/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>53980569
Linkies are still waiting for $1000 nearly 6 years after the ICO

Ethereum went from 50 cents to $1400 in less than 2 years

>>53980569
same as when i didn't sell ETH at 80, those who make it are those that survive multiple cycles, it's as easy as doing literally nothing. those who made it off btc, made it through multiple crashes.

there are two types of people, those who make 50% gains and are happy with it, and those who make generational wealth. those who make generational wealth are those that arnt swayed by small price fluctuations.

i bought link in the presale, during ico and after, never stopped, went through all the dumps, the siibos dump from 1.2$ to 17 cents was more brutal than this one, just like the dump from 60 cents to 20 or 80 cents to 26 or 2$ to 80 cents or 6$ to 1$.... you have to understand that us winners we will hold till you fags will think it's impossible that we could survive all those dumps. but we can stay retarded longer than the suppressors will stay solvent.

i know sergey isnt going anywhere, neither ari or whatever, link will become the amazon of crypto, and i'll be having a great share in it. you can seethe all you want, im still buying even at these prices

>>53980569
I did faggot, what are you talking about?

>>53980695
I could have bought 8x as much link if I sold it. At least I'm not trying to cope like this was a good decision, it has actually been disastrous for my mental health and interpersonal relationships.

>>53980695
you had 2 years to mine btc for pennies and 2 more years to buy eth under $5
4 years in total, but you chose to go all-in on a shitty altcoin because some anonymous autists convinced you it's the god protocol and that it would have an "ETH-like run"
congrats, you've been played

>>53980569
This must be the hottest brit ever

>>53980585
my net worth was at 20M$ when link was at 50$, and i didn't sell; i kepp my dca schedule and kept buying and buying, and i will never stop, you fags will never understand us OGs, what we went through the whitepapers we read the search wve done all while everybody was calling us schizos retarded or deluded. i was lurking biz when you wernt even born, you nufags are retarded, and the bigger this community grows, the lower the IQ goes, back then we were like few people very interested in the tech and the promises of crypto, and we were helping each others, we literally cared and shared for example the presale links, and organized ourselves, nowadays it's impossibe to do will all the pajeets that infiltrated us. you guys really think you will be able to pull off what we did back in 2017? the prsale was closed to public, yet biz organised itself and made it possible for us to get access to it.

you fags can keep seething as much as you want, you will never be OGs, you will never be part of our elite club, and that's a good thing, instead of learning from us and asking us to help you doo research and evaluate your opinions, all you do all day is circle jerk and have phantasms about us OGs.
do we lurk biz? yes we do, does the fud and demoralization affects us? nope, we have been 4chan fags for decades in 2006 i was lurking /b/ we were raised by this place, if you think you have an influence on us think again. all youre doing is make us participate less in /biz/ and you end up between the sad losers that you are

>>53980779
Link didn't exist at that time. Why didn't you buy Amazon and Facebook? Apple? You had your whole life!

>>53980816
>OGs with 100k stacks still haven't made it after more than half a decade
maybe you're just an idiot...did it ever cross your mind anon?

>>53980569
Seethe more kike

>>53980779

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XbZ8zDpX2Mg

>>53980789
Shes a Jewess thats why

>>53980858
>you are seething about my losses kike

>>53980816
This post is pure cope.

>>53980836
you had 2 years to mine btc for pennies and 2 more years to buy eth under $5
4 years in total, but you chose to go all-in on a shitty altcoin because some anonymous autists convinced you it's the god protocol and that it would have an "ETH-like run"
congrats, you've been played

>>53980569
I sold at $33 when we were going back down and I will never forget all the link cultits laughing at me

>>53980816

>>53981014
take it however you like, i just too the time to tell you guys what it's like to make it. the truth that nobody will ever tell you. it's not a steady climb up, it never was, but i'm never gonna settle for 20M$ even though i am a millionaire now i don't give a shit, also, how can i cope with link going from 50 to 7$? this is the like easiest of all the dumps we had over the years, we had way worse since 2017 and i held through all of em. it's just that now the dumps imply even greater amounts od dollar value. but that's what it feels like to make it. at first its pocket change, so you dont care if you lose 80% in $ value, then steadily, the $ value increases and increases, if you manage to see your millions of $ like pocket change same as when it wasn't worth much, that's when you truly make it and become part of the 0.1%.
for the extremely wealthy 20M$ is pocket change, it's about having the right midset. if you think about it, the bobos, they sell all the small % gains and they end up never making it, thats now how you make generational wealth, you need to hold for years and survive all the crashes

>>53981063
Link didn't exist at that time. Why didn't you buy Amazon and Facebook? Apple? You had your whole life!
>He doesn't know that I, a link holder, bought all of my eth under $100

>>53980816

>>53981094
KEK, Same goes for DBI retards, it already made 20x since they shared it here, hope we won't see them for 4 years as well.

>>53981109
the fact that you spent 5 minutes to type that out just shows you're super fucking butthurt about your losses

>>53981137
>hahaha, look at this millioanire it's funny
you're pathetic, implying this is the first crash link ever sees, also you will never make it

>>53981177
what losses? i made millions of $ over the years and started out as a poorfag

>>53980569
Because I didn’t start buying until it was $14 and dca-ed all the way to $6

>>53980816
Too busy buying to sell, c'est la vie

>>53981109
You will never be a woman.

>>53981203
you're down -92% from you ATH cuckold

but hey...atleast you paid the monthly salary of a green haired Chainlink Labs roastie lol

>>53981209
>>53981211
you guys are pathetic, how did selling every possible pump of every shitcoin youve had worked out for you?
i know that there are many faggot oGs that lost alot of money going into everest and UBT kek don't tell me youre one of the everest fags?

>>53981224
its all paper gains you retard, BTC and ETH went through exactly those same crahes. LINK also went through multiple crashes over the years, you're just gaslighting

>>53980731
>i could have
>if
yeah everybody should just buy the bottom and sell the top oof every shitcoin, yeah it's as easy as that. do you even listen to yourself? if trading was this obvious, everybody would be a billionaire.

>>53980569
I wanted to sell half when it went over $50 but I didn't want to buy/deposit/burn eth to move it

>>53980569
You've been asking this very question every day for many months now. Are you ok?

