/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>51707588
what website will people be directed to on monday?

>>51707588
>link staking
Whats the APR?
%50? %20? %2?

>>51707677
early 5% and by 1.0 about .2 the usual rate for link

>>51707697
ouch

>>51707709
.2% is bullshit that he just made up.

>>51707697
>.2
20% seems a little ambitious. It'll likely be less, I should think

>>51707726
I admit, it came out my anus, but in the end Link staking is going to be, from the user perspective lending link to nodes, and the usual rate fr Link in the money market is between 1 and .2 percent apy

>>51707588
>chain.link
>stake.link
they won, this is the best fucking domain name possible

>>51707763
it has entirely everything to do with the volume of jobs and the price of chainlink. comparing the staking yield rate to something like aave is nonsense

DRNS

>>51707763
The money market doesn't have any bearing on Chainlink Staking. They're not remotely similar and so completely incomparable. You're comparing apples and oranges.
If full staking does offer .2%apy then it means one Link token is worth multiple thousands of dollars. The system doesn't work unless every person involved is being compensated well for their part in securing the network. .2% is not enough. If Bancor or whoever else can offer that by using their jewish trickery then Chainlink will offer far, far more by producing real revenue in their very concrete profit-earning system of value capture of data throughput.

>>51707825
Customers can still chose nods with no stake. It might be foolish, but technically possible. I think the good pools are going to be filled fast and the rest can decide if they get .2 from aave, venus or joe, or 0.2 from kraken binance and whoever is going to milk the nulinkers

>Pool is backed by the highest-reputation Chainlink node operators.
now that is very interesting. i thought that node operators would use chainlink staking infrastructure to borrow link as needed.
but perhaps they're going to create a large pool that nodes can borrow from as needed? any details on this? would be good to see the talk

>>51707875
use linkpool's staking infrastructure*

>>51707588
Link staking limited to 7000 link per staker
Linkpool considered 1 participant. LPL holders limited to splitting that 7000 between all LPL holders lol

>>51707893
are you serious? Johnny has rimmed horses since 2017 and all he gets is 0.001% of the entire early bird cake. Hilarious

>>51707893
the allotments are separate for nodes

>>51707893
wrong

>>51707763
the apy will be >10%. we already know this to be a fact

>>51707588
Hell yeah! I get to stake and neet it up early! Feels good man

>>51707785
based and agreed

>>51707893
oh no no no
LPL sisters....

>>51707893
sure dude.

this is exactly how it works.

>>51707588
this has been up for like a whole year...

non-custodial staking

>>51708419

>>51708441

>>51708441
based

>>51707872
I can see you know some stuff but you’re just the slightest bit retarded so your reply reads like ass. Sorry anon

>>51707916
Jonny done nothing but copy a bunch of insecure terraform templates and leech of the success of LINK, link pool was the best IQ test I seen from chainlink

>>51707873
If apy was 20% the price of link would rise and lower the apy to the reasonable 5%