/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>52928899
Thank you for your concern.

>>52928899
I don't suppose you're gonna provide proof you're an insider are you? just like all the other LARPs.

>>52928899
checked
>insiders are dumping frantically
yet whales are buying
i mean, we can see on the blockchain that whales are buying
and we have an anonymous post on 4chan saying insiders are selling

>>52928925
>>52928928
This is a controlled demolition. You will see $4 before new year's. Remember, whales need liquidity to exit so yes you will see bots buying. Over the next 6-8 weeks they plan on emptying the tanks, you're going to see $3, then $4, then $1-2. It's simple, in a time of great despair, you're going to see just how little people want this token

>>52928899
Thanks I sold

>>52928899
Thank you for your concern. I sold.

>>52928965
Man I can’t imagine having the chance to replenish what bancor stole from me for 1000 dollars

>>52928965
This would be a dream come true for me. All the retards with goldfish attention spans can sell the bottom while I slurp. My timelines are longer than two weeks anyway.

>>52929110
>duuuuuuuudee we are HECKIN loaddddddin up on le discount. R r right guysth????

>>52928899
Stressful for nostakers who have to react emotionally to every little candle. Blissful for stakers who have literally ascended free from price movements.

>>52928899
i unironically believe this larp. Zero products, slow as a snail in term of release, ceo constantly dumping to fund an army of green hairs trannies

>>52929281
Hey man, you should get a Garmin Forerunner and start going for trail runs. “Runners high” is real, you honestly feel amazing as you get fitter.

>>52928899
>filename is 1000.png
What kind of shit is this op?

>>52928899
I would be quite happy if it dumped to $1 a token. I would honestly prefer $0.01 to mad stack linkies tho.

>>52928899
>using the verb “affect” instead of the noun “effect”
Opinion disregarded

>>52929454
There's a reason the "ceo" who removed that from his title has been looking disheveled and depressed. He's befriended quite a lot of "bad actors" in the past, wouldn't you say?

OP is a larp bobo fag.
Get a fucking life.

>>52929782
bad actors used his protocol. doesn't make the protocol bad inherently. at the end of all this, proof of reserves/liabilities/etc being the new minimum is good even if it took a year of retards getting fleeced.

>>52929826
>desperately tried to present PoR as a solution for truth
>every single call got rejected/hung up on
>some even hung up on serg himself

No, no one is interested save for some bored small time projects

>>52929816
>larp

You and I both wish it was a larp. $5.89 will seem high in 2023, but ignore this at your own peril

>>52929782
i was larping, but not aware of the situation. Is he really stepping down as CEO? top kek, if true then thats pretty convenient

>>52929873
you're crazy if you think customers won't value more transparency after this year. the first exchange, cex or dex, to have full disclosure will be king. it's inexcusable at this point to not at least have moment to moment solvency updates.

>>52929888
checked. yes there are talks right now, he's getting beaten up pretty bad over the LPL saga. This is after a ton of previous reputation slicing campaigns for bad actors, and performance which is quite frankly some of the worst I've ever seen in the software field.

>>52929894
Let's agree to disagree, no one wants to use CL's PoR. Another form of PoR sure. You are over estimating CL's value in the business world. They're "securing" their biggest price feed with a $5 poker chip

>>52929826
>proof of reserves/liabilities/etc being the new minimum
Is it? Everyone was talking about this a month ago and now nobody cares. There were a few half-assed attempts to implement some kind of PoR but Chainlink wasn't used as far as I can tell. Why didn't Sergey call CZ out publicly on Twitter? He keeps going on NASDAQ to talk about this stuff, ostensibly to maximize tradfi visibility, but Chainlink is still just as irrelevant as ever. He failed to capitalize on the biggest PoR related event in crypto history.

>>52929922
>hype up staking and ccip
>dumping relentless during bullrun
>5 years and the only achievement is mainnet
i say its a bad time to exit, surely he doesnt want to end up like Sam?

>>52929110
>>52929181
When it gets to 1 dollar you won't be buying anymore. No one will. Because everyone knows its dead by then. Everything under 1 dollar is lights out. Nobody will give a fuck then.