>>53980569
Benjamin Cowen

>>53980569
because im never selling

>>53981240
>>53981261
>>53981391
you had 2 years to mine btc for pennies and 2 more years to buy eth under $5
4 years in total, but you chose to go all-in on a shitty altcoin because some anonymous autists convinced you it's the god protocol and that it would have an "ETH-like run"
congrats, you've been played

>>53980695
Fucking based as hell

kek baggies!!! kek baggies!!!

>>53980569
because i fell for the BTC to 100k meme and BTC wasnt 100k yet
yes i want to die

sorry sers thought this was /bbby/ carry on LINK marines

>>53980569
i solded half at 20 on the way up, and the other half at 20 on the way down.
it was not my best trade, but far from my worst...

>>53980695
the majority of investments don't work out. if you follow your strategy, you will baghold the first one forever. that's mathematically retarded

Kek
Chainshitters are low IQ subhumans

"Le tech"
"Two more weeks until $1000 eoy"
"We le elite of baggies"

You will always be cuckhold morons.

They had to sell at 50 and become gorillionaires but instead cucked and locked away their tokens for like 3 McBurguers per month


Kek baggies baggies

>>53982012
go say that to those that have been holding btc since 2010, or eth since 2016, listen, chainlink was never a trade for us, we have something different than all the fags that lurk in here, we have a vision we know that in the end link will top top 3 coin. you can use all the stats you want to make any fucking predictions you want, but in the end WE were right no matter the chances.
back in 2017, all we had is the whitepaper and 2 devs. yet we somehow knew, not because we thought that it was a good idea to flip the ico, but rather, because we knew that sergey was going to go really far. here we are 6 years later, and we got a unicorn that is the best company that exists in crypto. in 6 years link will still be here, and guess what buddy, i will still be here against all the odds and the statistics you think you have.
how did the statistics and strategies workout for you so far?
link was never a strategy it always was a vision

>>53982193
why are you so desperately trying to equate link with BTC or ETH? they're not even remotely similar either in adoption, brand recognition, or most importantly, ROI
Both BTC and ETH had managed to establish themselves firmly at the top of the market well before the first 6 years of their existence, LINK is on the 6th year as we speak and it remains a lagging altcoin, literally indistinguishable from the rest of them
>b-b-but muh ETH and muh BTC
this post sums your problem very elegantly>>53981063
the reality is you drank the kool-aid from anonymous shitposters who psyoped you into believing that you bought the next ETH, when in reality you bought the worst version of NEO
cope and seethe

>>53982268
>why are you so desperately trying to equate link with BTC or ETH? they're not even remotely similar either in adoption, brand recognition, or most importantly, ROI
get a clue kek

>>53982292
>get a clue kek
bro the only person who needs to get a clue is you, you live in fantasy land
they're not comparable by any tangible metric, at all, and that won't change no matter how many times you attempt to gaslight the board with muh 4IR and the "god protocol" with a gazillion crypto integrations no one cares about
it's a slow rug and you fell for it

>>53982292
in fact, LINK is the textbook example of a shitcoin trying to generate "ETH-hype" for coping faggots who missed the train in 2015, there's a reason this made its way into the bagholder bingo
>"Screenshot of someone selling ETH at $3 in 2017"
you're the running joke of crypto, and condescending false arrogant shitposts like these will only bring more mockery upon you

>>53980816
Based

>>53980816
that's just ridiculous hubris and greed, $1M is enough for financial independence

also I find it extremely funny how "OGs" constantly evoke the "whitepaper" when in reality absolutely nothing outlined in both whitepapers has actually materialized into a release or a functioning service, all we got was feature creep upon feature creep that nobody asked for
>>53982416
greed and delusion are the primary reason LINK shitposting endures to this day lol

>>53982348
that's why you will stay poor forever, and i'll own you.

>>53982416
that's your pajeet poorfag view of things, that's why you will never make it

1m$ is for poorfags, you think btc and eth ogs settled for 1M$ or 10M$ when they had it? no

>>53982422
we evoke the whitepaper because thats how we found link, back then we were able to interpret the purpose of a tech, nowadays retards just follow stickers on skateboards

>>53982520
you had 2 years to mine btc for pennies and 2 more years to buy eth under $5
4 years in total, but you chose to go all-in on a shitty altcoin because some anonymous autists convinced you it's the god protocol and that it would have an "ETH-like run"
congrats, you've been played

>>53982520
you wouldn't even take $20M, now you're back to being a poorfag. beyond $20M you're firmly in diminishing returns territory, you'd have to go out of your way to burn that much money.

>>53982520
>that's why you will stay poor forever, and i'll own you.
kek, delusions of grandeur stubbornness and hubris, that's precisely why you'll never make it, you don't even entertain for a second the possibility you were wrong.
>we evoke the whitepaper because thats how we found link
what purpose does evoking the whitepaper from 6 years ago serve when every feature outlined is missing? you literally shoot yourself in the foot by constantly evoking features that have been missing for half a decade and counting

>>53982552
stfu retard, im gonna hold through the next cycke and the cycle after it, and i'll be here laughing at the poorfag that you will always be

>>53982593
I sincerely hope you do because witnessing smug midwits like yourself getting irrevocably rekt is one of the most satisfying feelings ever, not even memeing
I'm afraid you won't be around in year from now though

>>53982566
how can i be wrong you fucking retard, my link dca before 2019 is around 23 cents. since i kepy buying it has increased since then, but you jave no idea what you're talking about.
get a clue dyor i think we gave you guys all the vreadcrumbs you need over years.
i have nothing to prove

>>53982622
>kepy
>jave
>vreadcrumbs
bro, take a deep breath before replying, lmao
what do you mean "how can I be wrong" you are already wrong, it's been 6 years and LINK has objectively failed to meet the expectations by every tangible metric
more so, any comparisons to the best performers of the market (btc, eth) are completely invalidated by the absymal price action link has exhibited for half a decade
bro, you are completely wrong and delusional and you can't even refute the fact you're solely relying on HOPIUM

>>53982593
>he unironically believes crypto cycles will repeat ad infinitum
>he still believes after 15 years that he's early
kek right, because that's how things play out usually, the asset keeps climbing up exponentially every 3 years and BTC is going to $1mm in the next next cycle, right anon?
lmfao I'm literally trading against norons in this market.

>>53980569
I did, but I went into UNN with most of my profits

>>53982622
Yeah, you clearly have nothing to prove with your tirade of unsupported assertions and personal attacks. 'People' like you have lost the ability to learn and think critically. Try looking at what you've said from a neutral point of view maybe? Your own baseless rage has given way to the irreversible equivalent of brain damage lol. Iroiny can be funny, but you're a fucking mess and should seek help.

