/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>51505781
Kotowaru.

>>51505801
Fuck you bobo you'll see.

>>51505781
You are just trying to liquidate people as we scam wick down further

>>51505781
You already got destroyed in your original thread. No need for a new one.

>>51505781
No lol

>>51505781
a real delphi woulda got dubs

>>51505781
why?

my algo will put $10 in once stochrsi K rises above D

>>51505781
We will see what happens in a few days.
Only one week until the Shemitah ends.
What we are seeing now could instantly reverse by magic after that.

People who invested in Chainlink only wanted freedom to live in peace.
These greedy evil monsters are doing everything in their power to change this group into their foes.
The more they abuse their power the more likely this power will come back to hit them like a boomerang.

>>51507867
>What we are seeing now could instantly reverse by magic after that.
i am demoralized to a point where I do not believe this can happen ever.

>>51507964
always do the opposite of what YOU feel.

>>51507964
Believe in your instinct which brought you here to this current moment.
No matter what happens, it will guide you to your destiny, if you never give up on yourself and keep listening to it without getting blinded by your ego.

The SmartCon is barely 10 days away now.
Keep fighting to survive one more day.
Days will turn into weeks and then into months.

The future you is smiling right now full of gratitude for the courage you had to never give up.
Eternal glory awaits you at the end of this path.

>>51508321
thank you anon, I needed this right now.

>>51505781
thanks for the short signal OP, looking forward to your next posts

>>51505781
I'm short until $6.66

>>51506943
fuck off

I've wasted my entire youth, 5 years, with this shitcoin. I'm selling the rumors right before SmartCon

>>51510026
You realize once you sell its going to $1,000 right?

>>51508321
God speed anon.

>>51510026
how do you wasted it?
how can you stop wasting it?
with staking I hope we will get peace of mind anon.

>>51505801
Stare into my eyes and hear my words bobos

Let's get one thing straight. You WILL short those link bags. You WILL be happy with a 10% dump. That much I can tell you. A guard will come by your pod three times a day to administer the mood detection test. Should it read "insufficiently bearful," there will be an appropriate response. So, let me say it real clear. You're going to live with the dumps. You're going to keep all your profits. Yes, it will mostly dump, and you're going to love it.

>>51505781
Funny how everyone STILL got a boner for the pump to a bee's dick over $8 when we all know what happens next.

I can't wait to move on from this piece of shit honestly. That phrase "beyond a joke" really applies here. I can't even laugh at it anymore. Lessons learned I guess.

I just want to make it so I can take my dog somewhere cool what the fuck why am I forever stuck in this hell? Fucking kikes.

>>51511404
I've noticed it's always the anons with the more modest, enlightened goals who are demoralised. The ones with the delusions of grandeur and world domination always canter along hand in hand with the schizos telling us we're ungrateful for feeling an ounce of regret. Funny that.

>>51511390
I would judge after the network is feature complete and matured for 3-5 years.

>>51511459
Well, five minutes ago you were of the same frame of mind that I was until someone jammed a syringeful of copium back into your veins to keep you going, anon. I mean no offence but I aim for objectivity. There's a lot of talk about "listen to your instinct". My instinct now is telling me a lot different to what it was telling me in 2018 when I bought this thing. Which instinct do I listen to? It's possible I was just wrong and better opportunity exists elsewhere.

>>51511511
My take is there won't be a god candle but a steady YoY price increase due to adoption. I am just a retard relying on copium in the meantime but you do you.

>>51511436
>>51511511
If you bought in 2018, especially for under $1, I would argue that you have delusions of grandeur if you are regretful and worrying about opportunity cost. Most people lose to the market.

>>51511549
I bought BTC and ETH 6 years ago for the first time, LINK @ 18 cents in 2018, I'm so massively up it's not even funny
yet I'm still extremely dissatisfied with LINK's performance and disappointed by the rest of the market
whoever claims that you should just be happy is either disingenuous or extremely retarded

>>51511511
>and better opportunity exists elsewhere
but literally everything is crashing everywhere, there is no hiding from this mess, we are about to find out what massive deflation does to a modern economy and it isnt going to be pretty

>>51511549
DCA is circa $1.

