/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>52634249
You ready to steak my man?

>>52634249
>>52634255
>dumps
Lmao

>>52634255
Looking forward to it
The rate at which they've been unveiling build partners is really something

>>52634273
>Looking forward to it
For what, locking up your stack and rewards for 2 years? Lmao

is it realistic to expect the release of CCIP this year?

Newfag here. Will anyone be able to run a chainlink node in the future if he has some info to share? How much link is required to have a node? Will it be only for large corporations or also for smaller companies?

>>52634291
It already did… as poc with swift
It’s literally nothing

>>52634249
In the interest of full transparency I'll have to stop these threads after this one
As one might expect, I'm slated to be involved in a project with ties to Chainlink
I've always been clear that I am not an insider, but once that changes I won't be posting these kinds of threads out of respect for the team

I've enjoyed the other threads we've had here about topics related to life like
Forming meaningful relationships
How to use money to get success with women
and others
So I'd be happy to continue with those threads going forward

>>52634249
Why didn't they code a fixed withdrawal date into their staking contract, instead asking investors to trust them? Isn't that the whole point of truth over trust?

>>52634285
I'm looking forward to filling my allocation for early staking since I don't need access to those assets for at least two years
I'm looking forward to linkpools vLink/Link liquid staking to hopefully get most of my Link returning staking rewards
And I'm looking forward to increased volumes on link dex pairs related to the above which will provide another source of passive income

I'm also very much looking forward to CCIP and the new high frequency low gas print price feeds
Both of which are almost all profit for nodes

>>52634249
You will never be a real anon. You have no bants, you have no original ideas, you have no memes. You are a homosexual man twisted by fat- and sergeyposting into a crude mockery of nature’s perfection.
All the (yous) you get are ironic and half-hearted. To your face and behind your hunchback people mock you. Your parents are disgusted and ashamed of you, your “friends” laugh at your professional Chainlink shilling career behind closed doors.
Anons, jannies, and even other glowniggers on the board are utterly repulsed by you. Thousands of years of evolution have allowed anons to sniff out frauds with incredible efficiency. Even paid WEF shills who regularly post here come off as uncanny and unnatural to anons. Your post structure is a dead giveaway. And even if you manage to get a naive anon to take the bait, he’ll turn tail and bolt the second he sees the WEF agendas and the buzzwords were not a one off.
You will never be happy. You wrench out a fake smile through gritted teeth every single time you type “$1000 EOY, Token is needed, CCIP, WTFWT and When Staking” and tell yourself it’s going to be ok, that you don’t actually mean it, but deep inside you feel the depression creeping up like a weed, ready to crush you under the unbearable weight.
This is your fate linkie. There is no going back.

>>52634291
It is already in private testnets with synthetics and presumably swift
Listening to Lorenz it seems doubtful that a public beta will be available this year, but it looks like the area that is being most actively developed

>>52634285
What don't you understand about NOT. FUCKING. SELLING?

>>52634294
Currently you can run a node, but remember you should not run a node unless your infrastructure is rock solid and you have experience maintaining near perfect uptime
That's why the network has more value than standard data transmission: the trust element is economically incentivized

>>52634330
>I'm looking forward to linkpools vLink/Link liquid staking to hopefully get most of my Link returning staking rewards
So the only way to access your rewards is through a third party shitcoin… LMAO the absolute state of linkies

>>52634294
you cannot run a node unless you are in sergays social circle
link marines claim decentralized

Thanks anon, have a nice day

>>52634310
They likely did this for two reasons
1. It would have added additinal coding and testing overhead which would have pushed staking out past 2022
And
2. They are a team with legacy finance ties. In old finance the notion of a large one time asset unlock is generally frowned upon and unlocks of vested assets are generally done in a graded manner to allow for smooth price action. I would guess they'll enforce that with unstaking in a FIFO kind of order

They also have cover from the eth foundation doing the same, so they may have done it so they can say "we're going about this in the industry standard manner"

And to be clear, I'm not supporting or opposing this, just giving the reasons I see as most logical behind the decision

What do you think will happen with this current v0.1 Chainlink staking pool when actual staking goes live in about 2 years?

Will anons just have to withdraw and stake with third party services or will it continue operating in some form?

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA FAGGOT

>>52634366
You will not need to own any lpl for this, you will simply use it and the fees associated with liquid staking will go to lpl owners/stakers
>>52634377
Always glad to be here

>>52634249
why would institutions who subsist on lies and deception(fractional reserve banking) want chainlink to ruin the grift with "truth"?

>>52634249
What happens in a few years when they run out of the 500 millions LINK they have left?

They have already spent like 200 millions LINK so far.

Networks still aren't profitable.

Who will pay for networks and staking rewards?

Competitors will be able to undercut them if they begin to ask customers for fees.

>>52634429
nice reddit spacing
and yes that is an argument, faggie

>>52634425
because they know people are catching on to the grift and so the next step is to cement their place at the top via finite supply assets.

>>52634395
The initial early access stakers that are "securing" the eth/usd feed will likely be treated like the early node operators; their stake will be used to "secure" initial implementations of CCIP and be generally a walled garden outside of general staking

>>52634425
They interact with other institutions that have every incentive to screw them
So they pay armies of white collar workers to perform trust assurance

Not only do they then not have to pay those people, but also they can greatly increase the efficiency of their operations
So much so that if they are smart contract enabled and their competition isnt, they become in-space monopolies
Just like the internet
>>52634429
They are profitable on most networks
They could be profitable on all networks if they just said "we don't support networks that don't join scale"

Look up the term "loss leader" for what they're doing

>>52634304
As above I would like to keep making threads that aren't directly chainlink related when I can no longer make these
Are there any topics anons would like?

>>52634486
What happens in a few years when they run out of the 500 millions LINK they have left?

>>52634498
Nobody gives a shit about your life advice lmao, these threads are just for delusional hopium addicts.

>>52634502
Their most likely path is to keep scheduled distributions as they have been until staking returns passive income across all networks
That will likely happen in the next year or two

At that point CLL can exist indefinitely from staking returns on its 300mm tokens, which will likely be the long term plan

>>52634518
Those threads had hundreds of replies and good discussion
It sounds like you think people are like you but they are not

>>52634498
figuring tax would be nice

>>52634249
why did the fat fuck betray

>>52634532
This is certainly region specific and, as I am not a tax lawyer or accountant I would be a bad source

>>52634393
that's a very generous interpretation. to your first point, they could have started to implement this sooner, it's not like "withdrawing your principal" is a complicated feature and v0.1 is basically just redistributing investor money anyway. to your second point, the smart contract could have just included the staker's address in the withdrawal date calculation, achieving the exact same smooth transition. ethereum was wildly criticized for not allowing withdrawals as is CLL now, that's not following the "industry standard", that's just seeing that there are suckers willing to give up their power to sell and wanting that for themselves. they had every opportunity to set a new standard (isn't that their mantra?), but they succumbed to greed instead

>>52634590
You're welcome to read anything you want into the motives of the decision, but I'm not aware of really any evidence that the team had unstaking ready but did not release it because of greed
If you do have such evidence please provide it

>>52634249
I am mentally disabled and literally unable to hit the sell button. When do we crash to $0 so the suffering will finally be over?

Please send help.

>>52634304
what is the nature of you occupation going forward? developer in a dapp using chainlink services?

>>52634600
i don't have any evidence, it just looks pretty bad, don't you agree? also, the "industry standard" seems to be to announce dates when withdrawals will be implemented, but then push them further and further and stop announcing them at all. will CLL follow that "best practice" as well?