>>53982672
im using my phone and fat fingering the keys without even re reading myself. anyways you claiming im delusional aka (i should abandon right now) is as deluded as you claim i am. the difference here is that i will know where link will be in 10 years, and you, you will just be here gaping your mouth thinking, its impossible that link OGs were able to hold all those years.
guess what dude, i will be that OG. and people will call me a larp, they have been calling me a larp since 2020 anyways.
i dont give a fuck, and you have no idea how far we went to get our hands on our linkies.

this is the kind of determination we have, in 2023 biz is filled with weak handed faggots read this thread from back then and learn from us you fucking retard

>>/biz/thread/6189651

>>53983076
yeah and favela anon slept in his car because he was convinced he would make it with his poorfolio (which included link btw) and guess what, he's dead
this is your future I guess

>>53982927
im sorry that it is yhe first time you ever meet someone on biz with real conviction, if you think that my confiction is just baseless assertions, it's because YOU are deaf to what we have been saying for years and you got brain washed by the constant negative posting and low effort posting, i'm just someone from another era, thats why you cannot understand us. you never will.

>>53983076
>its impossible that link OGs were able to hold all those years.
nobody said that kek, you have to love when deranged bagholders inventing non existent arguments which they can easily win lmao
people are still holding ARK, NEO, NANO, REQ XRP in 2023, I can easily believe you are also stuck in the past with your head buried in the sand, like every other delusional crypto community
>b-but muh 2018 breadcrumbs
>b-b-but muh spoonfeeding threads!
get on with the times bro, breadcrumbs were total horseshit, remember Blythe Masters and Digital Asset? gone
OpenLaw? gone
Oracle, Google, Microsoft Libra, Consensys, all GONE
wake up
>>53983234
>I'm not delusional or in denial, I have "conviction"
yes and people keep trying to make you understand that your conviction is unfounded and unjustified after 6 years of nothingness
but keep sperging about how much "conviction" you have lmao

>>53983257
go aheadtell me about the shitcoins ure into, pretty sure they are complete scams

>>53983313
>oh shit he's fucking me up
>quick employ some ad homs!!
>n-n-nooo u!
kek, keep drinking the kool-aid midwit
>tell that to BTC OGs!
kek my fucking sides

>>53983368
0 answer given, tell how did i know you wernt going to name any shitcoin

>>53980695
>same as when i didn't sell ETH at 80
holy fucking based

>>53983384
tell me how I know you're actually desperate for anons to reafirm your delusions and that's why you've spent so many hours trying to convince the board that "OGs are still holding guise!!" when in reality most of them have sold a long time ago
you're a laggard, a midwit, a retard who based his entire financial thesis on anonymous shitposting unverified and unfounded breadcrumbs
see you in a year from now anon

>>53980695
>i know sergey isnt going anywhere
oh fuck, sergey will be back at his most hungry form, we need another $600m

>>53983234
Since were actually speaking honestly here:
Youre a fool if youre not listening to this anon

The biggest alpha in all of early stage investing is watching where the people at the very top choose to invest their lives
The former head of the most important cybersecurity firm on earth
Who is now chair of the best comp sci dept on earth
Works for chainlink

The former ceo of the biggest internet company
Is advising and speaking at chainlink events

The lead for the most important consumer facing ai platform
Left google for chainlink

Its not fucking complicated
Its all right in front of you

>>53983437

Concise + True + Based

1k eoy is not a funny joke

>>53983437
the biggest alpha is apparently appeal to authority, you heard it hear first on /biz/, because as we all know, prominent executives never engage in experiments and fuck ups, they're always right!
oh wait nevermind.
kek, you people are beyond saving, it's like I'm lurking /xsg/.
>you reaaaaaaally think that Rosie Rios, the former head of the US Treasury would associate herself with a blatant scam?? huh?? you're a moron stay poor!1

>>53983234
>im sorry that it is yhe first time you ever meet someone on biz with real conviction

This is my first time on this board. Also, you're equating conviction with accuracy; you're certainly not the first idiot with conviction.

>i'm just someone from another era, thats why you cannot understand us. you never will.

I can't decide between in-group and no true scotsman biases here. What the fuck are you talking about? Being a member of a 4chan board for a long time gives you authority/credibility no matter what you're spouting? You can't see the forest for the trees any longer my friend, you are a complete mess. Your contentions have no place in a debate between adults.

>>53980695
>the siibos dump from 1.2$ to 17 cents was more brutal than this one

No fucking way. It’s easy to hold thru extreme volatility when there’s promise. Link did FUCK ALL when it actually mattered in 2021, what’s stopping it from the exact same dogshit performance next bullrun? NOTHING

>>53980816
very based, newfags cant understand why stink is special, all the esoteric mythology and meme magick that surrounds it, only true 4ch autistic oldfags saw it all unfold it was surreal

>>53983414
okay faggot you keep believing that.
listen, my conviction has millions of $ on the line. yours has cow milk and 100 grams curry, go fuck a goat you goat fucker

>>53980569
I did
For some reason I didn’t learn from that success and held troika from .39

>>53983493
next bullrun we retest ath and beyond, but thats still nowhere near multigenerational wealth for me, ill be holding way past it, im not scared of waiting

>>53983516
>Millions!1
but I thought you said they were "paper gains"? lol you have nothing until you sell, enjoy playing with internet magic money

>>53983585
tell me the shitcoins ure into u nigger

>>53983501
>Sergey Nazarov
>initials SN
bros??

>>53983501
aaaah yes, only a select few schizos can grasp the esoteric meme of SN=SN, the mythical angel investor Sandro Salsano and the highly esoteric and masonic municipal marmalade
kek the absolute state
>>53983594
BTC and ETH is the place to be when you actually have millions and you're not larping like yourself.
but in reality I'm OUT of the market since Jan 2022

>>53983625

You own LINK. Pic related.

>>53983625
good for you, you will be back pumping my bags. as for btc and eth, where do you think i was before 2017 u fking retard, also between a x5 on btc and x50 on link i rather take the x50

>>53980695
Incredibly based.

>>53980816
based and truthpilled.