The argument is comparative. I didn't lose money, but that isn't an encouragement to "stick to my guns". It's irrelevant to prospects. LINK has now underperformed as long as it has overperformed. I can't relate to a handwaving of opportunity cost. Am I supposed to ignore that all? You might consider it a "delusion of grandeur" but I consider efficient capital allocation the whole fundamental idea of formulating any market position. Most large alts, if you would have bought them as close to ICO as I bought LINK, will have you in a similar or better position. Boring.

>>51511631
>>51511659
nice larp you concern trolling subhumans
you had 2 years

>>51511670
anon, I can already tell you bought LINK in 2021 with nothing to show for it, and you are coping
yes, no matter how unlikely it might seem to you, I'm not satisfied at all despite having bought at the literal bottom

>>51505781
This is a terrible idea.

>>51511670
I'd be willing to bet I hold more LINK than you and bought earlier than you did. Every time I get into it with someone who questions that aspect of things, I download CSV proof from Binance and post it, txid and address and everything, and still get called a larp who just made it up in Excel. You guys are fucking reaching at this point. LINK has underperformed any and all price expectations from 2018 to today so I have to agree you're either a newfag or a diehard schizo tier apologist.

>>51511684
>>51511738
>words words words words
you're totally not discord trannies, kek

>>51511749
desu, this is the absolute best fud

>>51511749
That's just disengagement, adhom, shittier reply. Why even bother contributing that to the conversation? You're clearly emotionally invested

>>51511738
>Every time I get into it with someone who questions that aspect of things, I download CSV proof from Binance and post it
Every time except this time, do you mean?

>>51511770
Kek, my thoughts exactly for the past 12 months at least

>>51511774
>>51511770
get a room, troons

i has made an emotional investments in teh chain$tink

>>51511784
yeah, I can confirm that if you try downloading your trading history from Binance, you get an .xlsx, each time I tried posting this here to prove my 2018 december buy (ETH/LINK) everyone claims it's edited
nothing will suffice to you
>>51511789
powerful post anon, just bought 100k

>>51511738
If you held a large amount of Link you 100% wouldn't be behaving this way. Nobody even needs to see proof. The fact that you want to show people says enough. You're clearly young and don't really know how grown ups think yet. But that's ok. Just remember you're not as clever as you think.

>>51511784
My point was every time I've done it it's gotten nowhere. This idea of discrediting because no one can post an impossible standard of proof and is therefore a larp is what makes this all an exercise in entertaining brainlets like yourself.

>>51511789
qanon tier follower-class brainlet

>>51511827
>No true Scotsman fallacy
ok, could you define "large amount"?

>>51511816
>>51511831
samefag

>>51511827
Post your holdings then. You're a pajeet shill after all...

>>51511855
>inb4 inspect elemnt!!

>>51511659
>>51511738
So you’ve had this argument many times over on the 4chins. I’m assuming you have reallocated out of link then, no? If so, please post those tx’s as well.

>>51511863
I think he's still holding anon, that's why he's here

>>51505781
The only token worth a damn is Chainlink. The rest are gambles. LINK is the only sure bet. Everything else is shit.
I finally understand. I first heard about Chainlink in 2018 (Currently only have 46 LINK). Now, finally, in September of 2022 I finally get it.
For the first time I understand what it means to solve the oracle problem.
It just seems so obvious that at a certain point anything and everything that has monetary value is going to want to be secured by an oracle. And the only oracle solution worth a damn is Chainlink. Like, sure, when you're talking about amount of a couple cents, dollars, hundreds of dollars, shit, even hundreds of thousands of dollars and maybe the low-end millions to tens of millions you might not give a fuck about a secure source of data.