>>52634407
>You will not need to own any lpl for this, you will simply use it and the fees associated with liquid staking will go to lpl owners/stakers
bullshit
still not buying and staking faggot. fuck off

best way to get linkpool?

so LPL and link can be staked at linkpool? Whats a resource that summarizes these mechanisms?

methheads not needed from yesterday's thread

>>52634393
>>52634590
What if they decided that its better that LPL will build the liquid staking on top? So you get big portion of tokens locked but also liquid.

>>52634486
Is chainlink more profitable than fractional reserve banking? Does it benefit the banks if chain link automates their systems if that automation loses their ability to fraction reserve banking, which happens to be their primary tool for existing?

>>52634577
Would any of these topics be of interest?

What to buy at various levels of wealth
How to program proper financial hygiene into your life
Pathways for various types of apex women
Common financial and personal pitfalls for various levels of wealth
Life plans for extreme circumstances (low IQ, inherited wealth, extreme beauty or ugliness)

>>52634249
So what happened with the staking and CCIP delay after the announcement in January?
Because I don't know what happened it makes it difficult to trust the 1-2 year will not become more.
Or maybe this time period includes the previous unplanned delay this time.

Will the Link community staking contract give a synthetic ownership token like stETH?

The Linkpool staking pool seems like a better option if gets the community rewards from BUILD, but the question is how the pool will be filled.

>>52634304
Are you joining this project for fun or for work?
What made you decide to build something in this field?

>>52634643
All of them are great topics

>>52634643
Financial hygiene/operational security would be nice.
Don't stray away from finance much in any case, don't turn these threads into some PUA bullshit lol

Do I still need 10K LINK to stake without a pool?

>>52634607
I have bad news for you
>>52634609
No
>>52634611
If you don't have any evidence then your answer is much less likely than mine to be true
>>52634617
This doesn't even make any sense. It's literally their value case
>>52634624
LPL can be bought on bancor
And yes, this does appear to be the plan
Sergey's inner ambition is bigger than almost anyone realizes

Linkpool has been clear that they've been developing a dynamic liquid staking pool for over a year now
The model for that is crv/cvxcrv which operates exactly as described above
>>52634628
That is what is happening
>>52634639
Chainlink doesn't stop fractional reserve banking
It makes fractional reserve transparent and allows for risk assessment and a transparent balance sheet
Just like now but with far less risk and far more efficiency

>>52634643
sounds good

>>52634304
Jesus Christ almight you are the biggest faggot on this board right now, and it is full of faggots


I have no words


Die

>>52634702
>If you don't have any evidence then your answer is much less likely than mine to be true
how so? you provide unsubstantiated guesswork that tries to do damage control as much as possible, I provide unsubstantiated guesswork that's cynical of their motivations. both are equally valid.

>>52634656
Looks like CCIP is delayed to 2023 from Lorenz's comments at smart con
Staking launches in dec
Community staking will likely be a real lock
LPL liquid staking will likely operate like steth/eth

I wish i could answer questions about the project, but it is adequately specific to dox me at this point
>>52634667
Any you would prefer first?
>>52634679
We'll add opsec for retail level investors
>>52634696
You don't need 10k

>>52634249
explain picrel to a brainlet

>>52634746
Thanks
>>52634751
All of my answers are based on public comments by the team and publicly available information that is verifiable (like eth's roadmap)

>>52634273
you might be getting those and its subject to change

when DECO? all of my interesting usecases/projects using web2 apis/systems arent feasible with just external adapters

>>52634775
>All of my answers are based on public comments by the team and publicly available information that is verifiable (like eth's roadmap)
your whole reply >>52634393 consists entirely of speculation

>>52634752
>Any you would prefer first?

Common financial and personal pitfalls for various levels of wealth and also what to buy at certain levels of wealth

>>52634249
token not sneeded

>>52634771
A chainlink node quorum can provide the same trust assurances as an L1 blockchain
This happens currently with arbitrum anytrust quorums

Chainlink's whole node network could easily become an L1 fallback layer when most smart contract executions are done over L2s

That makes link capture all the value of smart contracts

>>52634817
thanks OP
ive enjoyed the threads over the years
gl

>>52634786
OK
>>52634799
Checked
You and their industry partners
Would not be surprised if there was a public beta out in 2023
>>52634805
That they have experience and are replicating the practices of legacy finance and eth is verifiable fact
The motivation is what you're speculating on
I didn't speculate on whether the team was greedy or altruistic, I just gave equivalents from the real world
Which makes my guess objectively better

I think it’s wildly unsafe to deposit a token into a smart contract that has just come out. Generally you want to wait a couple of months before a level of trust can be established. Plus with a ~2 year lock-up forcing you to wait. Literally anything could happen, war, hospitalization of a family member or yourself, being laid off, etc… you have no access to those funds. Anons say that it’s money they’re okay with losing but we all know that’s false. Truth over Trust and I trust no-one in crypto, I’ll wait till I can make my own node and deposit and withdraw whenever I feel like.

>>52634840
I've enjoyed them too
Glad to be here

Popping over to a friend's for an hour or so
Will keep going when I get back

>>52634862
Make sure to take your kneepads Mr Chainlink Amabassador!

>>52634771
f( ) = eth validators
but
DONs can be interchangeable with validators as f
( currently it seems arbitrum implementations are headed this way )

DONs generalize the trustless property of blockchain consensus to validate things beyond block contents, but logic follows that they can also validate block contents (a subset of addressable data for DONs).


Not related:

Picrel misleads math anons because the implication is that
f( f( f(x))) = state at time T + 3
which implies validation can be extrapolated into the future. More accurately validation is a function of current state and new txs:

f( x , y_T) where y_T are new transactions at time T, that is used to update the current state.

>>52634702
oh i see ty

>>52634249
Wow he used to be thin.

>>52634643
What to buy
Pitfalls

>>52634358
you cant run a node unless you kyc and sergey only does that for ex employees and corps
>>52634393
>They also have cover from the eth foundation doing the same
eth foundation started removing lock up dates on their site. Eth foundation thinks MEV is a good thing.
>>52634407
source?
>>52634453
why didnt the team just use link from cold storage? they chose to test with public funds. its strange because they are subsidizing the network still
>>52634702
>Sergey's inner ambition is bigger than almost anyone realizes
you dont know that to be true, just like you wont give that anon a yes or no answer

>>52634817
I don't have enough link...

>>52634981
6k linklet here

Neither do I. Now the price action has shifted. LINK always has unpredictable upside when it behaves like this. And with short strength crippled, who knows what happens.

>>52634846
how do I best move into self employment/working fulltime in smart contract development? ive been doing hackathons for a year now. right now im improving the best idea i had but as i said before i realised it needs deco in order to be a 10x step above existing products

How much ETH for staking gas?

>>52634846
where are you anon i wanna have a legit discussion with you. the anti fud and fud shills are in full force and its hard to discuss anything link related
>>52634953

I vote for a what to buy at various levels of wealth thread

>>52634524
So the entire ICO distribution purpose has been lied about. Fraudsters

>>52634643
yeah how do i get rich if i'm stupid?

>>52634273
Can you report back to the ambassador lounge? You are directly contravening official statements about BUILD rewards.

Thanks,
Josh

>>52634643
>What to buy at various levels of wealth
strategies for a 1k linklet thx

>>52635198
me too

>>52634249
Thoughts on chainlink’s multi sig controversy?

