/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>55792881
implications?

>>55792881
>biss
>hebrew
biss isnt hebrew you fucking kike witch

>>55792881
>bbc
Of course it's a jew. It's always a jew. Absolutely disgusting.

>>55792881
>BBCA
Big black co… wtf is this? This shit is getting out of hand

>>55792881
This is extremely bullish. How bullish? If you’re wondering where all the FUD lately is coming from it’s cause we’re only months away from the release of CyberCode 2.0 testnet. As an insider, I know have no idea what/the importance of CyberCode 2.0 is gonna be for LINK when the alpha releases around the end of October next year (give or take a few months) so I will spoonfeed you out of kindness of heart:

CyberCode 2.0 secures the ledger cryptographically to encode transactions at 20x magnitude of legacy infrastructure. It achieves this by taking blockchain transactions to the BbC-2022 layer and parsing them through the node network incentivized by super linear sequencing which Sergey said is very close to finish line. This activity is incentivized through semi-permeable staking allowing LINK token holders to benefit for verifying data both on main chain and Blockchain Byzantine Consensus 2022 layer.

The obvious benefits of super fast transaction speeds also brings exponential economies of scale! What this means sir is if farmer has 500 Kg cow for sale, he can put the beast to market on the blockchain to verify the weight in a trust less system faster than global SWIFT system. Soon any business who wants to stay relevant will have to buy LINK to have access to CyberCode 2.0 feature. A unique proposition. Those who don’t use this system (powered by LINK) will get left behind.

Scammer motherfuckers want you to think that banks and other organizations are not currently fulling their bags with cheap LINK as we speak. DON’T LET THEM WIN. If you hold more than 50 LINK right now, you already made it. Immediately when we breach the $7 resistance it’ll be too late for you. You have been warned, sir. So go buy many LINK for you dream to come true.

>>55792881
>chainlink
>introducing BBC chain
cant make it up

Thanks OP can't wait to slurp up some BBCa

This article is about a new way of making computers agree on something. Sometimes, computers need to work together to do something, like keeping track of money or sending messages. But sometimes, some computers might be naughty and try to cheat or lie to the others. This can cause problems and make the computers confused.

To prevent this, the computers use a special rule called consensus. Consensus means that the computers have to follow the same steps and check each other’s work to make sure they all agree on the same thing. If they don’t agree, they have to fix the problem or ignore the naughty computer.

But sometimes, following the same steps can be slow or hard, especially if there are many computers or if they are far away from each other. So some smart people came up with a new way of making consensus faster and easier. They use a special kind of picture called a DAG (short for Direct Acyclic Graph) to help the computers communicate.

A DAG is like a big puzzle with many pieces. Each piece has some information on it, like a number or a word. The pieces can also point to other pieces with arrows. The arrows show which pieces came before or after another piece. The pieces can also have different colors or shapes to show who made them or what they mean.

The computers use the DAG to send and receive pieces of information. They can also make new pieces and add them to the DAG. But they have to follow some rules when they do this. They also have to make sure that the pieces are not missing or fake.

The DAG helps the computers agree on something because it shows them the order and history of the pieces. The computers can also see which pieces are more popular or important by counting how many arrows point to them. The computers can also check each other’s pieces and report any problems.

The article explains how the new way of making consensus works in more detail. It also compares it with other ways of making consensus and shows why it is better.

>>55793017
Cool story. I'm just here for the BBC.

>>55792881
they stole this from Kaspa
>never before seen
Ahaha massive lie, YOU COPIED KASPA

>Dahlia Malkhi

I will shortly link a video of her attending a Kaspa presentation and asking questions on how it works

>>55792910
It’s over, over

>>55793034
here you go niggers

https://twitter.com/KaspaCurrency/status/1588958291228606465

Dahlia Malkhi asking how to do it from the main Kaspa dev

>>55792910
do you really wanna know?
do you really wanna know?
do you really really really really really wanna know?

