/biz/ - Business & Finance

thanks op, they sound pretty powerful. is there a crypto i can buy to get exposure to all this?

>>51262239
Yes, actually, and the OP was kind enough to reference it in the image they posted. Thank you, op, for it if were not for this thread i would not have just purchased a stack of Chainlink (Ticker: LINK)

>>51262173
Sure, I'll protest, but only after Chainlink hits $2,500 and I cash out.
Until then, let globohomo win for a few more years.

>>51262173
>They've been referred to as a terrorist organization by experts and citizens of countries all across the globe.
by seething cucks, you mean

>>51262270
hurr durr I love globohomo and being a good goy because im so careless !

whatever dude

>>51262173
No wonder serbgay keeps dumping.

>>51262173
ill sign the petition but only because of shits and giggles. Wont do jack shit and wont prevent anything. Even when the WEF bites the dust, the cockroaches will hide in the dark as per usual. Nothing ever changes. These people have been around for ages unfortunately.

>>51262173
>approximately $5 trillion in assets
How much of that is in:
>insanely over-valued real-estate
>inflated crypto/foreign currencies
>unsustainable businesses who campaign for sustainable businesses, despite heavily relying on government contracts/subsidies and ""donations""

>>51262173
Everyone who signs that immediately gets added to a watchlist btw

>>51262173
>The "far-right" and "white supremacist domestic terrorists" hoaxes are inventions and products of the WEF

>>51262173

Good post OP.

>>51262256
This thread is so funny like what type of mental illness does one need to backwards subliminally fud chainlink

>>51262287
I see acting retarded comes naturally to you
>>51262299
for example, have you considered the possibility that the narrative you've internalized entirely from memes curated for your disaffected consumption might not actually be true?

>>51263851
Good

So who are the faggot companies that pay tithe to these losers? Also "European" they're all kikes and shitskins. Not one white person in your pic.

Has a change.org petition ever done anything? I've seen faster and bigger results from viral twitter posts than change.org petitions.

>>51262239
yes its xrp not an erc20

>>51263868

>>51265150
it's not a conspiracy, you can literally watch their speeches on youtube, visit their twitter, watch their videos. they're not shy about who they are and what they're up to.

>>51265425
> they're not shy about who they are
academics and technocrats
>what they're up to.
master morality

>>51265443
just watch their videos on youtube, it's straight out of science fiction dystopia. they openly admit they're creating a world where they have all the power and own everything and they're not planning on being at all benevolent. everything they're accused of being and doing by conspiracy theorists, they admit to openly. thats the thing, you think it can't be real so you dismiss it, you could just shut the fuck up and actually listen to what they're saying. its chilling

>>51263868
Top = Statistics
Bottom = Opinion

if you don't know anything about the wef, coin bureau has done some good videos on it. they're not some right wing radicals or anything and they keeps it factual.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I6lma4DXqok [Embed]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6o02uGWuMD0 [Embed]

also check out their video on blackrock
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qs_mWvf6yRI [Embed]

>>51265150
bro klaus schwab literally wrote books on the WEF’s plans for global technocracy. just read one of them, they’re like 10 bucks on amazon. your cope is actual conspiritard shit.

>>51265501
>they openly admit they're creating a world where they have all the power
why wouldn't they?
>they're not planning on being at all benevolent.
your idea of "benevolent" is clearly very different from theirs
>dystopia
I love that this word gets tossed around like candy without any critical examination of what human life has been like for 99% of people for all of history up until the last 40 years or so

>>51265571
and? you're acting like this is some big gotcha, when you haven't explained why you think it's so terrible

>>51265578
i hate to be one of those "just watch the video" guys but... just watch the video
>>51265563

yes i understand you think you're smarter then everyone else and that you're beyond the concepts of good and evil. but you're just playing sociopath mental gymnastics that these fucks use to talk themselves up. evil is real, it's a problem, and they are evil

"master morality" what a fucking larp
>we're not evil you're just stupid
fuck off

they're just power junkies, they'll do or say anything to feed their addictions for more power. they're mentally ill, they need therapy and to be weaned off their addictions

>>51262173
WEF is a sideshow staffed by inbred midwits and utopian socialists. Its the Bilderberg that you need to watch out for.

>>51265655
you might be right, wef is so cartoonishly evil that its almost hard to take them seriously

>>51265642
>>51265659
>they aren't playing by rules or doing what I want, therefore they are evil QED
what do you even want anyway

>>51265201
All but 2 of them are jeets

And the other two are only white if you consider slavs white (which they aren't)

>>51265675
more like they're trying to destroy free speech, control all money, run all the governments, and then use that power to enrich themselves and make the rest of us bug eating pod dwelling dehumanized slaves with absolutely no recourse. yes, thats classically evil. it doesn't even matter what i, or what you want, that's the whole point, they'll get what they want and we get nothing.