>>52634249
should i rather just buy and hold linkpool

I thought, having seen link tony, chainlinkgod and link drake, that I had experienced the extremes of human embarrassment. Now I see a 'spoonfeed link' anon come on /biz/ and ask if people want his opinions on life.

I would honestly rather a fucking nigger break down my door and rape me than experience this cringe again.

>>52635575
hes doing damage control because sergey and CLL are used to og anons sucking their dicks for five years and 11 months. i dont think they expected this type of reaction from the community.

>>52634249
1) My friend said to me, "but isn't chainlink wholly dependent upon eth as it's an erc20"? LINK tokens only exist on the ethereum network, despite being "blockchain agnostic", right anon?

I have spent the last 3-4 years learning everything about LINK (minus the level-0 first question apparently) and I've tried to contrast and compare that what else exists in the cryptosphere. LINK seems like an investment of a lifetime, but simultaneously the price action derives from the lowest echelons. Are we that far ahead or are we delusional retards? I've never been more gaslit in my life, honestly speaking. This recent range bound relative strength to btc does give me minimal hope, however. I've held the untested personal theory that LINK is going to 5-10x sometime deep in the bear to price out the plebs. My tinfoil hat mind thinks something more conspiratorial lurks beneath the surface.

>>52635650
>something more conspiratorial lurks beneath the surface

it does

>>52635696
>>52635650
no it was the kike shorting everything and manipulating markets not just link. im still waiting for spoonfeed anon to jump back in the thread

>>52634249
How complicated do you think it'll be to steak my 7k? I have some ETH in my wallet to put for gas, but not sure what the process will be to steak. Also, will I have to actually manually do something once the v0.1 trial period is over? Once Chainlink labs stops subsidizing staking, I'd have to actually perform work to make yield.

>>52635706
it would be naive to imagine that a project like this that will change banking forever *isnt* part of some sort of conspiracy. the schizos are the ones delusional enough to believe otherwise

>>52634628
Are you taking the same thing as SBF?
https://www.drugs.com/imprints.php?imprint=512

>>52634554
The fat fuck is building a fine software company that has some utility. Sadly, his greed had him issue tokens that aren't required, he now must lawyer up for the SEC. That's expensive.

>>52635727
>it would be naive to imagine that a project like this that will change banking forever *isnt* part of some sort of conspiracy.
it would be naive to think that it would be. if they wanted to price you out the token would be higher then it is after five years and all the collected info graphics that have been made to spoon feed people to buy.

>>52635746
Yes sir. I advice you do the same

>>52635625
It's literally on of the twitter ambassadors. The 'no withdraw' response was the shite cope, word for word they've settled on and the "im looking forward to filling my allocation" response to staking was the least organic, most PR speak answer you could possibly have produced.

What a fucking atrocious thread and OP. I don't know if the absolute lack of appeal is because the ambassadors are twitter troons or just qualia free browns for hire.

BTW they reported my earlier post for racism lmao. Looks like Rory and co didn't think the thread was optical for them. Go suck a shit-pocked pajeeta cunt ambassadors Back to twitter you run lmao, you don't fit in at all.

>>52635787
This, the largest flaw in the schizos "youre not meant to have this" theory is the garbage price action, if this token really was some kingmade 4IR amazon tier investment which was guaranteed to reach 81k eoy, then the price would of never gotten this low, literally all the insiders and elites would frontrun each other and buy up all the link. Instead it can be had for the cheap price of 5-7$. And when you factor inflation since links creation the pre covid price in terms of buying power is only like 2-4$..
Imo it really blows a massive hole in the schizo theory

I have about 1500 STINKers. I don't want to do any of that fancy staking shit I just want to hold like a gorillanigger. Will I make it?

>>52635575
>I thought, having seen link tony, chainlinkgod and link drake, that I had experienced the extremes of human embarrassment. Now I see a 'spoonfeed link' anon come on /biz/ and ask if people want his opinions on life.

>I would honestly rather a fucking nigger break down my door and rape me than experience this cringe again.
redpilled
>>52635625
this. just another marketing personality. make a trip op so i can filter you nigger
>>52635846
>Back to twitter you run lmao, you don't fit in at all.
this. fuck twitter niggers

>>52635846
im still waiting for him to chime in. i know he still has the tab open.

>>52634310
Reminds me of when they manually did the ICO, which was an utter disaster. A company literally named “smart contract” didn’t use a smart contract. Crypto is a joke

>>52636222
checked. This team was supposed to be different and they are doing the same shit

>>52634498
The main topics Id like is the status of securities fraud with the CL team. Are you seeing any movement on this? Pretty clearcut case if sec decides to pursue

>>52636237
literally why do the best minds in the space &etc. fall back on what everyone else is doing?
>>52636222
>Crypto is a joke
checked and this. all these lofty goals are just like flying cars or living on the moon. never gonna happen. nothing will change.

>>52634249
How much Link do I need to comfortable “make it”. I currently have a job that I love and plan on growing in, possibly starting my own manufacturing business, “making it” with Link would be icing on the cake and I don’t plan on selling for an incredibly long time. I have 1000 by the way. Would 3000 make more sense? Or possibly try to get to 7777?

>>52634249
what can i buy in the real world with chainlink?

which governments accept it as payment for taxes?

>>52635882
>Instead it can be had for the cheap price of 5-7$

it's a piece of shit like all the others.

>>52634656
>So what happened with the staking and CCIP delay after the announcement in January?
Remember, these products aren't releasing on Sergey's time but when it gets done and meets the standard needed to maintain its reliability.

>>52635727
>it would be naive to imagine that a project like this that will change banking forever *isnt* part of some sort of conspiracy. the schizos are the ones delusional enough to believe otherwise

as always, this shitty token has zero interaction with the real world of banks and finance.

>>52636460
new community ambassador ID

>>52634249
Thank you for all of your work over the years.

My question is: What mechanisms are in place to disincentivize investors from front-running the v.01 unlock and crashing the token price? It seems like many Linkies have a staking stack and a selling stack. It’s logical that many will sell their staking rewards immediately, especially if the price of LINK has increased substantially. Therefore it makes sense to front-run this selloff by selling immediately before the unlock and buying back in after the selloff. Any ideas on how this will be mitigated?

>>52636460
>Remember, these products aren't releasing on Sergey's time but when it gets done and meets the standard needed to maintain its reliability.
nigger staking was supposed to be have worked on since the first whitepaper. Do you remember the threads of us looking at the pivotal tracker looking for anything related to it? this should have been done already

>>52636499
Independent thought alert! Rory, shut it down!

>>52634249
what is jason parser's psychiatric condition? is his consultancy failing?

>>52635787
This range is perfect for pricing lots of people out but still low enough to make neet's hands shaky

>>52636599
this is false

>>52634249
Please just give it me straight ONCE AND FOR ALL: How much link do I need to make it??!!!!!!!

>>52636615
this post is a lie

>>52634799
Right were back
As above it sounds like lots of industry partners are pushing this one. Would guess 2023
>>52634808
OK well start with those
will include nfcdl in first post to make it easy to search
>>52634859
You can make that decision as you please
You will make other holders happy by giving them space
>>52634945
Carrying the weight of the world
>>52634953
None of what you wrote even makes sense
The team is using link to subsidize early stakers
Linkpool has been clear that they are launching liquid staking, they've been saying it for over a year and have a website stake.link specifically dedicated to it
I answered all of your questions and you still seem mad, sad
>>52635099
One of the best ways to break into any field is to offer to do any job for groups in the field while developing your skills in the job you want
Get any job you can at a chainlinked/smart contract enabled company
>>52635100
The usual amount for a contract interaction at high gas fees
I have 0.2 or more in each wallet just in case
>>52635193
Back from friends

>>52636757
i thought i made it clear what i was asking.