>>53983671
kek, believing that makes you feel better, right?
>1keoy is not a joke
LMAO stop it
>>53983679
>you will be back
kek, now here's the delusion we were talking about, I'm sorry I meant "conviction"
this sounds more like begging desu senpai but please, keep posting after stating numerous times "you don't care!"
>>53983680
>more appeal to authority
kek, this is the power of "fundamentals", shipping products doesn't matter, ROI doesn't matter, decades passing by don't matter, the only thing that matters is "authority" figureheads that might as well do jack shit for the company.
>>53983721
>2018 ancient pasta, invalidated completely after 5 years of failure
what's next, the power of positive thought? KEK THE ABSOLUTE STATE OF LINK MARINES IN 2023

>>53983778
JFL I can't imagine how anyone would think partnering with SWIFT is not bullish, let alone links with Google, DTCC, Meta, T-Mobile, AP, BNY Mellon, etc. But sure, Citibank were wrong when they released that report about chainlink eclipsing bitcoin. I hope you're fudding ironically, if not I pity your stupidity.

>>53983778
this is the kind of feminine faggots you find now on biz, all talk, this guy have been getting it in the ass for so long he learnt how to speak and bring out all the sjw tier reddit faggotry
look at him just trying to pickup words ojt their context and slamming his definitions and correcting faggots all while getting a self gratification and acting like he detainq some sort of truth.
urr obviously a giant faggot that takes it in the ass thats who you armuhh appeal to authority lmao

>>53983834
>Google, DTCC, Meta, T-Mobile, AP, BNY Mellon
>partnerships
thanks for completing the bagholder bingo btw
all of them are nothing more than paid marketing stunts from chainlink which will inevitably lead to nothing, just like every other "partnership" and "connection" Link has had throughout all these long years.
just to name a few, how about Oracle, BSN, Digital Asset, OpenLaw, Docusign, Consensys, Corda, IC3, IWA, "the Korean banks1", Fidelity, Facebook, EY, AXA, IBM, SAP, and the list literally goes on forever.
also please, be honest for once and stop overselling the SWIFT connection, it's literally nothing more than two proof-of-concepts performed in a span of almost 7 years, first PoC was performed in 2016 fyi
At this point it is painfully obvious that Link simply shoehorned itself in every prominent enterprise desperately trying to invent usecases out of thin air, with the most recent example being the marketing pivot to AI, which is total bullshit, while they keep failing to deliver their core features such as T-sigs, reputation, slashing, mixicles, deco, town crier, etc
>>53983837
>ad homs and butthurt sperging
you can stop crying now sweatie

>>53983541
I don’t think you can be sure of that. Very big players are holding Link down. It’s obvious. Be prepared to wait a lot longer

>>53983977

You are not even close to as smart as the average Chainlink hire, let alone Eric Schmidt or the top dogs at SWIFT.

Also, not sure why you're writing all this fud - you own LINK.

>>53984045
>zero retorts
>resorts to appeal to authority
>huurr derpity derp you think you're smarter than theeese guise bro???!1
kek, one thing's for certain, you are a retard

>>53983721
This stuff has zero effect now. In fact it’s more like fud. I was in those threads and I miss reading that anon and dreaming about how fucking rich I was about to be. It seems that faggot DRASTICALLY underestimated both the time it would take for network maturity and the immense retardation of retail investors. Anyone in that thread would have roped to learn Link is $7 in March of 2023.

>>53983977
>paid marketing stunts
Stopped reading right there. If anything, you're the one that sounds like a schizo if you believe this. But hey, why would I trust my lying eyes?

>>53983977

>>53984129
how do you explain all these connections getting dropped then? what happened?

>>53980569
Oh, you want to gloat? Sure, go ahead and do your thing, newfag. But just so you know, the next time I come across this gem, it gonna be worth a hundred bucks. Even though Sergey is acting like a retard, I'm still holding strong in my Trustwallet and Sylo wallet, while staking on Binance and Kucoin, any which way IGMI.

>>53984143

They didn't you MASSIVE fucking faggot lmao

>>53980585
Just have to hodl, some tokens are built different with low ass speed.

>>53980569
I trusted Sergey.

the fact that I have to put my inheritance into FUCKING ETHEREUM just to hedge against the likelihood of Link doing fuck all next cycle is BULLSHIT

>>53984164
oh but they did you BUTTHURT baggie
https://twitter.com/CoinDesk/status/1597782264091492353
as a matter of fact every entity I mentioned here>>53983977
has verifiably DROPPED any DLT project they had
google it, read it and weep

>>53980731
The unpredictability of the market dawning on us.

I have 60k Link, mostly staked and I will NEVER sell any if that stack, only reward tokens and not even all of those.
Get fucked, fudders. We're making it whether you want us to or not. You failed completely in that regard. How does that feel?

>>53984214
Based

>>53984214
I agree selling any of your original Link stack now that some form of staking is live with more implementation coming is pants on head retarded.

>>53984202
Don’t even need to look at the link. It’s obviously the maersk and ibm headline. You are such an easy poster to spot but this gives it away every time. link lives rent free in your head

>>53980569
One of my biggest regret is failing to take profits. I now know better and I don't take chances now. I already hold good promising project like KSC, CYMI and CHZ. Hopeful they will outperform many projects.

Just bought some, what am I in for?

>>53984238
actually I'm not the guy, I'm this guy right here
>>/biz/thread/S28046338
I've warned you 2 years ago but you didn't listen, you were all busy calling me bulgarian and running victory laps smelling your own farts
guess what, I sold link at $30 while you keep bagholding to this day, clinging on to invalidated breadcrumbs from 2018

>>53984268
and now you are here begging us to sell for our own good right?

>>53984303
no I'm here to laugh at your expense and desu I'm truly amazed by the sheer delusion people exhibit up to this day regarding link, you're literally in denial and it's hilarious watching it unfold

>>53980816
>>53980695
Fucking based.

>>53984320
yeah right? youve spend 2 hours here making 21 posts just to laug
kek

i've been shorting link on aave. it's going super well. pull out link, split for eth and provide liquidity on uniswap. wish i was man enough to just dump all the link but too high risk.

>>53983977
Fuck you. The LadyLuck partnership will save LINK

>>53980816
considering /biz/ popular make it numbers i think the general consensus would be that you are an idiot for not selling half at 6 mil and being certain that the rest of your life is set
just how greedy are you anon
but then again a proposed 400k link stack is pretty high for biz standard and there is little way that continued dca should move the needle now so why bother, both lead me to believe you are larping

In case someone is wondering why there has been so much link fud lately: Sergey stopped selling or is finishing with last sells RIGHT NOW. 9 months of sell pressure coming to end. They even told about this sell schedule beforehand and it's ending now. That sell pressure is what kept this token in this range. Start buying.

