/biz/ - Business & Finance

The reprint their cards and aren't trust worthy

>>53475317
They got caught lying about how many cards the print?
If only this shit was on the blockchain it would verifiable

>>53475317
No I just meant is the stock gonna keep dipping and dipping?

>>53475243
It sounds like they think hasbro stock will rise, but they cut the price they think it will rise to.
I'm not sure I agree with them.

Their general plan with wizards of the coast appears to be to just fleece/scalp their customers with new products and fees. It might work if wizards is the only company that can produce competent tcg and traditional rpg games, but the market feels saturated. Pissing off and bankrupting older players/collectors who are nostalgic for the IPs while raising prices for younger players or mod developers is a risky tactic. Boom or bust?

>>53475348
No, there are old cards that are worth a lot of money because they've never been reprinted in newer sets. They also have a prominent employee, mark rosewater, who promised or kinda-sorta promised, that they'd never be reprinted. This created a huge secondary market for collectors. Some of these cards are worth well over $10k. They have recently begun reprinting a few of the cards that mark rosewater said wouldn't be reprinted. This represents a potentially humongous threat to the collector community.

A company that can produce great games and utilizes the blockchain would be tremendous.

>>>/tg/87537005

Anon claims Disney is going to buy Hasbro, but is probably a shitposting faggot.

>>53476146
Fuck the Reserve List and fuck scammy collectors and speculators

>>53476609
Yeah, that's what hasbros betting on
We'll see if it works

>>53476570
Is there any legitimacy to this? Hasbro makes the figures and toys for Star Wars, Marvel and Indiana Jones. The only IP’s of value they’d get by purchasing Hasbro are transformers and DnD, the former of which is just kind of okay and the latter nearly being torpedoed by hasbro’s greed and giving way to dozens of dnd like games that could surpass it.

Isn’t it theoretically more beneficial for Disney to just keep Hasbro how it is?

>>53477178
I have no clue. A Google search doesn't produce any recent results. It wouldn't surprise me though.

Could explain the deeper underlying reason for the WOTC/Alta Fox thing.

>>53477212
What’s the Alta fox thing? Also I don’t really think there is a deeper underlying reason for the WotC thing aside from money and boosting revenue.

>>53476917
In full disclosure, I only say that because when I was 10 my mom threw out a Mox Pearl and a Mox Sapphire without asking me when we moved so I'm extremely salty about it.

>>53477301
I can't decide whether it's better to concede anything ever on 4chan, or to just double down on in a batman gambit to troll. The relative anonymity and the nature of arguement make it a tough call

>>53475243
Anyone know how much it would cost to buy the Hanazuki IP from Hasbro? or a specific generation of the MLP IP?

>>53475243
I hate Hasbro.

>>53477916
you sound like you don’t belong here and should leave

>>53478606
No. I don't think I will.

>>53477301
I can't decide whether it's better to concede anything ever on 4chan, or to just double down on in a batman gambit to troll. The relative anonymity and the nature of arguement make it a tough call

>>53478606
Sneed

>>53478118
>a specific generation of the MLP IP?
There were some estimations, maybe around $100mln if you intend to buy it.
But then you can negotiate to release it into the public domain, this will drop the price significantly as it will allow Hasbro to reuse it in any future works (which will not be in public domain).

>>53475944
Nerf or nothing bro, it's coming back