>>52929932
This precisely, a very high level advisor which I'm sure you all can guess was irate with Sergey over this, essentially fumbling on the 1 yard line. I am tired of beating around the bush so I'll just start the fireworks finale now and hit the sack

>Institutional sales team was firehosed for failing to acquire a single PoR client with high visibility
>The pandemic, inflation/supply chain woes, FTX failure were seen as easy wins for Chainlink which weren't capitalized on and led to many questioning Sergey's ability to close
>Staking unlock was sped up because high level advisors want to cash out sooner, not because of the community
>Smartcon was seen as a giant waste of money, most of the committed press didn't show/write articles, developer networking was way below target, event was seen as a huge money pit

>>52928899
Can’t sell staking, I know this upsets you but I literally can’t sell

>>52929454
What language do you speak at home?

>>52930135
i speak DRNS, HODL MARINES, 1k EOY, CCIP SOON. Enjoy holding my bags?

Yeah LINK is performing like shit but it's kinda just following the entire market which is performing like shit.

>>52929922
>>52929982
these posts are so fucking unironically based and redpilled

>>52928899
Whoops!
My picrel is out of date already!

>>52929281
Hey dude poster. I want you to know I hope your life improves and you can get your head straight. Good luck.
You should take
>>52929490 's advice. I started running a few years back and it really, really helped.

>>52930378
>duuuuuude just manipulate your neurochemistry so you can forget what a massive mistake holding link has been!
>duuude just run away from the charts!

I see someone else knows what I already know too. It's easy to see but humans are stupid and either are too dumb to think for themselves or resist their instincts and live off of hopium. Youve had tons of failed "banks" directly involved with link this year, much link "lost" as a result. Now youve staked and you know already know you will never see those linkies ever again, but dont stop hoping ya hear.

I honestly hope the company goes bankrupt and we can move on.

>>52929932
They just have the time slot available at NASDAQ, nobody is listening to the talks anyway. It's just to keep the appearance of keeping up with technology. Without any commitment (which they obviously would never give) it's just free promotion, no matter how niche and insignificant.

>>52931508
>Chainlink isn't special, they let everyone have a talking slot at Nasdaq, CNBC, Swift, ...

>>52930503
Not everything is about Link my man. Step away. Get your head in order. You CAN have a normal life. I am rooting for you.

>>52931517
https://www.nasdaq.com/articles/cardanos-hoskinson%3A-luna-collapse-shows-need-to-go-slow-in-crypto
https://www.cnbc.com/video/2021/09/01/cryptos-will-play-larger-role-in-afghanistan-after-us-exit-ethereum.html
https://www.nasdaq.com/articles/deciphering-the-present-and-future-of-nfts:-interview-with-justin-sun
https://www.cnbc.com/video/2022/11/21/were-still-actively-engaged-with-ftxs-team-tron-founder-justin-sun-says.html
should I go on, faggot?

>im le insider, i know le price in 2023
Then post your fucking proof or at least post your shorts, faggot. I have never seen a tranny fudder post their trade ever, but they screech about "muh price gongo down 90%"

>>52931641
Now Swift.

Also, those are all high-profile coins ranked much higher than Link.

>>52931661
https://www.kaleido.io/sibos-2022
keep moving the goalposts you spineless little worn

>>52931661
one more just because you're a massive faggot
https://www.swift.com/news-events/news/fintech-leader-and-ethereum-co-founder-speak-sibos

>>52931677
That's an event they held in their booth which they paid for.

>>52931683
>ETH co-founder
Yeah no shit.

Now here's Chainlink during the last two years.

>>52931531
No but this thread is you sanctimonious fuckwit
Great distraction attempt, bigbrain, kek

>>52930503
>dude just engage in activities that actually help you feel good instead of just wallowing in misery and expecting things to magically improve
Yes

>>52931747
these are all events that Chainlink paid for, your screencap only proves that Chainlink heavily invested in SWIFT promoting them
you pivoted from "only LINK has cnbc nadsaq and swift exposure" to "disregard that look at swift derpity derp" because your narrative got destroyed
get fucked

>>52931836
>these are all events that Chainlink paid for
lol if you could pay for those kinds of speaking engagements, you'd be seeing a lot more cryptos get the same treatment.