>cbdcs plus social credit schemes = do or say anything they don't like and they take your ability to buy or sell

>just trust them with absolute tyrannical power bro, they're academics and rich people that makes them good

>>51265721
ok, so what do you WANT? do you want free speech? what are you doing to protect it? I assume you're expecting a benefactor or some nebulous collective other to GIVE you that right. What about money? Why do you want money, do you want material things? Power? Why do you need money? What is your ambition?
>the rest of us bug eating pod dwelling dehumanized slaves with absolutely no recourse
this is not a new paradigm anon, look at history, it's full of fucking slaves - willing slaves serving ideas you've probably yourself been conditioned to believe are important when they directly defer your interests in favor of your rulers'

>>51265578
>tossed around like candy
i read 1984, i read brave new world and brave new world revisted. they're doing it for real, much of it is already in place. the reason the word dystopia is tossed around like candy, is because they're literally creating an actual dystopia right in front of us. it's not even hyperbole.

>your idea of "benevolent" is clearly very different from theirs
i don't think it is. i think we have the exact same objective definition. they're not trying to do the right thing. its not that they have a different idea of whats best for humanity. its that they're not trying to do whats best for humanity, they're doing whats best for feeding their all consuming addiction to power at all costs.

>>51265587
you actually need someone to explain to you why fascism is so terrible? what do you think happens to dissidents that don't want their entire lives controlled and planned for by a small group of trust fund boomers with no real life experience?

>>51265587
lmfao you people are so fucked and demoralized there's no point even having the argument. fundamental difference in values.

>>51265777
well deserved trips
let me predict his response: something something malthusianism, global warming, humans are stupid and must be controlled

>>51265764
>I read the meme books. it's happening!
your brain is full of cliches

>>51265778
>reee how dare you question my dogma

>>51265777
what on earth is "fascist" about the wef? I feel like it's always a grab bag of random injected propaganda and bogeyman -isms whenever I wade into discussions with reactionaries

>>51265762
>what are you doing to protect it?
i'm open to suggestions. what should i do? what even can i do? go ahead, say it.

history is full of failed governments and failed economies. in fact that's all it is, just failure all the way down. the problem is that there never will be benevolence because absolute power always, always corrupts. power lights up the addiciton centers of the brain like crack cocaine, it's been studied. centralize too much power and you get power addicts who all do the same shit because they all have the same junkie brains. they have to grab more and more control over our lives to feed their addictions.

they lie and manipulate through the media, they corrupt academia, they brainwash us with propaganda to make us stupid and compliant. they treat us like children and they've done their best to make us into children so they can do so.

i want it to end, i want we the people to go our own way. to reject their systems and just fucking ignore them. take our toys and go home. and never give any human being absolute power ever again. anything beyond a local government was a mistake. decentralize power away from global institutions, corporate monopolies, and federal governments that are largely a puppet show anyways. educate the people properly so that we can have a more direct role in democracy, get rid of the centralized media propaganda corporations so we can think freely. etc etc i could go on

>>51262173
>WEF bad

Alright, so what you gonna do about it?

Is it wise to undermine them?

They have a lot of influence, how would challenging the IMF/WEF/USA do anything else outside of fuck you in the ass?

>>51265806
>what on earth is "fascist" about the wef's definition of """private-public partnerships"""?
do you always take this strong of an opinion of shit you clearly don't know anything about?

>>51265806
dude you're just a boot-licking contrarian

>>51265816
ok buddy well good luck with that

>>51265823
>if I distort reality in my mind really hard I can make something mean anything I want!
tranny

>>51265830
>you... YOU DON'T AGREE WITH ME? YOU LICK BOOOOOOOOTSSSS

>>51265835
>t. WEF information warrior

>>51265835
answer the question
>do you want free speech? what are you doing to protect it?
is what you asked. and i responded
>i'm open to suggestions. what should i do? what even can i do?
do you even have any idea?

we have no power, no influence, no recourse. absolutely no ability or capacity to defend our values and soon we won't even be allowed to talk about it. you seem to think we should do something about it? what. what should we do? say, SAY IT

>>51265845
t. obliviously serves his master

>>51265835
>if I pretend to know what I'm talking about I can justify my midwitted smugness with the illusion of intelligence
>>/r/retard

>>51265854
lmao what the fuck, humans in this era have access to more information and a wider audience than anyone ever has, you're demoralized into oblivion by propaganda and your feelings of powerlessness are taken advantage of to direct your rage against something you don't understand

>>51265860
cope and seethe, can't even explain your retarded correlation between the wef and italian fascism. is the wef communist? fascist? nazi? it depends on who you ask apparently

Just bought another 1k link

>>51265857
>shills for WEF
>n-no YOU'RE obliviously serving your master!!!
sure thing anon. it looks like it's time for you to make a "pepe is actually super lame, guys!" thread

>>51265869
all the information and freedom to talk about will be stripped away from us with a social credit scheme and cbdcs. what do we do about it?

direct my rage? all i can do about it is impotently complain on a mongolian basketweaving forum and soon i won't even have that.

something i don't understand? give me a break. you know i understand. i've explained it all.

>>51265877
communism, fascism, nazis. what do they all have in common? centralized power hungry tyrants who exercise an increasingly disturbing, draconian, and eventually violent rule over the suppressed masses who have been socially, politically, and economically impotent to resist.

