/biz/ - Business & Finance

I-i-its over bro's

>>54706861
>he missed Oktoberfest

>>54706861
One day I wake up and it will be released.
Then one day after that I will wake up and DECO will be released.
How I fill the time between now and then is up to me, and me alone.

Oh no, I had more time to accumulate cheap LINK. It's over!11

>>54706894
never seen this version with the prat fall lmao

>>54706861
TruffleCon

>>54707157
wat about iit

>CCIP is very imminent for release to the market

>>54706861
But five different dudes reporting prices from yahoo and with a token is immutable truth

>>54706940
2027

CCIP is released in the mists of the second great recession

chainlink goes up a whopping 15% over the course over the next year

u end the suffering

>>54707577
Checked

>>54706861
Why would they release CCIP 5 months after announcing a delay and Sergey becoming an official liar?
Surely they could have announced this in December so allow Sergey to save face.

After such a magnificent failure Sergey has nothing left to prove, no trust left and no more promises to keep.
You will get CCIP when they feel like it and at the earliest maybe December this year if the crypto market stops shitting itself.

In the mean time you can cope with Chainlink Functions which is ironically more useful for adoption and with greater potential than CCIP. That should come out earlier maybe in June...

>>54707577
>in the mists

>>54706861
>+6 years
>Still no use case
>Still no revenue from any software services
>Only source of revenue is dumping premined tokens for cash
>Token still nothing more than illegal funding security for Sergey

Jesus, how has this garbage not been shut down yet?
Litrerally everything they do is illegal in every part of the world that counts.

Vechain tier "soon" scam.

>>54707926

May 7th is the proposed date…yep two more weeks

>>54707954
Like I said.
Nothing of substance. Smoke, mirrors and infographics.

$0 in sales.

>>54708539

>*releases ccip v0.000001 to a select group of private testers*
>In order to continue sustainably growing the network blah blah blah were dumping another 50m

>>54706861
>trustlessness
>can't be trusted

>>54708594
How much even is this? Like $2 million? If they were an EXTREME 200 P/E company they need $185MM in revenue to warrant current mcap. So they need 90 more GMX's, and there are only like 5 GMX's in existence.

If LINK is waiting on fundamental value to catch up to the market that has basically left it in its dust, then it has a very very long way to go.

>>54708955
$500mm at least.
Go figure, cope n seethe.

>>54708955
>it has no use case
>ok it has a use case but it makes no money
>ok it makes money but not enough money
Look at them squirm lmao

>>54708594
>Posts no evidence of any business income

So it's a worthless shitcoin with no value, and no purpose except to enrich its founders?

>>54709060
>Proposal

Lmao.
Like I said. There's nothing here.
How's the Google Partnership? Swift? Gravelcoin?

Fucking low IQ nigger. You disgust me. I literally gagged at yout intellect.

>>54709382
Good morning sir

>>54709060
It doesn’t make money. If it did the token price would be higher and we would be out of this bullshit version of staking.

>>54708916
just trust nastyslob bro
he totally won't eat all the profits and fuck up the gold/silver tickers

The usual discord nufudders are actually a lower form of life than unpaid internet janitors:
>constantly making 50+ pbtid fudding in discussion threads over 10+ hours whenever they're up
>the rest of the time they seem to be seething, samefagging, and monitoring in up to 6 fud threads at any one time during their "rush hour"
>sometimes when they're really upset because no one takes them seriously, they'll spam the board with nikado avacado's asshole threads
>they have been doing this possibly since 2021, when a lot of them bought the top and never recovered
>others lost their stacks on bancor and celsius
>some even think that they're "fighting the wef" by posting on here - yes they're that retarded
>lets be generous with the math and say that they've only done this for five days a week (including holidays) for one year (50x52=2600 hours spent doing this maybe, not including the time they've spent making low quality memes and looking at pictures of the best cock cages to use)
>all over an apparently shitty and unimportant crypto
>on a board that doesn't even affect the prices
>all for FREE

>>54708955
>EXTREME 200 P/E company they need $185MM in revenue to warrant current mcap
185 MM * 200 = 37 billion MC
did you fail basic maths there anon

>>54707246
>lifts your cares away
the truth is safe with me bro

>>54710906
based and gnome pilled

>>54710906
I trust the garden gnome guy

The truth is the team either doesn't know what they are doing or do they kind of do but they barely work due to remote zoom meetings. The ones Eric Schmidt warned Sergey about. This also explains why it took them one full year after announcement to create a staking deposit contract that any pajeet could've made in a day.

