/biz/ - Business & Finance

looking forward to the btc smart contracts on icp

>>51653284
It's a hedge on GameFi. If you think that GameFi will have any place in the world, it's like 90% guaranteed that it will be on AVAX. Outside chances to FTM, Solana, Matic and BNB.

>>51653963
>it's like 90% guaranteed that it will be on AVAX.
why?
>>51653284
I have huge bags.
Have a look at VTX anon.

>>51653284
avax coined the term subnet. icp is shitcoin vaporweave

>>51653284
AVAX is a dead end. It can’t scale. Everyone is using the c chain, but it’s just not going to work well ever- it’s had it’s time. I made a lot off of AVAX, but the AVAX ath’s are over, this will just bleed out and never see it’s former glory. Meanwhile there are gaming studios releasing full 3D shooters on internet computer in the next 6 months. Btc integration WILL be a big deal and might even kick off a bull run.

>>51653963
>it's like 90% guaranteed that it will be on AVAX
KEK
how much does it cost to store one game character on avax?
how much does it cost to store an image on avax?
if you can't answer these simple questions - which you can't - it will not prevail. sorry!

>>51653284
We are chads that have the best pepe memes and we say cope and seethe so our project is better

>>51653284
ICP is 99% only relevant because it created an army of rugged bagholders who, through a combination of Stockholm syndrome and gaslighting, are convinced that Dom is the next coming of Christ and all his outlandish claims are fact. It's a boring story, we've seen it time and time again with XRP, BSV, Skycoin, HEX(RH is based though), etc.

AVAX is a humble L1 that took the Cosmos model and merged it with their own unique next-gen consensus protocol. And it really is a next generation consensus protocol. I know that phrase gets thrown around by clueless faggots, but in this case it's 100% justified. Vitalik himself referred to it(the consensus mechanism specifically) as the 'third niche' in reference to BTC, ETH, and AVA(X). The consensus mechanism is a flat upgrade to Nakamoto and it's ability to handle over 1 million concurrent validators allows for novel changes to the multichain infrastructure that chains like Cosmos and ETH will never be able to do(until they switch to Avalanche consensus) So altogether it's currently the most powerful consensus protocol running the most promising style of architecture(multichain). It's basically what Ethereum dreams of becoming 5 years from now.

>>51654540
anon - respectfully, avax relies on web3 implementation
it simply can NOT do that. it relies on centralized tech for 99% of its storage + processing
i would rather just build on legacy IT at that point, it's why there's not much dev activity on it.

you can't build a chain claiming to be better than existing tech (cloud), while relying on it for computation and storage. it WON'T work - just beacuse it has up to this point doesn't mean it will in the future. it's the elephant in the room, and you're simply not in the right crypto circles if you think the current ways of doing it are valid.
this has nothing to do with dominic lmao - many people have commented on this fatal flaw.

>https://moxie.org/2022/01/07/web3-first-impressions.html

>>51653963
these are my favorite scp for next run too, with bnb looking safest, avax and matic solid, still have love for fantom (hope it comes back, it was my #1) and solana last because of difficultly in finding rust blockchain devs but has some advantages

>>51654540
>ICP is 99% only relevant because it created an army of rugged bagholders
agreed

>>51654634
nigger - respectfully, you can run an AVAX validator at home on a fucking laptop. Nobody is dependent on any centralized service. if AWS decides to burn their own company to the ground then I just switch my validator to the jeet-run one I use right now(smelly but cheap). If that one goes down then I just spin up that $300 laptop I bought at Costco and use that. If my the world government tells all ISPs to ban crypto, well fuck them cause I use a VPN. And if they ban that then I just grab my gun and shoot up the nearest police station.

>>51654752
i dont think we are at the bottom so i only want to lp with a stable, where is your favorite place to farm AVAX-USDC?