>>55792881
>a "BISS" in Hebrew/German
>Hebrew/German
Wtf did she mean by this?

>>55793040
>>55793095
Next time, post something useful instead of taking a dumb on your keyboard.

>>55792910
Chainlink creating their own L1 and then diluting all the current token holders when they migrate off Ethereum to the new BBC chain.

>>55793105
Next time, post something useful instead of taking a dumb on your keyboard.

>>55793157
Next time, post something useful instead of taking a dumb on your keyboard.

>>55793188
Next time, post something useful instead of taking a dump on your keyboard.

>>55793194
Nachstest mal, sagen Sie etwas nutzliches anstadend auf Ihres keyboard zu scheissen.

>>55793232
ਅਗਲੀ ਵਾਰ, ਆਪਣੇ ਕੀਬੋਰਡ 'ਤੇ ਡੰਪ ਲੈਣ ਦੀ ਬਜਾਏ ਕੁਝ ਲਾਭਦਾਇਕ ਪੋਸਟ ਕਰੋ।

>>55793148
they won't make their own chain....right?

>>55793290
sergey will do whatever causes token holders the most pain. that i can assure you

>>55792881
Why does my token not go up in price though?

>>55793100
That a certain leader of Germany missed one in his own backyard

>>55793300
a team of VERY competent people are working around the clock to make sure you do not get any gains from the chainlink token. this is their full time job. they make like 400k USD a year. it's serious fucking business. this is what you are up against. sound tough? well, maybe you should just sell and buy some ethereum.

>>55793284
https://vocaroo.com/1miKRA0fEdN3

>>55793300
its an old 2017 alt. they can do whatever they like, the top is already in. hype will never return to defi summer levels.

>>55792881
You literally cannot make this shit up. "Proud link traitor" pic is undisputed fact.

כולנו בזה ביחד

אין להעריך את כוחה של מחשבה חיובית! מחשבה חיובית קולקטיבית במיוחד!

החרא הזה הולך להגיע ל-$1,000 בקלות!
החזק את המחשבה הזו והצג אותה במוחכם כל יום בתדירות האפשרית, החל מעכשיו והיא תתגלה למציאות. תעשה את זה! אני לא צוחק!

הצג בתדירות ובפירוט ככל האפשר!

>>55793337
what does that mean?

>>55793352
I didn't save the pic because it's fucking weird, but someone will probably post it.

>>55792881
will this be on an avax subnet?

>>55793314
But how do they stand to profit from me making a modest profit from my tokens and using that to retire and live a simple life? It's almost enough to make a man hold out of spite and use his eventual fortune to systematically destroy the ones responsible, like an autistic modern retelling of the Count of Monte Cristo

>>55793314
But how do they stand to gain from preventing me making a modest profit from my tokens and using that to retire and live a simple life? It's almost enough to make a man hold out of spite and use his eventual fortune to systematically destroy the ones responsible, like an autistic modern retelling of the Count of Monte Cristo

>>55793034
kek get fucked faggot, Chainlink is Schmidt blessed now. Shark mode activated. They'll steal whatever the fuck they like and you'll cry about it.

>>55792881
Chainlink confirmed built for BBC?

>>55792881
Whoa... This changes... Everything...

BBC(a) and tells you ite name in Hebrew

Someone is seriously fucking with us

Why does this bitch get funded by Sirgay dumping on us to research her L1 pipe dreams that will only remain papers no one cares about instead of researching fucking oracles and how to pump my bags

>>55793290
Why wouldn't they? They've hired a bunch of L1 consensus experts and they keep publishing research about L1s. If you trust CCIP then why would you not also trust an L1 which uses the same node operators?

>>55793500
thats the whole point
L1s are abstracted away
they all become functionally the same
"which L1 is superior" becomes a moot point
the only thing that matters is CHAINLINK, THE UNIVERSAL GAS TOKEN

>>55793397
40 years from now people will look at Chainlink early adopters like people who bought Apple shares for a dollar or Exxon for a penny.

