/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>52837550
imagine being a 7.5k stakelet

>>52837550
If it had sold out in early access this would be an issue, but regular plebs had literal hours to get in the pool, so it's a nothingburger.

>>52837550
Based.

>>52837550
I am deeply concerned about it, anon

>>52837550
It's a wallet from Rory or Sergey to make LINK look popular and create FOMO after the initial early access looked like shit.

>>52837550
If only we decco

17500 Link a year. 1,750,000 dollars a year. Wow!

>>52837550
Eth had a high level entry staking amount, 34eth If I remember correctly. There was also no unlock date.
Chainlink did what they could to make staking as fair as possible. They did it very well by slowing whales down.

Oh no I’m demoralized

A burger flew over my house

>>52837567
I don't hold LINK, I speak for the people.

>>52837568
the pool was open for general access for a few hours only, most folks were at work at the time.

>>52837600
me too. Let's hope we hear something from Chainlink Labs.

>>52837661
who asked? Leave my thread.

wait, so how many people actually staked? Smart anons, can we make an estimate? If each person staked more than one wallet, roughly speaking how many people staked?

>>52837970
its simple, 22.5M / 7000 = 3214 wallets
you could only have 3214 wallets with 7000 link.
crazy knowing just me i staked 9 wholes 7k wallets kek

>>52837970
there's a graph of all the wallets which staked, it's basically a near perfect distribution of small wallets and big wallets

>>52838040
I staked 19 x 7k wallets and am ready for the next pool with another 66k link

>>52838040
There would be well over 3214 wallets. Not everyone can afford 7000 LINK, so it's a silly assumption to make.

>>52838040
>>52838115
>9 wallets
>19 wallets
holy based, I staked with six 7K wallets. So, the three of us combined we staked 238K LINK. The number of stakers must be so small then.

imagine locking your link up like a cuck instead of choosing to be a freelinker.

>>52838201
and the fact that there are anons in this thread bragging about how much link they submitted to Chainlink to hodl for them indefinitely is fucking hilarious. it's like a bunch of dudes bragging about how many dicks they can fit in their ass kek

>>52838201
>freelinker
I've seen this word pop up a lot lately, which discord are you guys coming from?

>>52837568
This, all the long term holders that wanted in got in. It was well organized that way. Why should I care if nulinkers got fucked out of the pool by whales? Guess they'll have to sell their 50 link stacks

>>52838271
i literally made it up and posted it in a thread cuz i thought it sounded catchy. turns out it was cuz now others are using it too. and no i'm not part of some gay discord, a freelinker would never.

>>52838302
i really really like that meme anon congrats on your contribution to board culture
>>52837712
You sound like that famous door dasher turned link fudder Chris Blec

>>52838302
I like the word too, although I've staked I wish you all the best in propagating this new meme.

>>52837712
A few hours is a bear market blessing. Normally these things sell out in a single gas wat block.

>>52837970
>>52838040
>>52838047
>>52838130
can you STOP derailing the thread? Go make your own.

>>52838338
what's wrong with working hard for a living?

>>52838302
do you know what implicit staking is?
you sure swing link but you would never swing 100% of your stack. so you always have a % of ur link doing absolutely nothing, that's the stacks we put in staking. also, if staking fails like you seem to imply, it would affect you nevertheless, that's called implicit staking the fact that you're holding you arn't getting passive but you're also as affected by staking as stakoors.
freelinkers is just codeword for retards.

also reminder : pool is closed, you will never stake

>>52838338
thanks anon. those who chose not to stake (for very rational reasons) needed a title that provided positive affirmation. "no staker" was getting thrown around too much.

>>52838412
well, what about the time? Why 12PM when people are at work? Who exactly are they marketing this for? People with no jobs? Simply mind-boggling.

>>52838255
Dysgenic freaks who succumb to staking and token-lock addictions become demons.
They always think they are winning no matter what happens.
As long as they're being stimulated according to the pattern that allows them to receive their yearly circle jerk rewards nothing else matters to them.
There is no incentive for them to logically analyze anything, least of all themselves.
They can always just retreat back into their autism and receive the greatest false hopium they know and all else can be forgotten.
Staking on demand accompanied by rewards hopium, the most common forms of hyperstimulus, have deleted the souls of the majority of the link bagholders.
Staking is the jew's greatest weapon and its casualties are piling up and choking out real anons.
We have to impale them all.

>>52838419
Oh no, u can sell something instead of holding to zero. How could sergay do this!

>>52837550
> indirectly
So im guessing he just did it during general access. What's the issue?

>>52838442
They gave you months of notice

>>52838419
the entire ethos of crypto is that you are in full control of your assets. v0.1 is a "just trust us" version of staking. linkies here memed Celsius for "HODL Mode" and yet can't see the parallels with link's staking contract. you literally fell for a paper promise that Sergey has tirelessly warned you about. i don't know how they'll fuck you, but you'll get fucked, and you'll deserve it because you were warned.

>>52838459
YOU WILL NEVER STAKE

>>52838515
oh so now you pull shit out of your ass?
the staking smartcontract is the safest in all of crypto, the unstake function is already there unlock date is 1st may 2023 it's in the smart contract.

fucking nigger pulling shit out his ass

>>52837568
yeah, even though there was a whale, interest in total was not very high so they had to open the pool for everybody

>>52838530
also it's glaringly obvious that the former pajeet fudders have now switched over to staking shills for some odd reason. that only reaffirms my decision to be a freelinker.

>>52838556
it's not a decision you made, you just missedout on the opportunity to get your walle whitelisted kek, you just cucked yourself.

>>52838353
i wish you no ill will anon and hope v0.1 turns out to be a positive experience

>>52838480
Lmao I literally heard about it the day before. Another classic case of media blackout

>>52838146
No you didn't. You couldn't have. I staked 300 wallets. The pool isn't big enough for 3 of us.

>>52838480
Who is (((they))) anon? you are sounding very anti-semitic with these dog whistles

>>52838581
Its OK to be a freelinker
*flashes Trump OK sign with 666 hail saturn uwu*

>>52838146
Put me in for 6 wallets fren.
The number of stakers is probably less than 1k

>>52838847
If the freelinkers outnumber the cucked then this is just like the unvaccinated chads outnumbering the vaxxed chuds
brb gotta vaccinate myself just in time for the arrival of our reptilian overlords

>freelinkers vs stakers
the question is why the fuck do you all still hold stinky linkies in 2022

>>52838418
>stop derailing my poopy poop pants thread
>waaahhh

lol

>>52837550
He only got 7k into the early access. The rest was whatever. You should've staked then if you wanted in.

>>52838892
fr bruh No Linker is a whole next level of cuck ngl susin

>>52838885
>The Cucked
i really like that title for those that staked. like a demonic, breakaway sect of the original link movement

>>52838970
The Betas could also work, nice play on words

>>52838970
based
>>52839032
the betas sounds like a band

>>52837550
time to sell

>>52839238
The Cucked it is then

>>52837550
>appears to have indirectly staked
git gud poorfags

>>52838970
>original link movement
go back to d*scord

>>52838533
the point retard, was that that whale couldn't get in during the early access phase due to the restrictive way they designed staking

>>52837550
Why do you care? you didnt want to stake anyway right?

>>52839614
this. staking is a scam worse than eth. proud to be free

>>52838288
its good for link holders if new people can access it
dont deny it

>>52839260
They aren't that until LINK hits a top and they can't sell. What life are they missing out on at this point that the unstaked are enjoying?

>>52837712
yeah, i was stuck at work while all this was going down. it sucked.