/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>53104705
Doesn't makes me laugh anymore, I could have sold the top and become a landlord

>>53104705
i guess people are getting bored at home and their peers told them to stop talking about their bags, so they post bagholder delusions and get dinged for it

well, bagholders claim that the nonstop negativity is caused by paid fudders, therefore is bullish, so I'm doing my best to reaffirm their delusions

We're laughing at you retard. Enjoy bagholding. Honestly bagholding should be a bannable offense because this board is neigh unusable with how many mentally ill losers cope and sneed about their worthless investments and flawed analysis.

>>53104717
>>53104733
>>53104738
>>53104739

Bitcoin ‘destroys’ Nigeria’s currency

Read more:

https://twitter.com/wallForYou2017/status/1609895470494789632

>>53104705
Feel free to follow linkdrake777, chainlinkgod.eth and danthehopiumgod if you want positive only cultivated sentiment. WAGMI marines! Wen staking!

>>53104750
i wish i could read less

For our little fuddy friends. Daily reminder that while you're fudding, I'm earning Link by doing nothing at all. Even while I sleep and you seethe, my 9 wallets are clocking up Link tokens. Just imagine what they'll be worth when tokenomics kicks in! Oh my! How does this make you feel?

>>53104705
>>53104717
>>53104733
>>53104738
>>53104739
>>53104753
>mentally ill discord fags spend their time spamming biz with link fud 24/7
>yes, even on christmas, new years, etc
>claim that it isnt important / they don't care about it
i'd be more worried if the third-worlders stopped spamming biz with unconvincing garbage begging me to sell
t. 21k staked across 3 wallets

>>53105280
>i'd be more worried
kek there it is like clockwork
you're welcome little buddy

>>53105280
>yes, even on christmas, new years
This is the funniest part.

These supposed "multimillionaire" uncleoldfag schiff michael chainshit chainlink labs employee sirgay nastyslob fudders quite literally kept spamming about Chainlink details during Christmas Eve AND during New Years Eve.

>>53104705
maybe because link holders feel betrayed by Chainlink Labs treating them like crap and dumping on them?

>>53105012
>>53105280
your the worst kind of human, fuck off.

>>53104705
Chainlink needs to die.

>>53104738
It's hard to decide whether to troll them by making them think you're a paid fudder and furthering them down the rabbit hole in their descent to insanity, or laugh at how retarded they are when posting in link threads.
>imagine thinking people on 4chan need to be paid to laugh at cocky retards and enjoy schadenfreude
>imagine looking at XRP and GME schizo cope about paid fud which everyone can see is obviously not true and yet willingly walking down the same path

>>53105321
>>53105338
>immediately triggered and on their 50th + posts today about link, the token they pretend isnt important
i'll say it again
21k staked across 3 wallets
how does this make you feel?

>>53105372
>i'll say it again
could you say it one more time pls?

>>53105387
of course, my linguistically challenged friend
21k
across 3 wallets
still - that's 21k that wasn't going to get sold, no matter how much you begged or seethed about it
do you understand now? or do you need to go get your handler to translate this into the language that you speak at home?

>>53105372
kys

>>53105280
>he thinks people here would rather linkies sell than stake them and get the entertainment of missing another bull run
Staking was the best thing to ever happen since it makes the cognitive dissonance here go off the chart since everyone knows you can't sell. Yet you use the same cope of
>they want me to sell my link
Even though it's funnier knowing you can't sell and that this was the 'staking' that people have been waiting for here since 2019.

>>53105399
ooh boy that's a lot of money!
>go get your handler to translate
apologies for poor english
unfortunately yes sirs, my bulgarian handler is greatly displeased at my body of work :(
does this post make you bullish anon? :)

>>53105403
>KILL YOURSELF FOR HOLDING / STAKING LINK
>STOP POSTING ABOUT STAKING STOP IT STOP IT STOP IT

>>53105417
sirs are u ok?

>>53105417
I'm just wondering why someone so poor is also so smug. Kinda odd for a third world trashcan to act like that lol.

>>53105417
not for holding, that's your loss. it's for coming here and posting that for us. no one cares fuck off with your stake rewards that you cant claim anyway.

>>53105412
>"c-cope" he says while raging at people for staking
how many link fud threads have you made today?
do you actually think anyone believes the shit you write or do you just go for sheer volume because you have nothing else?
>>53105413
it unironically does
if link wasnt important - i wouldn't have actual subhumans trying to part me from my tokens

these dumb niggers just can't help themselves
all the (you)s i could ever want now
all i have to do is mention how much i have staked and look at how fixated they are

>>53105452
>it unironically does
again, you're welcome little buddy!
now if could also market buy some link + proof with timestamp to cement your conviction and own the paid fudders that would be glorious

>>53105452
Why are you, a third world sack of cells, posting on this website 24 hours a day trying to seek validation for your poor decision making?
It's really odd and frankly pathetic, you're a loser lol and i'm happy that you'll never breed KEK.

>>53105419
>>53105431
>>53105438
LOOK AT THEM GO
tell you what
the first one to make a long-winded post in your best English openly and honestly begging me for my linkies will get a single chainlink token if they provide a legitimate wallet address
how does that sound?

>>53105474
>Y-YOU'RE A LOSER YOU'RE PATHETIC FOR HOLDING / BUYING LINK
>ONLY I CAN POST ABOUT LINK 24/7

>>53105460
only when you make that post begging me for my linkies in >>53105484 like you've been told to do
(plus how would i buy more link if I'm already 100% all-in link anyway, idiot)

>>53105506
you can't afford to buy $10 worth of link?

>>53105484
>>53105492
This is what I mean, you're an unhinged baggie and it's hilarious watching you rage lol. In 10 minutes you'll be up to 20 rage posts and you'll still be just as poor, kinda odd but have fun!