>>52634249
thanks for coming here OP. Will the SEC and US Congress regulations affect Chainlink? or Chainlink is already king made?

>>52636757
>I answered all of your questions and you still seem mad, sad
this. he has done his job what the fuck is your problem?

>>52636757
why does the team think its okay to test staking with bag hodlers tokens instead of the cold wallet tokens they use for dumping on the open market? Esp when there is a two year lock up. The team is paying sergeys friends who set up a kyc node right now?

>>52635198
Noted
>>52635243
They have been transparent about that allocation since the start
>>52635483
That is an interesting topic
Of course most rich people are smart, but there are more rich dumb people than you'd think
The real problem for the rich dumb is maintaining wealth
But there are some hidden advantages
>>52635502
What?
>>52635512
That doesn't require a post
Hold your assets and reinvest the passive income portion, while focusing on increasing your real world income for now
Once your life expenses are covered by passive income, semi-retire and continue working less and less until you reach a happy balance
>>52635529
Seemed like a nothingburger and everyone seemed satisfied with the solution
>>52635570
Hard to tell versus link, however especially during the period where there is only locked staking on the main protocol, I could see lpl's liquid staking protocol outperforming
>>52635650
Chainlink has built a network that is critical to all of crypto and defi
And is up 5000% from ico
Most projects that launched around 2017 have rugged or gone to zero
>>52635696
No, it doesn't
This is the normal course of a highly relevant, highly profitable early stage investment
>>52635706
I'm back
An asset with a large amount available at low borrow rate will of course be subject to shorting, but that can be a blessing or a curse. The community's decision to "fud the normans out" is what allowed the shorters to win in the short term
>>52635726
Very uncomplicated
Just like checking eligibility for staking
>>52635890
You will likely have plenty of liquid staking options once the network is mature enough to allow significant revenue from 1500 link
So yes, but it will take longer than those with more
>>52635968
You are in a thread you didn't start complaining like a spoiled child
You're the problem
>>52636062
I'm here
>>52636329
The team has done an excellent job of not discussing price and of giving real world utility to the token, so they are in good shape

>>52636882
you dont spend a lot of time here do you lmao? you guys should be getting a raise from sergey for how much hes been dumping on us. or does the fat faggot keep it for himself?

>>52636366
If you enjoy your job why not take 10% of your investable income and DCA?
You'll have plenty for standard investments and a fun hobby to keep up on that will eventually make you rich
>>52636408
You can sell it through any crypto exchange for fiat and pay your taxes that way
>>52636499
See above
In tradfi unlocks are done FIFO and progressively with long vestment windows so even if every unlocked link is sold, frontrunning is effectively impossible.
If you are concerned about this you can keep a small portion not staked and use it as a swingtrade opportunity to derisk
>>52636591
He's being replaced by Chad OFork
>>52636635
Depends on lots of factors

>>52636882
Can you tell the about the benefits of KYC nodes in a production environment for Chainlink brand price feeds?

What do you think Truth>Trust means?

In response to your comment I agree people who post niggers in the wrong thread are the problem not the Jews. Niggers will always be a problem but the Jews have special legal protection so they cannot be named.

Do you think Harry Potter is really about society learning to name the Jew?

>>52634304
thanks for your threads over the years, including the life advice one
interesting to see you talk about linkpool a lot more, the announcement on the 5th will be interesting

>>52636954
based

>>52636785
Your posts have been anything but clear
>>52636788
Chainlink will have the same regulation as any other baseline protocol
HTTP, TLS
>>52636839
Because most people, myself included, want to stake their link on launch and want the return on their investment
If you do not, you are free to not participate
>>52636910
I've been very clear about every thread I've started here, so no, I don't spend much time here
But I always enjoy the time I do spend

>>52636977
>Because most people, myself included, want to stake their link on launch and want the return on their investment
>If you do not, you are free to not participate
you dont answer questions for shit.

>>52636954
KYC is a requirement for launching a network like chainlink, I wrote a long post about it
Jews are exactly what they say they are: a highly insular group with high emotional intelligence who tend to do well in countries other than their own
This does lead to a fairly unfortunate but predictable cycle of what happens with them when the mechanisms by which they succeed are uncovered
>>52636961
It was surprising to me to see the entirety of liquid staking effectively outsourced to linkpool
That is a very profitable niche, at least while baseline link staking is not liquid

>>52636998
are you reeing in the other thread as well? are you french?

>>52636998
You asked why users link was being used for staking's launch
I answered
You are now mad
Your life must suck

I heard BUILD rewards won't go live until the actual next version of staking, is this true

I also heard retroactive rewards could be a thing however
all of this is rumour, do you know more?

>>52637048
im mad because ive been dumped on for five years and 11 months and have heard it straight from sergey's mouth that its coming next year all those years. Then told that v.01 staking is a thing and maybe you get rewards from build program, oh and you cant unlock your money and rewards for two years so they can test somethin(staking) that was in the first white paper.

>>52637078
you might not even get them, the community advocates were very clear to point it out

>>52637078
No insider info
Would guess that they will be accumulated but not accessible until unlock
Or
At least their value is accessible through liquid staking protocols for those staking on node allocations through liquid staking

>>52636977
>return on investment

Youre down 90% from last year and now you care about 4.75%? In before:

> i bought le ico

Yeah so you lost millions this year hodling. Hope Serg pays you well to do damage control here. Unfortunately I dont think its having the impact you want. People here are pretty dug in. If you wanted a bunch of attention from losers you could just do a youtube channel, instagram, etc.

>>52634249
ser pls some price predictions
i need to sell some at $12 so i don't have to wage cage for a year
you think it'll hit $12 anytime soon?

>>52637117
>At least their value is accessible through liquid staking protocols for those staking on node allocations through liquid staking
doubt it, it's not like they can unlock the actual rewards or like LPL would get tokens dropped in advance when community doesnt

>>52634249
Hey op, I lost so much since last year. I only have 9k links left and still have to sell links to survive each month. I'm eligible for early staking. If I stake 7k will I be able to survive on those 2k links until staking unlocks?

>>52636513
The industry wasn't mature enough for staking back then. What would they use the security for anon?

>>52637229
>we dont need that much security anon
>its fine crypto never gets hacked
>kyc nodes and walled gardens are completely fine
>to be honest permissionless networks are not my brand of decentralized oracle network
insidious fudfags like you make me sick

>>52637229
you mean they didn't have enough people using the network right? do you think subsidizing the network and paying ex chainlink employees to secure the network is a better move? they could have just started out with that from the jump

>>52637270
To this day anon I believe that CLCG really tore sir gay a new one so he is very reluctant to trust his nodes therefore this oracle network is not the decentralized brand by a kyc walled garden oracle network. seems to work though! I could link you to chainlinkgods twitter. he defends chainlink all the time. many such examples of brand favoritism but im sure you have read them yourself.

>>52637028
Sir are you saying I’ll make it with 1200 stinkers?

>>52637305
kek. i really should stop posting like this because i need to wait for a run up to get out.

>>52634304
>I'll have to stop these threads after this one
end of an era mate. always enjoyed your threads. take care.

