/biz/ - Business & Finance

cool. what happened to reputation.link? the site is down for me

>>53316106
I'm not sure buddy, maybe they're working on it?

>>53316179
what would you know about work?

>>53316092
i too am a fellow very happy holder of this overvalued ponzi coin with no purpose that i cannot unstake for 2 years. i am overjoyed with the price falling 91%

>>53316189
If you work less than 100 hours a week lower your tone when talking to me

>>53316215
>third ID ITT
shitposting is not work wagie

>>53316092
Hey me too!
Its been the best investment Ive ever made and has years of additional value capture ahead
Looking forward to it!

>>53316308
Good to hear friend, there are only a few thousand of us holding four to five figure stacks of Link tokens, it's important to encourage one another from time to time given all of the unfortunate friends who lost their funds with Bancor, Celsius, Nexo or even FTX. Poor guys, they should have had more faith in Sergey and waited for official staking.

>>53316199
>i am overjoyed with the price falling 91%
well i'm not too stoked about that part
but CCIP and DECO make me optimistic

>>53316308
>>53316690
I'll second that.. I'm delighted with my purchases of Chainlink and I even staked them all in last year's Community Staking Pool. With such turbulent economic times coming, it's a great feeling to know I'm well-invested in bullet-proof, future-proof tech built just for the transformation we're about to see. I count myself lucky to have been around at the right time for it.

>>53316092
>Shipping Stables

what does that even mean? I hate how software faggots need to always use some gay lingo.

>Can you spin up a database quick?
>Any important artifacts from your scrum?

>>53316753
Anon, it means they're moving stablecoins between different blockchains using CCIP. Perhaps you would be more comfortable investing in a different asset class if this "lingo" is not your cup of tea, as it is very important for us to due our due diligence and know what we're holding for such long term, fundamental value based investments.

>>53316753
fo real i dont get none of this shit just post mor dem frog pics that lil nigga funny af 100

I oft find myself giggle out of the jolly feeling that thinking CCIP makes me have. IY know YK

No one IRL wants to use a single blockchain for any real application. It’s definitely going to be invaluable to move shitcoins between a bunch of blockchains. How exciting and useful!

Web3 just gets more and more increasingly convoluted. Imagine if every website you wanted to go to you had to install a new application or buy a new shitcoin

>>53317267
>Web3 just gets more and more increasingly convoluted. Imagine if every website you wanted to go to you had to install a new application or buy a new shitcoin
That's literally what CCIP fixes

>>53317267
>he doesn't know Chainlink is going to seamlessly integrate web2 with web3
>he doesn't know chainlink is going to seamlessly integrate SWIFT's 11,000 members banks onto a single interoperability layer that allows them to connect to all blockchains
>he doesn't know about the digital dollar pilot working with banks that were at Smart Contract Summit
>he doesn't know

Oh my!

>>53316092
I too bought back in 2017 and am happy with my investment. I really hope everyone on this board is able to meet their financial goals this year and refresh mentally. I am excited for the future!

>>53316092
https://twitter.com/0xSwish/status/1615378100770017281

> It's real

nice

>>53317319
Bump

>>53317319
I have read several threads in which anons have unequivocally stated none of these things are going to happen, and if they are going to happen then there is no way that could lead to appreciation of the chainlink token

>>53317406
That's interesting anon, guess I will just have to hold my Link tokens and keep up with the project to see what happens - this has seemed to be a reasonable investment strategy so far(holding, not selling).