>>51262173
Huh thats a long post.
Can I get a tiktok instead?

>>51265877
>can't even explain your retarded correlation between the wef and italian fascism
corporatism is the epitome of italian fascism, actual fascism, not gay ass antifa """"muh fashisums""". corporatism is what klaus schwab explicitly advocates for as well as the elimination of national sovereignty. it's in his books, which you would know if you weren't an illiterate dumbfuck acting like everybody else is as retarded as you are.
>is the wef communist? fascist? nazi?
these are all different flavors of the same shit. the goal of socialism is communism, but it always invariably leads to national socialism/fascism.

>>51265905
stakeholder capitalism he calls it. when the rich and powerful have all the stakes it just means even more power for those who already have most of the power. but its never enough, they always need more power, more control. they will never ever be satisfied and they'll keep taking and taking and taking more and more and more power leaving us less and less able to do anything about it.

they want to micromanage your life. they want you to ask permission for every purchase, every activity, every word you say, every thought you have. they want it all.

>>51265923
right, and obviously there's nothing capitalistic about it. that's the mentality of a henry kissinger fanboy.

>>51265958
they love to play little wordgames and twist the definitions on everything. part of their pathological craving for more control. they need to control the language to control our minds.

>>51265905
fascism rebranded corporatism, they are not the same thing you dullard. if you have to draw a corollary to what has been, they want to create a nu-aristocracy where there are aristocratic bodies as opposed to states. your "buh that's le bad" excuse is that they will control eveything while knowing nothing, which is false given 1) that they have access to vast amounts of intelligence and know exactly what they're doing, and 2) the paradigm is trending toward FREEDOM if you as an individual stop holding onto indoctrinated slave ideals with a fucking deathgrip

>>51265997
>give them absolute power and they will give you freedom
how naive
thats not how power works

>>51266015
you have a cucked mentality and view them as an adversary rather than a tide

power is a sickness, an addiction. even the best of us given that kind of power would become corrupted. power is like meth, coke, heroine. you have a little taste, and then a little more. and then you need more and more to get your buzz, get your hit. you turn into a junkie who do or say anything to get more of it. man is unfit to rule over man

>>51266015
he means freedom from hecking oppressive gender norms and freedom from the threat of hot weather

>>51265997
>that they have access to vast amounts of intelligence and know exactly what they're doing
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA holy fucking shit

>>51266032
they view you as worthless taxcattle and a net liability as soon as AI can replace you in your productive capacity

>>51266032
i view them as junkies
and i despise the sick shit they will do, the unlimited abuse, to gather as much power and control as possible. and how even that won't be enough for them. they chase the endless high of unlimited power and control at all costs. they're sick broken people

>>51262173
why do their economic ideas have to be so gay?

https://odysee.com/@Realfake_Newsource:9/RFNS-1.22-001-007:a

>>51266047
to dehumanize us. part of control and dominance. what better way to dehumanize then to erase the very idea of man and woman

our humanity is a threat to their power. an obstacle to the junkies getting their power fix. it must be crushed out of us

>>51266037
>>51266045
>repeating cliches
brainlet
>>51266043
>hahaha can't argue
cope
>>51266046
bitch all your rambling is one long impotent power fantasy, you're projecting hard

>>51265997
>fascism rebranded corporatism, they are not the same thing you dullard.
"The Fascist conception of the State is all-embracing; outside of it no human or spiritual values can exist, much less have value. Thus understood, Fascism is totalitarian, and the Fascist State–a synthesis and a unit inclusive of all values–interprets, develops, and potentiates the whole life of a people."
"The Fascist State lays claim to rule in the economic field no less than in others; it makes its action felt throughout the length and breadth of the country by means of its corporate, social, and educational institutions, and all the political, economic, and spiritual forces of the nation, organised in their respective associations, circulate within the State."
"The corporate State considers that private enterprise in the sphere of production is the most effective and useful instrument in the interest of the nation. In view of the fact that private organisation of production is a function of national concern, the organiser of the enterprise is responsible to the State for the direction given to production."
Benito Moussolini
swap out the state with """stakeholders""", and you have what klaus schwab calls the fifth industrial revolution

>>51266066
it has a few advantages.
it demoralizes
it renders gender and sexuality into products to be sold
mainly it's a form of soft eugenics and (voluntary) sterilization of degenerates and autists

they hate us because we do not resist them. they are like naughty children of overly permissive parents doing bad things for attention, deep down wanting to be punished. it sickens them to see us powerless against them, and yet they do everything to can to keep us powerless, and their rage against the impotent meak creatures we've become makes their grab for further control and power feel like vengeance to them. they believe they deserve to rule, the junkie brain convinces itself of anything needed to believe in order to indulge the addiction further.

>>51266085
lmao smug faggot acting like you've made any real arguments

we disgust them because we let them get away with it

>>51266085
i am 100% accurate

>>51262173
Back to plebbit, commie faggot.