>>53105506
>8 posts

Jfc this linkie is so triggered if people even post the slightest amount of criticism lmao. The 90% dump has done a number on him

>>53105509
>NOOO I'M NOT MAD YOU'RE MAD
lmao just bail on the thread and go make another fud thread
go on
i'm having fun here
>>53105508
my conditions in >>53105484 are very simple and clear
start begging

>>53105532
>start begging
but you can't sell since you've all-in'd on staking?
sirs I'm confused here

>>53105522
>w-well if you make any more than 5 posts about a token you own while making fun of third-worlders you must be absolutely UNHINGED
uh huh lets just keep pretending that you havent switched ids a couple times now (probably)

Everyone here owns Link and is a Twitter user.

>>53105539
21k =/= my entire stack
but anyways, no more attempts at deflection by you
start begging
or just bail and go make more fud threads about this allegedly unimportant token

>>53105417
Just from your 21k staked you had unrealized losses of nearly a million dollars, and your 21k staked is barely cracking 6 figures. You're smug about this fact. Lol, lmao

>>53105553

>>53105574
>start begging
but I don't what your tokens sirs, all I want from you is to market buy 10 bucks
sounds like you can't even do that lol

>>53105581

>>53105584

>>53105574
stop discussing with nolinkers and brainlets and let's talk over here for real

>>53105599

>>53105577
>switches ids
>b-but if you had perfect hindsi-ACK
nah, I'm up quite a lot and still happy about it - life-changing money, and definitely make-it money in whatever shithole you live in
>>53105582
>NOOOO i don't want to beg j-just do this thing i ask
nope
plus if you weren't a complete retard you would understand that you could just look up my wallet from the transaction to see how much I actually have
if you would just stop pretending you have dignity and BEGGED like you've been commanded to instead of deflecting
how close are you to running away and making a new fud thread?

>>53105607

>>53105625

>>53105632

>>53105621
holy shit ngl I ain't reading all this lol
fyi, typing all this unhinged drivel makes you look like an seething retard lmao
I asked you a very simple thing, prove your conviction by market buying some stinkers right now, all you're doing is sperging out with deluded projections kek
the state of the bagholders rn

>>53105651
>holy shit ngl I ain't reading all this lol
>fyi, typing all this unhinged drivel makes you look like an seething retard lmao
>I asked you a very simple thing, prove your conviction by market buying some stinkers right now, all you're doing is sperging out with deluded projections kek
>the state of the bagholders rn

>>53105678
I thought I was bulgarian not a jeet? :(

>>53105651
>more deflection
>ngl fyi rn
>still no begging like he has been told to do
i accept your graceless concession
i bet you're gonna be seething EXTRA hard in your next few dozen fud threads

>>53105686
>I thought I was bulgarian not a jeet? :(

>>53105693
oooh yes sirs, my entire village in plondiv AND my cousins in mumbai (half bulgo-half indian no cap fr fr) are absolutely seething rn

>>53105452
Zero threads.
Believe? All I have to do is point out objective facts. There's nothing to believe or disbelieve.
Raging at people for staking. The only thing I'm raging at is it being capped so low. Would be hilarious to see every single link locked up desu.
>all i have to do is mention how much i have staked and look at how fixated they are
Obviously a ton of people here are going to laugh at you after five years of having to endure link on /biz/ and the amount you get laughed at is going to be directly correlated to the amount of link staked.

>>53105646

On my last day in the other room, did they come into my room when those loud people showed up next door? It seems weird that the last two things I ate would have been poisoned while none of the others were, and the first of the two was what I ate exactly as they were showing up with their noises.

>>53105717
sirs...

>>53105707
>s-see my sarcasm? t-this means I-I don't care anymore
don't you have a quota to be making for fud threads about a token you don't hold or care about? come on now, you've already been shat on here - get back to work

>>53105717

>>53105743
no we have very flexible guidelines sirs
are you going to market buy some linkies or not?

>>53105607
>>53105625
>>53105646
>>53105744
can you fucking stop? your ruining the thread.

>>53105710
>a-all i have to do is point out objective facts sirs
>i have to point them out 24/7, even on holidays
>i-it would be so funny if all of the tokens were staked sir i would not be upset at all

>>53105740

>>53105740
>>53105761

>>53105012
you are earning link tokens that further sink to 0 value. while sergey dumps on you and big early stake whales dump on you. great job idiot

>>53105756
>15 pbtid
rent free buddy

>>53105756
>i-i don't want to b-beg sirs pls
sorry retard, that's exactly what you're gonna do if you want any kind of transaction history out of me
and as i said i'm already maxed out on fiat for link this cycle (which i'm pretty sure i said twice previously but you're pretty retarded so)

>>53105744

>>53105756
Holy fuck fudders are so retarded and cringe
Why would buying $10 link prove anything when he has 21 thousand staked? I promise you that you will be found, abducted, and pickled in my minecraft basement out of spite one day just because you're that much of a dumb animal.

>>53105819
but I don't want your tokens
why do you insist on begging me to buy your bags lmao
>Why would buying $10 link prove anything
oh it would prove absolutely nothing, I just find the idea of someone buying link right now absolutely hilarious and I want a screencap for 2023 so I can keep laughing at it in the future

>>53104705
The fud is at ath. Im getting link fud on discussions that have nothing to do with link

>>53105793
That sounded really unconvincing lolol
Cheers for the advice, champ. I'll be sure to toast your good health as I partake of the fine dining in whichever classy hotel I check into first x

>>53105880
>he's so retarded and his reading comprehension skills are so bad that he thinks I'm trying to get him to "buy" my bags when i told him i'd give him a single link token for FREE if he dropped the pretenses and just begged
you're literally too dumb to respond to basic points in this conversation - i guess you always were
do yourself a favor just stick to being the guy that copy-pastes templates from the fud discord - this reactive posting thing has not worked out well for you at all

>>53105980
>this reactive posting thing has not worked out well for you at all
but you keep responding?

>>53104705
>positive posts get lots of (you)s arguing with it most the time
Yeah the fudders get pretty damn triggered if you post anything even tangentially positive.