>>53984781
Just to be clear. That sell pressure is over or ending as we speak. No more dumpage by sergey and I'm not kidding. Check their articles.

>>53984781
saucce

>>53980816
I've been looking into link for a couple of months now I'm a new fag and I started investing into the market when Luna first collapsed because the bear Market had finally started and I came across link and I started researching into it, this board didnt help much so i looked into the archives and found alot of great info on link since then I've been buying link Non-Stop week by week, sold some of my old stuff, reselling stuff from thrift stores, and even used my tax returns this week now I only have 900 link right now with an average of 6.50 per link and i don't plan on stopping as long as it's under $10. I'm extremely grateful that I haven't missed out completely and have been able to buy at these prices, do you think I would still be able to make it with a small stack that I have now? Its very hard to come across other link holders especially an og nowadays since this board is full of link fud that it gets to me sometimes. Especially since i have a small stack

>>53980816
but to clarify after reading the rest of the thread
your points are correct most will need two cycles to truly make it from nothing and being fudded into selling the bottom isnt going to gain you that
eth was a truly unique project for its massive growth in 2 years the idiots in this thread who take that as a standard are beyond retarded

the link fud has grown increasingly deranged and nonsensical lately: i am beginning to believe that schizo theory that most fudders here arent bulgarians or paid jeets but rather true anons that lost their entire stacks on on of the cefi scams and are now stewing in terminal seething
still tho big serg really has butter on his face for promoting celsius

>>53984745
i was an eth faggot before hopping in link, i didn't use my personal life savings, but piggy backed eth and btc before that, i joined crypto when btc hit 1000$ for the first time back in 2014 3 years later i was a linkfag

Never bought it, and was too afraid to naked short it because you never know how far a tiny market cap may get pumped by retards.

>>53984998
the faggot that came here fudding for 21 posts isnt someone who lost it all, he has a true agenda

>>53985138
ok but still, did you cash out enough of your eth gains to be set for life
if you reached a certain number having certainty of that is pretty recommendable, but at least i salute your uncompromising conviction anon
but do tell me this, how are you dca'ing in in the past few years with any amount that matters, this part of your first post i cant seem to see
but also keep up the good work on calling out the fudders

>>53985168
What could his agenda be? There are different kind of fudders but they all know that holders will never sell no matter what. What do they want to accomplish with their daily malicious fud?

>>53980569
Wait, you guys didn't sell? I sold and flipped it over to the next big thing, and then the next, and so on. Currently all in on raw bloody $Steak, waiting for the Shibarium launch

>>53985500
BBBY

>>53985462
they unironicalky believe they can make us abandon our link stacks. for all i know, they could also be paid by the wef so we autiqts stay far away from their plans.
but too late we are in and we will stay.
the millions of link sergey is dumping, he is probably doing OTC with swift or whatever the fuck, i dont see him pressing the sell button on binance.

Okay I only have 1000 linkies and I'm basically a mouth breathing retard when it comes to understanding the nuances of crypto. My only question is how and and why did link jump to 52 dollars and change a few years ago?

>>53980569
I didn't have any

>>53985383
i still got a good chunk of my og eth stack, and still got my linkies i dca with the money i make wage slaving, ive just cashed out enough in 2017 to buy a house and pay all my debts. now i'm just waiting for the singularity. some people made it to 9 digits by investing 50k into amazon or tesla, im pretty damn sure i can make it there with chainlink.

>>53985714
again i salute your conviction anon
but i escaped the cagie with far less than you had and i dont regret my choice
and yes you will make it to 9 figures only wen moon is the only question left but if moon is long settled into yes

>>53985714
If I buy 5k links right now, would I still be able to make it? I don't need generational wealth just a mill or two to be comfy

>>53985676
Just a guess here since im also new fag. Pol, Redditors and twitter fags discovered link and all the breadcrumbs the ogs found and were hyping it up and buying. However the hype died down the past 2 years since staking (Real staking not this v.01 shit) and ccip havent come out. Most of the value is in those 2 features hence the terrible price action right now. Keep buying bro these are clownworld prices.

>>53985991
that's 200$ link, id pay a nigger to fuck me in the ass if it never happens

>>53985752
i have a good paying stable job, so i don't really need to quit for now, i'll only quit when i'll truly make it.
i see myself like a very imporrant sergey and ari shareholder, i basically own a share of anything they will come up with. thet retard elon is way more retarded

>>53981224
>just time the top bro
>just swing perfectly
>>53980569
I hold LINK because it makes people mad. that's really it. I didn't buy for a long time. Then I saw lots of FUD. I thought it would be funny if I boughted. so I boughted. boughted more. I boughted at $1.10 and I boughted at $40.
>YOU ARE DOWN SO MUCH MONEY
it's not much. Link is an asymmetrical bet. Why do you care about my finances so much?
PS: still haven't sold. 1000 stinkers owned.
hahahaha. you guys are just made you can't manipulate autists into selling like you can with normies. we don't react like other people do. git gud

>>53986378
amen brother

>>53980695
>losing money makes you more money
wow powerful!

>>53980569
Because 50 is shit.

>>53980569
Sold around 40 on the way down, dodged that bullet.

>>53984875
I would honestly say that 1K could possibly be a suicide stack, but it’s not a make it stack at all, man. I wouldn’t expect you to get rich from just 1K link. Even with the fabled $1,000 per LINK token, you would be sitting at $1 million. That’s not enough to stop working completely for the rest of your life.

Entertaining thread.

>>53986293
I was here as well during all those times. I have most of my stack in tact, only ever sold a little to pay taxes and a house which I mortgaged to ensure I kept most of my link stack. I could have sold more of my stack and had it fully paid off, but instead I can see where link will end up.
A few more years is nothing on the decades I would otherwise be wageslaving. A few more years to guarantee generational wealth.
We're getting closer every day and I can see it.

>>53984875
Look at all the partnerships link has, it's right up at the pinnacle. It's a shining example of how a project should be run. The only thing needed is time and patience with the amount of integrations and the quality of the team behind the project. The most difficult part is just holding through the peaks and troughs and keeping your eye on the end game.
I recall in 2018 sitting in the pub, counting how many link each beer was costing me. I wish I went harder on the buys but I'm forever grateful I went heavy in the first place.