>>51266121
>plebbit
it's owned by WEF fags conde nast
https://www.weforum.org/organizations/conde-nast

>>51266134
he's just trying to gaslight the narrative to make resisting the wef "reddit" and "commie" with the implication being that supporting the wef is "based" and "capitalism". it's a non-argument, its just manipulation. there's no reasoning with him

>actually the supranational corporate consortium trying to implement a global control grid is a good thing because... you're a fucking schizo and you can't stop them anyway!
kek fucking faggot

>>51266112
he's not arguing in good faith. he's a dishonest person just trying to manipulate and twist words and definitions and play debate tactics.

>>51266112
>>51266163
like a typical normalfag, he has a strong opinion on something he knows literally nothing about. dude's a literal conspiracy theorist calling everyone else conspiracy theorists lol

>>51266184
all his "arguments" consist of saying we have no arguments. and when we present arguments, he doesn't address anything in our argument and just dismisses whatever is said with a smug remark.

>>51266149
>WEF controlled by the most powerful capitalists in the world
>no, it's not capitalist! that's gaslighting!
dilate troon

>>51266213
>capitalists

>>51266213
samefag

>>51266213
you responded to my accusations by doing exactly what i accused you of. you really can't help yourself can you?

the form of capitalism they seek is one where they have absolute domination and control over all governments and economies. they want a social credit system linked to your cbdcs so you can only buy or sell what they tell you to. absolute top down centralized total control and micromanagement of our lives. their form of capitalism would be stalins wet dream

>>51266263
the only difference between communism and wef capitalism is that instead of the state governments, there is only the wef. they already have so much influence and control over every government already, but they want to make it official and they want to start dominating more overtly, seeking more control even then they have now.

there will be no "free market" when the wef controls the money in your bank account and there isn't even any cash in existence to shove under your mattress.

>>51266228
Do they or do they not own most of the world's capital?

>>51266263
>not muh real capitalism
Every fucking time. Capitalists own capital. Of course those who control capital control the government, that's just the nature of power. Deal with it, tranny.

>>51266303
just like how in communism the state owns the capital. guess what, they want to become the state

>>51266303
having access to capital is not capitalism. capitalists produce goods and services using the division of labor, klaus schwab and the WEF produce nothing. they extract and redistribute wealth according to their narrative du jour. there's nothing capitalistic about it.

>>51266303
they're not idealist capitalists, they're pragmatic "capitalists" who want to shut the door behind them, cripple any potential competitors with burdensome regulations and taxes, and implement "marxism" for the plebs to keep them satiated and individually powerless

>>51266324
Allowing unfettered private ownership of a nation's productive infrastructure means the state is owned and controlled by private capitalists. There is no way around that.

>>51266322
the wef pushes transsexualism through the esg agendas. capitalists influence the government but they're not supposed to be the government. when they literally are the government, and the government controls all the capital, thats communism. they'll choke out any semblance of "free market capitalism" which as you know is what people mean when they say capitalism. and through cbdcs and social credit they will control who can buy what. just as the communists control who can buy what

>>51266342
read wealth of nations because you clearly have no idea what capitalism is

>>51266322
>tranny!!!!
>*shills for transhumanism*
lmao pathetic

>>51266335
>having access to capital is not capitalism
Where did I mention "having access to capital"? I didn't.

>capitalists produce goods and services using the division of labor, klaus schwab and the WEF produce nothing. they extract and redistribute wealth according to their narrative du jour. there's nothing capitalistic about it.
Lmao, this has to be satire. No one can be this retarded.

>>51266342
ok, so they're capitalists who want a form of capitalism indistinguishable from communism. they're commy capitalists or capitalist commies. the worst of both worlds. whats your point? of course, you don't have a point. you're just playing a little word game because you have no arguments, because you're wrong. because there is no justifying what the wef is up to

>>51266339
>"capitalists" who want to shut the door behind them, cripple any potential competitors with burdensome regulations and taxes
Yeah, it's called capitalism. No one owes you jack shit, commie.

>and implement "marxism" for the plebs to keep them satiated and individually powerless
Hahahahaha

>>51266352
>Do they or do they not own most of the world's capital?
>Where did I mention "having access to capital"?
"owning most of the world's capital" is not capitalism. it's access to capital.

>>51266343
>capitalists influence the government but they're not supposed to be the government
Says who? Those with the money make the rules.

>>51266386
why are you shilling for the wef? you think you're getting on their good side? they despise you for being a worm

>>51266346
Unintentionally ironic post of the day. Adam Smith was a critic of unfettered capitalism, not a promoter of it.

>>51266396
he think they're capitalists

>>51266401
you should probably read wealth of nations before embarrassing yourself further

>>51266366
>ok, so they're capitalists who want a form of capitalism indistinguishable from communism.
No, you aching dumbfuck. They want unfettered capitalism because that's what benefits major capitalists like themselves.

>>51266402
and he's right. but he's wrong in calling us commis.
because the wef they're also communists
the two are not mutually exclusive. fact is either capitalism or communism taken to its extreme is exactly the same. when the state owns the capital, and controls everything, thats communism. and the wef is trying to become the state through control of capital.