But

When you get to the point of big financial transactions that are actually worth a damn.. You want something to secure whatever the determining factor behind that transaction is.
It's so clear to me now. The last couple of years I read through the Chainlink whitepaper and Whitepaper 2.0 start to finish multiple times. I read up on the oracle problem. I read all the shill threads. I watched videos. I tried so hard to understand. I thought I did understand. But now, finally, this moment of clarity. I feel so foolish. It took me four years or processing for it to finally click.
I finally get it. I'm dumbstruck. Paralyzed. Blinded by its majesty. Jesus fuck I feel like an idiot. I feel like such a huge fucking idiot. It's LINK. It was always fucking LINK. This shit wont just be used by neckbeards and hobbyists, not even small businesses. This is THE fucking solution that every major corporation and government will use in the future. And now it's so obvious why.

>>51511831
you forgot to call me /pol/, trannie

>>51511846
>define 'large amount'


large
/lɑːdʒ/
Learn to pronounce
adjective
adjective: large; comparative adjective: larger; superlative adjective: largest
1.
of considerable or relatively great size, extent, or capacity.
"add a large clove of garlic"

2.
of wide range or scope.
"we can afford to take a larger view of the situation"

amount
/əˈmaʊnt/
Learn to pronounce
noun
noun: amount; plural noun: amounts
a quantity of something, especially the total of a thing or things in number, size, value, or extent.
"sport gives an enormous amount of pleasure to many people"

>>51511863
Sadly not. I wish I would've listened to those same "instincts" that spoke to me in 2018 that told me a very different story in early 2021 yet here we are.

>>51511898
kek
I didn't ask for a wall of text anon, a simple number would be enough
good job on avoiding giving a proper answer though

>>51511858
>post your holdings
I just stated that bragging about holdings is childish and you say "post your holdings". Can you read very well? Dear God the retardation in this thread is eye watering

>>51511867
Two things I don’t understand.
1 - why are you speaking for this anon and defending him so vehemently. It’s weird.
2 - why continue to hold if you feel this way? If you genuinely feel you are better off reallocating, then why are you not reallocating

>>51511916
>a simple number
3

>>51511905
Pussy

Less than 9 days to SmartCon. Easy LINK long, etiher for a buy the rumor / sell the news or a buy the news event.

>>51511436
Yes you are called normalfag retards and you don’t matter because you’re a slave kind of animal, mentally chained to being as reddit as possible. That’s what you’ve noticed, nothing more than that. As for your concerns about LINK yeah, it sucks poop out of the butthole but honestly, it’s sustained 7$ at 30k, to 7$ at 19k. That’s almost a 2x gain. This only happens when there is purposeful correction, even if smartcon is coming up go look at the chart and see this has happened before - the run up to 55.

So even if LINK is a pile of dogs hit and Sergei is a con man, it’s starting to look like we have one more run up, and schizos have one more chance to hand in their golden ticket. But it’s probably only one more chance, don’t play with it.

>>51511931
he resorted to "bragging" because this guy>>51511670
called him a larp
>>51511549
then this guy claimed that after "x" amount of holdings you should be content no matter what
he's not "Bragging" you people are literally doubting his claims
>>51511935
1.because I wholeheartedly agree with him, I'm in the same exact position
2. I spent the last 4 years of my life on this project, I have derisked heavily but I still hold a sui stack
you could say I'm still invested
>>51511941
why do you resort to shitposting? just give me a proper response, what amount of LINK tokens do you consider "large"

>>51505781

i agree with OP

then again link just broke something on the weekly

all you have to do is open the weekly link btc chart, and draw one single line. then determine whether that's bullish or not

spoiler: $1000 eoy

>>51511871
I can't believe I didn't put it together earlier. The high IQ LINK meme was real. I can't believe people were able to comprehend the ramifications of LINK from the start, while for me, it took four years to finally put it all together.