>>53984803
>Check their articles.
link

>>53982832
>internet was created in 1983

>>53989389
Yea ive been finding ways to cut my expenses so i can keep buying more but im not sure how much time i have left to buy at these prices and was even wondering if i should continue to buy more after getting a 1k stack or to diversify into something else and with those profits move it into link.

>>53984115
This

Keep in mind BTC was $16000 when LINK staking launched, while LINK was $7.20. After 4 months of staking, BTC is $22000 and LINK is under $7.

>>53980569
im retarded

>>53980569
I thought it was gonna break 3 figs at least, tons of other shit like bnb and quant were doing it. And everything was performing generally really strong, except link. Holding link up until 2021 was awesome, holding after that has been pure hell. But nobody thought $50 would be the 6 year high.

>>53980816
>greedy anon pretends it's virtuous to tie yourself to a memecoin in the name of 4channel(the taiwanese father-son fishing competition forum) brotherhood
I would sell any of you retards down the river for $20

>>53990976
this is why we can't have nice things

>>53991058
HODL REDDIT DIAMOND HANDS WE CAN TAKE DOWN WALLSTREET

>>53991093
>he cant in2 meme
calm down nigger

>>53980695
kek

I unironically believed the EOY $1000 bullcrap and thought we were criminally low.

Hahaha...

>>53989349
it doesn't matter how long its gonna take, lie, we got our future secured, like with link we 100% sure made it, we just need to be patient.
is there any other crypto that is sure to make you rich?
nope

>>53981261
The concept of 'paper gains' makes no sense in an asset that in liquid. LINK is quite liquid, especially if we're talking single digit millions.
Same thing applies to a liquid asset that people say shit like: 'you don't lose unless you sell'. Stupidity.
You have stock options with your company that are locked up for years and can't be sold? The price goes up and down and you want to call that paper gains and losses? That's fine. That is a reasonable way to use the term. They're paper gains and losses because you can't actually sell even if you wanted to. Same with pension related things.
Think I'm full of shit? Ok, take the logic and apply it to a foreign currency other than your own...now keep going...other assets...down the liquidity ladder...

>>53984250
Long time fudder here. I just bought 740 LINK and is the first LINK I’ve ever bought. Was going for 1000 link but hit my daily buy limit. Shooting for 5000 LINK by summertime. Coinbase using Chainlink for their BASE ETH scaling protocol is too big to ignore for me. Sorry for the years of fudding. Turns out this shit seems like a huge deal. Hope I get rich lads.

>>53984532
Take your sheckels and run before you get burned. $6.50 looks like a hard floor this bear run.

>>53980569
I did.
Completely accidentally, in fact.
I was farming on Pangolin's AVAX-LINK pool and impermanent loss sold my linkies at the top for $4 AVAX. I was also farming $120k/week for 2 weeks there, and IL got me to 90k AVAX-ies, which I sold between $40 and the top.
Fun times.

How do I get my husband to stop going ‘Rabbit Chad Mode’ during sex? TLDR; My husband says ‘Rabbit Chad Mode activated’ when we start to have sex, growls and acts like a caveman, and then says ‘Rabbit Chad Mode off’ when we stop, and then pretends not to remember afterward. I really love my husband and he’s always been great in bed. But recently he’s been acting really weird. So, a couple of days ago, my son went on a rampage through our house and said he was in ‘Rabbit Chad Mode’. We didn’t really know what to do with him, so we sent him to live with my parents so he can go to a special needs school. My husband a really great relationship with our son and loved him more than anything. Naturally, he was upset when he had to leave. He’s an incredibly tough man, but this was the first time I’ve ever seen him cry. I think since then, he’s been a little emotionally unwell. I’ve heard him muttering, 'Red Rabbit token' repeatedly when he didn’t notice me, staring blankly into his food, and just going alone by himself to do who knows what. I feel awful for him, but we both agreed that this was for the best. Last night, the day after our son went away, we decided to have sex to relieve our stress. However, my husband said ‘Rabbit Chad Mode activated’, starting growling, and went wild having sex with me. Admittedly, it was some of the best and most experimental sex I’ve ever had, but I’m worried that something might be going on with my husband. Any advice?

>>53985676
sauce? who is she, she's beautiful

>>53983257
>get on with the times bro, breadcrumbs were total horseshit, remember Blythe Masters and Digital Asset? gone
>OpenLaw? gone
>Oracle, Google, Microsoft Libra, Consensys, all GONE
I hear this a lot but no recognition of the fact that much of this was known to be supposition, guesswork done during the pitch black days of 2018-19, while the team was burrowed away in near silence. If you wanted any kind of alpha then you had to work for it and accept you'd have to theorise and experiment.

It's harsh to say that because not all rabbitholes led somewhere the project is finished, but more importantly it's foolish to say that projections about CL's industry relevance were wrong. Oracle, Libra, Consensys, Blythe Masters were optimistic breadcrumbs trails followed in the dark with varying probabilities of materialising (the Blythe stuff was considered pretty fringe at the time). Deutsche Telekom, AP, SWIFT, Eric Schmidt exist in the open light of day now, among a great deal else.

I'm not one of the anons who will tell you I know a LINK price explosion is coming, and admit I was surprised by performance from August 2020 to date, but that's the truth.

>>53992530
>optimistic breadcrumbs
https://imgur.com/a/HS9hIfr
keep trying to downplay the absolute failure of securing all these enterprise clients which had verified ties with Chainlink, I guess if/when SWIFT falls apart you'll be using the exact same excuses, "it was just an overly optimistic breadcrumb!"
be honest for fucks sake

>>53980569
Because then you lose your good position Captain Hindsight.

>>53992554
I thought my post was pretty level-headed for such a sarcastic flying-off-the-handle response. I'm not sure what you think I think SWIFT is but I'm not one for sweeping conspiracies. To me, CLxSWIFT is CL doing the right things and working with impressive people and organisations to develop their products.

You do clearly have some history or relationship with LINK as you're very opinionated and aware of even fairly obscure aspects of it. Everyone would be curious to hear it. You've said you don't own any - did you in the past and if yes what happened?