>>51266368
>actually, wanting to implement marxism IS capitalism, you fucking commie!
retard. capitalism isn't just unfettered self-interested power seeking. by that logic every monarchist and communist dictator throughout history has been "capitalist"

>>51266382
Capitalism is private ownership of capital, dumbass. "Access to capital" is what everyone has who uses capital, which is everyone.

>>51266420
>WEF wants unfettered capitalism
picrel
>>51266425
he's not right. you guys sound like 15 year olds that don't know wtf capitalism is

>>51266420
it's not unfettered when they control everything by taking all the powers of a state and locking out any free market competition
unfettered means uncontrolled

>>51266396
I'm not "shilling" anything, you moron. I'm explaining to you that the WEF is an organization who mission is to promote the interests of the largest capitalists in the world.

>>51266416
You have clearly never read it.

>>51266427
Wew, you have no clue what either "Marxism" or "capitalism" are.

>>51266452
your definition of capitalism is facile and meaningless

oh no a petition

>>51266440
i know what capitalism is supposed to be, what the ideal capitalism is. and i know we don't have that, and as our capitalism moves further and further from the free market ideal to a top down centralized control market we move close and close to communism. the top capitalists have become the government.

usually communism is the state (owned by the few) seizing control of the capital. this time its the capital (owned by the few) seizing control of the state. the end result is the same.

>>51266465
>n-no u
ok moron

>>51266440
>don't know wtf capitalism is
No, that's you.

>>51266452
>no u
dude out here defining capitalism as private ownership of capital acting like he's read wealth of nations. next thing this dumbfuck is going to say is keynesianism is capitalism because reasons. absolute fucking retard.

>>51266467
It's not "my definition". It's the only definition of capitalism that has ever existed.

don't you see what he's doing? he's derailing the discussion into an unwinnable word game. a semantics pissing competition. because he has no arguments so he resorts to a classic manipulation tactic designed to end a debate.

>>51266481
>defining capitalism as private ownership of capital
That's literally Adam Smith's definition, you drooling numbskull.

>>51266478
>>51266487
capitalism is the production of goods or services through the division of labor. your understanding of capitalism is about as informed as a retarded edgy teenager.

>>51266478
you're the midwit arguing that destroying competition by regulatory capture is capitalism
you've essentially defined capitalism as "self-interestedness" - again, completely facile and meaningless.

>>51266494
>derailing the discussion into an unwinnable word game
Sounds like what you're doing. There is no controversy outside this thread full of mouthbreathers about what capitalism is. It's had the same definition for centuries. The WEF is controlled by the very mega capitalists that commies rant against and loathe.

i'm going to repeat myself

usually communism is the state (owned by the few) seizing control of the capital. this time its the capital (owned by the few) seizing control of the state. the end result is the same.

call it whatever you want, it's a very bad thing whatever you want to call it

>>51266499
>capitalism is the production of goods or services through the division of labor
Wrong. Division of labor exists in all economies.

>>51266487
You don't even know what the WEF's stated objectives and goals are lmao

>>51266516
>N-NO U!!!!
kek

>>51266524
loool bro read wealth of nations

>>51266507
>destroying competition by regulatory capture is capitalism
It's not part of the definition but it is an inevitable consequence of unfettered capitalism. There is no regulation at all in unfettered capitalism, nor any limitations on the deployment of capital. Regulation is government intervention in the market.

>>51266549
Cite a single passage in WoN that defines capitalism in the retarded way you do.

>>51266525
>it matters what they tell people their mission is
wew lad

>>51266551
>It's not part of the definition but it is an inevitable consequence of unfettered capitalism
no it isn't you absolute fucking retard. every monopoly that's ever existed in the history of ever has occurred from state intervention. the WEF is just a surrogate for a global governing body, no different from any other government.

>>51266551
>come in arguing "WEF IS BASED THEY'RE CAPITALISTS"
>end up arguing that capitalism is ultimately inherently destructive and oppressive
lmao we see right through you, disingenuous fuck

>the state owning the capital (communism)
vs
>the capital owning the state (crony capitalism)

the end result is the same. the few people in power control the money and the government.

>>51266538
Not an argument.

>>51266577
Monopoly and enshrinement by the state is the end goal of every capitalist. Free competition is their sworn enemy.

>>51266596
>Monopoly and enshrinement by the state is the end goal of every capitalist. Free competition is their sworn enemy.
when you're done not-reading wealth of nations, read menger

>>51266579
I never made any value judgments on the subject, commie. Get a grip.

>>51266587
>not muh real capitalism
>not muh real communism
Holy kek.

>>51262173
You vil drink ze cockroach milk und you vil be happy

>>51266607
You have so obviously not read a word of Adam Smith, it's painful.

>>51266596
you're describing what the capitalists refer to as crony capitalism. they believe that the government enabled crony capitalism through regulation killing free market capitalism.

and you know what, i'm going to agree with you. capitalism is naive. because those with the most capital inevitably influence and then become the government. and so capitalism will always become crony capitalism. and real capitalism is a pipe dream that will never work.

its the exact same as communism. the naive idea that the people will own the state and through that own the capital.

capitalism and communism really are two sides of the same coin. the powerful few end up owning the money and the government either way.

