/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>55767496
staking your LINK in the pool of pools of nops will qualify for BUILD incentives and payout a higher rate of rewards than the community pool through Chainlink. SDL staking will also generate a decent amount of LINK rewards as the protocol expands

>>55767714
fpbp

>>55767496
>pump my bags please so I can sell them afap before I get rugged again

>>55767496
Imagine falling for this
Twice

>>55767714
but the real question is will SDL get forked and then diluted even further

>>55767496
Redpill me on SDL

>>55767496
Gonna buy a small bag incase it does rip.

>>55768079
Imagine you knew how big Eth would be in 2015.
But you decided to buy ethpool instead

>>55767714
>will qualify for BUILD incentives
really? that's lame

>>55768094
Imagine you knew how big Eth would be in 2015.
And you decided to buy rpl as well

>>55768079
-15 of the best chainlink nodes attached.
-chainlink owns 7.7% of SDL..
-the official Chainlink community pool wont provide staking to holders forever.
-its very hard to build your own chainlink node, plus if you do, who the fks going to use it..

>>55768067
>>55768074
mistakes are made and things change, the future now looks bright for stake.link

>>55768086
based

>>55768094
Lido DAO is in the top 40 and Lido staked Ether stETH is in the top 10...

>>55767496
Pool’s closed.

did some reading looks like 15 new nodes in next staking expansion
then wonder how much capacity each node is going to get... could be interesting

>>55768533
fucking kys johnny

>>55768518
>the official Chainlink community pool wont provide staking to holders forever
I doubt this is true. Post proof or larp

>>55769193
The rewards are coming from the non-circulating supply and must be changed to revenues someday.
But before that even happens, my bet is that as community staking versions continue forward, they will at some point require you to reduce your stake within the pool. It will make more sense for other investors to get into it when complacent OGs get forced out of fat positions, and thats a good thing.
This won't apply to actual node staked link though, pretty happy with where I'm at.

TAKE CARE NEWFAGS:
They literally rugged their last project. Anybody shilling this shit is sitting on huge illiquid bags and was wrecked by the lpl->sdl migration.

TAKE A LOOK AT THE LAST THREAD, WHERE EVERY PROBLEM WITH SDL WAS BROUGHT UP
>>55736712
>>55736712
>>55736712

>>55769739
sTaY pOoR bRo

>>55768079
Read through >>55736712 this thread. The shills let it die and started a new one because they were absolutely BTFO.

IN SHORT:
- SDL RUGGED THEIR LAST PROJECT
- SDL NOT NEEDED TO STAKE ON STAKE.LINK
- ATROCIOUS SDL APY
- SHILLS WANT YOU TO LOCK UP THE SDL FOR 4 YEARS
- MANY BURNT HOLDERS WITH HUGE ILLIQUID BAGS WAITING TO DUMP ON NEWFAGS

>>55768553
You are comparing an ETH staking protocol to a chainlink *LIQUID* staking addon.

CHAINLINK WILL OFFER A STAKING PLATFORM AND AUTO DELEGATION IN THE FUTURE, SDL IS NOT NEEDED TO STAKE YOUR LINK

>>55768086
Also considering this. Diversification works all the time. Refreshing to have a platform like AstraDAO which makes that easy while also giving indices rewards.

>>55769758
>>55769768
>buy SDL
>buy bancor
why cant i just buy more link like a normal person?

>>55769842
Why not diversify into a token with a competent Team, that didnt rug their last project after they built it with the money of the community?

daily reminder linkpool fags are responsible for the token not needed spam

>>55769768
just 2 more weeks eh

>>55768074
You can't fork nodes being whitelisted in the Chainlink staking pool sweetie

>>55768107
>>55769768
>AUTO DELEGATION
Read the blog you are quoting smoothbrain. The Auto Delegation fee is brilliant news for stake.link since it is what increased their APR from 4.75% to 5.13%

>>55770188
He probably meant Johnny will fork it again and change tokennomics for the 100th time.
>>55770205
Go shill your horseshit some place else. But its good that you finally saw the light that SDL will NOT be the one handling the delegation of staked link to nodes.

>>55770217
>He probably meant Johnny will fork it again and change tokennomics for the 100th time.
The good thing about governance and giving away contract ownership to governance multisigs is that they can't do as they please.

It literally x4'd since 3 months ago. It seems like you have a horseshit living rent free in your head faggot

>>55770236
I do have a horseshit living rent free in my head thanks to Johnny and the rest of the Gang scamming me.