I love posting a single positive thing and then watching the (You) counter go up.

>>53105880
>3 hurs and 16 pbtid in a Link thread
>"but I don't want your tokens"

That's like staring at my groin for three hours and then saying "but I don't want to suck your dick".

>>53106012
ikr? doesn't it make you bullish?

>>53105989
>but you kept dumpstering me and making me look like a retard?
yes
if i see a cockroach i feel compelled to spray it / stomp it as well
same kind of thing

>>53106050
but you still can't afford to market buy 10 bucks worth of LINK?
doubt

>>53104738
>bagholders claim that the nonstop negativity is caused by paid fudders
It is. As proven by the fact that paid fudders infested /biz/ just as badly even when Link was booming.

>>53105363
Spot on. It's only slows left, that's the thing. That's why real conversations about LINK's prospects ends in avoidance. Poking at them as they fulfill their destiny as the next batch of miserable rambling fucking bagholding lunatics is all that's left. The bullshit they tell themselves won't last another 3 years.

How the fuck did this thread prove OP right and make absolutely no attempt to hide it. Fucking lol

This is absolutely deranged

>>53106088
so aren't you feeling extremely bullish?

>>53105363
>>53106090
People who believe the "paid fudders and bulgarian trannies" are mentally retarded niggers.

They'd fit in well in every crypto reddit community, every single one of them believes there are paid FUDDERS trying to steal their bags. What's even more pathetic is OGs with huge stacks believing that bullshit

>>53106090
I'm willing to bet you had a miserable childhood. Am I right?

>>53106068
>out of context - brings up that he still thinks that i should buy a mere $10 worth of link it will do... something?
>still doesn't beg me for a single free link like he's been told to
it's obvious that you're cornered with nothing else to say
so - be honest for once and just beg me for linkies, of which you will get a single one - or just admit that you're out of here with your tail between your legs to make another fud thread

on a side-note i liked guy's idea actually >>53105870
i wonder how many fudders will get disappeared by bored and wealthy linkies once the network matures

>>53105957
basementdwelling stinklinkers are scared of hotels. you just sit in momas basement and pretend on the internet

>>53106124
Like I said, the things they say will lose their sheen eventually. Most of the salt has come from bagholders who have had an epiphany, or changed perspectives after the last 2 years. Whoever's left are slows, low iq.

>>53106150
Great childhood. Still close with my family.
Fwiw, I've had many attempts at worthwhile conversations about what the last 2 years and macro outlook means for the realistic bounds of LINK's prospects. There is nothing left anymore except fingers in ears "I can't hear you" tier cope. They'll catch up eventually but that's the whole point of bagholders. They're the idiots left holding the bags after everyone else already left. Poking fun or feeding the fantasy constantly shoved in your face is fairly effective and could be perceived as doing these idiots a favour.

>>53104717
Glad it didn’t. Fuck you faggot for even want to be that.

>>53106261
>Most of the salt has come from bagholders who have had an epiphany,
Then explain the massive fud campaign between 2018 and mid-2020.

>>53106328
Well, the ZC hitpiece was real, that much is known. But the idea anything that happened before the past 2 years of underperformance is mutually exclusive to the idea that bagholders have become dejected in droves since would be wrong. As a general rule, I think it's wise to steer clear of beliefs that, as the other anon said, are the habit of the likes of XRP et al nutcases. Supposing there must be a neverending fud campaign which has now extended over 4 years apparently is one such belief.

>>53106153
it will make me laugh anon
tell me, are you feeling bullish?

>>53106387
>The third world link trashcan you're responding to can't afford a $10 purchase.

>>53106261
So, how many Link tokens do you own?

As LINK price PLUMMETS back to the $3-4 CRAB, chainlinkneetfags start to COLLECTIVELY LOSE THEIR MINDS. Starting to believe in bots, discord trannies and other conspiracies, as if the whole world is conspiring to get their 5-dollar, -90% in one year, rank-25 functionless shitcoin.
LINK seems to attract the same populace that RUBIC does. Jaded, excluded, uneducated NEETs that are full of themselves, quickly swayed by a chronically underperforming shitcoin promising "true utility". They empathise with the coin on a deeper level. They believe that, just as this incredible hidden gem of a coin hasn't yet pumped, their own lives haven't really begun yet. Truth is, neither them, nor their favourite coin will ever amount to anything. They don't get results not because other people are too dumb to realise the value presented to them; but because there is no value there to begin with. They will never sell, because selling means acknowledging this excruciatingly painful fact on a personal level.
By the next bullrun, linkies will be confined to their single schizo thread, completely removed from reality. LINK is the next XRP, LINK is the next Star Citizen. A piece of rotting bread thrown at outcasts starved of hope.

>>53106473
hey there, since the other seething baggie is performing all kind of mental gymnastics to avoid buying a symbolic amount of $10 worth of linkies I wanted to ask if you are perhaps up for the task?
>"b-b-but what would that accomplish, s-s-seething bulgarian trannie?"
I hear you say, well it will prove a couple of things:
>you're not a paid pajeet shill but an actual human being invested in LINK
>prove your conviction about your investment and giving you a chance to boast in the future in case you are right
>provide top tier comedy for me in case you're wrong which I will repost in a year from now in every /biz/ YLYL or loss porn threads
you literally can't lose, it's a win-win for you, what do you think

yay a new link thread
boy I missed those

>>53106372
So you can't explain it.

Between 2018-2020 the fud was at least as bad as it is today, fudders would fill entire threads with 50pbtid arguing how Link's partnerships are "fake", just to give an example.
Just like now.
Nothing is different.

Fudders using all kinds of jewish psyops to ruin this board. Disgusting.

thats RIGHT, fudsisters
NO ONE CARES ABOUT LINK
and we have to make threads about it 24/7 to tell everyone that
NO ONE is paying us - we do this for free
chainlink is UNIMPORTANT - which is why we have to make so many threads about it
and uh... yeah lets go with the made-up wallet stats
maybe these stupid chainlinkers will give up and sell their staked tokens if we post these

alright guys great work
lets meet in the usual channel to come up with our next strategy to stick it to these CHAINSHITTERS in 5 minutes!!!