>>51266613
>you don't like the WEF? go back to r*ddit commie faggot!!!
>oh btw I never made any value judgments
lmao that kind of gaslighting faggotry doesn't work when you can literally just scroll back up the comment chain retard

>>51266647
>gaslighting
Back to plebbit, troonboy.

>>51266621
you're over here defining capitalism as "private individuals with money" like some wikipedia tranny, calling the WEF "capitalists", pretending "unfettered capitalism" leads to monopolization, and that the goal of capitalism is absolute state power. nice larp, typical uneducated leftypol hillbilly.

>>51266657
>oh no he pointed out exactly what I was doing
>BACK TO PLEBBIT TROON
lmao

>>51266662
he thinks if he tosses in a few "dilate troon!"s we won't know

>>51266662
>defining capitalism as "private individuals with money"
Where? Nice job outing yourself as a 60-IQ troglodyte incapable of elementary reading comprehension.

>>51266630
Seems like a nice note to end on. Have a good night.

>>51263868
kys
>>51265150
Slit your wrists and jump off a bridge retard

>>51266679
>Where?
right here you absolute fucking retard lmao >>51266435
>Capitalism is private ownership of capital

>>51266679
>>51266693
Lmao as soon as anyone points out his obvious lies and sophistry he leaves the thread
I'm sure he'll show up on a different VPN with more diversionary faggotry if the thread doesn't just die now

>>51266693
Wait, you think "capital" means money? Holy shit.

>>51266712
>obvious lies
Name one, you seething moron. You got nothing. A capitalist is a private owner of capital (= the means of production, aka industrial property, plant and equipment). Nothing to do with bank notes.

>>51266729
>I didn't make any value judgments!!!
>w-well so what if I made a value judgment, go back to r*ddit!!!!!!!!

Overall the WEF is extremely based.
When they started culling all the subhuman normies with vaccines I started to clap because how based it is.
All the people I hate got vaxxed and basically removed from living by the WEF and so far I dont miss any of them.
Business I didnt like was destroyed so it can make room for Chainlink (Ticker: LINK) and automated trustless Smart Contracts.
The WEF policies on crypto made me richer than I ever dreamed of.

So why should I hate them?
For me Klaus Schwab is a Hero.

>>51266771
>I don't trust the medicine they shill
>but I sure as heck trust the tokens they shill!
i hope you sold at $50 anon

>>51266771
samefag

>>51266798
The difference is the Vaccines were never meant to be Medicine. It was always a depop play and for everyone who paid attention this was really easy to figure out.
>but I sure as heck trust the tokens they shill!
Chainlink solves a Fundamental problem, the Oracle Problem, without Chainlink we cant get trustless data into Blockchains.
Its an extremely important project and actually the core of the 4th IR.
>i hope you sold at $50 anon
I took enough profits to never have to work again and I still have a massive LINK stack.
Some of these dips helped me accumulate a lot more Chainlink too.

>>51266771
a new shill account, a new tactic
this time an appeal to psychopathia, because they believe we truly are as edgy as we larp to be.

meanwhile the businesses you don't like are the only ones left standing. the big globohomo corporations get their small business competition stomped out. while at the same time becoming slaves to a dehumanizing esg agenda through the wef.

>>51266714
>>>/leftypol/

>>51266915
Go there now, tranny. Be with your people. Fight the man!

shut it down!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nykFC37W1Jw

>>51266870
>psychopathia
There is nothing wrong with depopulation, only the useless and obese got removed and filtered out of Society.
Everyone will be better off without them.
once the maxvaxxed die off there is more resources for survivors like me and other based people.

>the big globohomo corporations get their small business competition stomped out.
Most of that Business is not necessary anyway.
I dont care about small restaurants serving goyslop or degenerate nightclubs that had to shut down.
>dehumanizing esg agenda
Ita part of the depop agenda and this is something we still urgently need, depopulation isnt finished yet.
Still many useless eaters roaming around, not for long tho.

>>51266855
it sickens me that the chainlink shills, the xrp shills, the hbar shills, the icp shills, have largely taken a pro wef nwo cbdc agenda because they believe it will "pump their coins"

why would it? they would seek to control these coins, gain the controlling stake if they wanted to use them, which means dumping the price down to buy as much as they can cheaply. they manipulate the markets it pumps or dumps on their command. and then no pump because they already bought in and it wasn't about profit for them, and all thats left is retail which cant pump for shit. they'll use it, but they don't need a high price to use it, and they're not trying to make you rich its quite the opposite.

but even if it did pump your coins, which it wont. it comes at such a cost that you're shilling for the absolute domination of humanity under an evil tyranny that will crush your freedom.

NGO contractors paid to provoke you for the sake of “enagement” in conversations they control the flow of; most of the arguments in this thread are between the same person or people using proxy software and 4chan passes. They control what the conversation is, they control argument a, they control argument b, you get mad and participate and believe this is a real conversation, their autosuggestion sinks into your subconcious.