God, can you even imagine how insane this tech is going to be then? No ones going to believe you if you tell them you own a whole Link token.

>>55793148
>>55793500
i unironically believe this. it doesn't make any sense for them to keep Link on Ethereum. i'm still waiting for the shadow fork

>>55793540
Theranos and Enron*

>>55793540
40 years from now people will look at Chainlink like they do betamax. The technically superior solution that failed due to bad marketing (and a slightly chubby CEO that dumps on holders).

SAD!

>>55792881
Very nice!

Love from the Citadel!

>>55793017
Thank you, anon. I've been wondering what the hell this is all about for the last few hours. Hope you don't mind me copying this as it'll no doubt be asked repeatedly in the coming days..
Thank you from this goy!

>>55793100
she doesnt know the difference between hebrew and jiddish

Why would they even be considering an L1 design? why aren't they making pull oracles production ready, actual staking ready, DECO ready?

Why even devote time/resources to this idea?

>>55793017
Thanks chatgpt

>>55794081


They also didn't indicate if/how/when this would or could be used for chainlink or what the next steps are. Is this something they are going to work on producing, was it just putting the idea out there for other people? what was the point?

>>55792881
pretty sure this shit is in my pre-workout

>>55793521
Brainlet here, if L1's are "abstracted away," how does that deal with the varying degrees of security of each L1 chain?

>>55794189
kek first thing I thought too but forgot fuddies are mindfucked porn addicts

>chainlink chain
But why? I thought the whole of point was to keep oracle tokens away from consensus ones?

they've said before they wouldn't release a chain because they don't want to compete in that way
they want to provide services for all the chains and connect them
I bet this is just some theoretical nonsense that never leaves the lab

>>55792881
So what chain will the main chain for the LINK token? Hmmmmmm?

>>55795054
but why have one of your best researchers working on something useless to your company?

>BBCa
clown world

>>55795166
the truth is that Dalia has gone rogue
we're subsidizing her pet research into useless tech

>>55795166
I also find it fucking weird that Dahlia has been working on novel consensus research for the best part of the year.
What's it in aid of? Does Chainlink want to drop a lightweight "settlement as a service" product on their DONs and be the ultimate one-stop-shop?
I'm a link maxi and even I think that would be overreaching.

>>55793472
Stop asking questions goy

>BBCa
Is this what you marines were excited for?

>>55792881
...are they about to make a layer "1" with asymmetric data contributing to consensus?

>>55795289
Go away Michael

>>55792970
The chart tho

>>55794081
>>55794141
Chainlink Labs is a lifestyle company funded by dumping on token holders. Some employees like to do blockchain research, but it doesn't necessarily have to benefit Chainlink, they are just hired so they can fund their lifestyle.

>cucks
damn the fudsters were right a bbc chain

>>55795338
that's old pasta
"cybercode"? c'mon dude

>>55793148
>>55793290

>>55793584
I agree, keeping link on ethereum doesn't make sense long term. its coming sooner or later.

>>55795399
LINK isn't "kept on ethereum," it can go on any chain powered by CCIP.

>Hebrew/German

why not just call it Babka Chain?
Calling it bbca chain and pronouncing it Babka is stupid

>>55795506
Alright smartass, tell me what chain is the safest to hold link on then?

>>55792970
Is this pasta?

>>55795706
Polygon, ser.

