for so long, its only a matter of time till its at $1

oldfags will lose and newfags will win this one, SDL will come though this time around when the pool opens

>>55857757
>>55857780
>>55858550
Keep coping retards

>>55796668
Gods work anon. Fuck these scammers that keep bumping their threads

>>55813035
Take advice from pajeets on 4chan instead of ranting. Pajeet like you are getting into Krest to score that Peaq airdrop. What's your game plan, anon?

>>55860555
checked

>>55860454
you just bumped it you fkn moron

>>55860454
DYOR but SDL isnt a scam, they made a mistake and now they have fixed it, it will succeed after slurp 8 and when Chainlinks community pool opens

>>55860929
They fixed literally nothing idiot

>>55861149
100m supply
16% of stlink rewards go to sdl holders now
actually go read it

>>55861162
>JUST LOCK YOUR SDL FOR 4 YEARS GOY
>I WONT CHANGE TOKENNOMICS THIS TIME, PROMISED

Imagine being stupid enough to lock up tokens of a Team that literally rugged their last project.

I read the SLURP 8.Also with the new tokenomics, the future of SDL looks mediocre at best, even if the platform scales well.
The yield sdl will get people is not comparable to what linkpool would have gotten us.

>>55861194
You're a retard who doesn't know what rugpulling is, haha

>>55861952
Oh linkpool didnt rug then?
Where are my LPL tokens?
Where is my revenue share?
And last but not least:
Why is linkpool still operating?

If I ever see Johnny or go to gym faggot it's on sight just want to reiterate it

I'm not using telegram to fucking seeinsider discussions post that shit on twitter faggot

Bump so shills dont start a new thread

>>55861963
They're still there, and they even still have liquidity pairs if you want to stop being a mindbroken sperg and leave the project without migrating.

>>55864073
Ignoring the Elephant in the room just makes you look even more desperate.

The SDL team force migrated the old project (lpl) to a new project (sdl).

The old project was infinitely better for retail holders.
The new project looks mediocre for holders, even if the platform suceeds.

I know you know this and are trying since over a week to paint a different Image of the situation via these threads.

Your tactic isnt working though, so i hope youre getting paid for shilling bc you are literally wasting your time if not.

>>55864137
>The old project was infinitely better for retail holders.
So good for them that it would have killed the old project
>The new project looks mediocre for holders, even if the platform suceeds.
It's sustainable, zoom out
We're at 300 replies anyway nice knowing you guys

>>55864745
see you in the next thread you disingenuous cuck

>>55864745
The point is that we trusted them.

I think many people in the community would have been open to discourse about the future of LPL.

It has been repeated many times in these threads, but there would have been plenty other ways to solve the situation.

But the linkpool Team chose to not engage with the community and instead hyped up a snapshot and then proceeded to rug the project and force migrate holders to sdl on the day before staking released.

>>55864776
Nah I ain't coming back here, I've done my due diligence towards throwing at pearls to swine, enjoy being full of hate on your dead board tho dude.

Bump so fags wont start a new one