The purpose is consensus cracking. That is making you believe their gibberish is something real people believe or discuss. There are no “bots”, they are real people paid per reply. Do not engage them. If you are being angered, you are being taken advantage of. They will pretend themselves to be other users who have been angered to create social momentum to catch you in.

>>51266939
it's more your speed since you seem to think "unfettered capitalism" leads to monopolization with the goal of absolute state authority

>>51266984
totally worth it for the deluxe pod and enough wealth to purchase Special Movement Rights (ticker: SMR) for a yearly vacation to a different smart city

>>51266965
>power hungry control freak psychopaths running the world is a good thing
they will micromanage and dominate all aspects of your life and then throw you in the trash when they are done with you, basically as soon as they can replace you with an ai or a robot. you won't escape this with your life intact and even if you do it will be a completely dominated and controlled life not worth living. you are a fool

>>51262173

>>51266999
Ask any large capitalist if he would like more competition, or whether he'd like to tap into massive government contract revenue. Hell, ask any podunk 'small capitalist' like a local car dealership; without legal protections against competition all those 'businesses' disappear.

>>51266984
Now you blame the WEF because you are a bad trader that has zero to none risk management? Git gud.

Also chainlink isnt like the other shitcoins you mentioned, they are nothing alike.
ICP, hbar, XRP are scams to keep the vaccinated mouthbreathers away from LINK.
We dont want these subhumans to make it, they need to croak in poverty, not make it.
Meanwhile Chainlink solves a very important problem, thats why the Price will be high. Token is needed.

>>51267043
>hurr durr gay commie cope
>>>/leftypol/

>>51266990
based on this thread, what do you think they are trying to get us to believe?

>>51267055
you're not real

>>51267016
>they will micromanage and dominate all aspects of your life
They are already doing that, now the difference with the 4th IR is that TRUSTLESS Smart Contracts will do it in a fair and sustainable way.
All the problems you have are coming from the issue that everything is build on TRUST and not on TRUTH, chainlink fixes this.

>>51267059
Nice projection, you little fucking faggot. Go back to your commie message board where you can rant and rave against all the big bad capitalists who are ruining your life.

>>51267043
you're describing self-interested opportunistic capitalists, not ideological capitalists. ask any large businessman if he would like to be granted infinite power while everyone else is compelled to live in a global communist state with no property rights and he'd most likely say yes - but that doesn't mean such a system is therefore capitalism

>>51267086
>t. buttfucked leftypol hillbilly

>>51267060
That the largest most successful capitalists in the world are somehow "not real capitalists". Black is white and up is down with these schizos.

>>51267060
Kill yourself Nigger.

>>51267104
>hurrrr govt intervention in a planned economy is capitalism
>>>/leftypol/

>>51267080
Cope?

>>51267089
>ideological capitalists
No such thing. Capitalism is not an ideology, it's a legal framework that enables capitalists to own capital.

>>51267125
>Capitalism is a legal framework
real retard hours over here

>>51267082
they don't want fair and sustainable. they just want more power to satisfy their addictions to control and domination. so why would they put in place a trustless system? fair and sustainable wouldn't benefit them, so thats not what you'll be getting if its a system they're backing.

if getting that power requires creating an illusion of a trustless system so be it. they'll own the controlling stake on the proof of stake ethereum that chainlink is running on.

and when you complain its not fair they'll just say that it is.

built on truth? they'll decide what truth is. and chainlink will say that the associated press is truth
>>The Associated Press will make its trusted economic, sports and race call datasets available to leading blockchains via Chainlink, the world’s largest decentralized network of oracles, enabling smart contracts on any blockchain to securely interact with the AP's real-world data.
https://www.ap.org/press-releases/2021/ap-chainlink-to-bring-trusted-data-onto-leading-blockchains

do you trust the associated press? trustless my ass

>>51267080
you're right none of these fags are genuine lol
consensus cracking indeed

>>51267135
and thats just the beginning. if chainlink is deciding what is true and what isn't, simply by tapping into "trusted" sources like the associated press. then its just bullshit and fuck chainlink, what a scam

>>51267133
Not an argument. Capitalism is any economic system in which capitalists exist. Capitalists cannot exist without laws that protect private property rights for industrial infrastructure.

>>51267135
>they don't want fair and sustainable.
yes they actually want it, they understand that their way cant continue on like this otherwise they doom themselves too. If they wanted complete and total control they would have implemented a centralized solution decades ago and never bothered with decentralization at all.
>so why would they put in place a trustless system?
For their own Survival.
>fair and sustainable wouldn't benefit them
Wrong, it would benefit everyone.
>that chainlink is running on
Chainlink is Blockchain agnostic and ETH is designed to fail for multiple reasons I dont want to explain to not spook the useless eaters into jumping ship. Its kinda like with the vaccines.
>do you trust the associated press?
Smart Contracts will fix them but right now Chainlink is nowhere near finished and lots of work still needs to be done.
It takes time to transition away from the Trust based system into the Truth based one. It doesnt happen over night.

>>51265425
Look up the definition of conspiracy dumbfuck

>>51267300
it's a cabal of people doing shady shit in secret. when they do the shady shit out in the open is it really a conspiracy?