>>53106603
You have to understand how weird it looks to everyone else that you even think there's something to explain desu.
Like what alternative universe would you expect normal people not to post negatively about link in 2023 given staking is out already?
The sheer amount of money the company raised with dumps vs the questionable hiring practices and lack of technical progress with CCIP and such really just fuel the fire. It deserves to be shit on. The negative posting reflects the reality.
If anything it should be more negative from stakers since they need to get the message through to the company that they have to do better.

>>53105214
What if there was a telegram where you had to verify with your metamask that you own at least 1k link to participate in chat, while keeping the wallet address private from other chat participants.

>>53107504
Why does the company need to do better? They owe us nothing, we haven't invested into their stock, we've bought their token.

>>53106535
I don't understand what any of that meant. Was it fud? Also, how many Link do you own?

>>53107927
if they want to continue selling their tokens they will have to appease the angry mob they created, else they will scare off any new potential investor

>>53107927
Correct.
Unrelated to token price I think if you were to relay the current status of Chainlink in general to anyone 1 year or more ago they would not find the progress they've made impressive. Especially given the amount of funding and their monopoly position.

>>53108700
But why do they need to have impressive progress? Why does it matter to you? You never look at the progress of other projects like ADA, ICP, HBAR or others, your only focus is on chainlink.

>>53108739
>whatabout
>whatabout
>whatabout
ok baggie

>>53108582
This is true.
No one owes chainlink anything and the crypto community at large has known that for half a decade. Any new potential investor that does their due diligence is going to quickly find out the token is nothing more than a gofundme token and sergey has dumped more than 5 billion usd worth and still has basically nothing to show for it. No one owes sergey anything and he's going to be met with this reality very soon as the price continues to dump and he has to sell even more tokens to keep up with what he is accustomed to getting in return for his useless tokens creating a negative feedback loop that will drive link baggies to the deepest depths of insanity.

>>53109052
hypercriticism of chainlink is the most boring FUD there is on /biz/. They can do fuck all for the next two years and I'll still be insanely bullish. Does that upset you?

>>53109077
You're a brainlet and it's hilarious to watch you squirm trying desperately to type a coherent sentence.

Can you guys just stfu seriously this is my job you arseholes

there is a thread and I am upset
I wish the nervous bagholders and the one buttblasted hater that fills their threads with replies would go away

>>53108739
I would indirectly make money if Chainlink did well in various ways. Even more generally, if 1k eoy actually happened the knock on effect for eth and others would be huge.
>You never look at the progress of other projects like ADA, ICP, HBAR
There's no substance to those really except maybe in theory ICP, but it's just not relevant to crypto as a whole like link is.
ADA especially just sucked up dead money last bull run and was an even bigger joke than I could have imagined. As much as I hate Charles and think the project is a joke, I actually thought when they released the hark fork that would supposedly enable dapps in Sept 2021 we might get a bunch of redditors buying into a bunch of new pump and dump shitcoins on there for a month or so and be able to make some quick money. But it was so bad that they couldn't even run a dex. All those years and poor choices like using some modified version of Bitcoin's UTXO to end up flopping that spectacularly is a good example of what a joke crypto has become.

>>53109077
nobody is stopping you, in fact you should buy more if you think the situation will improve. not everyone sees it like that though. it's essentially a startup with almost limitless funding. instead of putting all of his focus on the problem at hand, the founder instead siphoned off over half a billion dollars for himself, that's like a $100MM salary. i think that says a lot about where the priorities lie nowadays

>>53109077
checked. I have a lot of Link and have held since 2017. These posts >>53108582 >>53109052
are drivel and in no way represent the sentiment of anyone except fud merchants.

>>53105280
You are a fucking moron

>>53109098
You seem angry? Does the fact that I can't sell my chainlink tokens make you even more angry?

>>53109218
no one owed sergey anything and the token isn't needed
thanks for proving that this undeniable truth upsets you for the 19th time today =^)

>>53109258
no one owes sergey anything and the token isn't needed
thanks for proving that this undeniable truth upsets you for the 19th time today =^

>>53109282
Does this image fill you with uncontrollable rage?

>>53109336
no one owes sergey anything and the token isn't needed
thanks for proving that this undeniable truth upsets you for the 20th time today =^)

look at this nigga spamming lmao it's hilarious how the fudders call us angry and emotional but it never takes long before they start seething

>>53109571
>more cope
that's funny because
no one owes sergey anything and the token isn't needed
thanks for proving that this undeniable truth upsets you for the 20th time today =^)

>>53109584
I can give you a linkie if you want, I have so many of them but only if you beg and bark like a dog for them.

>>53109609
no one owes sergey anything and the token isn't needed
thanks for proving that this undeniable truth upsets you for the 21st time today =^)

>>53107890
this is basically that chat. no one can see your wallet address, you get a pseudonym

>>53109642
i like the idea but no one's going to trust that shit until unless it has deco

>>53106487
Probably true.

>>53105417
kek

>>53105012
24 linkies for 7000?

thats RIGHT, fudsisters
NO ONE CARES ABOUT LINK
and we have to make threads about it 24/7 to tell everyone that
NO ONE is paying us - we do this for free
chainlink is UNIMPORTANT - which is why we have to make so many threads about it
and uh... yeah lets go with the made-up wallet stats
maybe these stupid chainlinkers will give up and sell their staked tokens if we post these

alright guys great work
lets meet in the usual channel to come up with our next strategy to stick it to these CHAINSHITTERS in 5 minutes!1

>>53104717
there will be another top retard

Singularity This Year.

>>53105336
>during Christmas Eve AND during New Years Eve.

Yes they were trying to target people who were drunk and or emotional. You are supposed to be with your family and friends during that time. If you are at home on /biz then its probably a depressing time for you for personal reasons. I was with my people during those times.