>>52634330
>the new high frequency low gas print price feeds
Hmm first time I'm hearing about this, can you share some links?

>>52637348
Maybe a new marketing personality will suddenly appear?
Would really be something
can one of you scam coiners make a market that I can long ref. new chainlink marketing personality appears on /biz/?
Moochoos grazeeus
>>52637342
there are no brakes on the rape train

>>52637081
Ive held the same period
Im happy to have a 5000% return (my best ever fwiw)
And look forward to watching my investment and the network continue to grow
>>52637125
Why are you so mad about my investment decisions?
>>52637139
Depends on the sentiment of the cryptosphere
So no idea
>>52637150
Same exact mechanism exists for eth/steth
So long as what the rewards are is known, there is a way to make them liquid
>>52637169
Sounds like you should find a job
>>52637229
There's the post
>>52637335
Over time Id think so

>>52637348
Always happy to be here
>>52637371
https://blog.chain.link/low-latency-oracle-solution/
Note specifically all of the per execution "gas" costs are link payments
The only L1 prints are the initial contracts
This makes way more money for nodes and will likely become the default for price feeds after there is precedent

>>52637449
>https://blog.chain.link/low-latency-oracle-solution/
are you saying I can get all this information about Chainlink without listening to your life advice?
Holy fuck niggers can hang! This is like the skip to recipe button on the cooking websites! XD

>>52637449
>https://blog.chain.link/low-latency-oracle-solution/
maybe I should copy and paste this LINK into my web browser just in case clicking it creates data metrics and feedback loops that encourage paid marketers to come here and advertise. Advertising is forbidden here

>>52637422
>And look forward to watching my investment and the network continue to grow
i dont think you and the team get what you guys have done. You have fucked your base over with this lock up and confirming the project is another two years out.

>>52634249
what do you think the linkpool snapshot was for?
>>52636961
>the announcement on the 5th will be interesting
cant wait for the 5th as well!!

>>52637518
>>52637518
>You have fucked your base over with this lock up and confirming the project is another two years out.
Wrong totally wrong. bad post! Cold take!
Lockdowns are essential to the health and safety of the wider crypto community. Grandma and Grandpa need to be saved!
Lock your link. Listen to Chainlinkgod. Like share and leave a comment if this post has motivated you in some way or other
tldr gibs me youre feedbacks

>>52637449
>https://blog.chain.link/low-latency-oracle-solution/
Thanks, I missed that, I'm gonna read it now

Another thing I may have missed, but just noticed it now browsing their repo - what the hell is this thing?
https://github.com/smartcontractkit/chainlink/tree/develop/contracts/src/v0.8/dev/ocr2dr

Am I correct in assuming this is a new feature that was not discussed before, allowing arbitrary JavaScript code to be executed off-chain and results posted back on chain? So basically a generic oracle solution, with off-chain logic (like fetching external data, running compute-heavy calculations etc.) defined as on-chain source code?!

Conservatively, when can I get spendable passive income from my investment five years ago? I've been patient and I've not sold anything, but I haven't really reaped any rewards from it besides feeling very rich for a few weeks in May 2021.
Please also give me some hopium, anything exciting coming from the team soon? I was promised CCIP and Enterprise Abstraction Layer.

>>52634249
ser how come there's no defi app that lets you yield farm for 4-5% from the U.S. Treasury?
wouldn't this be the killer defi dapp?
safe 4-5% yield from Treasury.

>>52637569
Sorry fren no money but you sound like you need some life advice! spoon feedie is very good at giving unsolicited life advice almost like someone in marketing said hey whats the opposite of fudders telling anons to sell?

>>52634249
What is your thoughts on VCs now without LINK. Over the course of several years working for a firm, my job was to beg people for welfare (grants) and court VCs to invest. I mainly did Web3/crypto but I did ask a few outsiders for laughs, to include USAA.

Through public research, outwardly 70% of VC firms have closed (sold) their positions in Chainlink. Now obviously they could be lying, but I don’t see the reason for VCs to lie about publicly announcing they’ve closed their positions.

What do you think is going to happen in the next one to two years, WRT to VCs seemingly now missing on the biggest token run. Do you believe there will be VC fomo to get back into LINK, coincide with CCIP, BTC halves, etc

thanks

>>52637569
>Conservatively, when can I get spendable passive income from my investment five years ago?
two years from now when the network just gets started

>>52637517
You're trying too hard michael
>>52637518
That may have been the case if liquid link staking wasnt launching right alongside
>>52637537
I think it was for proportional allocation of space of linkpool's initial 12 nodes using their liquid staking protocol
Just a guess tho
First week of dec will be fun
>>52637549
You'll be able to see if youre right by how quickly the early staking allocations fill up

>>52637603
>That may have been the case if liquid link staking wasnt launching right alongside
i dont think ive seen anything confirmed. im still waiting for the blog post from link pool

>>52637603
If I do not click the links in this thread does that make you mad?
Maybe you should anonymize your links like a normal anon spoon!

>>52637537
it's for stake.link

>>52637603
>You'll be able to see if youre right by how quickly the early staking allocations fill up
The thing about Crypto is that there is never a shortage of retards who want to throw away their money in exchange for some future promise so I do not think this is proof that I am right. Let's see what the KYC nodes have to say about it

>>52637603
Is 5k link enough to make it?

>>52637695
Yes you have already made it. Congrats bro you made it!

>>52637702
why are you so butthurt?

>>52637556
Thanks for sharing link, will dive in
>>52637584
Need banking infra access, link is working on it
>>52637601
The same idiots who got rekt from SBF and alameda
Im shocked!
>>52637615
We have linkpool saying theyre doing liquid staking and chainlink saying liquid staking is available through 3rd parties
>>52637656
The whole world is wrong except you
It must be hard being so special

>>52637422
is 20k link enough to make it

>>52637695
>>52637730
Yes, with time

>>52637722
no your work here will convince idiots to run into a two year lock up.

>>52634249
When?

>>52637711
Why are you butthurt bro you made it you should be celebrating. enjoy it bro you earned it and congratulations

!!!

>>52637722
>The whole world is wrong except you
>It must be hard being so special
You carry the weight of the world on your shoulders spoon you must be a very important individual. Are you also a frog version of someone from the team?

KEK.

Come back from dinner to see lab troons reported me for racism A THIRD time, then after a safe period the fucking ambassador came back lmao. Let's send him away again:

- brown people do not have a phenomenological internal experience like what we understand as humans, they are more akin to plants
- kikes are a metaphysical, spiritual evil

That should buy this thread some breathing room until they ban me again

>>52637741
Lockdowns lockups whats the difference? The most important thing to remember is nodes must be kyc and permissonlessness is a tool of the devil

>>52637770
redpilled and basedo

>>52637809
here bro straight from the sauce
https://anonym.es/?blog.chain.link

Please sir, may I have some more breadcrumbs?

>>52637838
here bro straight from the sauce
https://anonym.es/?blog.chain.link

>>52637737
how much link is NOT enough to make it

>>52637855
Congratulations bro you made it

>>52634304
>I'll have to stop these threads after this one
You've answered many of my questions in these threads and enriched my perspective in a way that has resulted in lasting personal change. Thank you and I hope you continue to speak about what you can.

>>52637855
also as an addendum should I lever up my link on AAVE now?

>>52634249
Is it still gonna moon?

>>52637877
this. spoon is a solid community guy who carries the weight of the world on his shoulders and gives good unsolicited advice.