>>55795706
coinbase

>>55795632
babka chain the first yiddish chain where MEV is eliminated and instead replaced with on-chain haggling over value transfered 'oy meshugganah what you mean i now have to pay 0.03 LINK gas per tx I just paid 0.02 LINK you putz'

So Link is basically a college where the professors get paid to research whatever the fuck they want even if there's no profit to be made? Dahlia and Ari are just circle jerking pipe dream theories just like the homoerotic encryption they posted the last time, that again, has zero to do with oracles

>>55793017
You guys have no idea how big of a deal CyberCode 2.0 is gonna be for LINK when it comes out around the end of April next year (give or take a few months). You have no fucking idea so I’m gonna spoonfeed you: CyberCode 2.0 secures the ledger cryptographically to encode transactions at 20x the speed of legacy infrastructure. It achieves this by taking blockchain transactions to the BbC-2022 layer and parsing them through the node network incentivized by super linear staking which Sergei said is gonna be finalized soon. The obvious benefit of super fast transaction speeds also brings exponential economies of scale. Soon any business who wants to stay relevant will have to buy LINK to have access to CyberCode 2.0. Those who don’t use this system (powered by LINK) will get left behind. You’re stupid if you don’t think banks and other organizations aren’t packing their bags with cheap LINK as we speak. In other words, if you hold more than 50 LINK right now, you already made it. Once we breach the $15 resistance from last year it’ll be too late for you. You have been warned.

>>55795822
What the fuck is cybercode 2.0? You’re the only one spewing this nonsense based on the archives

>>55795856
It’s obviously a nickname for whatever test net is used at CLL it’s real too look at the OP

What the fuck. Check the date of this post

Can someone explain what any of this means with out using the usual mumbo jumbo technobabble buzzword salad?

Is number gongo soon? I'm getting old...

>>55795926
This also lines up with this years smartcon. Only off by a few weeks. lol

>>55796024
Yes. Two more years Ser. Be patience, is key. Good day sir. More bags buy now before go up, plis do the needful plentifully. Thank you good day for you Mr.

>>55795926
I thought this was a fucking larp bro holy shit they are fucking with us

<the derailers have arrived>

>>55792913
>>55792921
>>55793100
>>55793340
>>55793434
>>55795632
it means /pol/chuds and jews should hug
you guys made it, leave the common folk who whine about african weiners and people who question their genders to themselves.

>>55795822
What's with all the fucking bot comments in this thread?

>>55795926
Uhh

>>55795926
Wait, this wasn't some shitty pasta?
What the FUCK is going on?

>>55796195
It’s happening anon we’re gonna make it

>>55796195
It's definitely a copypasta
>>/biz/?task=search&ghost=true&search_text=cybercode

>>55796213
No, I know it's a copypasta, but unless we live in a simulation apparently it's also real.

>>55796218
It is real that anon has no critical thinking skills

>>55796218
>>55796220
There's no such thing as "cybercode 2.0"

>>55796231
It’s obviously a code name use your head fudcel

>>55795926
Check'm m8

>>55795926
holy fuck it's real
it's all real

does anyone have the paste with f(x+1) = f(x) + c or something like that and you don't need a 'blockchain' to reach consensus?

>>55796195
This is the funniest thing that’s happened here in a long time

what does this mean for hedera?

>>55796386
Nothing for your faggot shitchain this is bullish for kaspa>>55793053
A better DAG

>>55792881
Bro did they really name it BBC. How are we not living in a simulation

>>55796424
It’s named after a blockchain consensus porn brained /pol/cel

>>55795926
ayo wtf this shit bruh ong we finna be rich fr

>>55795926
Wth?
I remember reading this post and thought it was a troll because of the tongue-in-cheek "BBC" reference, but turns out this shit is real.
Can any intelligent(ish) anon explain what exactly this anon was saying is going to happen? Chainlink L1?

>>55796457
One stop shop for chainlink 81,000 isn’t a meme>>55795270

>>55796248
There's literally nothing to indicate this.

>>55795926
>bbc layer
Yeah its bullshit

>>55792970
>bbc
>bbca

Difference

>>55795926
I remember reading this and feeling like it was detailed enough to be real but using just enough retard lingo to get people to not notice. Thanks insider anon.

>>55793095
is that a Spice Girls reference?