>you pivoted from "only LINK has cnbc nadsaq and swift exposure"
No, I said not just everyone gets that kind of exposure.
Certainly not all of them at once.

>>52931756
> but this thread is
Yes, meaning you can just ignore it if you don't like Chainlink.

>>52931865
The thread is about LINK hitting $1, brainlet
You can ignore it if you like Chainlink
I really hope you take up running anon!!! uwu

>>52931887
lol so what, this is a thread for the nolinker support group?

>>52931823
In other words, LINK is a failure and none of you want to confront it.
Thanks for the coping strategy general life advice but I don't think it counts for much when assessing ROI, retard

>>52931913
>LINK is a failure

>>52931860
>if you could pay for those kinds of speaking engagements, you'd be seeing a lot more cryptos get the same treatment
nice headcanon mate, the truth is you can pay to ensure a spot in all these conferences, as seen by multiple other insignificant projects appearing there over the years
the problem is that these events do not generate sufficient hype for crypto, and that's precisely why other crypto projects focus on social media marketing instead of "legacy enterprise exposure" that does shit
>>52931916
>TVE
>Jan 2022
ok what's the latest update regarding that metric?

>>52931912
Keep slinking away from the point at hand
>biz
>business and finance
>"hey this token has objectively underperformed and has a bad outlook by my estimation, perhaps long positions could be rethought?"
>"hmm. thanks anon, have you tried drumming?"

>>52931913
I think you'll find that a lot of people are doing some other shit while we're in an interminable bear, and that other shit is actually pretty enjoyable.
Are you really getting much actual, lasting pleasure or happiness out of this fixation? Start running, or bouldering, or muay thai, or whatever makes your feelgood chemicals naturally start to circulate. Time will pass either way.

>>52931916
Oh sorry I didn't realise you were in it for the tech

>>52931924
>you can pay to ensure a spot in all these conferences
Funny how Chainlink is virtually the only one then.

>>Jan 2022
It goes to roughly May or something.

>>52931926
>Keep slinking away from the point at hand
You should try slinking away from coins you hate and do not hold.

>>52931933
I absolutely am.
Because the tech is what's making things like Swift happen.

>>52931931
>I want to talk about the shitty state of link
>STFU NO BAD VIBES POSITIVITY ONLY
yep, it's a bot

>>52931931
I do two of the three activities you listed and have done all my adult life.
Guess what? That has no bearing on a conversation about LINK being a dogshit investment. But sure, go for another 5 year long run, anon, maybe we'll be at $10 by then and you can lecture me again about how the only reason I'm complaining is because I'm not making enough origami cranes in my spare time

>>52931942
>Funny how Chainlink is virtually the only one then
funny how that objectively isn't true
>It goes to roughly May or something.
almost 7 months have passed since then, where's your TVE now?

>>52931942
>I absolutely am.
>Because the tech is what's making things like Swift happen.
Kek
/conversation

>>52931954
>funny how that objectively isn't true
Prove it.

>almost 7 months have passed since then, where's your TVE now?
Chainlink's market dominance probably increased even more.

>>52931949
Those activities have quantifiable benefits for your physical and mental health. I can't imagine that seething about the price of an asset actually does you any good beyond, I dunno, short term venting. The regularity of the seething suggests it isn't really helping or getting any better.

>>52931961
I proved it by linking at least 6 different sources
just about anyone can get invited on CNBC, NASDAQ and SIBOS
>probably
so you virtually have zero updates ever since may, but you simply opt to trust the team, amirite?
thanks mate I think we're done here
>>52931972
>pls stop dissing my bags, I beg you

Very interesting perspective. I have taken it onboard. Unfortunately I have staked.

I will also buy more chainlink tokens throughout the next year.

Thank you for your concern.