>>53984320
>Spend hours and hours everyday and double digit posts in every thread
>knows every single little detail about a project he doesn't care about, must have taken years
>just to have a laugh bro

>>53992579
I can't respond in a serious manner to someone who's blatantly trying to twist reality with low effort damage control.
Remember the enterprise abstraction layer announced for 2022? Was that also an "optimistic breadcrumb trail followed in the dark"? You are desperately trying to adopt the narrative of "information asymmetry" as if this is 2018, while nowdays Chainlink supposedly powers the entire defi sector, being the "industry standard", featured in articles of entities such as CitiBank and WEF. Here are some more optimistic breadrumbs for you
https://cointelegraph.com/news/chainlink-brings-fx-rates-data-from-top-korean-banks-to-defi
https://twitter.com/chainlink/status/1275414264916959232?lang=en
>You do clearly have some history or relationship with LINK
I already admitted itt I sold at $30

>>53992638
I think you're the one twisting things, and if you did sell at $30 and you're content with that, congratulations. You're still boxing shadows though.

You pointed out a number of things that were, literally, pieced together or inferred with varying degrees of confidence years ago. As you yourself say, we are not in 2018 anymore. CL has since done plenty else which would impress anyone objectively. Do you disagree? You're quick to crucify for "unachieved" biz-born guesses that anons (perhaps, dare I say, you) hoped would eventuate, and my counterpoint was that while those specific (biz-born) theories may not have materialised CL has grown. In response you've just added in unrelated things in scattergun negativity, including links to things that are merely announcements of stuff that happened which obviously doesn't fit the bill of failed breadcrumbs.

I'd like to see better delivery too, anon, but your take is lopsided.

>>53992724
>CL has since done plenty else which would impress anyone objectively. Do you disagree?
yes absolutely, CL has delivered zero core features, zero breakthroughs, and we're essentially back to May 2019, do you disagree? What about reputation, slashing, t-sigs, mixicles, deco etc?
>You pointed out a number of things that were, literally, pieced together or inferred with varying degrees of confidence years ago.
such as what? OpenLaw, DocuSign, BSN, Korean Banks, IC3, Corda all of these entities were either announced from Chainlink or were actually featured on their website at some point, these connections were NOT based on pure /biz/ autistic conjecture, and you trying to pass this narrative as "truth" is entirely disingenuous
>you've just added in unrelated things
no you're trying to twist the argument, a futile and desperate attempt I might add.

>>53980569
I sold at 40 and mostly on stables now. Would likely buy ORE next and not LINK.

>>53992787
Your initial posts concerned XYZ breadcrumbs from 5 years ago not eventuating and trying to rub people's faces in it because you sold at $30. My counterpoint was 5 years ago the space was an opaque graveyard and the team was silent, and that equally impressive achievements to the breadcrumbs you pointed out have been made since.

You've moved onto pointing out undelivered tech which is fine and something I hold the team accountable for too, but separate to the point I addressed.

It's painfully obvious you not only held/hold LINK but that you likely held these breadcrumbs a little too close to heart yourself, which is why you're so aggressively, lopsidedly negative about an asset you say you haven't held for over a year. Maybe you sold at $30, but it's safe to assume you probably had higher hopes for LINK and its performance, and this whole topic, is a sore point for you which you project onto other people who you feel sold you a lie, or somehow you're better than despite once believing what they do. You can keep pretending you're a truth crusader and this is all an ad hom but you're not conducting genuine conversation which is why your every reply drips with condescension, hostility, and pure, unbalanced negativity.

>>53992787
what happened to you're just posting to "laugh at linkies"

>>53992787
What are you trying to accomplish? Do you want holders to sell because you care about their financial well-being? Or maybe you're just having a laugh, after spending years researching everything about Link. Sold at $30 but still sit here 24/7 fudding? Are you really having fun?

>>53992840
>5 years ago the space was an opaque graveyard
it still is
>You've moved onto pointing out undelivered tech which is fine and something I hold the team accountable for too
thanks for agreeing with me I guess
>but separate to the point I addressed.
It is the same exact issue, failure to deliver and fruitless connections.
>but it's safe to assume you probably had higher hopes for LINK and its performance
so did you
>I'm not one of the anons who will tell you I know a LINK price explosion is coming, and admit I was surprised by performance from August 2020 to date, but that's the truth.
No genuine conversation can be had if you continuously refuse to accept that LINK has objectively failed across every metric.
>>53992849
yes

>>53980569
I sold some at $ 38 and I'm holding the rest I give 0 fucks, bears laugh at hodlers but the reality is that most bears are poor bitter fucks

>>53992903
yep, all bitter fucks, imagine holding 0 links like that guy, then spend 2 whole days debating that link is shit

>>53980695
>I-it's not a loss if you don't sell
>I don't care about paper losses
>I don't care about oppurtunity cost
Lol, lmao

>>53982193
Yeah, the problem with your theory is that Link isn't Bitcoin.

>>53992840
>equally impressive achievements to the breadcrumbs you pointed out have been made since
name one
protip; you can't

>>53992554
>if/when SWIFT falls apart
if you think this is still an option at this point you really are a paid fudder, nobody can deny the swift connection anymore
do you really think anyone that is still holding or bought back in since june is going to be swayed by your emotional outbursts here

>crabbing pre-market
even the most normie redditors are interpreting the tweets so why won't a bigger whale than the shorters start buying yet

>>53993353
Oh no. When did they find her?

>>53980569
I don’t know but i really fucking regret not selling.

>>53993402
she goes by her real name on tiktok/insta, the pic is from her linkedin

>>53992854
>chainlink failed to deliver
>chainlink has fruitless connections
>i sold it all
but somehow i still care about it, and i want to post about it every day, and debate for days non stop.

lmao you fucking nigger, it's the holders problem if they deliver or not, it's not your problem anymore go touch grass or fuck a goat

>>53993443
Although I find failure to acknowledge opp cost in your situation delusional and unwise, I agree with you and others here about there being obvious psychological reasons compelling this kind of fud, eg lost their LINK, bitter about LINK performance, regret not selling etc. Not the healthiest cope choice for them. The "I'm just here to laugh" or "this is just really fun teasing you guys" stuff does not stack up to their actions, especially not when the starting point is so unreasonable they pretend they can't even fathom something positive or impressive about LINK. Literally laughable

>>53980569
I'm happily holding LINK and ORE. Both are my top web3 projects

>>53993353
oh shit i thought i was in /BBBY/

>>53993524
well they arn't gonna tell you the truth right? the fact they just endeavor into fudding link for this long and with that much of insistance, just either shows they are mentally ill, or they are financially motivated the mentally ill part i doubt. i think that they are paid pajeets by competing projects like API3 or pyth or by VCs like jump or whatever the fuck OR another theory is, the WEF guys don't want us into their club, let's not forget that the ICO was closed; and the people behind link are very powerful people. why would they want us to hold it, if you look at the onchain stats, ull notice that chainlink has a weird token distribution, very few wallets own 90%+ of the supply, this means that we somehow got into their club, and they want us to give up before they unveil everything, and they are suppressing it on purpose delaying the success ofl link just so we fuck off.
we will never give up.