>>55796642
>NOOO! YOU CAN'T JUST SLIGHTLY CHANGE THE NAME OF A NOVEL PROTOCOL AFTER 1 YEAR OF RESEARCH AND NO PUBLIC RELEASE!

>>55794201
They are abstracted away for the end user, but the devs of the app will still need to make the decision of which chain to use for what based on the needs of the app/protocol/whatever.
The point is, different L1s can now be easily used for what they are best at. Worrying about moving tokens from chain to chain based on the application is no longer something the end user needs to worry about.

>>55795926
Meme-magick is back on the menu bois lessgoooooooo

>>55795926
I’m officially schizo

>>55795926
Calling bullshit. The BBC layer? To be fair you have to have a very high iq to understand black cock related chainlink shitposts.

>>55795388
>>55795708
>>55795926
>>55796045
>>55796195
>>55796218

What the fuck bros. It returns this tweet as a first result.

>>55797133
IT'S REAL. I JUST CHECKED. FIRST RESULT IS CHAINLINK TWITTER.

>>55797133
>>55797193
No, it's not

>>55797219
My results

>>55797133
>>55797250
Why would chainlink's twitter come up if "cybercode 2.0" isn't mentioned anywhere by their twitter?

>>55796424
bbc is already an established acronym for
binary byzantine consensus
so nothing to do specifically only with chainlink it just happens that they work on it because it’s a known problem
the larper guy just researched some chainlink stuff saw that they work on bbc (haha muh big black dick) put it in a larp and named the next smartcon date

i know that the average iq on this board took a heavy toll since there is only pajeets and bots left but you can see that it’s not a insider or crumb
it’s just a meme

This had to be intentional kek

>>55796604

ahem*
>>55792881

>>55795338
newfag

>>55796013

Sure, here's the translation:

It's a bunch of made up shit, that will never be used for anything. However, by mashing a few math words together it sounds intelligent. And as such, it will serve as an effective method of extracting money from poor, greedy and gullible idiots to fund Sergey's insatiable hamburger addiction.

>>55795748
a jewish blockchain would be the world's first perpetual scamming machine

>>55795926
uhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh

>>55796604
Are you actually fucking retarded?

>Big Black Cock Consensus Layer

The ride never ends.

>>55797133
What in the actual fuck my brothers in Christ.
On a side note, if /biz/ didn't go to shit we shouldn't had to wait a whole fucking year for this breadcrumb in plain sight

>>55795926
>some retard memed the BBC layer into existence
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

>>55792881
>BBC chain
It wasn't enough for them to shit up /tv/ and /int/, now they're doing it on my cryptos

>>55798199
>inb4 hr-Roastie Chain

>>55792982
>cuckhold chain
>cuckhold token
>cuck holders..

Imagine my shock

>>55797133
Holy fuck, this sweet is about hybrid smart contracts. Meaning the larp might be real, Sergey was saying that the hybrid smart contracts are CCIPs next step. And super linear staking being used for it check outs. Honestly thinking that larp was real now.

>>55795926
Goes to show how /biz/ is still the best and worst place. Breadcrumbs and early info is here but just surrounded by absolute filth and low quality posts drowing everything. We are gonna be loaded.

>>55798307
Was just reading into it. That specific tweet post have a link to a chain.link blog post. Maybe it has SEO or metadata related to "cybercode 2.0"? It only appears when you add "2.0". The blog post talks about linear staking, which is referenced in the BBCA post as well.

I'm so excited for you anonbros

>>55792881
>>55792970
>>55797133
>>55795822
guys what the fuck is this? i dug through warosu myself and the google search result is real but how? i looked through the comments on the twitter thread, searched the code on the blogpost, no results found there for cybercode 2.0. meme magic is real
>>55777777
and its enough to make you feel schizophrenic. bbc eh? ha... good one guys

this, along with Big Mac contest and OK;LG is definitive proof that the team lurks here
they're literally mocking us using our own memes

So chainlink builds its own L1 and leaves Ethereum isolated while it migrates to its own ecosystem.
Sounds... solid

>>55798915
>CLL memes on us
>it was an insider
>it was a time traveler
>it was a massive coincidence
there are no other options are there

>>55799005
yep completely isolated. kek.