I've always known that blockchains are fully deterministic. That the same final state would prevent forking of disparate nodes due to the inherent determinism behind the functionality of a blockchain. No randomness. No subjectivity. Consensus. This was blockchains genius, and also an incomplete solution. Oracles fill the void that was necessary to make blockchains functional in the first place, without breaking that functionality. Ugh, it's all going through my head so fast now. I feel like an idiot for not seeing it before. I need to vent it here now. A and B reach an agreement with a set amount of funds held in escrow in the blockchain - this is basic stuff - an oracle mechanism is required to fetch the outcome of their agreement off-chain and deliver it to the blockchain in a secure and reliable manner.

You need an oracle to essentially govern the smart contract, otherwise you will inevitably fall victim to tampering of the outcome. Say, for example, on a 50 billion dollar a year military budget, or a 10 billion dollar science contract between partnering Countries.

Fuck fuck fuck. It was always so obvious. Every financial system in the world is going to end up using Chainlink. It's only a matter of time. It was always only a matter of time.

>>51511738
>I download CSV proof from Binance
why do people always come up with the most elaborate ways not to do the one thing that settles the argument
post a tx from your main wallet here right before you make it and everyone can see without a shred of doubt what you have
>but i sold already
then we can still see how much and when you send it of to binance
i'll wait

>>51511973
Fair enough. If you’re not larping, at least you have the conviction to act, and I can respect that

>>51511989
why would you dox your fucking wallet? are you retarded?

>>51511992
thanks, I'm not

>>51511973
Idgaf how many bloody Link tokens anyone else holds. Why should you? This is the most childish thread i've seen for a while. I don't know why i'm still here. In fact, goodbye.

>>51511989
>people always come up with the most elaborate ways
question, do you hold a Binance account from more than 1 year ago? if yes, try exporting your trading history and see what happens
>>51512010
then why did even post this?>>51511827

>>51511996
>>51512020
like the other anon said words words words words but no action
thats the one undeniable advantage of the block chain through bull and bear as its visible to all, this means the larper has no recourse

and no i dont have binance, i got a goybase account but what possible difference could this make in posting your wallet

>>51512093
ok fren, do you feel comfortable in posting your own wallet here? I don't, but if you are, please go ahead
I would also not go through the trouble of moving anything out of cold storage just to prove to (You) I'm not a larper

>>51511989
Maybe people are skittish about posting their personal address? How totally unreasonable of them to think on a forum with its entire identity based on paranoid anonymisation, right? Especially where it literally would prove nothing because cult fucks like you would say I plucked it off the blockchain. Why don't you prove you're not a fucking paid retarded brainlet shill? Go fuck yourself, retard. Special rules don't apply to you. Debate me on what I've said. I've tried your "post personal information" bullshit before and was literally mocked for it. Get fucked.

>>51512105
i do not hence i dont start engaging in behaviour that gets me called out to back it up with proof, simple how that works isnt it

>>51512121
> Especially where it literally would prove nothing because cult fucks like you would say I plucked it off the blockchain
this is rich the idiot denies the immutable proof that is the chain, nobody can deny the veracity of the request i made if it is performed
that you even try to deny this shows just how little you know about what you claim to master

>Debate me on what I've said
your stack is about the only argument you made
everything else you did is fud right here at a considerable low which screams sentiment control fud
if you mad those argument in dec at above 30 usd prices they would be fair, making them now is ridicules
do you really believe there are, here of all places, people who held large link stacks from 18 all through the bull and are now panicking and selling
right before smartcon
nobody is going to debate a statement as ludicrous as that, so we attack you on the 1 verifiable thing you claimed, that you ever owned a sizeable link stack
and after all these words words words i am still waiting

>>51512121
You love to talk the talk but can’t walk the walk. Your opinion is literally worthless.