>>51654752
>you can run an AVAX validator at home on a fucking laptop
cool, you won't be able to run games on-chain with that sort of hardware
sorry man, avax just had some design flaws that make it impossible to build fully scalable, on-chain apps

buying AVAX for less than $300 US is a bargain, simple as

>>51654968
they are giving games their own dedicated chains, they have growing pains with the subnets but AVAX is not a bad bet for gamefi

>>51654987
>>51654968
>>51654891
>>51654752
>>51654744
https://pastebin
.com/1UKc6jLs

>>51654993
... that are hosted on centralized servers
i swear this board is extremely untechnical, and only cares about number goes up

>>51654891
>where is your favorite place to farm AVAX-USDC?
idk, yield yak? you are asking the wrong person. I stake my AVAX via my validator and keep my USD safe in a Jewish run bank because I'm a good goy

>>51653284
>>51653963
>>51654239
>>51654467
>>51654491
>>51654540
>>51654677
>>51654744
>>51654752
>>51654891
>>51654993

kek
kek
kek

>>51655034
i dont love amazon either and that recent exploit proves its not ideal (although that was frontend iirc), they have a lot more validators compared to say bsc tho, ill look into the details of how many of those validators are using aws

>>51655013
>>51655034
if I run an ICP node on an AWS VPS will Dom lose his shit?

There is literally no way to tell if computation has been performed on a VPS or physical hardware at home. Also, as I said before, as long as it's trivial to switch from VPS to physical hardware then any level of "centralized" AWS fuckery amounts to nothing. Fuckery will just chase away customers to other VPS that don't fuck with people, or customers will just run their own home servers, beefy ones if need be, because risk of losing uptime would be worth more to them than the convenience of a VPS.
You must understand that market mechanisms are in full play here and it's a essentially a frictionless environment very similar to BTC's mining pool situation. If a centralized system can quickly and gracefully fall back into a decentralized system then it's hard to say that system was ever truly centralized at all practically speaking. For example, let's say some of the largest mining pools decides to start abusing their granted hash power and perform a doublespend attack on BTC. The miners in those ming pools would very quickly pull out and within a day move to other more honest mining pools, likely preferring smaller ones as well to avoid future collusion. The mining pools know this as well, so they don't do it. The fact that they exist in this frictionless environment encourages honest behavior, no matter how centralized they look on paper.

>>51655250
You can't run an ICP node without getting Doms permission first. They only give insiders permission. 20 of them last I checked.
>the future of internet

>>51655013
Are you implying ICP is not centralized? You have to fill out an application to run a node lmao, what a joke. ICP apps are literally more centralized that current web

>>51655281
>You can't run an ICP node without getting Doms permission first. They only give insiders permission. 20 of them last I checked.
well fuck me, I guess I've been overestimating ICP these people. So they just want to replace validators and miners freely picking VPS(or running at home) with a centralized authority (aka Dom) picking VPS providers he likes. Jesus that's really fucked. It's a goddamned cult.

>>51655331
Why do you think nobody in crypto cares about it if it does even 10% of what the shills claim it does? You are swapping AWS for the Dfinity foundation. You haven't decentralised anything you have moved to a different centralised service.

>>51654634
Buddy you got psyoped by the centralized cloud compute meme. The hyperscalers are not centralized in any meaningful way (I do understand AWS or Azure etc can opt to not do business with you) and do you think Dom has the resources to spend infinity billions to build out sufficient compeditive infrastructure? You are relying on ICP having to build physical infrastructure on top of developing the chain as well, the entire concept is a meme - or who is building it? Where is it coming from?

Honestly, how many alternative highly redundant physical datacenters does ICP have currently?

>>51655416
>who is building it? Where is it coming from?
https://dashboard.internetcomputer.org/nodes

Independent node providers. They get paid monthly in ICP to run a node. The node has to have very good specs in order to keep load times on the IC fast.

Right now you have to get whitelisted to run a node IIRC, but they're planning to open it up to the public soon (tm)

>>51655331
>>51655357
>>51655416
you three are such retards lmao
ICP is a protocol
it's not centralized
dfinity is not fully decentralized yet, but it will be once anyone has the dedicated hardware requirements

avax dapps run on PROPRIETARY servers aka aws/azure/gcp
extremely centralized, and extremely vulnerable - no thanks

>>51655770
>>51655774
You idiots are the ones that claim you can run everything on ICP, no serious mainstream institutional workload is going to deploy on independent providers with all kinds of dubious SLAs when they can deploy an AVAX subnet on their high redundancy hyperscaler infrastructure with their formally agreed on SLAs and network peering agreements, you guys have no idea how the real world works.