>>55799047
dude, Big Mac with Serg
they're doing this on purpose 100%

>>55792970
>>55798690
yeah this is unironically the most schizophrenic shit I've ever experienced while holding Link since 2017. Cybercode 2.0 literally throws Chainlink twitter as first result on google, but that post from last year was obviously someone being cheeky - and if it's real well, all I can say is that there very few opportunities like this in any given lifetime, and you have to be hyper-focused on some edge case shit for years to have a chance of noticing.

>>55795926
if this is true why the fuck have they kept this from us?

They knew it from previous smartcon and what we got instead was breakdancers and a zoom chat with SBF?

FUCK YOU SERGEY THIS MEANS THE TOKEN NEVER HAD TO CRASH THIS LOW

>>55799453
Of course it did. BTC/Link correlation is 1000% strong. Don't you think that banks and financial institutions might be playing dirty by manipulating the market? It's a 4 month old shakeout.

>>55795926
this being posted for years as just another pasta/ troll fud and turning out to be real is absolutely fucking nuts.

>>55797321
i would love to hear a theory on this question that has been ignored

>>55797321
yeah thats very fucking weird kek

>>55799363
>all I can say is that there very few opportunities like this in any given lifetime, and you have to be hyper-focused on some edge case shit for years to have a chance of noticing.
Yeah I almost can't believe how lucky we are to have stumbled upon this opportunity. Later they're going to say we had it easy since it was so "obvious" but they'll never know the years of FUD we endured, all while being gaslit by the team themselves and then having these schizo occurrences like leakers posting weird shit and then it turns out to be true, all the strange recurring numbers which point to a Chainlinked future, the weird media silence on Link. They'll say it was easy but they'll never know.

>>55800419
If that cybercode 2.0 larp actually turns out to be real, what does this mean for the token price? Is 1000 per token not a meme within the next two years or so?

>>55800854
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZylSidJ9eC8

>>55800854
I'm all in LINK but I don't think we see $1000 for another 5+ years minimum, I think we could see max $150-$200 in the next 2 years

>>55792970
What are all these terms?
> CyberCode 2.0
> BbC-2022 layer
>super linear sequencing
> Blockchain Byzantine Consensus 2022 layer

> if farmer has 500 Kg cow for sale, he can put the beast to market on the blockchain to verify the weight in a trust less system faster than global SWIFT system
What does this even mean?

>>55797626
the chart is the chart. The cult hates reality, because reality is fud

>>55801442
the chart is the chart is the chart
the chart is law
cannot be broken
the chart is truth
all can see it and behold it

>>55793148
Thanks, Johnny and team tested the waters with the LinkPool fork.
People got mad but took it like good cücks.
Get ready for CLL to do the same, the butthurt is going to be glorious.

>>55801656
not buying yer hbar bags

>>55792910
they hired this person to create tweets to the tune of > $100k of investor money a year

>>55801656
Who gives a shit? Thisnis nothing more the scribbles and wil take another seven years to come to fruition. If we are lickk

>>55802009
what you are describing is a healthy, growing company with happy employees

>>55802009
I made that thread and you spell like a jeet, go hang yourself NOW

>>55792881
Wow a new feature to keep holding waiting for! Surely THIS is the team delivering!

>>55802204

>>55796013
You don't need to know anything. Link is a dogshit, centralised, globohomo security and since it is inherently worthless they have to keep coming out with buzzword salad papers hyping up some solution to a problem that doesn't exist to keep these retards holding their bags.

>>55797321
search results are based on your search and browser history. apparently you are very interested in chainlink, that's why you get search results for empty phrases like "cyber"

>>55802456
Except you get the same results in incognito

>>55802494
since you are using chrome, that's meaningless

>>55802456
cope

>>55802456
I've tried using private tabs and a vpn in Firefox, Chrome, and Safari and have gotten the same result.

