/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>55715344
>Sergeant Major
damn you missed the commissioned officer ranks by one rank

Sergeant Major here reportin for duty SIR

Nice demoralisation FUD. Posting the real pic.

Bagholder cope thread / thread sponsored by chainlink labs advocates program shills

>>55715497
that's for when we get past $50

staff sergeant reporting in

Sergeant here

>>55715497
Lmao you realize we all bought link under .5 with our ETH gains right?

It’s not FUD but I understand it bothers you

Sgt. Retard here, reporting for boredom.

>>55716872
it's just a meme, relax

April 2023 rankings

>>55715344
Captain reporting in my fellow Marines

WAGMI

>>55716987
I was looking for a more recent one but Google images only had OP pic

Ty fren

>>55717741
>Google images
jesus christ
https://www.chainlinkecosystem.com/ranks

>>55717754
NGL every non Chainlink community site gives me the heebie jeebies, no IP for them

>>55715344
All these ranks should just say Sergey cuck bagholder.

Staff sergeant here recentley promoted from sergeant

>>55715497
Do you really think that's demoralising? Or are you just fishing for (yous)?

That roll call thing is so cringe. I always thought so. How old are you people?
t. Link maxi

>>55718879
touch some grass and have some fun

Major General here.
Considering selling 20k link to live off since this coin is so slow to take off and I don't want to wage.

>>55718879
this is based linkbro culture
you will never understand

>>55715344
I prefer the term Linksoldat.

>>55720179
Chainlink is going to decentralize Arbitrum soon.

>>55715344
> - General of ChainLink: General Sergey Nazarov
- General: 500001+ LINK
- Lieutenant General: 250001-500000 LINK
- Major General: 175001-250000 LINK
- Brigadier General: 125001-175000 LINK
- Colonel: 750001-125000 LINK
- Lieutenant Colonel: 50001-75000 LINK
- Major: 35001-50000 LINK
- Captain: 25001-35000 LINK
- First Lieutenant: 20001-25000 LINK
- Second Lieutenant: 15001-20000 LINK
X<><><>X<><><>X
- Sergeant Major: 10001-15000 LINK
- Master Sergeant: 9001-10000 LINK
- Sergeant First Class: 7501-9000 LINK
- Staff Sergeant: 5001-7500 LINK
- Sergeant: 3501-5000 LINK
- Corporal: 1501-3500 LINK
- Specialist: 501-1500 LINK
- Private: 1-500 LINK

holy fuck I'm selling

The real blackpill is link is designed to be low cost (see the coffee standard in the whitepaper)

50k link is minimum to make it

>>55722649
very new and interesting fud

>>55720179
Why does Metroid make my peepee hard

I was a Sargent major but I sold at $40. Now that stack is worth 70,000 and my house is worth 550,000

>>55715344
Not sure how recent this data is, but that’s crazy that there are maybe only about 7000 people (wallets) with more linkies than me

>>55716987
Oh fug nvm I’m ngmi

>>55715344
Specialist reporting for duty sir

>>55722862

>>55716987 is better
There's probably a lot of sub 1k holders on cexes that won't be ranked, probably more than multi wallet users.

>>55722862
>Not sure how recent this data is,
There's a link to updated-last-April data elsewhere in this thread:

https://www.chainlinkecosystem.com/ranks

>>55715344
>>55715497
>>55716987
>>55722635
>>55722862
I only have 100k Link which is nowhere near enough to actually make it.

All these Linklets with 10k stacks singing about 1k eoy are starting to piss me off with their propaganda. It was a joke and they are actually believing it and causing FOMO in newfags preventing the dump. Link is only going to $10 max. Right now I might make 700k before tax on that, but tax will take a big chunk out of that then inflation will fucking ruin me over the next decade.

Even if I chuck the 700K into a dividend stock that pays out well and I get 70k a year of it, it's not enough to beat inflation unless I basically live in poverty as a neet and keep my wagecuck job in the meantime so I don't have to sell any retirement Link. In 10 years that 70k a year will feel like 20k a year. You need a minimum of 5MM, but more likely 10MM to make it. The upper predictions for Link were about $80 but that was made during the bullrun of last year, and it assumed that the overall crypto market cap would still be expanding and BTC would go on to 1MM a Bitcoin and that we would be in a full blown crypto FOMO hype bubble when mainnet came out and we got our price singularity. All of that isn't going to happen.

>>55723843
Link could easily reach $80-$100 during the next bull cycle. You are retarded.

>>55723843
>i'm knowingly holding a lot of money in what i believe to be a bad investment
Why do you guys keep posting this kind of low IQ garbage?

sergeant first class here

>>55723454
>probably a lot of sub 1k holders on cexes
True, forgot about these fags

>>55723935
>>55723971
>not recognizing ancient link pasta
thats an oof guys

>>55724942
I haven’t browsed here regularly since 2018 sorry

>>55723843
>we're healing

>>55723843
Dude, if you did any research into chainlink at all you'd realise that the token price could rise to meet any price it needs to to secure the network. with its limited supply it could literally rocket to four figures easily. You're so ignorant it's unbelievable, even newfags getting triple digits of link will be millionaires. Do your research before posting again

>>55725101
I'm actually more qualified to talk about this than most anons.I'm employed with a cyber-techno machinations company, I do a lot of security analyst programming type work. Open source, decentralized, APIs, partnerships, you name it. We'd be one of the first companies in line for something like Chainlink, if the decentralized smart contract space had more value over traditional data exchanges. There's a catch though, an underlying flaw more deeply embedded in the bedrock of LINK than the very code itself. The flaw is with the concept, and it's this: Companies won't actually go through the hassle of trusting their data API's through crypto.

Now I can already hear your keyboards going frantic, but hear me out. /biz/ hates banks, and traditional data providers. But actual companies, businesses, and investors do not. There's an old saying you might have heard of: "If it ain't broke, don't fix it!". The idea that any of our bosses would give us the go ahead if we approached them to put our companies valuable data in a smart contract on a cryptocurrency called Chainlink, that they've never heard of, we'd be laughed out at best and fired on the spot at worst. We already have API data buyers and providers we trust.

'But Chainlink is trustless!' I hear you cry, but is that really a good thing? Just listen to the sound of it. Businesses don't want to spend millions of dollars on something that is trustLESS, they want something trustFUL. 'But the reputation system!', doesn't that defeat the whole point of your coin? If companies only trust nodes with high reputation, what's the difference between trusting banks and data providers that already have reputation, but in real life not on a computer screen.

The fact is, LINK is going to share the same fate as ETH will. A lot of 'real world application' hype, with a lot of 'crypto world application' reality. Only, this billion supply coin isn't going to come close to the $1k that Etherum hit.

>>55717956

>>55715593

>>55725118
Not reading that essay but look up the partnerships that chainlink has and the extraordinary talent they have on the team. This shit is going to 1k easily.

token not needed

>>55725344
>>55725363
You got spunk, kiddo
>>55725390
c'mon duuude read the essay, paragraph 3's first line always gives me a chuckle

>>55725363

>>55725663

>>55725700

>>55725765
>>55725700
>>55725663
Holy kek lets see how far this goes

>>55725771
Nah

>>55725883
Pathetic