They need you emotionally distraught in order to get you to sell. I'm not kidding. Its the only thing that overrides the logic and data analysis that culminated over the last nearly 6 years.

They have no other tools to get you to sell your LINK other than convincing you to do so assuming you are holding spot.

>>53106150
Damn you got owned in this thread, loser

>>53107927
This level of cuckoldry is jawdropping. Im speechless every time I see it. Imagine going through life having such low self respect. You disgust me.

>>53109077
>i am proud of being a pushover cuckold

Yikes

>>53104705
If you take a moment to think just how many people got filtered thanks to their greed. Not just the swingies, but also:
>those who lost half their stack on bancor
>those who lost it on celsius and other exchanges
>those who invested on LP instead of LINK

and now we have people who missed out on staking after years of waiting because they stored their wealth on exchanges instead of wallets

would be genuinely surprised if even 10% of the OGs make it at this point
it was decided from the beginning that this was a hold for iron hands and firm believers only

Lol people are still talking about chainlink? I havent been to /biz/ since last year.. I think the crypto bottom is coming in the next 6 months.
Maybe ill rebuy my link when it reaches $2-3

>>53112165
Sure sure

>>53113108
There's literally no point to being on /biz/ when the bullruns not active lmao

>>53106603
>LINK doesn't have a proud self-FUD culture since inception
Kek, dream on idiot. Only "difference" from 2018 to now is there is all the more reason for burned bagholders or former holders to shit on it.

>>53107504
See pic and just shut up already.

>>53114565
>now is there is all the more reason for burned bagholders or former holders to shit on it.
Weird, because fudders were shitting on it just as hard when Link was absolutely booming, pic related.

>>53114720
You've really gone and posted 1 screenshot from 1 anon from 1 thread in 2020 and compared it to 2023 when, over the past 2.5-3.0 years LINK has been losing value to lower risk assets and suggested, in both cases, motivations are more sophisticated than they need to be.

You're built for bagholding, anon.

>>53114763
>1 screenshot
That's just one single example of fud being spammed over the course of months.
It shows some of the key fud points being spammed at the time: fake partnerships, Sergey dumps, "competition", ...

This fud got spammed so hard it even made it into fucking Bloomberg.

>from 1 anon from 1 thread
Legit blind lmao

>>53114720
>being retarded enough to think this contradicts the premise of the very same post you replied to
LINK has had a culture of self-FUD from day 1. I remember it. It was "fun" to fud it to reddit. It was "fun" to "scare the normies". Arrogant wankery. Here we are at $5 5 years later and the same retards are all crying foul.

>>53114794
>JSON parser
>nail salon in SEA
>philosophy phd
>2 man team
>headquartered in XYZ
You're a fucking whore, anon. This was the shit perpetuated by people who themselves held Chainlink in the earliest months of its existence.
LINK has now underperformed the market for half of its own existence and you're pretending this hasn't made any enemies.

>>53114802
>LINK has had a culture of self-FUD from day 1
Then what's the difference with today?
Fud is fud. There certainly isn't any difference in volume or intensity.

>>53114817
Literally only one of your examples is in that screenshot.

The meat of the fud in my pic is fake google pnd, Sergey dumps, fake partnerships, same slides, competition arriving.
Which make up key fud points even to this day.

>>53114802
>>53114845
>There certainly isn't any difference in volume or intensity.
Or even content.

>>53112084
LP rug pulling its investors is the result of the Chainlink network failing to generate growth and adoption...
If it was not for the paid fud showing interest from big hands I would be ultra bearish right now.

>>53114861
>Chainlink network failing to generate growth and adoption...
This has to be the most hilarious thing I'll read all day.

Chainlink is THE most adopted crypto, maybe after ETH in some variables.

>>53114802
>Arrogant wankery. Here we are at $5 5 years later and the same retards are all crying foul.
Exactly.

>>53114845
What is it that you think I believe, anon?

The premise is that either the Bulgarian illuminati is fudding using a legion of paid pajeets or it's just more bored 4chinz losers fudding their own investment, as they've been known to since LINK was first traded. The fact biz has been at this in some form or another since LINK's very inception, and this has been a known thing before any of these recent zoomer copespiracies arose as a means to cope with plummeting from rank 5 to rank 30 over 2-3 years, is objectively relevant.

To those sorry losers holding the bags left bellowing their own shit, maybe not.

>>53114887
>What is it that you think I believe, anon?
That the fud is somehow substantially different because Link's price did poorly.
It's not; the fud was just as bad when Link's price was booming. And back then, the backbone of the fud wasn't just "for fun", it was comprised of genuine attacks against Chainlink, just like today.

>>53114877
Open your eyes:
https://dune.com/gsm/Chainlink

The network is decreasing to the start of 2022 values.
Do you know why Chainlink uses additive numbers with total number of calls instead of real metrics of monthly usage?
Because even with their manipulated metrics you can see it's decreasing...

The network should at least double in usage every year if it's really an innovation, not collapse slowly.

>>53114921
>The network is decreasing to the start of 2022 values.
Because all of crypto is down, you dimwit.

>>53114901
Anon, you epic fucking retard, re-read my very first post: >>53114565

>Only "difference" from 2018 to now is there is all the more reason for burned bagholders or former holders to shit on it.

My entire post is about how it's not at all different to past fud. This was in response to this recent cope that everything is some coordinated campaign that secretly paints your preferred asset in a positive light because it's being gangstalked by the FBI or whatever bullshit you retards are left peddling. You're a retard, anon. The point, obviously lost on you, was the Bulgarian illuminati conspiracies are retarded trash best left to the dregs of XRP generals.

>>53114947
I'm telling the backbone of the fud was never about "le ebin self fud".
It was always as malicious, pervasive, and tenacious.

>>53114924
moving goalposts

Chainlink is not the most adopted crypto when its usage is decreasing and ETH generates magnitudes higher gas fees.