>it literally 4x'd
Youre right, great point to sell the rest of your SDL because there is a lot more pain incoming. Chart looks atrocious, true it got a little dead cat bounce after the nodes dumped their unlocked sdl when they saw SLURP 8.
Prior support now seems to be resistance, not looking good.

i cannot believe you faggots are still trying to shill here after LPL. fuck off

>>55769768
>>55769758
Neither of you addressed the concept of Chainlink reducing maximum stakes for the community pool someday, if it's going to be perpetual I bet they're going to make changes to force complacent 7kers back into the market.
They can even use deco to prevent multiple addresses from a single person staking into it at some point, because a single person doing that kind of undoes the point of a community pool.
My vote is kleros court to any multi address stakers in v 0.1 staking

>>55771128
This post is highly retarded and doesnt make sense at all.

>>55771405
Lol, lmao even.
You guys are gonna get 'rugpulled' by the chainlink team someday because of the economic implications of limited supply.
They can't have unlimited LINK in some auto-delegating pool, and they also need you lazy guys to clear out so actual players who provide economic energy in multiple directions can get in.
The freebie pool is an anomaly that can only exist for so long. My bet is one of the pre-1.0 staking versions will require 7k stakers to migrate 5k LINK to the new community contract and take 2k+interest, and so on.
If you fagz do ever need to clear out I told you so

>>55771439
They could also use a decay and queuing method of keeping things fair also, but yeah at some point 7k stakers are going to need to be more active than complacent if they are to remain competitive.

You got btfo in the last two sdl threads you paid scammers made. How many times do we have to teach you this lesson old man?!

>>55767496
Remember when LINKPOOL idiots spent like 3 years telling us we'd never be able to stake unless we bought their shitcoin and then staking came out and LINKPOOLers couldn't stake but people who just bought more LINK could?

Hilarious times. They'd get so angry and aggressive when you called them out on their idiocy too. Now they are falling for it again. LMAO.

>>55771536
I haven't seen any BTFOing, just spitballing in both directions.
If someone thinks that the community pool is going to provide them free LINK forever with no work, they're free to be retarded too.

>>55771561
>muh you vill never stake wizout ze linkpoo-ACK
>muh in ze future you vill not be able to stake any longer wizout ze st-ACK.link (you are here)
>sergey vill rugpull you wizout ze horserimmer proteckting you whilst pretending to have never worked for CLL
(you)

>>55771671
I gotta go to physical therapy but to all the fudders, salty dogs, emotionally damaged anons, and friends,
Thank you for making stake.link threads the place to actually theorize the future of staking.chain.link and stake.link, its way better than all the other LINK threads, probably because low IQ anons don't see it.

>>55771678
hurt yourself in the gym?

>>55771128
>They can even use deco to prevent multiple addresses from a single person staking into it
how?

>>55768067
This.
Imagine being the LPL/SDL wagie making these desperately hoping people dont remember how they fucked over the people who supported them. Nothing can fix their reputation.

These posts are made by SDL/LPL wagies.
>>55767496
>>55767714
>>55767778
>>55768086
>>55768518
>>55768533
>>55768543
>>55768553
>>55768759
>>55769261
>>55769748
>>55770188
>>55770205
>>55770236
>>55771128
>>55771439
>>55771509
>>55771561
>>55771678

>>55771561
Oh so thats why you let the old thread die and started a new one minutes after?

TO EVERY NEWFAG THINKING ABOUT BUYING SDL: CHECK OUT THIS THREAD:
>>55736712
>>55736712
>>55736712

>>55772052
It died when captcha and 4chan wasn't working for me, I would have bumped
>>55771846
You can count me as several different IDs, there's a big wait at PT today

>>55771701
Hey PT results are looking good. My right tuberosity got fucked on my e bike but I'm almost back.

>>55772052
Bump
You're a fag and the SDL team and nodes working with it have more knowledge of what's coming down the Chainlink network pipe than you lmao

>>55773363
>fucks over the people who supported them
>insults them when called out
SDL, ladies and gentlemen

>>55773526
>words hurt
You guys are the ones who want to feel like you got bent over, I'm just trying to be accepting of your identity, sorry I'll stop.

>>55773658
Anybody Posting a comment like this is either too retarded to realise the implications of what lpl did or a paid shill.

>>55774525
Anyone who gambled on the potential to be a part of a singular node on a functionally unknown network should be upset at what their assets have evolved into as the network's functionality has gained more clarity.
It could have wound up turning into literally nothing which would have been something to bitch about, but I'm personally just not a whiny moaner, especially when I'm still up 10x on my USD investment right now.

