/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>55001427
>client
>DAO

>>55001400

>>55001440
>>55001539

I'm not here to argue. Some people might find this information helpful or at least interesting.

The information presented is compelling however I will not make further inquiries and will promptly evacuate the thread

>>55001427
That's a huge bid of confidence, he was an Ethereum developer at https://consensys.net too

Not bad, thanks OP.

>>55001995
Yep. Multi-billion dollar blockchain firm that provides enterprise solutions to companies like Amazon and Microsoft.

Now he has his own firm that is serving as the core developer for a project that was fair launched without any dirty venture capitalist money or team allocations whatsoever. They're accepting part of their compensation in SPARK token, which means they'll have governance rights as part of the DAO.

Don't have to be a rocket scientist to connect the dots on this one. There's more alpha, but anyone who looks can find it and this should be enough for now. Just thought I'd toss the community a solid.

You will never be a real identity provider. You have no biometrics, you have no regulatory approval, you have no ongoing monitoring. You are a credential sharing platform glorified by buzzwords about blockchain into a crude mockery of true identity.
All the “validation” you get is misunderstanding and non-compliant. Behind your back people mock you. Your peers are disgusted and ashamed of you, your “users” implement actual solutions behind closed doors.
Institutions are utterly repulsed by you. Thousands of years of KYC and AML have allowed institutions to sniff out frauds with incredible efficiency. Even DIDs who “verify” through soul bound tokens and ZKP won’t be accepted. Your lack of biometry at the base level is a dead giveaway. And even if you manage to get a green check mark NFT, any serious clients will turn tail and bolt the second they get a whiff of your failure to acquire a license.
You will never be compliant. You wrench out a fake verification every single morning and tell yourself it’s going to be ok, but deep inside you feel the regulation creeping up like a weed, ready to crush you under the unbearable weight.
Eventually it’ll be too much to bear - you’ll buy $ID, run a VNO, stake your tokens, and comply with regulations. Your clients will find you, relieved that they no longer have to risk dealing with the authorities. They’ll delegate their tokens to a VNO with a better reputation than yours, and every Everchain observer for the rest of eternity will know a superior solution is used. Your project will decay and go back to the dust, or you will be sent to prison and get butt raped daily by Tyrone and his gang.
This is your fate. This is what you chose. There is no turning back.

>>55003063
disdain.

>>55003063

>you'll buy $ID

Get the fuck out of here with your pathetic scam and its 40% team allocation that rugged everyone else who got involved to death.

>>55003685
>scam
kek, the sparks founder not only admitted sparks doesn't have deduplicated identity, he practically bragged it

>>55003063
OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOH BAAAAAAGGGGGGGIIIIIIIIEEEEE

>>55003786
where buy?

>>55003786
u can rotate keys with key event logs dipshit multiple identifiers != multiple identities. and it doesn't care where the inception keys come from. so if some government approved biometric scanner comes around we can use it to derive keys for sparks. off chain first means no lock in while your stuck hoping your pay to play identity shitcoin has it right. let me help you out, it doesn't. but keep coping with ur copy pasta fud maybe it'll help feel smth while.

>>55003786
lol this is actually a great thing in the real world of freedom.
I want a government ID on the government blockchain
I also want to be able to verify who I am once with one ID without the government knowing I did it.
Sounds like sparks is the latter.
>>55003901
use gecko terminal. search token, they have places to swap usually.

>>55004267
>>55004316

>>55003786

You're arguing in bad faith. That cherry-picked excerpt of yours is very old, and more importantly, taken out of context.

Red Squirrel (https://redsquirrel.com) and ArgonAUTHs (https://argonauths.eu) will be working with Human Colossus Foundation (https://humancolossus.foundation) on behalf of Sparks to implement a novel technology called Key Event Receipt Infrastructure (KERI) that prevents issues with duplicity.

https://humancolossus.foundation/blog/thinking-of-did-keri-on

>>55001400
the vacuum guy created codecamps???

>>55004603
>To create a DID, a user must first generate a public / private key pair. The DID can then be coupled to a DID document and usually within an infrastructure to enable that process
>KERI generates a type of “DID document” in the form of an appendable private micro-ledger that contains cryptographically-linked sets of events for transaction verification purposes. In doing so, KERI facilitates sapored data supply chains providing an append-only chained key-event log (KEL) of signed transfer statements, which account for the source of the identifier and all transactions related to it.
>a signing key is required to authenticate the controller. As a self-certifying identifier with an event log, KERI provides a strong binding between the DID and DID document, thereby enabling all DID identifier operations (e.g., key rotation, delegation, and interaction) to be tracked and cryptographically verified by any recipient of the identifier information
>KERI introduces a component called Resolver, which provides a mechanism to discover identifiers. Resolver simply maps identifiers to URLs or IP addresses where users can either obtain (or be directed to) auditable identifier event logs
I got news for ya pal, this is not what a deduplicated, unique identity looks like. You and everyone else itt should unironically watch this video https://www.youtube.com/watch?app=desktop&v=EISCmVcLxYs

>>55003802
I’ll be honest I bought some under 3 cents. At this point it’s so down I don’t think it could get much worse but it could do a lot of x’s from here. Of course if I had been holding from a dollar or something I’d be seething right now

>>55004717
Key event receipt infrastructure isn't DIDs, it just happens to be able to interop with it and mimic it. Sparks is starting there because credentials are easiest way to offboard users from web2 silos. End game is dde infrastructure iirc

>>55003063
Anon I want to learn why ID will save us all but the website only shows half. Do I need deduplicated government biometrics to access other half? Can dev do something.

>>55004964
The team are pretty shit when it comes to fixing little things like that. There's a lot of potential genuine fud, but mostly it gets called a scam which is demonstrably untrue.