We have all just made it.

Congratulations to us all

>>52637722
>Thanks for sharing link, will dive in
https://github.com/smartcontractkit/chainlink/blob/develop/contracts/test/v0.8/dev/OCR2DROracle.test.ts
Yeah, I think it's a generalized, programmable oracle

A bit like Automation (ex-Keepers) in that there will apparently be subscriptions with a web3 "dashboard" and you'll be able to run arbitrary code there. Pretty obvious idea when you think about it, the Chainlink node can easily spin up isolated virtual machines with a javascript engine (V8) to run arbitrary code...

>>52637770
Lmao this new narrative from you freaks is fun

>>52637877
Sorry the ambassador is currently away right now and this thread is down for maintenance.
>>52637770

Please check back later for more Awesome! Chainlink Tips!

>>52637913
>chainlink brand ambassadors hate racism
this is not a meme

>>52634643
I enjoyed your spoonfeed threads, I am going to miss them. I just want to say thank you. -k

These are all good topics.
I was thinking "Which countries are excellent bases to settle in when you have that passive income?" I feel like escaping from the western society that has divided us. Especially men and women, we are hating each other more and more.

>>52637941
kek why is decentralization and community engagement important for a kyc walled garden type oracle system thing?

>>52637838
Sorry, not an insider
>>52637855
I'd say 10 will never take you to the promised land
>>52637877
Always glad to be here
Glad you enjoyed
>>52637886
No
>>52637897
Quite likely I'd say
>>52637898
Thank you for bumping my thread
>>52637906
Interesting, thanks

>>52637722
Anywhere I can read about the APY on Linkpool staking? Didn’t see it on their site after perusing.

>>52637969
Ooo that's an excellent topic, would love to type that one up
Lots of hidden gems out there nobody talks about

>>52637971
You are welcome bro I always enjoy reading your headcanon but you should anon your links to the chainlink brand website otherwise they might dox you and that may ruin your chances with that future project

>>52637971
>I'd say 10 will never take you to the promised land
I'm gonna be so freaking rich

>>52637990
>Ooo that's an excellent topic, would love to type that one up

>>52637898
>>52638002
look at how this guy responded to your post. you can clearly tell hes an intern they hired to hang around here or is purposefully posting like an idiot to throw people off a trail

>>52634304
Hi Spoonfeedy. Welcome back you've been away ages.
When the 25M pool is expanded up towards 75M, will early stakers from the 25M pool be offered more early staking? If not, it'll be hard to get in, will it not?

Also, I think you're gonna be the new CMO, replacing Adelyn. If it is you, scratch both eyebrows one after the other in your first online interview, will you?

>>52638002
imagine spending 28 posts shitting up this thread because you're mad about lockup timelines and the fact that LINK hasn't lived up to your expectations. What a miserable person you must be. Do you also attend AGM's for stocks you hold that underperformed and shit those up, too?

>>52637269
Anon, for staking to work, people have to pay for the services. It took years for people to understand why oracles were important in the DeFi space, let alone its importance in general, and Chainlink was subsidizing node operations the majority of the time. To add staking on top of all this, you're adding costs for a system that just wasn't ready for it. And do remember that Chainlink and a small group of collaborators were also subsidizing price feeds so everyone could use it for free.

>>52637270
At the time, not enough people were using the network, correct. I'm not complaining about what they did so far to get to this point of staking nor am I going to speculate on what they could have done better.

>>52637422
That was you who wrote >>52637229? Holy crap, thank you!

>>52634249
Will there be a queu priority for people to get in line once staking comes out? Like if the pool gets filled in early access will you able to queu your self to be the next up in line?

Good afternoon everyone at /biz I'm a longtime lurker and hardly ever post but I do enjoy watching people here and always have been interested in investing, unfortunatly my life hasn't allowed me access to enough funds to do anything serious, I'm a long time Christian although my faith gets tested a lot but I also believe everything I've done has lead me to the place I am today and finding biz as well.

Besides all the scamming going on with the indian coins there has been plenty of good advice here I've learned and seen many of you help eachother in various ways, it has softened some of my harder edges knowing the same people I thought to be inconsiderate and only horde their wealth have shown me that prejudice just isn't true, I don't enjoy the shame that comes from asking for a hand up and It is usually met with pretty upset results but I also know the intention is what is matters and people can tell who is being sincere versus who is being dishonest.
I'd give you a sob story but that would take longer than a simple QRD to really explain but to say the least I've walked a path most wouldn't dare wish upon their worst enemies.
I honestly hope you all have a good holiday with your family, God bless you all and your future God is still in my heart and my life and I hope he remains in yours as well whoever reads this.
0xd07Cd512c0Be08F0e58EA29D599198Ea2De07F56

>>52638125
>and Chainlink was subsidizing node operations
they still are.

This thread is just OP on his phone that he's disconnected from his wi-fi, and then cycling his router in-between using his laptop to reply to his own comments. Check how many 1pbtid that are in here gushing over how thankful they are to him, all in a similar style. The fact that a Link ambassador had to resort to this kind of deception just shows the shambolic state the project is in.

>>52637569
NFCDL, did you miss my post? It's fine if you have no answers, just say so, don't leave me hanging.

the start of staking is feeling like the start of a new chapter of life. i hope it bodes well for each and every one of us

>>52634249
y'all think staking event could be same as mainnet event where people think there'll be a sell the news event but then we'll just keep on going up and up after a slight dump on day of event?

>>52634285

>>52638187
I am not bullish, I am beyond bearish.

Chainlink is a globohomo shitcoin of the highest order and is going straight to zero.
Their days of shitting up biz with their astroturfed psyops are over. They've been found guilty of using DARPA bots, paid shills and sybil attacks to push the WEF agendas, and for that they will pay with their miserable life.
The shills and bagholders will be financially EXTERMINATED and there is nothing they can do about it except watch in horror as it all comes tumbling down. The ride ends here for linkies, the game is over for them.

>>52637422
Im not mad. I stated an observation that you lost 90%, which is reality, and because its a topic that makes you upset, you projected your emotions on me a coping mechanism.

So…back to my question, why are you concerned about 4.75% when you just lost 90? It seems trivial. Also, given you just lost 90, what makes you think youre qualified to serve as some kind of mentor to people here?

>>52637722
>The whole world is wrong except you
It must be hard being so special

LOL the irony of a link holder saying this. Man I hope that was sarcasm…

So what is the difference on Linkpool when staking pure link versus having lpl token and link there

>>52638600
I remember losing 90% sats holding LINK from 11000 to 1300 sats in October/November 2017, when everyone priced everything in sats.
I remember losing 80% when we went from $1 back to $0.20 in 2018.
You get used to it after a while.

>>52638802
>I remember losing 90% sats holding LINK from 11000 to 1300 sats in October/November 2017, when everyone priced everything in sats.
this drop was the best thing that happened to me as it deadened all emotion in this market from that point on
the eth 2018/19 bear market drop from 0.14 to under 0.02 is another good example (~95% drop) is another good example of this kind of stuff

>>52638187
>This thread is just OP on his phone that he's disconnected from his wi-fi, and then cycling his router in-between using his laptop to reply to his own comments. Check how many 1pbtid that are in here gushing over how thankful they are to him, all in a similar style. The fact that a Link ambassador had to resort to this kind of deception just shows the shambolic state the project is in.
this. chainlink is in Shambala

>>52634273
There are two types of people in crypto. Those for whom this lockup is not an issue at all, and desperate poorfags gambling away the money they should be saving up for their village.