AWS/Azure/GCP are not remotely centralized, I work in the ISP/cloud industry, you may as well say the Internet is centralized. You guys got marketed memes.

>>51655416
>>51655822
based high-IQ cloudchad, Icy Pee definitively and irrevocably BTFO

>

>>51655774
>once anyone has the dedicated hardware requirements.
That is factually incorrect. It is a permissioned blockchain and evenif I had the hardware I couldn't host a node.
>>51655770
They are way behind schedule on this because they can't increase the nodes without increasing the inflation rate. Tying network security to token price is retarded. ICP is already tanking in price and increasing the amount of nodes would put it in an inflationary death cycle. All of the VCs and the Dfinity foundation have a financial incentive to keep the network centralised. Do you see what a huge conflict of interest that leads to?

Bump.

>>51654752
holy fucking based. i am an AVAX holder for life now

Emin Gün Sirer:
>Cornell CS Prof has been in crypto since BEFORE BTC (Karma2003)
>exCo Director of IC3 which is 180+ researchers & 6 Unis
>close partnership with the Chainlink team
>Vitalik endorses EGS & acknowledged Avalanche is a Breakthrough on par with Nakamoto
>is for decentralization and Censorship resistance
>oldschool haxxor

Avalanche protocol:
>third consensus protocol after Nakamotos PoW & Classical
>basically consensus is reached by probabilistic sampling thousands of independent nodes over multiple rounds
>This is not repackaged shit with minimal tinkering here and there its a completely new type of Consensus Protocol
>4500+ REAL TPS (no bullshit tricks, batching, or centralized L2)
>can scale to MILLIONS of Validators while maintaining high tps & sub second finality
>highest Nakamoto coefficient
>running a Node is easy & hardware requirements are low
>Resists 51% attacks (would need 80%)

Tokenomics & Profit:
>hardcapped
>AVAX needed for staking on nodes & delegating to nodes
>needed to participate in governance of the network
>fees are burned (also when Subnets, Blockchains & other assets are created)
>9% APY + delegator reward% + Subnet Rewards
>only requirement is 90% node uptime
>no slashing

Subnetworks:
>sub networks can be launched on Avalanche with near infinite customization
>"Blockchain as a Service" to tokenize all the Assets in the World
>Chainlink Subnet is in the works but also 900 other subnets from gaming to finance to CBDCs, payment providers everything is possible on Avalanche
>AVAX node may be a member of many subnets & earn additional rewards from them all!

Full EVM support:
>All ETH infrastructure can work on AVAX out of the box
>C-Chain (EVM) Subnet is constantly developed further and made more efficient
>C-Chain mirrored the best parts of the entire ETH ecosystem and improved on many ideas giving it all the TPS, scalability, speed and interoperability that it needs for the next stage

>>51653284
You choice anon. I choose Geeq over both. Their blockchain development is based. I don't care what normies think.

>>51654382
I don't care whether it will work or not. Would rather spend that energy on multi-blockchains that actually work. No time to waste.

>>51655026
How many days to unbound that shit? Get a life fag.

>>51653284
I think its a good add you've got, I also recently bought some alts ETH, AVAX, MATIC and low caps UDO, ORE and TOWER. Most of them should turn up some good gains imo

>>51654540
Thanks but no thanks, I'll take MTL, XPR, LOAN instead for the next popular money mover.
>>51655250
Why not ask Dom on reddit as he just signed in again.https://www.reddit.com/user/vrf5/

>>51653284
ICP is very gay. Just buy AVAX goy, also no silver and gold hehe.

>>51655013
Who goes for centralised shit now? Would rather stick with decentralised chains, preferably those I can run nodes and build hybrid chains on.

>>51657538
Locks are a pain, Good thing I get flexible and autocompounding staking for Geeq. Works for me.

>>51655822
>he thinks centralized means geographically

>>51655326
Is it multichain like Geeq tho? Don't answer that. I don't care.