>>51512217
then you either have to trust my word or not, but don't ask for proof you yourself are not comfortable in providing, that's hypocrisy at best

>>51512217
>>51512219
Please post your wallets otherwise I refuse to engage you. Thank you.
Also please answer me these questions:
1. Why are you paid shills clearly working together for the Illuminati on 4chan biz?
2. Why are you suppressing my particular investment?

Absolute shit thread. Derisked suistack holding "fellow Linkers" should rope, all 3 of them, including former 50k anon. It's disgusting how recognizable your writing styles are. You made a decision so stick with it. Pathetic how you constantly try to reassure yourself that you didn't make a mistake.

>>51512217
>words words words
kek the irony, Link shills are not that bright are they
>>51512385
>hurrr dissatisfied holders must rope
truly a cult!

>>51512385
oh so I'm not a larper now? that's progress at least lmao

>>51512263
its not about you fren, its about the other anon who by himself made the statement, unasked that he shared csv files in the past
he got rightfully called out on the bullshit of his words
i dont need to be a tidepod eater to call tidepod eaters idiots as long as i dont make a statement to the tune of tidepods tastes good

>>51512385
also, using the exact same logic, since you made a decision to keep holding, stick to it and don't try to constantly reassure yourself you didn't make a mistake by endlessly shilling and spreading hopium
see it goes both ways

>>51512481
fair enough I guess
given that I'm in a similar position (asked to provide proof, got berated) I felt the need to chip in

>>51511749
I am delusional about link and non-ironically believe it will be over $1k within 5 years. But you are making linkies look even more retarded

>>51512441
>>51512449
>>51512483
All 3 of em, looks like I remembered right.

>also, using the exact same logic, since you made a decision to keep holding, stick to it
Yes? Sounds reasonable.
>and don't try to constantly reassure yourself you didn't make a mistake by endlessly shilling and spreading hopium
No, holders of a token will keep speculating and talking about it. Cope, seethe, dilate, do whatever you must do. I'm just noting that it is absolutely pathetic how you lot feel the need to derail each and every LINK thread with your thinly veiled bag separation anxiety.

>>51511982
You're still early and blessed with a bearmarket just dca.

>>51512319
You literally said that you are still holding despite having multiple arguments about your disappointment in link and the opportunity cost of moving your capital elsewhere. You are a pussy who lacks conviction, and a retard who can’t follow a basic argument.

>>51511871
>>51511982
Can't remember if I'be read this before, if it isn't pasta, then better late than never, anon. I'm sure a lot of us here have had a similar revelation in the past few years

>>51512576
I'm still a holder so I'll keep speculating along with you
you really have no leg to stand on here

>>51505781
No thanks I'll wait for $1.

>>51512576
3 of them?? you're quoting me twice kek

>>51512481
Let's just take a step backwards here, anon.

I was posting about general discontent towards LINK. My DCA was then questioned (see >>51511549) so I then explained that my DCA is $1. I was then immeditely called a larp and now the all conversation since has been iterated on whether or not I hold a lot of LINK and therefore what my prescribed emotions must be, otherwise I'm a scammer/etc.

This is standard ad hom affair for the likes of yourself and your ilk, who yourselves know there is conveniently nothing I can post that proves anything beyond the fact that something was published at sometime by someone (anyone) on the blockchian. In the same way, you cannot prove anything about yourself and your motivations. I've been here before in such conversations with LINK apologists and it's gone in similar circles.

>>51512603
That's all fine. You can hone in on my decision *not to sell LINK* and how awful it was not to follow it, but I really don't know how you can cling to that and not have a laugh with me at how funny it is that such a position would prove to be so financially lucrative.