>>52638875
that was meant for
>>52634285

>>52634249
why should I give a fuck about chainlink?

What was the deal with Ari Juels tweeting those things

I've been holding on to 500 chain link for some time. When is it going to net me a bunch of money?

Hi guys I need to get in touch with a Chainlink brand LINK employee rn before I do something irrational...

>>52634249
why is the token needed? Is it really needed to begin with?

>>52639018
shut the fuck up jason you're such an annoying midwit, no one fucking cares

>>52639062
That's Mr Parser to you faggot.

Get me a Chainlink brand LINK employee right now!

>>52637990
You missed my question! >>52638075

>>52639111
>Spoon Feed Bro™ is under no obligation to answer all questions posted by anonymous internet users of the internet forum website 4channel.org. Any and all answers provided by Spoon Feed Bro™ are fictional accounts and should not be construed to contain financial advice. The advice contained within Spoon Feed Bro™ threads are a limited time event contained within the thread itself and represent no relationship with Chainlinklabs or the nascent Chainlink Foundation. This post has not been a recording. Do not repost this.

>>52634304
Congrats man. If Chainlink moons so I can retire from my otherwise too well-paid job, I’ll apply to join you.

So I do t have any chainlink on ethereum due to gas fees. I have mine on polygon and arbitrum.

Does this matter?

Also, i have 1017 link avg about $9. Will this be enough to make it

>>52637971
Do you know who Satoshi nakamoto is?

Are there any other investment opportunities that you can redpill us on?

>>52634249
Thnx anon for the useful bread. I don't have metamask wallet or walletconnect.
How can I connect my myetherwallet address for early staking? If I need to create one of the above which one you recommend?

Also, for under 3k stacklets, what % of folio would you advise to stake and therefore leave unaccessible for 2 years?

Hello OP, I'm just a retard that doesn't really understand any of this, but I have a 2k stack and have been holding it for a while now. What would you recommend I do next, just continue holding? I wanted to get in on this before you leave forever.

Hello OP thank you useful bread sers i has one question of the steaking ok
>1pbti

>MUH 2 YEARS!!!!!! OH NOES!!!
why do i have a feeling there's a lot of 28 year olds in here
>I'LL BE 30 WHEN I CAN PULL MY LINKIES OUT!!! I'LL BE A MIDDLE-AGED BOOMER AND OVER THE HILL!!! NO 23 YR OLD CUTIE WILL WANT ME ANYMORE!!! AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA NGMI!!!!!

>>52634249
He wasn't always a fat fuck?

>>52634249
For real what happens when all the link dries up that is rewarded for staking. Is there a point in time in the future where the network just ends because no one has an incentive to stake because there is no link to give out as rewards?

>>52639587
>>52639668
this really depends on your living situation and time horizons
do you have a good, stable job? any taxes coming up? what stage of life are you?
then we can expect a bull run around 2024, how will you feel if link goes over $100 and you can't sell it?
next just run the numbers, you'll get 4.75% per year
staking 1000 will obviously get you 47.5 link per year
that might not seem much but if link is $100 when you take it out that's $5000 for doing nothing
if it's $500 then it's $25,000 etc
those numbers might so ridiculous but if link succeeds then they may well be low
basically, you need to _think_ and make a decision

>>52639940
+ build rewards too of course

>>52639925
Beginning in v1 the rewards will start being less from inflation and more from network fees. Eventually staking will be sustainable with no inflation at all to the circulating supply

Lol.
Will zenon holders (ticker znn) also make it in the chain link fairytale?

>>52639961
build rewards are not for sure. The team was very adamant about making that clear

Link sisters.. Its over I sold

>>52639923
No he unironically only got fat once he started dumping link, ever since then hes been gorging himself because thanks to baggies he basically has an unlimited amount of money to eat anything and everything he wants any time of the day.
His lack of self control is quite alarming for the chainlink company

>>52640077
they're just using "may" as the teams will set how they provide the build rewards
might do things like a minimum stake of 100 link etc etc
it's just corp/legal speak for saying "it's not up to us"

>>52634249
why does the price need to be high?

>>52640343
do you trust a team that announced staking in jan only to release a gimped version the last year of the month to follow through?

>>52637990
For someone with limited funds, does it make more sense to buy LINK or LPL right now? I have around 3k LINK but no LPL.

>>52640406
? the teams have allocated their supply so is up to them not chainlink?

>>52640430
chainlink lost my trust and any team associated with them. they shilled bancor, celcius, and ftx

>>52638075
My best guess is that the 25->75 expansion will all be node based staking allocation for early nodes supporting CCIP
That lets everyone in through liquid staking/lpl
This is why I was so surprised they fully outsourced it to lpl
>>52638125
One of the best parts about 4chan for people like me is the ability to rapidly test highly abstract concepts without sycophantism
That post was one of those iterations
Say what you will about 4chan but there is no better crucible of ideas
>>52638132
More like after early access first come, first served
>>52638205
Sorry about that, thought I'd responded
Once a liquid staking option goes live, there is the ability to access staking value
You may take a haircut to do so, but I would guess that people staking through liquid staking (not early access) will have a permanent and ever growing passive income source from the beginning of 2023 onward

The downside is you are competing with the full ecosystem there, so nodes will take a hefty cut at first
>>52638256
If there is a fault of the team it is an overabundance of caution. Staking really is the next chapter and perhaps overdue, but definitely good
>>52638454
I think this
Especially if staking is the only way for retail to access equity in very high quality projects and that induces a fomo-proof cycle
>>52638746
Early access staking is full reward, but illiquid until unlocking is released
Liquid staking is staking reward minus lpl fee
Which is why I'm surprised link left this value capture portion to linkpool
>>52638802
This
>>52639045
It is proportional ownership and value capture of a network more valuable than the internet
>>52639243
Yes, you likely wont be able to access early access staking or lpl liquid staking without l1 eth based link
>>52639245
A group of people with the main brains/work done by Hal Finney
may he rest in peace
>>52639585
I dont shill anything but link in these threads, but since it's my last thread what the hell:

>>52640491
My top 5 holdings are exactly what you'd expect from someone with experience in the space
Link
Eth
Xmr
Crv held as cvxcrv and in crv lp's
Lpl

>>52640468
just the reality of the wild west, stick to your 401k, this market isn't for everyone. either accept that fuckups will happen or move on

>>52639587
If you have early access, I'd stake 50% or less and leave the rest accessable for the next few years
There may be some great opportunities to get liquid staking spots or great prices with liquidity crunches in the next year or two
>>52639923
The world will eventually orbit around him
Literally and figuratively
>>52639925
Price increases to compensate until some people sell
If link is $500 and offering 0.5% apy most will sell some
>>52640368
See above
>>52640408
Since you're post snapshot, buying link is reasonable

>>52640506
Based LPL chad. What's LPL make it stack in your opinion. Also, farewell spoon-sneed anon

>>52640617
Honestly no idea
I do think they'll do well short term as above
Farewell and best wishes

>>52637028
Linkpool is UK based and can completely shield Chainlink from all the worries about being a security being a separate non US based company.
That must have played a role.

However I hope I get to see the staking contracts before the release.

>>52634249
How do you feel about the token being unneeded?

>>52634249
Welcome back, it's been a while

>>52640748
I'm going to miss your threads once you're in your new position. I wish you all the best my fren, it's been so many years, thank you for all the posts.