>>53114959
Complete nonsense. The fud is the same as ever, an asset routinely shit on by its own base, just now coloured with the failures of the past 2+ years of underperformance. Yet now these mangled autistics come out of the woodwork supposing it was all coordinated by higher powers so they can go on in their fantasies that they're denied geniuses. Gay. Lame. Fuck off. Put up or shut up.

>>53114968
The goalposts were never moved, Link is still one of the absolute most adopted cryptos in existence, even now with usage being down across the entire industry.

>>53114978
Virtually nothing changed about the fud; it's just as widespread and vicious as it was back when Link was booming.

Literally the only thing that changed is your personal headcanon about why there's so much fud.

>>53114979
because its free. chainlink is the janitor of crypto

>>53114988
>because its free
lol yeah that must be it

>>53114988
also no, it's not free

>>53114988
And I'm pretty sure the actual performance has something to do with it as well.

>>53114984
Retard, listen carefully.
We've been over this point. You're tilting at windmills.
My point is that the FUD is exactly the same as 2018... not that it's different. That is actually the opposite of the point I made.

My point is this recent bullshit about FUD being perpetuated by the Bulgarian illuminati is unnecessary and that LINK has a long culture of fudding its own investment so that "normies" and "redditors", God forbid, drive demand and price upwards. This is the baked-in loser-mentality of the biz bagholder.

>>53115021
You got involved in an argument I was having with someone who said "MOST of the salt" is coming from linkers who got butthurt during the past 2 years.

>>53114992
>>53114999
>>53115003
Oh, look at that, it's been one retarded 19pbtid loser left shilling his own shitty bags this whole time. Would you look at that.
What a gimp.

>>53115035
what?

>>53115003
Haha you BTFO him. I havent read his reply yet but I’m gonna assume its seething.
>>53115035
Yup

there are many geniuses on the team, and the philosophical idea of the implications of their efforts was sold to me by sergey, and i believe it. i have believed it for many years now, and i believe it is amongst the biggest steps towards solving the earth's greatest problems. any sound mind who came to listen and learn will still realize this, and the financial implication of being involved in a scheme as grand will be contemplated, and it is worth putting a sum of our current funny money of today we use into the people who are building the foundation of a new trust.

>>53115035
>agrees fudding your own bags was stupid
>gets flustered when someone shills

What’s your angle here

>>53115040
You're one guy, in here, possible now samefagging given the post above, "fighting the fud" aka denying reality on your own and racking up 20 posts in the process.

It's a simple point that LINK has a proud, self-admitted self-FUD culture extending back to inception and that no Bulgarian pajeet illuminati conspiracies are required to explain why there is negativity hovering over an asset which has overpromised and underperformed for half of its existence. You're in your own deluded fantasy but I guarantee it will soon stale.

>>53115071
You're another example of some weird agenda-pushing baggie insisting that I'm making some point I have not literally made already. My point is straightforward >>53115074

>15 negative posts per shill post
maybe link just sucks
just like ICP, integrate all the services you want but in the end if no one uses it outside of the giant shitcoin casino, it's pointless

>>53115074
Anon, you got involved in an argument I was having with someone who said "MOST of the salt" is coming from linkers who got butthurt during the past 2 years.
If you're saying not much has changed in the fud, then I agree. But that's not the discussion you injected yourself into.

>>53115093
>crypto is a giant shitcoin casino
>therefore Link bad
kek, another classic

>>53115093
>integrate all the services you want but in the end if no one uses it outside of the giant shitcoin casino, it's pointless
The irony of you posting that but not understand what Link is or why it will succeed. Whew.

>>53115094
Conversation as I see it went something like:
>so much fud, must be coordinated
>nah, it's from bagholders
>oh yeah?! well why was it the same in 2018-20?
>thanks for the input, you stupid demented fucking desperate retard, but LINK has always proudly self-fudded and nothing has changed from then til now
It's at this point that I can't even follow the logic of your own retarded replies. How you aren't seeing that the idea of a self-fud anti-normie culture is entirely consistent with the idea of today's salty bagholders is a mystery.

In fact, setting aside what either of us actually attribute any of this to, or where we would place our bets, the point is that no conspiracies are required to explain the persistent negative sentiment surrounding LINK as of today. It has underperformed as long as it has existed. People are shitty, and you can see why without needing to inject forgiving conspiracies into the mix.

>>53115141
You said the fud hasn't changed much since then.
The guy I was arguing with said it has.

You got mixed up into an argument without knowing what it was really about.

>>53115084
Nothing to do with what I said, but ok chief.

>>53115141
I bought some Link earlier today. Are you upset by that? Are you upset I am getting free link everyday for doing absolutely NOTHING?

>>53115256
no fren, from the start, you keep insinuating that the fud is paid and inorganic>>53106088
and only now after several hours of you losing every nuanced argument you've made, you change your point to muh
>fud is the same!!
kek, isn't this entire thread making you all extremely bullish boyos?

>>53115546
9/CZVzIj said the fud didn't change much, and that Link holders hurt themselves by fudding their own bag.
Which is a point I absolutely agree with. The argument is with the people saying the fud is worse today, which it isn't.

>>53115590
>the fud is the same
ok so that means it's bullish right?

>>53115590
The FUD is not the same.

In 2018 is was done in jest. Json parser, address at nail salon etc.
2019/2020 main net came and everyone was blown away. Blown away with partnerships. Blown away when Schmidt came as advisor.
2021 the decline started. It was sti riding the wave of inflated crypto priced but underperformed broad crypto market.
2022 started with big announcement of staking + CCIP, none came, only a half-baked extremely scope-limited and capped staking V0.1 beta, and even that MVP function was only delivered at the very last month.

So 2022 has been a massive, unprecedented loss in trust, momentum, and commitment in the Chainlink team. Overpromised, massively underdelivered, since 2017 chainlink has never looked as bad and untrustworthy as it looks now.

The fact that the big guy cashed out $600mn in his own pockets doesn't look good for the future of this project at all.