>>55775039
The thing im angry about is that linkpool still exists. They just cut early supporters out after building linkpool with OUR money.
Countless other ways to handle the situation and they chose the worst.

>>55775039

>>55775126
They BUILT something though, you guys would have just been sitting around with your ETH and dicks in your hands and the network would be none the better.
Thanks for the sacrifice, at least you're still in on the first actual staking pool if you put LINK into it.

>>55775181
They built something with stolen money and cant be trusted.

>>55775181
The lack of self awareness is astounding. I hope you're trolling.

>>55775208
They have persisted and given a different form of currency, sorry if it's not up to your standard. You should definitely rely on staking.chain.link for all of your future staking needs.
>>55775211
You literally only seem to exist to try and bash the token, which is fine, I want to buy more myself and if anyone listens to your opinions

Goldfish. God bless your oblivious hearts.

>>55775304
I will just swap my link to stlink if i choose to use stake.link retard. What you dont seem to understand is that the SDL token is only a way for Jonny to finance the platform. There is literally no need for SDL, its only a way to raise money for him. Just like the lpl presale.

>>55775334
Ok then swap them and make the stLINK premium over LINK even higher :y
>>55775320
The price action is pretty spicy right now, I think you've convinced me to finally sell my SDL

>>55775376
There are economic incentives at play that keep the ratio of stlink to link roughly the same. Its healthy for stlink to have a light premium because it accrues fees.
This doesnt mean that stlink will moon vs link

>>55775515
Depending on lockups, returns, and demand for them it likely can be higher than what it currently is when the network is more mature. I'd never mind someone swapping in and validating the function of stake.link though.
I gotta get some house repairs done good luck everyone.

>>55767496
>I remember buying this shitcoin because chicocrypto recommended it a long time ago

it will be interesting seeing sdl in the next few months
we will see the effect of staking v0.2 and a pool expansion

The fud is unbelievable, using capitals is full desperation.. im buying more and cant wait

>>55776420
SDL is going to be the Chainlink of the 2024 bullrun

stop shill rug call link

>>55776748
I remember when sergey 'rugpulled' his initial investors for the first two years

>>55769739
>>55769758
>>55769768
>>55772052

>>55776997
Here's the thing, if you bought LP before 2020 you'll still be up in profit

>>55777487
1 LP = 25000 SDL

now since 1/1000000th of the total supply and SDL is going to have max supply of 100mil after SLURP 8 that means the stacks are the following;
> 100 suicide stack
> 1000 make it stack
> 10000 fuck you stack
Fuddies are absolutely seething they can no longer NEET off their LPL rewards for the time being and the fact newfags/latefags have the chance to buy the bottom of a 1.95mil market cap gem

>>55776828
if you talk about it on twitter then you get called low iq

>>55777528
no you stupid twat. They are mad jhonny stole from early supporters, participated in insider trading with selected nops and got a job at CL for doing so

>>55777528
you can also use dextools and to check buys and sells showing you who's dumping and swinging

>>55777565
>>55777529
>>55777528
>>55777487
>>55776997
>>55776828
>>55776420
Not buying your bags you disgusting shills. You should have sold on the migration, anyone with more than 2 braincells did.

There are so many things from with SDL. 1. The team can not be trusted because they rugged their last project.
2. Even if liquid staking is a nice idea, SDL is not needed to profit from liquid staking because you can always just stake your link by buying stlink.
3. Seeing all the shills in this thread desperately trying to argue against the obvious red flags is a red flag in itself.
4. The chart looks fucking horrendous, and big holders are dumping their bags
5. Even if stake.link as a platform suceeds, there will be no real value flowing to the SDL token.

>>55778606
if sdl get 15m stlink then a 25k stack will give you 140 link per year, not great but not bad
also big question if they get that much stlink
also staking priority

there is also some advantage in being able to get stlink directly through staking priority rather than the slippage you'd be hit by
not that much but would add up quickly when staking thousands

>>55778912

>>55767496
which village is selling the sdl today,,, bastards we are down %20 ahhhh

>>55768074
Yeah, on the shadow link fork. It's the only way to devalue link back to a cuppa

>>55778912

>>55779000
>>55778912
Slippage goes both ways and there are economic inventives at play that keep the ratio between stlink and link roughly the same.
Also if the project really suceeds then the slippage will be less because there will be more liquidity and more trading pools.