>>53980695
Imagine reading the whole cope

>>53980569
Kek, Quantum threat is coming and fags are talking about selling LINK. Get your asses on Quantum resistant blockchain before the emergence of quantum computer.

>>53993408
I dont fucking care, I'd keep coping new coins. I'm definitely not sleeping on the ID management projects.

>>53993633
Doubt it's paid pajeets. They have too clear and accumulated a grasp on LINK lore and history. They are literally burned and/or former holders, many of whom like green id itt probably had way too much riding on it. I've had a miserable few years holding it so I can empathise but it's still pathetic stuff. Idk about the rest of the schizo shit you posted tho

>>53993524
most of the fudders either never bought despite knowing about link since 2017 or sold for a pathetic 2x or 3x and both groups are scared shitless that link will pump again in the next cycle or even on its own, they are scared that it won't tho if they actually decide to buy and scared that it will if they don't, they are stuck in constant fear and dillema, that's why you see them fudding 24/7, they hope someone will counter their fud and spoonfeed them so they feel safe buying back or buying for the first time, they desperately want some reassurance in either direction, they can't take it any longer, that's why they are more and more aggressive each month, it's psychology 101

I hope none of you fuckers buy a single token, I want you to be all smug just as you are right now, but in a year or two you will be the ones crying into your pillow at night with the gut wrenching feeling of having go to work 6 hours later for mr shekelberg, while all the "autists who got lucky and didn't deserve it" will live stress free lives you'll never have

>>53993816
>They have too clear and accumulated a grasp on LINK lore and history
this, their listing of every little detail regarding possible partners ever discussed here is way too serious
they know more about it then i do and claim to be here only for laughs which is a pretty ridiculous proposition

>>53993978
did people really forgot the concept of a suicide stack
if that was the case go anymore from 5 to 50% in link with the rest in eth
the people who never bought in 2017 or sold too early should be ecstatic about the current prices at which they can buy in not this fudding
i still stand by my earlier point these are people that lost it all on cefi the past year despite knowing about links inevitable rise and are of course bitter to no end

>>53993978
>link will pump again in the next cycle
you nignog. do you actually studied the cycle before. LINK literally underperformed compared to every new on the block, hot VC backed project.
thats why it stalled out at 50 bucks like a bitch riding the general btc run up wave. now they started all the tiktok marketing, so you could argue Adelyn is responsible for not riding this project into 3 digits years ago.

this project is just a disaster and accumulated all this baggage at this point. sergey doesnt care about his most loyal stewards for the project, actually going mentally ill going into the 6th year now. every bagholder is like a fuse thats about to go off. these energy leaks through the community, through the company, and it most definitely leaks to proposed new ''dumb'' money that would be put off by this undefined history
if you propose another cycle it will without a doubt favor fresh off the press projects again

its like HR hiring the more optimistic, more open, more engaging grad instead of the jaded guy thats more qualified on paper
there isnt an investment thesis or edge to be made for the link token anymore to bet on

>>53993978
also stop telling anons to wait another year
marines tell this since
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023

there are kids browsing here actually believing this fairytale, and therefore putting off doing a trade or a university degree.
you ruining lives, think again before you post next time

>>53984781
No. Sergey has been selling LINK OTC all this time, probably to SWIFT and the like. Can you imagine if he was actually market dumping this on binance? The price would collapse to 10 cents with how much he's sold.

>>53994186
>holy mother of projection
this type of seething bitterness over link is only found here of all place, i wonder why
on twitter, where fudders cant hide in anon, it isnt there, og holders here dont have it cause they understand link and are in profit
so who are you, i advise you to look to me post one up for that

Biggest mistake of my life. I was so delusional

>>53980569
I sold all, bought car and started coding. It's good to be a developer

Stop reminding me lol, I could've cashed out 500k and bought a house and lived my dream of making art all day for the rest of my life, and getting a wife too. Could've done that in May 2021 right before the bubble burst. Instead I've been stuck with my parents until then lol. Got 50k now, this shit can't moon quickly enough.

My biggest problem is I didn't factor in how bad my lifestyle would have been if it crashed (which it did of course).

>>53992903
Never too late to get back to it, preferably an AI and ID management project.

>>53980569
I sold earlier than that, I am currently enjoying my gains from RAIL.

>>53980816

>>53981206
You could be happier now investing in lowcaps. I got some privacy alts and I have been happier.

>>53994247
what are you even talking about.
basically everyone capitulated on link already
what exactly do you, and OGs <<understand>> about link?

lets say they some how got in below 1USD, 600% return in 6 years with a complete blindsight regarding what the future possibly offers
do you call this having control over this situation
just read this thread, every OG is hating their life for not cashing in their 6 and 7 figures, and are back to 5 figs

>>53994258
Some trendy cryptos are now the real deal, ENS ORE and ROSE.

>>53994890
getting desperate
>basically everyone capitulated on link already
>lets say they some how got in below 1USD
absolute hilarious claims that show you have to go back immediately

linkniggers tongue my anus

>>53981206
Hey poorfag, getting your ass on a quantum resistant hybrid blockchain could make you rich. Imagine fucking trannies at no cost.

>>53994288
What a juicy pussy life you've got after the release of the documentation and the first smart contract sample for the most used programming language worldwide, JavaScript by the quantum resistant hybrid blockchain.

>>53980569
Didn't have any

>>53995412
>>53995467
good morning and thank you sirs i have now boughted 100k !!!

>>53983594
As long as you're happy and I am happy that's fine. DiD management projects are top on my list.

>ITT angry cuckolds holding a premined shitcoin that didn't make them rich

>>53980569
I thought prices wouldn't crash until Fall. LINK just crashed early. I sold at around $30.

>>53980816
>Still has over $2M

Congrats on making it but you should have at least taken some profits

>>53994890
Why are you so poor? Back to 5 figures? Lol?

>>53996253
i wont settle for less than 100M$

pee pee poo poo