>>53115021
>recent point about FUD being perpetuated by the Bulgarian illuminati
The bulgarian meme stems from zeus capital, which did happen. This caused some (a few) people to speculate that nexo is behind the non stop spam fud. Fudders hope that newfags don’t know the history, and appropriate this “bulgarian illuminati” meme to trick them into thinking all link holders are conspiracy theorists.
I also don’t understand how you think it’s impossible that anyone could be paid here when it literally happened in the past (in b4 it was a 1 off)

>>53116081
so all this fud is making you extremely bullish, right?

>>53116103
Nice deflection

>>53116105
>nice deflection
nice deflection yourself kek

>>53116109
What does your statement have to do with the post you replied to
Oh wait youre the same moron from yesterday who claims he doesnt hold link but spent an entire day in a link thread with your 25 pbtid. Kind of pathetic no?

>>53116121
yes it is indeed very pathetic
doesn't it make you bullish anon?

>>53116131
No. Now fuck off or address my post about zeus capital you drooling moron

>>53116141
>instantly raging
but I thought paid fud is bullish? kek

kek the jeet shill literally bailed out lmao

>>53116144
Sloppy job Simeon.

>>53116219
>sloppy job
so our bulgarian fud does make you bullish!
you're welcome!

>>53116220
>29 pbtid

>>53116260
>17 pbtid
step up your game bro

>>53116064
The fud was exactly as bad back in 2018-2019-2020 when Link was completely destroying the entire market.

See >>53114720

>the big guy cashed out
lel this too was common fud spam back in 2019-2020

>>53116293
>disregards every point
>repeats the same thing ad nauseam
SO BULLISH

>>53116314
Pot meet kettle

>>53116345
hi kettle
aren't you feeling extremely bullish?

>>53116354
>1 person says the fud makes him bullish therefore everyone feels that way
Imagine being this stupid kek

>>53116360
so it doesn't make you bullish?
the fud is working?
great!

>>53116314
You mean points like the one where he got the year of Schmidt's involvement wrong?

Also, 2022 saw a global financial market meltdown, it's extremely normal for major development timelines to get impacted. Hell, even ISO 20022 got delayed because of this.

>>53116367
>off by one year, disregard everything else lmao
kek
>ISO 20022
this has been constantly getting delayed since 2019
where was the global financial meltdown then bro?
oh wait, they were actually waiting for Chainlink, right?

>>53116265
No need. I don't get paid to post. I have a passive income. Would you like to learn about it? Give up the daily grind.

>>53116379
>this has been constantly getting delayed since 2019
So it's even worse than Chainlink.

Point is ISO 20022 was delayed specifically because of the 2022 global market circumstances.

>>53116384
great bro! now if you could market buy some link + timestamp you would make my day!
funny how not a single shill can seemingly afford 10 bucks
>ISO 20022 keeps getting delayed for 5 years
>ISO 20022 was delayed specifically because of the 2022
what did the shill mean by this?

>>53116395
>>ISO 20022 was delayed specifically because of the 2022
>what did the shill mean by this?
It's a literal fact.

>>53116398
but it keeps getting delayed since 2015 actually
>https://fedpaymentsimprovement.org/wp-content/uploads/strategies-improving-us-payment-system.pdf
>b-b-but muh meltdown!!
>the whole market is down, not just us!!!

>>53116420
That means it's even worse than Chainlink.
And it's a simple fact that ISO 20022 was delayed in large part because of the 2022 market conditions. Not sure why you're sperging.

>>53116434
>SWIFT is even worse than Chainlink
>literally every single entity associated with LINK is worse than LINK according to the shills
kek, unbelievably bullish

>>53116363
> noo you can’t feel indifferent

>>53116439
>idc!!!
good, then why do you even bother coming here bro?

>>53116440
Dude you have nearly 40 posts over 24 hours and claim to not hold or care about link

>>53116453
dude you claim you don't care about the fud, yet here you are
from my first post itt I've made it perfectly clear I enjoy trolling (You)
rethink your approach here bro lol

>>53116437
You're coping badly.

>>53116462
>btfo
>c-c-cope!111
kek, thanks for playing fren

>>53116395
Have you heard of our god and saviour assblaster? Would you like to know more?

>>53116467
Chainlink only ever delayed one thing in its entire lifetime: CCIP.
And it was largely because of severe market conditions in 2022; the same market conditions that helped lead to another ISO 20022 delay for instance.

It's extremely reasonable.

>>53116458
The fud has been here from the beginning. If I weren’t indifferent to it I probably would have sold at some point along the way. Am I not allowed to read or post in link threads unless I’m not indifferent to the fud? I don’t get your point

>>53116486
>ever heard of our oldest tripfag larp in the lore? the greatest memesmith of our time, Blythe Masters?
>want me to shill him for you?
no I would prefer you market buying a symbolic amount of $10 worth of link so you can definitively prove you're not a jeet/bot
>>53116499
and enterprise abstraction layer
and proper staking
>was largely because of severe market conditions in 2022
this is your pathetic attempt to rationalize through conjecture, you can't even explain how stocks could impact the adoption of a banking messaging standard, being built for almost a decade
SWIFT is not a company relying on revenue, clueless cheerleader
>>53116508
I'm not allowed to mock you relentlessly? I don't get your point

>>53116521
>and enterprise abstraction layer
That's not a product.

>and proper staking
What you think is "proper staking" doesn't matter to anyone but you.
Sergey delivered exactly what he promised.

>>was largely because of severe market conditions in 2022
>this is your pathetic attempt to rationalize through conjecture
No, it's literally what Swift is saying.

>>53116535
>What you think is "proper staking" doesn't matter to anyone but you.
likewise my retarded friend

>>53116541
Sergey didn't promise "proper staking in 2022" though.

>>53116521
You hold link though. You know too much about the project and it’s developments. I have to go now, great chat

>>53116521
>I would prefer you market buying a symbolic amount of $10 worth of link

lol you're just bored so you're trying to get people on the internet to play your games.

