/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>52517789
I think at $50 Roger would just buy all of them but I'm hoping for lower so I can join in with thousands of these.

>>52517789
Why? Oh right, bag holding, dunning Kruger, retardation, stubborn refusal to admit mistakes, gullibility, and being underage.

>>52517859

>>52517789
>I want to buy as many as I can
You are a seriously dumb motherfucker

I lost all little respect I still had for Roger when I saw him shilling that HEX garbage. He almost listed it on his exchange too.

What a fucking retard scammer. That forced me to finally dump my BCH bags.

>>52517859
B-b-b-based (sed.. sed...ed....)

>>52517949
>He almost listed it on his exchange too
Pretty sure he actually did.
He's also supported USDT before.
And he did agree to have a non-liquidation account in a lesser known exchange which filed for chapter 11. Even if the exchange wrongly blamed him for the insolvency, he did agree to his Alameda status.

And he played a major role in NOT implementing the so-called "dev tax" which wasn't a tax and would have brought a ton of cool tech advantages to BCH, instead of creating a fourth obscure fork that nobody knows about. In fact, Avalanche (the consensus protocol) was about to debut on BCH and it only debuted on AVAX because of a few brainlets on /r/btc who Roger loves to appease for some reason.

But imagine thinking that BCH shitting the bed price-wise makes it a bad purchase instead of a great one.
For one, there's people in the community who can buy up the entire supply and choose the price on their own, if they decide to do so. Instead they're investing in the ecosystem (and not so much in the tech). That's bullish af, and I'm holding 0 and have held 0 since the AVAX ICO.

>>52518353
I've been subscribed to https://www.youtube.com/@bitcoincashcity for a few months now. It's giving me immense copium and TopSignal vibes, simultaneously.
I only have 12 of these things so w/e.
A TAFag was schizo posting extensively about laddering 4k-8k, 6 months ago. I wish I believed him.

What's this about a dev tax?

BCH is the one true Bitcoin
Proof: all the paid shills trying to smear it
>s-stop noticing things!

>>52518430
>What's this about a dev tax?
The idea was to redirect 25% of new issuance to devs, voted by holders.
This would have lowered the overall hashrate of the network, but not the profitability for miners, making it so that with 1% of SHA256 hashrate, only 1% of the money would be paid by BCH miners, most of it would come from BTC. It was pretty smart, actually, and would have led to great tech improvements for BCH, many of which you can see on XEC today.
Instead all of the BCH money was invested into adoption, tech remained oldschool, while another shitcoin with no adoption (XEC) was spawned.
Everyone lost.

>>52518353
You're right, he did list it

this thread is a bottom signal, btw.

>>52517789
You can buy them all when it goes to 0 (soon)

>>52518499
huh, that's sensible. I wonder if hodlers will rethink this after the crashes.

BCH, the coin run by a hardcore libertarian.
So hardcore that he stole hash power from a pool he operated and used it to push through a hard fork that he wanted which deviated further away from the bitcoin protocol.
guys a giant fucking hypocrit, midwit at best.
Roger actually supported the segwit 2x idea for BTC before the chain forked, absolute retard

>>52517789
I don’t know but look at the volume. We are back to pre zero trading fees. Scary.
Wtf, I had to view a /pol/ warning before posting this.