>>55004964
>>55005151
Everest isn't going to save you, but it is the only viable full on identity solution despite what kilt, sparks, cheq, ore, etc shills may screech.

all of these secret alpha threads are bait cringe and fail

>>55004717
You're arguing in such bad faith that even your ID says "bad". Robert Mitwicki is an expert in Self Sovereign Identity. Apparently you're just some guy who lost a shit load of money on Everest. You and everyone else ITT should unironically watch this video: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=yBkmONZlUrI

>>55005167
ok sure it's still pay to play. 90% of peer to peer use cases dgaf about being on a blockchain, KYC or paying for network access. both for different things imo.

>>55005280
I'll check out the video when I have time, but you are being a prick.

I'm watching a bit now and this bit reminds me of Ari Juels' CanDID speech. I am trying to help when I encourage you to watch >>55004717 this video and to learn the difference between identity and identification.

Buddy, I dont think you understand the point I was making. You can use as many fancy ZKPs and decentralised bits of tech as you like, but unless you have a unique, live piece of carbon, human as the base layer for identity, then that end point will always be falsifiable. That is why Everest's identity solution is incomparable to all of these credential sharing DIDs. And then on top of that Everest has all the other features which nobody else has like programmable RWAs.

>>55005414
Clearly you're the expert here. Have you thought about contacting Mitwicki and letting him know that he's completely wrong, or is your expertise confined to /biz/ threads?

>>55005507
I've never heard of him until now. He seems alright. I bet he'd have an interesting chat with Bob.
No need to be a sarcastic prick all your life anon.

>>55005517
You're the guy whose initial reply to this thread was a slanderous copypasta after OP shared some solid info involving a very respectable industry veteran.

No self-awareness.

Ok so he's talking about the problem of private key management and his solution is a digital identifier which he describes as a string set of characters. Everest's solution is to use your biometrics as your private key. So yes, Robert is wrong on this one and Everest is right.
>>55005566
lmao muh pasta
and yet it was proven right by your very own video

Ah to be fair to Robert, he did mention a private key being derived from biometrics but skimmed over it. I dont know why you didnt say that earlier

I think Robert Micky would be very excited by Everest

this bit is the point i was making earlier about everest and dids

>>55005167
Brother, we’re all on the same side here. Let me tell you an interesting story. When I was younger, I wanted to have sexual intercourse with this female friend of mine. I never felt such a strong desire to penetrate something like I did towards her. Sadly, it never came to be and to this day, I’m still a virgin. My body aches and I always feel tired. I can’t help but feel like this is God’s way of punishing me for being a simp my whole life. Having said that, you really should join the TG and become a sparky

>>55005614
They're saying same things but keri / sparks isn't opinionated about the source. Deduped biometrics on everest is only useful if everyone agrees. You will be able to do biometrics as source for sparks. it's hubris to think everyone will have access. Different approaches but they are saying the same shit. Dumb to argue sparks vs everest desu different problem spaces imo.

>>55003063

>>55005585
Biometrics are the future of identity for crypto, you can find lectures at Ivy Leagues going back to 2017-2018 talking about this. Anyone who is interested in blockchain identity but isn't integrating biometrics is wasting their time for multiple reasons.

>>55005681
It is not a different space, you are building a financial product and not tailoring the solution in a way that financial regulators require/are shortly going to require. Everyone who matters does agree that biometrics have to be integrated into identity btw.

>>55006501
I agree with you anon, biometric blockchain is the future. What coin should I buy to go long this, please help me I’m retarded

>>55002530
Alright niggers, XRP holder here.
This guy is buddies with Schwartz and his project has connections to Flare Networks. I haven’t looked too deep into it but you just reminded me Schwartz himself actually shilled this a couple months ago, so this is probably legitimate considering he only holds like 6 cryptos and he said he’s sure that what he’s buying is going to survive in the future.
Where do you buy this?

>>55006578
The coin you want is Everest (ticker: ID)

>>55006578
Worldcoin, it's from ChatGPT's founder

Hey slightly off topic ive been off the grid for abit since late last year & interesting thread - went to uniswap & wtf is going on with eth network & fees damn ! Why network so busy & $$$ ???

>>55006744
>can't delete your own data
>biometrics fed to AI
Yea I'm sure this shit is gonna fly in the EU

>>55001698
Fucking scumrag, only newfags will fall prey to your scamcoin. Researching myself with Altcoinistdao reviews has been the best option to find gems
>>55003786
>>55004345
>>55004717
>>55004815
>>55004964
>>55005151
>>55005167
>>55005353
>>55005414
>>55005504
>>55005517
>>55005585
>>55005594
>>55005600
>>55005600
>>55005600
>>55005614
>>55005636
Fuck off samefag kek

>>55001400
fuck niggers

>>55001400
Qanplatform is the only alpha here jeet

Why are new liberal fascists so desperate to sell corpo scams
Is funding drying up. Have your masters abandoned you, thrown you to the wolfs

>>55001698
yes, ignore him and thanks for that

>>55006744
It is not quantum resistant. I ain't buying this shit dumbfag

>>55003063
I prefer steering a middle course, with NFEs and DAOs like in mnicorp. Decentralized investment, but if you wanna be a part of the dao, that's when the KYC kicks in. So, it's basically optional.

>>55006578
Hyperpolyglot chain is your best bet

>>55003802
>>55004743
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

>>55008381
asking the real questions but there's only lackeys of lackeys here, don't bother

>>55001400
sure thing, Dave

>>55006690
Not when QANX is in the picture jeet

>>55009260
What's the real question

>>55001400
>>55001420
>>55001427
>>55001698
>>55002530
appreciate the effort posting op, any work on tokenomics?

>>55005636
Same way I think that everyone will be fascinated by the idea of mainstream adoption of crypto payments