/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>52687622
dead token

>>52687622
The ol bait and switch just to keep em thirsty

never staking

>>52687622
So is it going to be another 8 years until 1.0?

discord bros have you gotten the rebuttal to this yet?

>>52687622
What a mess

>>52687622
staking not needed

wonder how fast the expansion to 75 million will be. could create a lot of buying pressure for those wanting to get in.

I sent him 3 DM's telling him to stop fucking with my money. HE WORKS FOR ME GODDAMNIT

>>52687663
kek

honestly this is an unexpected surprise from chainlink to actually listen to node operators/community members, bullish

>>52687622
all this shit is pointless if the price doesn't budge

>>52687622
literally no one is using chainlink? Why the fuck are there always threads up for this coin?

Can we get a thread for a better coin like LEO?

I cant believe what I am reading.

I am literally shaking rn with rage.

The team cannot deliver this product within the new deadline and when it fails and oh it will fail cap this the blood of the team will be shed by you crazed incels and I, for one, am not sticking around for the massacre

Consider this my official resignation from The Chain Link Labs Foundation.

Thank you and goodbye

>>52687622
Congratulations, Bulgarians! Looks like you will have a job again in 9-12 months!

v0.2 in 9-12 months? They need to SLOW DOWN!
There's no way they're catching all the bugs at this break neck pace. Audits should take place of the timespan of decades not months.

>>52687833
Maybe go be a newfag somewhere else. /biz/ is a Chainlink board.

>>52687622
>Are you happy linkies?
I'm never happy
And I'm never selling either

>>52688337
U think v1 would be in two years, but .2 in one year, lmao. So what 0.3 by “second half 2024? Top fucking kek

V0.2 IN 12 MONTHS!? FUCK ME. NAME A COMPANY WITH A SLOWER DEVELOPMENT RATE THAT CHAINLINK. YOU CAN'T.

>>52687622
desu good of them for at least addressing the community concerns and 9-12 months (12) is not so horrible.

>>52691185
yeah, at least we won't have to wait for v1 to unlock rewards, instead we're getting v0.2 in less than two years!
amazing

>>52691185
This. Them responding at all to the views of the community is a pretty substantial first.

>>52691185
Same. Is this nit fantastic news? Surely anyone who was on the fence about staking will do it since the wait time has just been cut in half.
Most people could survive the year knowing they can cash out eventually. 2 years is just too uncertain.

I'm not an early access fag but ill definitely try to stake at general access now. Originally I was gonna just hold.

>>52687622
>v0.2

>>52691278
sshhh, no more fud, only dreams now

Why are people mad about v0.2? The only thing to be mad about was the lock up period, which has just been halved. Dont get it.

>>52691302
6 years to release v0.2

>>52691302
it's truly a mystery

Damn now sirgay is going to have to dump twice as fast

>>52687622
It's over bros, LINK is not new tech, a hidden gem, or a coming 10-100x. LINK is mainstream and is in Twitter roasties bios. It’s a corporate entity now, so Sergey has to dump another 750k LINK to hire talent managers and diversity officers. LINK hasn’t been the biz token for over 2 years now. Just sell anons... i-i-iit’s over. It was a good ride.

>>52687622
this is just like when no one bought ticekts to smartcon so they dropped the price to $50.
nobody wants to steak even if they hand out freebe shitcoins

>>52691325
LINK is truly the most disappointing crypto hold of all time. What a complete fucking joke, someone needs to go to Sirgay's office and tell him to work faster. I wonder what he's even accomplished this week.

>>52691390
there is a demand for staking, just that it is limited, primarily for insiders and you have to lock up while chainlinklabs is going to need steady streams of income, dumping link on an already depressed orderbook

>>52688337
“Bugs”

Lmfao this a a crypto the same as any fucking other with random little bullshit added in that had been done already even with scam coins. They arent coding a fucking video game or anything revolutionary. Fucking loser lmao

>>52692422
>They arent coding a fucking video game

You're right. With a video game, the worst that happens is that you release a shitty game and piss some people off. With crypto you risk people and institutions losing billions of dollars. And this is the Elder Scrolls VI of crypto. Give it time lad.

>>52689312
v1 is in 2032

>eth mainnet

hahaha fucking linkies and their shitty erc-20 token, holyshit get a life you losers

>>52687648
Parasitical rent seekers get what they deserve.

>v.02
Lmaooooo
Only 100 more updates until real staking! Youre so close linkies!!

>>52695730
so clever and original

Btw youre welcome stupid cult members, thank us critisizer chads who were calling out sergey on this bullshit 2 year lockup. We just helped you access your own money earlier while you shill faggots were sucking off sergey saying "this is fine" dear leader cannot make mistakes please lock me up harder daddy!

2 years is far too long in this economy, 9 months now thats far more reasonable, this could be the difference between missing another bullrun and being liquid and being able to make it.
KNEEL cult faggots

>>52695972
>implying it wont be 2 years of soon unlock

>>52695730
By the time it gets to v0.5 ill be driving lambos around cryptoland