[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance


View post   

File: 121 KB, 832x1088, stable-diffusion-ai-10-01-22-3[1].jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
52382444 No.52382444 [Reply] [Original]

how to find good recruiters who would grand me remote work with no experience?

>> No.52382458

>>52382444
SEX SEX SEX
Kill yourself you subhuman faggot

>> No.52382641
File: 105 KB, 832x1088, Fd1ptefagAAWNw-[1].jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
52382641

>>52382458
yes, what are you gonna do about it?

>> No.52382670

I have 12,000 memes on my phone if I had to be shipped off to Antarctica.

I 'member my first AI stable diffusion lewd. Someone posted it on /biz/ and it looked exactly like my ex.

Fancy that.

>> No.52382676
File: 210 KB, 1261x688, 5ea.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
52382676

>>52382641
clean it up janny, range ban this nigger while youre at it

>> No.52382751
File: 95 KB, 857x1200, FhAwQpKWQAECecr[1].jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
52382751

>>52382670
i didnt see a single lewd stable diffusion yet

>> No.52382755

AI is limited greatly by its input. So all the art AI you see is just a better looking version of whatever coomers and artists were drawing for centuries. Ai is not creative, nothing original will stem from AI. People who take AI seriously are people dont understand high school maths, ie women and leftists

>> No.52382765

>>52382670
Okay shannon

>> No.52382794

>>52382755
This has actually now become a core topic in the field: what constitutes creativity and what makes our biological substrate capable of it but a computer can't?

>> No.52382831
File: 159 KB, 640x832, Fgwb9HJVIAAGsf7.jfif.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
52382831

>>52382755
name a single artist creating original images

>> No.52382838

>>52382765
Incorrect info.

>> No.52382841
File: 69 KB, 1200x800, Jannies.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
52382841

>>52382676

>> No.52382872

>>52382751
I'm talking /biz/ tier lewds. We know how to extrapolate how this is going to go.

>> No.52382922

>>52382872
animated stable diffusion, but when?

>> No.52382949
File: 418 KB, 512x768, file.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
52382949

is AI good for you?

>> No.52383095

>>52382949
its the face that kills this image for me
does anyone have a comic where group or ironical memers gets replaced with unironical memers?

>> No.52383137

>>52382949
It's when Alameda does the 50 film snippets to HOOKED on ME OF ALL PEOPLE GARY GOONSLER that peturbs me but has never worked.

PAY ME MY 1.2M XRP CONSULTANCY FEE

>> No.52383230

>>52382444
>>52382641
>>52382751
>>52382831
>>52382949
I don't know why but I can't fap to stable diffusion pics.
It turns me off knowing they're AI generated.
The mostly look the same, too.

>> No.52383262

>>52383230
what are your fapping habits? do you only watch one specific thing?

>> No.52383303
File: 89 KB, 657x346, medieval3.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
52383303

>>52382755
Protip: The artists in the middle ages producing this stuff weren't intrinsically less capable than modern artists; they simply hadn't been exposed to competent art so they never learned to do it. Had you shown those artists >>52382444, art would have rapidly advanced several centuries as they internalised what was possible. No artist learns without exposure to other people's art, not a single one. They all do the same thing AI is now doing.

>> No.52383348
File: 152 KB, 700x700, nice cat.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
52383348

>>52382755
You're right about the input data being a limiting factor. AI image generation right now is innately worse than a professional artist unless you choose to make prompts ONLY for very highly tagged stuff like faces. And even then it's prone to fucking it up. The dataset of SD is plagued with art made by industry professionals who were either trying to be creative or were pushing product, leaving subtle errors in their images, which in itself is reasonable but crippling as data for an AI where the goal is either peak human or superhuman all of the time.

>>52383303
No, people think differently. All these AI models do right now is fluff numbers together in a funny statistical way that produces fantastic results in very specific and very brittle conditions. You make good points otherwise

>> No.52383429
File: 1.63 MB, 1024x1024, {{{kawashiro nitori}}}, autumn forest, blue hair, blue eyes, green hat, short, looking up, backpack, dramatic angle, dramatic shadows, {{character focus,}} morning, fog, sunrise, d.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
52383429

>>52383348
>All these AI models do right now is fluff numbers together in a funny statistical way
There's a strong argument this is what the brain is also doing at its core. At any rate, there's no reason to believe AI can't fully capture the brain's learning approach with further research. Not there yet, but may be soon. Unless you believe the brain is made of quantum magic or something.

>> No.52383431

>>52382676
What's wrong faggot? Not enough black men in those pics?