>>52931977
>I proved it by linking at least 6 different sources
I was talking about Swift.
You posted one other crypto guy who talked at Swift, and it was an ETH cofounder in 2018.

>so you virtually have zero updates ever since may
You're welcome to check the on-chain metrics lol.

>>52929432
this desu

>>52931677
kaleido uses chainlink tho. still chainlink $1 EOY

>>52931989
>I was talking about Swift.
no, you pivoted to SWIFT only after you got btfo>>52931517

>>52931972
As if it's not obvious enough, what you're doing is changing the subject because price performance simply isn't something any of you are prepared to engage on. You're literally babbling inane irrelevant nonsense about running, totally ad hom, because you can't dispute it. Fine, that's the only card you have left in the deck, but it's a transparent act you're performing here

>>52928965
Absolute euphoria would be the result. There's no chance we're going to get nulinkers having a chance to get up to 100k stacks again.

the one (1) time i ever bought crypto i spent 200 bucks on link when it was around it's ath (I got like 5 link tokens) and was hyped about all the buzz
that's now worth 30 dollars
i hate you faggots
i will never buy crypto again

>>52932115
thanks for sharing

>>52932021
>you got btfo
You proved my point by posting top 15 coins lol

You said Chainlink paid for all those Swift speaking events, but if you could pay for that half the top 100 would've done exactly that.

>>52932091
no one will have money to buy. ppl will only sell their links to just get by. from linkpool blog they estimated it takes 3+ years they can make some money. you think the whales are gonna wait that time when everything is collapsing left and right? in 3 years link will be trading between 1-10 cents.

>>52928965
NIGGER. I know this is a larp. But the buying pressure around 2 dollars would be insane. A lot of OG would rebuy their stacks at that Range at 0 risk. That's why it isn't happening

>>52932250
it went from over 50 to 6 in a year, 6 to sub 1 is very feasible

>>52932258
Everything is possible. But link @ $1 is highly unlikely just because a lot of people who took profits during the years and never looked back will definitely start looking back at those prices. I'm one of those. My opinion is that 3-4 is a more feasible range assuming 2023 is somehow worse than 2022. If WW3 happens sure, 20 cents links and sub 1000 BTC are on the menu , but that's a Omega bear scenario. Everything would be fucked at that point.

>>52928899
>>52928965
>>52929782
>>52929873
>>52929922
>>52929982
i think i'll start worrying about link when there aren't a punch of pajeets being paid to make hundreds of fud posts a week about a token that they pretend isn't important

>>52933396
bunch*

>>52929982
This is why I know you are not a larp or at least you are a larp who heard first hand sources.

What's your favorite chair?

>>52929961
>you won't buy LINK for $1
Lmaoooo

>>52928899
>insiders are dumping frantically
most of us are following the wallet distribution on eth plorer and know that whales and sharks are accumulating like mad for as long as retards get scared and panic sell

>>52928899
>no affect
poo in loo

OG here, still holding my 40k stack, if LINK ever gets close to $2 im buying another 60k instantly, i mean fuck its only $120k and ill finally have 100k LINK.

>>52932042
Let's engage on price action: it's bad. What now?

>>52928899
Good thing I cant sell.

any time I see these I immediately ignore
>do what you need with this info and all it's variants ie if you know you know
>chainlink labs and all the abbreviations like CLL and the now wordfiltered stinky one
>some dogshit generic OP picture, every single time it is the fucking same shit
>post count by this ID greater than 5
I do not give a shit if you and your faggot friends """"""""""""""care"""""""""""""" about my financial wellbeing

>>52928899
I'd love to be able to sell anon but I'm afraid I'm staked and am unable to take advantage of your obviously sincere and honest advice.

>>52933396
These posts are the most bullish thing imaginable, that there is someone so heavily invested in getting people to sell means that they hate the fact that we're in their club.

Eric wall should be focusing on writing his crypto blog

>>52931836
>these are all events that Chainlink paid for
That's a blatant lie

>>52938812
Yeah, I'm so glad that these anonymous users on this mongolian basket weaving forum care about the performance of assets owned by other anonymous users, yeah. They clearly care about our financial wellbeing and have no ulterior motives.