>>51655822
> I work in cloud
> proprietary clouds like AWS are in fact decentralized
> AVAX is therefore also decentralized
> the ICP protocol, that’s centralized though, since it’s bootstrapping its permissionless, fully decentralized network protocol with a whitelist
Avax “chads”, everyone. And cloud “people”.

>>51656484
> evenif I had the hardware I couldn't host a node
That’s correct, because you are far from a trustworthy person, and during the bootstrapping phase, until the network is big enough, we can’t afford to have, oh, say, a bunch of seething Turkish saboteurs dilute network quality. When the network is bigger, turkroaches would only waste their money trying, so at that point it will be permissionless so even a sleazy low life like you can join.

>>51657592
Just buy RAIL

>>51654968
>you won't be able to run games on-chain
Its about running the game economy
On chain you dumb nigger retard.

>>51653284

>>51653284
AVAX apps can NOT scale beyond subnet capacity, don't expect anything with real usage to be built on it. Price-wise sure idk, it may pump with bitcoin whenever bitcoin pumps, long term i don't think this can survive. Also, 90% of people promoting avax (even in this thread) are paid or bots so that's not very bullish to me personally

>>51658501
Oh another point is that AVAX subnets do NOT have shared security, terrible design choices

>>51658501
>don't expect anything with real usage to be built on it.
https://cointelegraph.com/news/491b-asset-manager-kkr-s-health-care-fund-tokenized-on-avalanche

https://www2.deloitte.com/us/en/pages/about-deloitte/articles/press-releases/deloitte-ava-labs-blockchain-state-local-government-natural-disaster-recovery.html

>>51658441
> this asset is worth $1,000 so I’m going to treat the ownership token for it with utmost care!
> who cares what happens to the asset itself tho?
Avax “chads” in the house, a big hand for our merry band of jesters

>>51658506
>shared security
The CBDC subnet doesnt want to share their security with other subnets and depend on them.
Dumb Nigger.

case in point about the bots/paid posts, lol. these guys are here 24/7 repeating the same lines.
>>51658520
yeah, every chain is full of partnerships. DAG has a partnership with the DoD, no one gives a shit though, only 1% of existing chains will be able to deliver anything
>>51658538
that's not what shared security means

>>51658596
>yeah, every chain is full of partnerships. DAG has a partnership with the DoD, no one gives a shit though, only 1% of existing chains will be able to deliver anything
these are not partnerships sweaty. these are funds tokenizing their assets or utilizing a sub-net for their own purposes..
.>>51658506
shared security would be the most retarded thing in the world here brainlet.

Lol you dont understand how they work this is quite funny. Try and fud avax but you cant fud the tech...

>>51658621
Again, all shitcoins have these. HBAR is working with Walmart, VeChain is working with Microsoft. No one gives a single shit, because it's very early and that doesn't mean anything.

> Shared security would be a mistake
For avax yeah, because their subnets can't interoperate so it wouldn't mean anything to begin with. Gonna stop replying to you though because you're kind of vulgar and not interested in honest conversation

NGL this thread gives me 2019 vibes.

>>51655034
lol

>>51653284
Good time for AVAX. Looking out for some gaming token set to launch there like GSTAR.

>>51658037
>That’s correct, because you are far from a trustworthy person
That's the whole point of crypto, you don't have to trust anyone. What you are describing sounds completely centralized.

>>51658863
Even with that, you still don't have control over certain things. For example, your transaction histories publicly visible for anyone to see

>>51653284
>Smart move?
What's better is investing in privacy preserving systems and chains.

>>51653284
AVAX is hardcapped, that is all you need know. Anything without a hardcap is a scam, ponzi-scheme, they will print coins forever to pay you with. They have no time limit to become deflationary imposed upon themselves. You might as well go long on fiat as an investment.

>>51654540
Bullish on icp

>>51653284
I'm hyped on AVAX big time for long term, it's my favorite alts atm

>>51658863
Indeed, decentralization is at the core; every user being in full control over their identities and rights. I just can't see how that will work without web3 auth protocols.