>>54710906
>>54710906
>trusting some garden gnome larper
kinda based ngl

>>54710906
>the most trusted garden gnome in the garden
based and LPL pilled

>>54710999
HOLY CHECKED KEK IS WITH US BROS NEVER SELLING MY LPL WAGMI LPL IS THE ONLY WAY TO STAKE LINK HAHAHA POOLS CLOSED LOSERS SEETH

>>54710999
checked and capped LPL bros are we back?
I hope /ourguy/ garden gnome dude does a podcast again soon like the good old days
Never migrating desu

>>54710999
CHECKED LPL is mooning guys APE the fuck in ASAP

>>54706940
those days will come and go and nothing will change about the price, just move on already

>>54706965
at this point you'd become a millionaire by waging more quickly (at 50) than by accumulating LINK (at 80, maybe)

>>54709060
kek this. It' going to be a riot brothers. These brownoids are absolutely MALDING at every FUD point being destroyed.

>>54711062
this is just like 2018!

>>54706861
>>54706940
The bad news is CCIP isn't coming any time soon.
But really that's not that bad at all.
Because the good news is that CCIP has basically been here since March 2022.
Well not exactly March 2022, since they didn't actually start using the real Chainlink until late last year. But even from the beginning they were using an oracle concept which was a direct clone of link from what I understand.
Oh, of course I'm talking about
LayerZero
btw
Anyway. So we basically have a cross-chain generalize messaging protocol powered by Chainlink running right now and absolutely taking over crypto bridging.
Now if it didn't use link, maybe we'd be sweating. But it uses link.
Someone(probably Sergey?) managed to land the most important deal of link's life by actually hooking this up.
So is CCIP important?
Not really imo. At least not in the next 5 years or whatever since we're really looking towards crypto for growth atm.
And outside of crypto the most important overall thing going on is this:
>>54707881
>In the mean time you can cope with Chainlink Functions which is ironically more useful for adoption and with greater potential than CCIP. That should come out earlier maybe in June...
yes.jpg
100x more important then CCIP over the next while. And also more interesting as a concept from where I'm sitting.
...
And now for the real interesing question that needs to be answered...
So now that Sergey has flipped he switch and people are ready to start paying their mfing bills and shit, the biggest question on all of our minds should be:
JUST HOW MUCH IS LAYER ZERO WITH THEIR HUNDREDS OF MILLIONS OF DOLLARS FROM THE ABSOLUTE TIP TOP TIER 1 VCs IN THE WORLD P A Y I N G US NOW????
It's gotta be some fucking fucking checks, no?
The sheer amount of oracles used is unlike anything. It's like hundreds at least I think. Look at how many tokens and bridges and run through lz and understand that each transaction is a two part affair with an oracle and a relayer...

>>54712192
>CCIP isn't coming any time soon.
>>54707191

>>54710980
Hmm. I wonder why link struggles as a company in getting their shit together and running as an efficient organization...
It's not like a bunch of parasites were allowed to get their fangs in over at Chainlink Lerbs...right?
Sergey would never allow that knowing how important this all is and that tech and tech people come first...r..r..right?

>>54712215
Perhaps we see it rolled out for tradfi related purposes now that lz w/ link is handling crypto?
I mean that's where the real potential is *long term*. But short term growth is still crypto focused and generating sustainable income and a self sustaining network.

>>54707954
what is this from? don't remember seeing it

>>54712192
Red pill me on layer zero senpai

>>54714135
Imagine if Sergey built CCIP on Chainlink in like a month and didn't run it through the usual paces for security hardening.

>>54711062
2 more decades my cuckold marines
We will be so fucking rich
Trust le based Sergey!

>>54707954
>Pretend infographics while nothing in reality is close to this