>>52634249
Will sergey save us bancor retards??

3rd edition for any curious anons who missed out

https://theionpublishing.com/shop/cbcube3ed/

>>52637838
>>52637845
If this isn’t some blatant samefagging idk what is. Look at this kid’s desperate faggy 30+ pbtid meltdown.

>>52640748
See you in the lpl telegram anon

>>52639587
If you decide to use MetaMask wallet, learn how to add a new network and choose another Ethereum mainnet node from this site:

https://chainlist.org/chain/1

Metamask's default RPC node (the Ethereum node you send your transactions to for processing) is Infura and they track your IP and have been known to block transactions based on country.

kinda feels like drunk anons final thread

how many Big Macs can Sergey eat???

>>52634304
good luck in your role of director of marketing for linkpool

>>52640748
salutations nfcdl, enjoyed your threads over the years

>>52634304
Thanks for making these threads.
I just want you to know that your efforts over the years have been appreciated.
I look forward to these threads, and enjoy reading your responses. They always revitalize my hopium even when times are tough.
Thank you and good luck.

>>52640551
>The world will eventually orbit around him
>Literally and figuratively
Sounds very centralized. When will they get rid of the multisig shit?

>>52639925
18 decimal places

demand for link will continuing going up...until institutions are warring over a fraction of a fraction of one link token

enjoy the ride frens

>>52640506
I would probably replace XMR and LPL if i were you, can't wrap my head around how they made it here.

The recent launch of Nexera ID makes me want to put ALBT there also the success of GMX gives it a shot as well.

>>52642166
These type of responses seem very contrived desu. You are thanking someone who has instructed you to lose 90% of your investment. Its hard not to feel like these posts are made up but then again who would bother doing that…

>>52640748
appreciate all the effort posting over the years. Goodluck to everybody

>>52634249
why did CL support scams such as Celcius and Bancor? Even I was smart enough to not trust those scams.

>>52642663
How have I lost 90% of my investment when I bought around 20-30 cents? Dumb nigger

>>52640748
God bless spoonbro

>>52643608
n-word used

>>52641078
kys dumb cultist. I wanted to post a lighthearted funny pepe I stitched together, but some fag replying to my post made you seethe

Why are link fudders always so much angrier than shills?
Holders are the ones who are down 10x vs ETH, and we’re in the middle of a bear market with black swans happening every week. You’d think the fudders would all be happy and upbeat, this is as good as it gets for them. Instead they seem so hateful and upset.
If you can’t be a happy fudder now, then when?

>>52640797
Chainlink isn't American and is registered inbthe Cayman Islands, a British Overseas Territory anyway. Why would they need British Linkpool to shield them?

Another link cope thread where people move the goalposts. 2022 bro! $1000 eoy was just a joke huhhuh

>>52644143
Thanks for more fud. It motivates me to buy more link
And thanks OP. Good stuff

>>52643974
Because Sergey and multiple members of his team lives in Jew York which can be used as an attack vector.
Having a second separate company take care of staking removes all risks from the Chainlink company.

If the SEC mafia tries to go after Chainlink for staking they will be able to deflect everything completely saying they were not responsible for it.
The reason for the community alerting was both to secure the network and to make it an active investment.

There are too many issues when you try to do something with the US mafia.
Staking is also completely different from L1 staking because it relies on nodes providing a real value as a network.
Linkpool is the perfect company to solve this staking problem because it is one of the oldest node providers with close connections to the Chainlink team, run by honest white and not jewish people.

What I really want to see now is signs of the future adoption with tokenized assets and all the new features being tested with new use cases in a beta version.

>>52644143
it's paid twitter ambassadors, that's their job

>>52644236
how much are they paying you to fud? because it works well as an ad for link each time. Should be worth something

>>52644250
>paid to fud for advertising
I'm not chainlinkthomas, mr MayorStinky or whatever the fuck your handle is

>>52644280
I'm not either. We got something in common it seems

>I'm not a twitter shill, pinky promise
sure, keep monitoring every thread and give the fudders more (You)s for free!

>>52644314
Ok buddy

But really, there are too many fud threads for anyone to monitor. You'd know, as you make them twitterboy2001 or whatever your handle is

>twitterboy2001
very smooth, cl twitter shill lmao
keep seething

>>52644339
> seething
I'm amusing myself, fellow link holder.

BASED THREAD
LINK 1000 EOY
CHECK EM
BEST OF LUCK OP

>>52644389

>>52634931
I have been thinking about this a bunch. I think it works out for a certain subset of PoS L1s, where Eth is included.
I don’t think Chainlink could take over creating Bitcoin blocks, simply because PoW > PoS and we just definitely need PoW for the base SoV layer.
Chainlink also couldn’t take over running ICP canisters, simply because the Chainlink protocol is nowhere near as efficient for doing so compared to ICP itself.
But for Ethereum, now that it is PoS, using Chainlink nodes to decide on new blocks seems like a much better, more robust, scalable and efficient idea than the current setup with builders and validators. Also, it would probably be easier to move these Chainlink nodes over to running in canisters in ICP than all of Ethereum, making the transition from running on AWS to having a fully decentralized stack from hardware to frontend faster.

>>52640748
By based spoon-sneed anon

Gun to your head, you must give an answer: What year will LINK reach the fabled $1K?

>>52644627
2029 checkum

thanks spoon. Godspeed

>>52644627
2024

single 1(one) LINK token holder why am i not a trillionaire yet

>>52644714
Good, it's not 2029.
I am guessing next year, 2023, honestly. And I've been around since 2017. Not that my time really matters, I guess. But curious what OP says, if he's still around.

It would be interesting to create a prediction market for the, also fabled, singularity. How many schizos would make it purely based on a win in that market, assuming it has low odds of occurring?

>>52644809
I think it’ll be a year after ccip comes out, which is hopefully next year.
The thing to remember is that by 2030, Link is going to be so essential and valuable that even having 100 will make you a millionaire.

>>52643882
they are mostly link holders themselves that went mental. they had too high expectations and too little experience. if you have any experience of investing in startups chainlink has been a good investment. but they want to compare link to all the scams in crypto that pumped more. also they still cant figure out why chainlink has this gradual approach with mainnet and staking launch.

>>52643882
It really is an interesting phenomenon; they seem to get angrier the lower Link's price is.

>>52644933
>they are mostly link holders themselves that went mental
There might be some truth to this; they fudded Link for fun and now that the effects of their fud are clear for all to see, so they blame everyone else rather than face the consequences of their actions.

>>52645003
Man those fudders sure do have a lot of power, singlehandly holding the price of Link down against 400+ of the top developers from Facebook, Google, Microsoft etc etc. They must be gigachads.

>>52645092
If you think turbospamming tedious fud every day for years is "gigachad", then sure.

>>52638002
Nobody this unfunny is able to entertain themselves by just spewing negativity, lazily but yet relentlessly berating and derailing any discussion. It’s obvious you’re paid to do this, duuuuuuude

Always love your threads anon. How about future threads where we discuss promising projects like Link is?

Can someone link the threads on:

Forming meaningful relationships

How to use money to have success with women?

>>52643608
Yeah im the dumb one. You just bragged about losing millions bc youre in a cult.

>>52643882
Imagine the mental gymnastics needed to type out that small wall of cope

>>52636222
>they manually did the ICO
No, they didn't.

>>52646335
>youre in a cult
And you're in a cult devoted to beta-orbiting our cult.

>>52646121
see >>52637537