>>53116545
no he promised "reputation systems, slashing mechanisms, super-linear staking, build rewards" etc
you can define "proper staking" however you want, doesn't change the absolute fact that not a single feature promised on whitepapers v1 and v2 has actually been implemented
keep coping about muh "global meltdowns" and muh "crypto is bad doesn't mean chainlink is bad"
>>53116549
>y-y-you hold link therefore your posts are bullish
>few, I can sleep well at night!
>it's time to gtfo bye bye!!
bye see you tomorrow!
>>53116570
>l-l-lol ok you're not a paid fudder you're just bored, rejoice marines, I've invented a new head canon, fud is posted by bored marines, therefore it is bullish1!

>>53116521
I'm not shilling anything. I've just posted some images with information and some funny memes. Why do you dislike chainlink?

Anyway, back to assblaster. In the dark bear of 2017, a white man, who spoke English as his first language, began using a trip of assblaster and explaining the purpose of chainlink. Highlighting the swift links, 5 years before the announcement of the PoC.

How did he know this? Would you like to know more?

>>53116580
>he promised "reputation systems, slashing mechanisms, super-linear staking, build rewards" etc
Not for 2022 he didn't.

>keep coping about muh "crypto is bad doesn't mean chainlink is bad"
I love how Chainlink's adoption has ballooned to the point where you can fud only Chainlink anymore by literally fudding all of crypto.

Fudders think the Swift guy Jonathan Ehrenfeld Solé who was on live at Smartcon 2 years running is fake and doesn't work for Swift. This is so easily disproven by simply googling his name. He's on LinkedIn AND the Swift website kek
https://www.swift.com/modal/node/134571

End of debate! You can seriously fud after that. What a joke.

>>53116604
*can't*

>>53116604
Fudders spent years saying the Google blogpost was fake.

>>53116597
>how did he know this???
well, Sergey has appeared on SIBOS 2016 and had announced the first PoC in 2017, you would have known that if you weren't a 2021 tourist I reckon
>>53116601
>heh, he didn't promise THOSE things for 2022!
>adoption has ballooned
but all chainlink services are declining across every L1 with the sole exception of the jeet chain polygon? lmao
how can adoption keep "balloooning" if by your own admission we're already experiencing a global financial meltdown??
you literally make zero sense kek
>>53116604
lol this is a jeet 100%

24 hours later and OP could not have been proven more correct.

>>53116629
>all chainlink services are declining across every L1
All usage across all cryptos has been declining last year lol
Doesn't change the fact that Chainlink nearly dominates crypto at this point.

>>53116629
>Jeet
He's fucking French you clown

>>53116629
>>heh, he didn't promise THOSE things for 2022!
No he didn't.

>>53116641
>chainlink is dominating crypto
>but crypto is dying
???
>>53116648
the absolute state of angry ESL shills
YOU are the jeet, brainlet, not him lmao
>>53116653
>lalalala I can't hear you!!1

>>53116664
>>chainlink is dominating crypto
>>but crypto usage had declined
>???
Yes.

All of crypto is down, but Chainlink's relative position within crypto has only risen.

>>53116664
>jeet
The absolute state. First you claim he's fake and doesn't work for Swift, then you're confronted with cold, hard facts and you vlaom he's a 'jeet'. Then you're disproven on thay so you start calling everyone Jeets! You're shot at this, pal you need to go back to fud kindergarten kek

>>53116676
thanks for conceding
>>53116680
good bait ngl lol

>>53116680
And I need to type more slowly

>>53116688
it won't make any difference, my brown smelly friend, anyone can see you're ESL
>vlaom

>>53116686
>thanks for conceding
lel buddy here doesn't understand relative position. Do you struggle with the concept "per capita" too?
Imagine being THIS non-white.

>>53116740
again, thanks for conceding
>my cousin sandeep has a total monopoly of selling pokemon cards on the entire village!
>village is poor and demand for pokemon cards is declining, but that doesn't change the fact that sandeep has completel control of my village's pokemon card market!1
congrats, sandeep!

>>53116751
>Chainlink bad because crypto bad
I'll never not love this "argument".

>>53116766
again, thanks for conceding!

>>53104705
That is actually quite bullish to be honest. But I don't trust that fatfuck.

>>53116814
you're welcome man, make sure you keep holding and adding to your stack
in fact, market buying some linkies right now would send a powerful message to every bulgarian fudder across the entire world, that link marines do not get fazed by their pathetic and transparent attempts!
go on bro, be the hero /biz/ needs in these dark times

>>53104705
I FUD Link because most Link holders are white and I hate white people.

LMAO

Holy shit guy, go get a girlfriend
>50 pbti

seriously impressed by your dedication but imagine if you put that effort into a girlfriend than fudding a token you don’t have to own or interact with

>>53116597
Have fun with your linkie bags, It may boom with the FUD, recently got some bags along with some web3 assets

>>53116907
>impressed by your dedication
thanks, does it make you bullish though? cause that's what I'm going for here

>>53106012
kek

the most bearish thing is undoubtedly the fact that the only positive sentiment these days comes from third world low iq linklets being unable to acknowledge even the slightest criticism, clinging on to 3+ year old crumbs and repeating the same arguments while being completely detached from reality, as evidenced by this thread
>inb4 seething low iq linklets drown me in (You)s

>>53117524
>even the slightest criticism
You mean like "all of crypto bad, therefore Chainlink bad"?
fucking lmao

>>53116918
^^since this clown began posting fud itt yesterday, i've earned over 10 Links kek see pic rel for wallet 1 of 9

Did jannies delete the recent thread highlighting all the scams link associated with?

>>53105321
kek holy seethe

>>53105452
You are too stupid to understand all fudders are frustrated old fags that saw the chainlink vision and are utterly repulsed by how chainlink labs has one about their business the last 3 years. none of the fud its paid, its all frustated bagholders on the verge of capitulating