>>51655013
ICP shill, holder of the second greatest rug in the history of crypto, calls other chains unethical kek.

>>51655770
>>51655774
>>51657996
I've not come across a single ICP cuck that has actually read their whitepaper. It literally says in the paper that the consensus mechanism is permissioned and relies upon trusted admission to the network kek. Also the entire network is governed by the NNS which Dfinity effectively controls and can vote you off the island with a simple majority.

>>51658501
Avalanche consensus means throughput is essentially unbounded by the protocol you retard. Enjoy your 500 write per second hard cap though kek.

>>51658647
They can in fact interoperate using any bridging technology one wishes. Avalabs is developing their own version of IBC as we speak as well for a generalized protocol level bridging solution.

>>51659566
Another rug coin, fell all the way from $2831 to $6, WTF

>>51657230
With multi-chain becoming a new standard, I wonder how vital interoperability will become

>>51658768
Their investment with mighty Kingdom will enhance their token at launch.

>>51660139
> bridges
oh nonononono

>>51658501
Coping and seething ICP incel jealous of the Avax chads

>>51660583
Yes, the project actually have lots of partnership that will enhance their growth in no time.

i don't care what avax shills say because the reality is that it costs 1 MILLION DOLLARS TO STORE 1GB OF DATA ON-CHAIN
YOU. ARE. NOT. DECENTRALIZED.
INCREASING SERVERS COSTS WITH A DEPENDENCY ON BIG TECH CLOUD WILL NOT END WELL

>muh dfinity is permissioned
dfinity controls 20% of the NNS - it used to control 40% at genesis
the network is rapidly expanding and decentralizing
anonymous amateur node providers will be able to run nodes once badlands is implemented

>https://www.dfinitycommunity.com/beginners-guide-to-understanding-badlands/

you cant fud this project. tell me how much it costs to store an image on-chain with avax. simple fucking question that none of you turkroaches can answer. that goes for every other chain too.

the first mainstream blockchain application with billions of users will be social media or gaming. avax can not host either of these on-chain, nor can eth, solana, bnb, etc.
openchat + dscvr already with hundreds and thousands of users and will reach millions next year after sns comes out.

>>51659540
inflationary = expansionary
deflationary coins as a base layer for applications is retarded
>>51655822
difference between your shit chain and the internet computer
apps run on a PROTOCOL on top of TP/ICP
your apps run on top of a PROPREITARY SERVER aka quicksand
look up how many companies say platform risk is the #1 threat to their startup
platform risk = building on quicksand
building on blockchains that rely on big tech = building on quicksand

building on icp = building on top of a PROTOCOL not owned by bezos and potential bad actors.

>>51653284
Fuck this crab dumping piece of trash coin. Going down faster than you can say double spend.

>>51661432
The purpose of Avalanche is not to store jpegs, you absolute piss covered retard. It's to enable the tokenization of the world's assets and instant, permissionless flow of value. Avalanche is not dependent on big cloud tech, if bezos turns off the validators you bet your ass people with hundreds of thousands of dollars in stake are going to run out and buy a fucking $500 laptop to get their node back up assuming they don't already have one.

ICP nodes are ran in giant server racks inside data centers aka centralized.

>permissioned
it literally is at a protocol level kek, I will never not laugh at ICP shills who screech to the contrary of their own documentation.

>Badlands
Absolute nonsense project, its a concept put out by the marketing department so shills like you have something to cope post with when anyone with more than room temp IQ points out that ICP is permissioned and centralized as fuck. Dfinity would have to effectively create an entirely new stack from consensus to execution to achieve what they claim badlands can do. And you sure as hell aren't running all the chainkey cryptographic overhead or any of the things that actually make ICP somewhat unique on a raspi kek.

Ironically badlands is exactly what avalanche already is, permissionless and runs on minimal hardware reqs. Unless they fork avalanche it will be straight up inferior and run into the same issues every other classical consensus protocol runs into like ETH, MATIC, etc.

>>51661432
ICP uses physical server farms sweetie. Do you really want to talk about decentralization lmao

>>51661371
What other projects are they partnering with?