>>52938812
>>52939966
Keep accumulating, im sure you guys will make it. top kek

>>52939992
Rent free.

>>52928899
Didn't read, can't sell.

>>52939992
Thanks bro! WAGMI

>>52928899
>They have a plan to hit $1 that's going out in their email blasts. I am under NDA to not tell.
My company does this with their share price too

>>52931836
some things money can't buy anon. throwing money around only gets you into some places and not others. you and your vc friends wouldn't get it.

>>52929961
Hello newfriend.
Link spent its first year and a half under one dollar.

>>52940435
Cool my thread is still up. Not one to toot my own horn but $5.70 is way below where I made the thread yesterday. There is literally no reason why LINK is worth its current $2.9 billion value

>-90% from ATH
>dropped from rank 5 to rank 24
>hordes of woke HR whores hired by Sergnigger
It’s over

>>52940906
How fast will it happen? Unironically about to sell 15k on the market, need to hold cash until Powell stops being a fag

>>52940941
Worth dumping a grand into stinkies at this price?

>>52932115
why are you still here ? you need to leave and buy at the next top.

>>52942474
Cheaper to use onlyfan

>>52928928
actually not true, 1m to 10m wallets have been dumping

>>52928899
Not that I don't beleive everything you said.
But why the hell is CCIP taking so long when LayerZero fucking made it happen in months.
And I heard they recently actually integrated actual Chainlink into their protocol now instead of just copying/forking/customizing it.
So if LZ has link now, wtf is even the benefir of CCIP now?
LZ doesn't even have a token either so no one is even benefiting here lmao.
What a joke. I'm sick of this shit given all the money that has gone into Chainlink Labs and what they've chosen to spend it on with zero results.
Not selling now just because fuck me that's why. But I suspect I'll look back on 2023 and again wonder why I didn't just flip it into eth since that will likely outperform it since it's now basically deflationary or close to it while Sergey is dumping 50m on us again.
It's all so tiresome.

>>52928899
I sold so should everyone before it gets worse. We are here to help

>>52943810

>>52929586
Came here to say this. Most people know the difference between their, there, they’re and your/you’re. But if you don’t know lie/lay or affect/effect, it tells me you’re smart enough to have achieved small victories in life over others, but you also massively overestimate your own intelligence.

>>52943785
LZ is incredibly simplistic vs the CCIP framework, CCIP isn't some simple bridge to move tokens from A to B, it is a protocol to facilitate cross-chain-anything. It will become the default/standard for future SC dev.

>>52928899
chainlink is the same price it was vs usd since may
chainlink is up 66% vs eth since may
chainlink is up 75% vs btc since may
:)

>>52938812
>duuuuuuuuuuude losing money is so HECKIN bullish
>HODL MARINESSSTHH

You know it’s rock-bottom when the cuckolds are literally advoating losing your entire net worth because you’re part of cult. A cuckold and his money are soon parted

>>52944176
>You know it’s rock-bottom when the cuckolds are literally advoating losing your entire net worth because you’re part of cult. A cuckold and his money are soon parted
are you posting about ETH?

>>52944176
Did you go for a jog this morning, anon? Eat a healthy breakfast, at least?

>>52944191
>duuuuuuuuude even though the most established alt coin that made all of its early investors rich before anyone knew about crypto dipped means its the heckin same for my ranked 25 and dropping shitcoin. I mean who could miss being behind gems like shib, doge, okb (what is that again ) , cripple and tron.

Pussy

>>52944205
>duuuuuuuuuuuude i i if you c c call out my cult it means YOU are the one with a mental disorder.
>brooooooo i i i am the healthy one who has lost my entire future to a russian scammer. Yes that TOTALLY makes sense. I am SO healthy, r r right marinesth!?!?

The funny part is I am undoubtedlly more man than any little punk ass scam “marines”. Out drink / out fuck/ out fight any of you little pussy / obese faggots any day of the week. Stick to what you’re good at, which is scamming people.