>>55779032
so that number given is incorrect? (losing 16.3 link per 1000 swapped)

>>55779040
Nope but when you swap back to link you wont lose to the Premium, you will gain the 16 link back.

>>55779056
... but you could get 1:1 when depositing directly into protocol...
also if it's anything like other ethereum lsds you many well not want to swap back

>>55779069
I would Lose more than the value of 16 link if i deposited directly into the protocol because i would need to swap my linkies into a worthless token called SDL. Im not sure how much SDL i would need to stake 1000 link but maybe you know it?

>>55779084
nah no one knows until staking v0.2 details come out

>>55775126
This. Linkpool should not exist in any shape or form. They're trying to pull the same stunt twice and are obviously behind this thread. They're hoping if they just keep going and pushing their shit under a different name that eventually it'll be forgotten about. Well, I won't forget about it and i'll be doing everything in my power to inform those in the dark exactly what this shower of cowboys is all about.
Imagine even having the nerve to keep pushing this thing. Fuck off, Linkpool. You had your chance and you screwed everyone.

>>55767496
>>55767714
This is a stake demon.

Dysgenic freaks who succumb to staking and token-lock addictions become demons.
They always think they are winning no matter what happens.
As long as they're being stimulated according to the pattern that allows them to receive their yearly circle jerk rewards nothing else matters to them.
There is no incentive for them to logically analyze anything, least of all themselves.
They can always just retreat back into their autism and receive the greatest false hopium they know and all else can be forgotten.
Staking on demand accompanied by rewards hopium, the most common forms of hyperstimulus, have deleted the souls of the majority of the link bagholders.
Staking is the jew's greatest weapon and its casualties are piling up and choking out real humanity.
We have to impale them all.

>>55779330
>>55779352

>>55779851
You know things are real bad when shills wont even try to counter the argument and just make low effort cringe memes.

>>55780200
wrong, things are bad for you not for me..

Never forget that Linkpool SDL hates you, stole your money, thinks it's funny and wants to do it again.

>>55780231
if thats the illusions your mind is making, i feel sorry for you

>>55780242
you are an objectively bad person

The pure delusion. You retards actually think you have fundamentally analyzed SDL and are some sort of elite investor. You know about SDL because its been shilled to fucking death on this shitty board with terrible infographics and extremely far reaching claims with no evidence. I guarantee none of you have actually even tried to use stake.link or have even considered the token economics at play here. The protocol is a piece of trash centralized (it uses centralized nodes) node pool that uploads staking into a non self executable smart contract. A fifteen year old could write the code to do this, it tests nothing envisioned in the whitepaper. Now for the token economics 20% of the total supply is in the hands of Johnny himself. The top 100 wallets control 85% of the supply of this coin and it's not exchanges. Sushiswap, the biggest exchange owns ~2% of total supply. Your investment can be quite literally wiped out overnight without a moments notice. Going all into this project is probably one of the stupidest things you can do with your money but retards like you keep lining up thinking you are the next Warren Buffet. Stake.link is so far from a sure thing.
I love it how all you gullible fucks think you've already made it just by purchasing a bunch of meme tokens on a meme cat picture trading platform which does nothing just because a bunch of anons on a kosovo organ trading board said they will be worth a lot someday. Their arguments sound so convincing, so well researched, but the painful truth is that you've been fooled into investing in a honey-worded fairytale of a solution to a problem that isn't even needed outside its whimsical world of princesses and dragons. Starting to notice the pattern? I mean, the project leader is a fucking horse rimmer for fuck's sake.

I was just astral projecting and remembered something old
When LP shares were a thing I sent .04 to the ETH burn address to make LINK deflationary, yeah those fuckers stole from me now I'm angry

>>55776446
Stop the shill... Biz is smarter than you think. After all my investment in Link pool, the SSLP via Allianceblock DeFi terminal played out better... What a heartless marketing strategy...