>>51661843
>>51661855
ICP RUNS ON A PROTOCOL
AWS RUNS ON PROPRIETARY SERVERS
PROTOCOL = NOT OWNED BY A SINGLE TNTIY

>>51660186
This is more relevant in cases of identities interoperable across multiple chains. By all means, users should be able to manage them through a single account

>>51660123
>web3 auth protocols.
Besides Ore protocol and ENS, what else?

>>51661869
So many of them anon
They are partnering with SONY, MArvel and others, also in partnership with Steve Havard, the American TV show host

>>51661887
Stop wasting your time with these guys. They’re just avax shills. Nobody gives a shit about their double spend eth fork. This is the first time I’ve seen an active avax thread in weeks and the only reason it’s active is cuz they mentioned icp.

Avax currently has a DEXT Score of 89.
ICP currently has a DEXT Score of 19.

Do with this information what you may.

>>51662303
what is the score based on? is it like tokensniffer

>>51662233
yeah you're right
icp makes eth stronger with the uniswap front end demo
and avax's only mission is to be an eth killer
btc, eth, icp - all you need
fuck you avax and fuck you turkroaches for the bots and shills.

>>51659911
What the hell with this chain?
Isn't it SOL a better option?

>>51662303
Wiow. /Thread.

>>51662303
Yea, I love the Chain, more amazing projects are currently launching there, Gamestar will be launching their project on AVAX this EOY

>>51653284
https://cryptoleaks.info/case-no-3

>>51662401
>icp makes eth stronger with the uniswap front end demo

did you see the r/ethereum post? kinda exploded and there's a lot of support for ICP responding to the retarded fudders there, kinda wholesome to see the community finally push back to the retardation

>>51662617
What's their project up to anon?

>>51661578
>inflationary = expansionary
>deflationary coins as a base layer for applications is retarded

Avalanche is not one chain. Subnet coins will be the application coins, AVAX is more like gold in the ecosystems economy. There will be many different chains with different economies.

>>51663524
They are set to revolutionize board games and bring it to blockchain and other streaming activities, infact you can refer to them as the blockchain netflix

>>51662401
Incorrect. The ultimate end goal of Avax will be to subnet Eth, and by doing so, make it stronger. Avax is the Eth savior, not Eth killer. ICP is just - well its nothing is it.

>>51662492
>SOL
Literal spreadsheet that breaks down every other day and falsifies their tx number, yawn.

Only reason why anyone knows about it is the Jew behind it, doesn't mean it's not shit.

>>51653963
It'll be FTM

>>51654540
>ICP is 99% only relevant because it created an army of rugged bagholders
100% this.

>>51664318
Mfw these insects are literally copying every single talking point from DFINITY, watch them call AVAX ETH's sister network next. LMFAO, jesus, very bullish for ICP

>>51653284
u r not a genius, u made the most obvious choice

>>51661843
amazing post frendy

>>51653284

why would u even consider ICP anon?

>>51664187
What are the available board games here?

>>51666216
either its a subtle icp shill trying to imply that these two projects are on the same level, or it is a newfren falling for the endless icp shilling - if you were to simply read the catalog you might think that /biz/ is very high on LUNC and ICP (two biggest rugs in the history of crypto)

>>51666324
We have Scene It atm, and other board games will be added as we proceed

>>51661578
>your apps run on top of a PROPREITARY SERVER aka quicksand
Holy shit do ICP bagholders actually believe what they say? This is hilarious, I can't tell if you are actually this stupid or you're just saying it out of desperation.

Before I can get my TETH fixed for the third time, I need to understand why it hurts now. It does not make sense that it would suddenly hurt and have temperature senstitivity from them cracking off a corner of the BLOCK CHAIN since it wasn't temperature sensitive before I got the TETH fixed. It was just achy.

The ICP data centers are required for product launch and early adoption. If it's able to become this much competition using a dozen datacenters, imagine what it's capable of once mining incentive take place. This is the elephant in the room and you better start buying now before you get priced out. This crypto had more GitHub commits in the past 6 months than any other crypto. Developers already figured out what you all haven't yet. ICP is already on the moon.