>>55802543
cybercode by itself doesn't bring up anything relative, it's the 2.0 that does the trick
also tried using other browsers as well, the Chainlink twitter result came up second instead of first

>>55802543
weird, all i see are burned retail idiots grasping at straws. oh wait, wrong tab

ooooooooh linkies

>>55802456
I literally used a brand new PC and got the same result lmao cope fudcel

>>55795748
criminally underrated

>>55792881
>BBC A
>its actually real
>mfw
Ok, you guys win. I'll sell now.

>Chainsink
>Chain shit
>Link submarines
>Down 90%
>TNN
>Token not needed
>Chart
>1x in 3 years
>Scam
>65% premine
>Sergey dumps
>700k binance
>2 more weeks
>HR roasties
>Pumps the least dumps the most
>Kek baggies
>Fake partnerships
>Pump and dump
>Bagholders
>Cuckolds
>Pay up paypigs
>Fat Sergey
>Linktranny
>You will never make it
>Down vs btc
>Down vs eth
>Nft gaming
>Shitcoin
>Underperformer
>I can't perform
>Chaincels
>Linkcels
>African wfh devs
>WEF globohomo
>Cult members
>Saturn worshippers
>Chainlinkgod incel
>Klaus Schwab
>Sirgay
>Women in crypto
>Refugees welcome woke
>Missed the entire bullrun
>Outperformed by dog coins
>ERC 19 downgrade
>No adoption
>Ccip flop
>Staking flop
>14% inflation
>Token not needed
>Cuck cage link marines
>$50 Top buyers
>Fell for lpl rug
>Fell for bancor
>Fell for Celsius
>Got btfo by bulgarians
>Nexo won
>Shorted by Simeon
>Zeus capital
>$50->$5
>Bagheld for 7 years
>No link holder made it
>Fell from rank 5
>Subsidized by dumping on baggies
>Sergey cult antichrist
>Ccip tranny
>Chainlink shill team 6
>Paid community advocates
>Bagholder support group
>All smart OGs left
>Gm based king clg
>Eric Schmidt yacht payment
>gravelcoin
>Nft partnerships
>Team owe you nothing
>Cayman islands shell company
>Link is an unregistered security
>Chris barret running
>Chris barret flexing
>Francisco smartcon threat
>Russian scammer
>Smart Con
>Chainlink FTX endorsement
>90% of baggies in negative profits
>Link shorted by everyone
>Rorys wife's black son
>Swift announcement dump
>Shadow fork
>Stockholm syndrome
>Missed the 2021 bullrun
>Dead 2017 shitcoin
>Every narrative failed
>Bulgarians -> VCs
>Token not needed
>Down 90%
>Kek baggies

>>55802664
yeah honestly, the more i think about it, the more i agree it's ogre

>>55792999
Checked
>>55793017
Good post anon
>>55795632
Because babka has the perfect black and white swirl fuddies love
>>55795748
Kek
>>55795777
Checked
>>55795822
Checked and eventually proven correct
>>55795926
Theyre cheeky bastards, that much is certain. Layered. They operate on another level. These are the sorts of clever people that level you up aimply by you being briefly in their presence. What many stories and cultures wpuld call Gods. Let's hope they arent tricksters but are benevolent altruists.

>>55797133
Checked. It doesnt from ddg but does on chrome

>>55798191
>a whole year of this bread crumb DUDE!1!1!1

Yeah bro instead buying at $6 we get to buy at $7. Damn :/ kys retard.

>>55801656
>wow bros now Indian shitskins can sell cows faster!

Revolutionary!

>>55802292
>buzzword salad
Posts buzzword salad. OK.

>>55795926
This wasn't an insider you braindead niggers.