>>51508321
Three
Two
One

>>51512510
you didnt do what the other anon did, you maintain a reasonable position in this thread
the other anon made the retarded claim that someone csv's proof anything when the standard ever since 17 here has been onchain proof or its larp
but its especially in what you are saying in your other posts, yours are like i said reasonable
the other anon is using emotional sentiment in order to get people to sell at lows, its that i take offense with

the entire joke about this is if he did indeed sell via binance as he claimed, there is nothing stopping him from sharing his now empty wallet, we can only see past transaction to and from binance having no way to identify him and any future coins he can deposit into another wallet
so you see just how stupid his position is compared to yours in this thread
i mean just look at his latest reply which i am not even going to (you) anymore

>>51512612
This is literally my today. I've spent the entire time since realizing this reading up on Chainlink again. Planning out and configuring a node right now while I consider what data sources I could potentially utilize to become an active participant in the network. It's my best chance at making it since I failed to accumulate LINK. I'm so scared it's potential will be realized before I can accumulate enough. I only have 46 LINK. I can only afford to invest $500 ~ $1000 a month in it. I need more. I want more.

I'm configuring a Chainlink VM + PostgresDB + Eth node right this minute as a proof of concept just to get back in the game. Whatever it takes. I need more LINK.

I wish I had understood the ramifications of this technology earlier. It was so hard to grasp though. I just didn't "get" it. I have never had a stronger appreciation for the "biz high IQ meme" than I do now. It's astounding to me that people could immediately understand and grasp the ramifications of what Chainlink has set out to achieve.

Knowing what I know now, it's possible, even likely, that the 46 LINK I have now will be worth a fortune given enough time. Right now LINK might as well be the equivalent to research leading up to TCP/IP in 1983 - but the realization and utilization of that research on mass scale is fast approaching. I deeply regret only realizing it a few hours ago.

>>51511982
Based and welcome. Reading that was like reading part of my auto biography

>>51512869
Protip I was in your shoes. Stop wasting time and money right now. Do not buy shit just the bare minimum to survive, sell your car gadgets other bs (gf) and buy every link you can afford. Someone like you should own more than 46 Link. Never stop buying.

>>51512869
>I only have 46 LINK. I can only afford to invest $500 ~ $1000 a month in it.
wuh?

thank god i managed to avoid the link and lunc honeypots successfully. buying more doge and more vinu rn.

No.

>>51511982
>>51511871
>>51512869
Congratulations Einstein, you figured it out. This is why, people are so concerned about why others keep buying Chainlink. This is why you see x amount of fud threads and y amounts of shill threads. Why on earth would anyone be interested in the financial decisions of other anonymous random people. Anyways, the solution is in the name. ChainLink.

>>51512812
>if he did indeed sell via binance as he claimed
I did not, not claim to, sell via binance, you retarded motherfucker. Go start from the beginning and try drop your biases this time.

>>51512869
Your thread reminded me of when I "got it" some years back. I had butterflies in my stomach and began pivoting everything into Link over the course of a few months as my conviction became stronger. The conviction has never left me, though thankfully the butterflies have..
Beg/borrow/steal anon. You'll only get one chance to do this. I don't know how much longer you'll have but it feels like we're getting close. If, for some reason it all fails then at least we all gave it our best shot. It really is a once in a lifetime thing. I've never seen anything like it and doubt I will again. Hope you make it.

>>51512656
It’s odd that you would come here multiple times to argue this, yet won’t even commit to your argument by reallocating. Can you explain your reasoning?
I can laugh at how it would have been more profitable to sell and buy back in now. I can also acknowledge that I’m not a fortune teller, and that wasn’t a risk worth taking for me. Is that why you’re not reallocating?

Bought more and am now the owner of 300 linkies

Been buying since 2019 solely based on the sentiment of biz and a certain anon bull on Twitter. Its my belief that it's a board full of high iq people pretending to be retarded but personally I don't understand the tech I just want to stop wage caging

My linkies stay stinky

6k new linker, looking into getting to 12-14k

>>51511846
10k+

>>51512565

>>51512565
what platform is this? the fuck

>>51514997
sneedbase

>>51514642
As do mine fren. In a few weeks we will no longer have to wage ever again

>>51514728
delphi

>>51514704
thanks, I had a bit more than that

>>51515074
Not coinbase that's for sure