>>51662303
kek, it's honestly impressive that ICP niggers can cope with holding this shit. This is Jonestown level of mass psychosis.
I'm expecting mass suicides when the next bullrun comes and ICP just dumps even harder.

>>51669771
defillama has them at #112 tvl with only one dapp around $800k, if they have more than that it would help to submit the other projects and get that ranking up

Not many arguments needed imo, just check this chart and tell me if you unironically believe that there's any kind of comeback from that.

Most people shilling ICP are coping bagholders anyway, they are desperate for hopium. I'd be like them too if my bags were down 99.6% ngl

i will do you a favor by giving you the advice of choosing MATIC over both icp and avax, other than the fact that the biggest companies in the world are choosing to work with polygon, but it also had a 4x growth in dapps and is now powering over 37k dapps which is almost 9x the number of dapps on ethereum

>>51661887
Reduced to autistic screeching in all caps kek. ICP shills really are the dumbest motherfuckers on this board.

>>51653284
too hard to make a shitcoin on
takes a few weeks of holding before you realize all the (boring) projects are full of bagholder millenials and boomers who think theyre finance experts
the inflation rate is 43% annualized, too
avax sucks ass
t. holder for a quarter of this year

>>51672682
Shitcoin can destroy you, potential tokens likGSTAR will be lauching by Q4, you can take advantage of that and get whitelisted for a spot to buy

hello AVAX cuck
How is the Turkish Lira doing? is the $200/month that Emin is paying still enough to cover living expenses?

my personal advise for you is to sell your AVAX and buy some MATIC instead. Polygon has the superior technology, the funding and building teams that AVAX lacks so badly

Also move out of Turkey while you still can or else you'll end up having to serve overpriced Shawarma and Sujuk sandwiches to tourists who you hate

both are sacks of shit.
Avalanche is a scam double spend shitchain that cant even scale
ICP is a rug pull with basically no development

>pic related
transparent and honest about what they do
major developments every other week
one of the cheapest and fastest L2s out there

>>51671288
>>51674399
>>51674424

i hate turkroach avax aswell but matic is the same, these paid pajeet shills are invading every thread. stop. those two shitcoins haven't got anything new and innovative, theyre just eth clones, unlike ICP, HBAR or XRP which all the three have unique technology behind them.

stay poor.

>>51653284
Avax is good but it ain't quantum resistant and the quantum threats are not too far. I will bag AVAX as well as QANX which is a quantum resistant blockchain.

>>51653284
There is nothing to FUD about avax cause they have been constantly developing and I kinda love it desu.

>>51676337
>ICP, HBAR or XRP
kek, the schizo trifecta. take your meds and try buying into tech, not delusions

>>51676659
You are right anon but as this anon mentioned >>51676606 the quantum threats are unavoidable so that I will focus on quantum resistant blockchains for now.

>>51676606
Based plan anon, but I'm more concerned with safeguarding my assets and NFTs now. so I'd store them in the sylo smart wallet just in case

>>51676677
Kek that's true they just proclaim to be futuristic but to be honest I would say coding smart contracts in any programming lang the dev wishes is futuristic and it's live already!

>>51676606
Quantum resistance is irrelevant when the tech like Nillion is making will be compatible with every current blockchain and make them quantum resistant

>>51676715
I have heard about that wallet it's pretty unique once the mainnet is live with QAN I will migrate my assets as it is EVM compatible and store it in that wallet. More the security more the better.

>>51676751
Kek...that's sounds good to me but OG can't be replaced to be honest QAN is using the CRYSTALS-Dilithium algorithm which is approved by the NIST and with the X-link feature it can be upgraded anytime they want at ease. No qualms I prefer native quantum resistant blockchain.

>>51672849
When exactly is the token launching and how do I participate on the IDO?

>>51658153
this does sound interesting.

>>51677929
Interesting?
What makes it interesting?

>>51677766
The team will comunicate to the community when the time is ripe, but I;m sure it'll be EOY

To participate, you have to register on their whitelist to get a spot, you will need to do KYC as well to qualify

>>51676677
they are all you need maybe some algo and iota aswell. and im buying into tech of course, dyor!

also checked