>>55779851
Anon, I never bought any Linkpool and I never used any defi platforms. I just kept buying Link. I looked at both LPL and defi but decided Linkpool made little sense and defi I couldn;t be fucked figuring out how to use. My instincts and my laziness saw me through.
Having said all that, I can see how people were suckered into buying Linkpool and I have more sympathy for them than the people who lost on defi. I find it shocking that the same people are still in the space and selling their wares. It's like SBF coming back and saying "hey, trust me i'm cool now" (which might actually happen lol). I think they're trying to capture naive people who may not know about the sorry incident. I'd be quite shocked if people who witnessed it allwere still involved, but what do i know.
tl;dr: I never got rugged

>>55782056

>>55782371
>pajeet
erm, ok

>>55779330
When I bought the LinkPool ITO I thoght I bought a stake in a pool that staked with several nodes, (ideally most nodes). This is what SDL is. I remember that when we got revenue sharing I and everyone else thought this is a pittance and not what we invested in but nice to have. Personally and imo before the sperg out at the token swap it was universally thought development of SDL is what the LinkPool ITO was selling all along for a 25% stake in the tokens earned by THAT protocol NOT LinkPool's node. After slurp-8 that 25% is now 30%. I simply don't get the acrimony. It's like 95% of people in the discourse weren't there from anywhere close to the beginning.

>>55776997
This meme is really bad. It's formatted incorrectly.

>>55778606
>>55782056
I remember you guys effortposting fud about LINK when it was $.40

>>55782700
Yeah, these Bizfans can be disgusting. They fudded NXRA too, but today everyone has suddenly become bullish..

>>55782460
this is the great irony, linkpool didn't even need to give up 25% of their node's revenue back in the day, they could have just icoed on the staking protocol alone
this protocol was always the big thing but linkpool's revenue share became so good that the project got defined by that

>>55779330

>>55782460
>>55784462
Nice pilpul you disgusting jews. Linkpool ico Was never about a pool of nodes but about a community node that guarantees you a part of the revenue of said node and a place to stake your link

>>55776446
Redpill me anon. Any utilities involved? The asset that has my attention currently is the tokenized Tesla from Eloop, seeing as holders would earn rewards for driving.

>>55780626
just bought more

>>55769851
the initial narrative of these pajeetscams was that staking was going to be literally impossible for the average joe and that you absolutely had to buy their inflated shitcoin ($100k to stake 10k LINK at its absolute ATH) to ever have a chance to earn passive LINK income or else you would be permanently excluded ("pools closed")

not only did this narrative die when chainlink announced staking, but their company fucked up multiple times due to internal issues and basically anyone who didn't sell that shitcoin experienced -99% loses
i suppose that their baggies still exist, making the occasional thread in hopes of getting some exit liquidity

>>55786046
hahaha get a load of this guy, who hasn't got a clue whats coming.. people that have sold their bags are the ones that will be on suicide watch

>>55786046
pools closed

>>55786046
this is only partially right
lpl holders thought that there wouldn't a community pool, only staking with node operators
the community pool is a bit of an add on but you can argue it improves decentralization through community alerters i guess
anyway, sdl has 750k space from node operator allotment
the big question is how much space it will get from next staking round
if it can get 5m+ then will be bullish

>>55786373
To be fair stake.link should remove anyone without SDL staking in the pool that way it benefits the token holder. A new SLURP could always change it and vice versa if needed due to competition

>>55787782
meant remove LINK stakers from the pool if they don't have any SDL staking to claim there spot

>>55772714
Easy on the throttle, it's not your dick

>>55787782
The cope is off the Charts, SDL is not needed to stake on stake.link now and will be even needed less in the future because liquidity of trading pools will increase.
SDL is only a way for Jonny to incentivize liquidity and to raise money.

>>55788317
hahaha check out this faggot that sold his SDL, tranny suicide watch for you

>>55788476
I Sold on the migration you absolute fucking retard. Imagine still holding this trash.

>>55788491
you cared enough to write back, definitely a tranny aka suicide watch for you

>>55788317
>The cope is off the Charts, SDL is not needed to stake on stake.link now
the staking queue is being designed now
you will need sdl to stake

>>55788552
I never said i didnt care. I care a lot about what linkpool did and will uncover their shills so newfags thinking sdl is a good buy wont experience what i did with lpl
>>55788571
You can always just buy stlink over third party trading pools (curve atm) if you want to use the stake.link platform. No sdl needed. The whole purpose of stake.link is exactly that. Liquid staking.

>>55788740
how much slippage to do that retard?

>>55788740
i can go on curve and swap my link fo stlink and it will be more valuable... most retarded strategy

>>55786046
>the initial narrative of these pajeetscams was that staking was going to be literally impossible for the average joe
sergey was the one pushing that narrative and it rings true. you need to jump through a bunch of hoops to become a node operator

How much will I earn from staking 10k SDL?

>>55788900
Pajeet, why dont you learn English first.
>>55791302
Around 10 Cents per year, if you lock your SDL for 4 years you will earn around 35 Cents per year.