[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance


View post   

File: 664 KB, 1079x1617, Screenshot_20230417-150819.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
54624820 No.54624820 [Reply] [Original]

They are prepping the normies, it's happening soon. Schizos win again.

https://twitter.com/Forbes/status/1647832273608212480

It's not even a shitty independent blogpost, it's actually by Forbes.

>> No.54624868

>>54624820
gods the next chainlink parabolic run is going to be legendary

>> No.54625090
File: 112 KB, 1600x1065, switchflipped.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
54625090

>>54624820
>>54624868
>gods the next chainlink parabolic run is going to be legendary

>> No.54625112

>>54624820
Forbes is faggot but Chainlink is based and redpilled.

>> No.54625133

Token not needed

>> No.54625217
File: 32 KB, 645x770, srakaczaners.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
54625217

>>54624820
>https://www.forbes.com/sites/digital-assets/article/why-do-blockchains-need-oracles/?utm_campaign=socialflowForbesMainTwitter&utm_medium=social&utm_source=ForbesMainTwitter
>/sites/
Do Chainiggers really?

>> No.54625246

>>54625217
>posts this in 3 threads
>didn't realize the article was written by a Forbes staffer
Yikes. Panic in the discord?

>> No.54625279

>>54625217
>>54625167
>>54625184


Wow how incredibly organic with the exact same memes and wording. They don't even try. You are terrible at what you do kek

The article is made a Forbes staff member not contributor and mentions Chainlink twice.

>> No.54625294

>>54625246

I noticed the same thing

>>54625279

>> No.54625835

>>54625217
>>54625246
Pink Boys are actually scrambling lmao

>> No.54626265

>>54625217
>>54625246
Oh boy, the fudders can't stop embarrassing themselves. I wonder what they will come up with next.

>> No.54626309
File: 379 KB, 652x773, author.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
54626309

>>54624820
Do linkies really?

>> No.54626649

>>54626309
i know it's an old article but why does your screencap say clg is the author?