>>52944205
Yes quick maybe if we all just jog our investment won't be a 5-year long failure?

>>52944109
>duuuuuuuuude if you keep changing currency is actually heckin up on the year!!!!
>-90% in every currency
>duuuuuuuuuude youre a fudder!!!!!

What prescription are you on? And did you need a doctor for it or is this pure delusion?

>>52944687
Alcohol is terrible for you anon. You should try steel cut oats for breakfast with:
>chia seeds (1 tbsp)
>FHC meal (1 tbsp)
>whey protein powder (1 scoop)
then topped with blueberries and yogurt. Delicious and crazy good for you. Leaves you satisfied all morning.
>>52944700
Time will pass either way, anon, might as well focus on the stuff you can actually control.

>>52944767
Alcohol is bad

Hahahhaahaha thanks grandman. And yet im bigger than you, fuck hotter bitches; and make pussies like you bow in my presence…But yeah, all that is “bad”. Pussy. Youre gonna die early for promoting a scam, so dont worry about me, you coward.

>>52944758
wow i got a you from the duuude guy, what an honor. thank you sir

>>52944793
Grandma*

Coward

>>52928899
Shitlink

>>52944793
You should take my advice about steel cut oats tho.

>>52944767
Your conviction might inexplicably have remained the same after the past two years but others' haven't. This current shill cope of making lifestyle changes to distract yourself from your underperforming asset on a forum called Business and Finance is so silly that little elaboration is needed.

That's what I ascribe the negative sentiment to. It's just people reevaluating and venting about LINK and its failure to deliver.

>>52941442
By next week now, timeline has shifted. In an economic shit storm, this token is the last thing you want to hold. It has no intrinsic value and isn’t recognized as a valuable asset. In times of great tribulation, only the worthy hold up their value (BTC)

>>52944793
This is genuinely the most Indian post I've ever seen on this board, I can smell the curry, feces and human despair through my screen.

>>52943997
LZ is not a bridge but a generalized message passing protocol with the intention and reality of being exactly that...but it works and it's out today. And even based its oracle system off Chainlink afaik(and just recently like within weeks started using link for real or whatever).
Even if CCIP is 10x better, when there's already a generalized cross chain messaging protocol that uses Chainlink, are people going to care in 2024 or 2025?

>>52928965
>tfw only have 250 LINK
I own just enough to make some decent money if it goes big, but at the same time, not enough to really give a fuck if it goes to zero.
Super comfy.

>>52945369
Such a basic logical point put in the most retarded terms possible
Bored link holder confirmed

I sold so it will go to $1000 in 2023

>>52944853
>This current shill cope of making lifestyle changes to distract yourself from your underperforming asset on a forum called Business and Finance is so silly
Yeah bro imagine making yourself happier and healthier instead of just seething constantly and praying for Sergey to drag you out of misery at a completely unrpredictable time in the futrue.

>>52940906
Didn't last long, anon

Thought I'd tell a few jokes about Chainlink:
>CCIP
>DECO
>4/20 multisig
>Mixicles
Thanks everyone you've been a great audience

>>52928965
Imagine having staked now and sell in two yearsfrom now for $0.35, kek

>>52946394
... are you serious? Point being, why make it Sergey at all? It is a completely separate conversation. Dumbo.

>>52946888
Checked. So what's the plan beyond saying "Chainlink price bad" for the 10 millionth time? What is the point, what are you trying to achieve?

>>52944853
>It's just people reevaluating and venting about LINK
Weird, because the fud was just as bad back when Chainlink spent two years pumping against the entire market.

>>52946903
Questioning the viability of LINK as an investment, retard. I know that's an alien concept to you but other people are capable of making objective decisions.

>>52928899
>Staking has no affect on price

>>52947216
>Questioning the viability of LINK as an investment
Weird, because the fud was just as bad back when Chainlink spent two years pumping against the entire market.

>>52928911
He also warned us about FTX and Luna you stupid retarded faggot. Go neck yourself he is trying to help.