>>55798191
>>55797219
>>55797250
>>55802977
Just ask bard, what the fuck are you boomers doing

q. Does "CyberCode 2.0" mean anything in relation to Chainlink? I have not heard it directly referenced before.

>The term "CyberCode 2.0" is not explicitly mentioned in the Chainlink whitepaper, but it is closely related to the concept of Hybrid Smart Contracts. Hybrid Smart Contracts are a key feature of Chainlink 2.0, and they allow dApps to access real-world data and events. This makes dApps more powerful and versatile, and it opens up a new realm of use cases for blockchains.

>In a sense, CyberCode 2.0 could be seen as a synonym for Hybrid Smart Contracts. They are both terms that describe a new way of building dApps that are more secure, reliable, and feature-rich.

>It is possible that the term "CyberCode 2.0" will be used more often in the future to refer to Chainlink 2.0 and Hybrid Smart Contracts. It is a catchy and descriptive term, and it accurately reflects the potential of this new technology.

>Here are some examples of how CyberCode 2.0 (or Hybrid Smart Contracts) could be used in real-world applications:

>A dApp could use CyberCode 2.0 to access real-time weather data to power a weather insurance product.
>A dApp could use CyberCode 2.0 to verify the authenticity of physical goods, such as luxury watches or high-end art.
>A dApp could use CyberCode 2.0 to automate the trading of financial assets, such as stocks or commodities.

>These are just a few examples of the many potential use cases for CyberCode 2.0. As the technology matures, we can expect to see even more innovative and groundbreaking applications.

>>55804025
or maybe it was

>>55805249
It kept mentioning a ""Introducing CyberCode 2.0: The Next Generation of dApp Development" blogpost by SmartContract in 2021 and even quoted it, but when I asked for help searching for it, Bard said:

>I apologize for the confusion. I did some more research and it appears that the blog post I mentioned was actually a draft that was never published. The term "CyberCode 2.0" is not currently being used to refer to any specific technology. It is possible that the term will be used in the future, but for now it is just a placeholder name for a new dApp framework that is still under development.

I like AI

>>55801285
>beast to market
>mark of the beast

>>55805298
Ask the question again but replace chainlink with cardano.

>>55805249
That doesn't elucidate anything about the term's origination, you stupid fucking dopamine-fried zoomtard

>>55805298
Ooohh the plot thickens

This is what I got from Bard

q. what does Cybercode 2.0 refer to?

There are two main things that Cybercode 2.0 refers to:

A text-based MMORPG (massively multiplayer online role-playing game) called CyberCode Online.
A new programming language that is designed to be secure and easy to use. It is based on the Python programming language, but it has been extended with new features that make it more secure. Cybercode 2.0 is still under development, but it has the potential to be a major new programming language for the future.
The Cybercode 2.0 programming language is not related to the CyberCode Online MMORPG.

Here is some more information about each of the two things that Cybercode 2.0 refers to:

CyberCode Online is a text-based MMORPG that was created by a small team of developers in 2021. The game is set in a cyberpunk world and features procedurally generated items and dungeons, real-time co-op, and a pay-to-win-free environment. CyberCode Online is available to play on the web and on mobile devices.
Cybercode 2.0 is a new programming language that was created by a team of security researchers at Chainlink Labs. The language is designed to be secure and easy to use, and it is based on the Python programming language. Cybercode 2.0 is still under development, but it has the potential to be a major new programming language for the future.
I hope this information is helpful! Let me know if you have any other questions.

wagmi

This shit isn't organic.
>Ive noticed that other search engines like qwant do not return Chainlink twitter when searching cybercode 2.0. Its worth noting that “Cybercode” and “Chainlink” have the same number of letters, are both made of two words with the same number of letters each, and both start with C. It might be a Google AI/autocorrect correction, but still weird.
Its google trying to work out what it is. Cybercode is all over pages with link stuff - 2.0 is in the chainlink whitepaper title. It is connecting the dots but getting it wrong.