>>51262173
The WEF is nothing but a front company for the jewish cabal. The kikes are the ones behind this will of total enslavement of mankind (and genocide of most of it too). The WEF have been designed with the sole purpose of diverting away attention from the (((ones))) truly in charge of the conspiracy.

They are nothing more than the spokepersons of the anglo-israelite mafia, a bunch of obedient, corrupt, greedy goyim and semi-low level kikes. That's why so many jeets are there. Nothing more obedient and servile than a greedy jeet void of any moral compass.

The real puppetmasters behind them are ultra-powerful dynasties, like the Bronfman, Schiff, Lehman, Rothschilds, Warburg, Sassoons, Kadoories...
who shaped and financed through nepotism -also called philantropy- the new generation of jewish elites, especially in finance and telecommunications, who are hellbent in this plan to enslave us all : Brin, Zuckerberg, Dell, Page, Ellison...
We currently are in the last days of a conspiracy who have been carefully crafted for decades to create a judeocratic world order based upon noahism. The scamdemic was the Part I of their big show. Soon we will witness horrors beyond our comprehension.
Kikes are demons. Prepare for what's coming, few will survive. And even fewer will fight back against their tyranny.

>>51267191
they're power junkies, they've lost their minds. they're beyond reason. everything they do now is just to satisfy the overwhelming addiction to power and control. in order to get more control they'll use cbdcs and tie that into a social credit system. they don't give a fuck about decentralization or even their own survival. they will risk their lives for power in the same way a meth junkie will risk getting stabbed if it means a chance to get more meth. because they have junkie brains. there is no transition from the trust based system, just a plausible enough delusion to reduce resistance. we'll accept something we think is decentralized and they can centralize it further later. means to an end.

>>51267316
Look it up. Dumbfuck.

>>51267376
conspiracy
kən-spîr′ə-sē
noun
An agreement to perform together an illegal, wrongful, or subversive act.
A group of conspirators.
An agreement between two or more persons to commit a crime or accomplish a legal purpose through illegal action.

ok so technically, a group of people getting together to do something wrongful is a conspiracy. even if they do it out in the open. fine technically. but really you're just being pedantic, look that up

>>51265762
So many stupid questions you have to be living in your mommas basement.. i bet that every person who has kids wants to atleast have a decent house at good neighborhood and good quality food and water to feed family, not some bugs and pods when owning nothing

>>51267358
sure of course they want power and control but they already have that.
what they dont have is a sustainable system that allows them to keep it, if they continue like they do now their influence and power will eventually fall apart and they will be left with nothing. thats what they are trying to avoid and the writing has been on the wall for some time now. thats why its time for real change.

to get the trustless system that solves all these issues for them they have to psyop the useless eaters that are stuck in the old ways into suicide and break some eggs along the way.
>and tie that into a social credit system.
a Social Credit System isnt a bad thing in itself, it depends HOW that system is made.

>>51267392
conspiracy is a weaponized term like communism/capitalism, it's loaded with so much bullshit that it just derails conversation instantly, intellectual/linguistic traps encouraged by the elite because they tempt people into emotional arguments about spooks and obfuscate the real workings of power (see: that shill derailing "WEF is bad" by screeching about communism and capitalism for half the thread)

>>51267512
>sure of course they want power and control but they already have that.
you don't get it, they need more, they always need more. does a meth addict ever have enough meth? they need more and more because they develop a tolerance. power is just another addiction it works the same way. they'll suck back all the power they can until they od on it. their brains re-wired by the addiction into junkie brains seeking only another fix. they have to increase their power and control to get that fix.

social credit is bad because control junkies are behind it and its their latest fix for their addiction and it will only get worse and worse

>>51267540
and whats worse, it happens to everyone. if you or i had the kind of absolute power they have, power we can't even imagine. it would twist us same it twisted them. most powerful addiction on earth and the most dangerous of junkies. human psychology simple is not designed or evolved to handle absolute power.

>>51267540
thats how brainlets like you would react to power but these people are used to it for many many generations. whats important for them is conserving their power and having it in a sustainable way, otherwise it would all crumble and they would have to start from 0, they are nowhere near as dumb as you think, thats just your projection.
>social credit is bad because control junkies are behind it
not in a TRUTH based system with a decentralized Oracle Network.

>>51267576
there is no getting used to it. its the most powerful addiction on earth, nobody can fight. its an inherent flaw in humanity. you're attributing a degree of sanity to them that their junkie brains no longer possess. they have all gone mad. they're not thinking clearly, they can't anymore. before they destroy themselves and us with them they'll have sucked away as much power as possible and then some, completely dominating our lives in every aspect. often in cruel and unusual ways because forcing us into shit we don't want is the domination they crave.

>>51267576
it's not even about being smart or dumb. it's about sanity and addiction. their brains are re-wired by the addiction, they are incurably insane.

>>51267594
>more projection

>>51267576
>truth based
we've already established that their idea of truth is tapping into the associated presses databank and calling that decentralized truth. its a larp. your cope was that its a work in progress and it will be properly decentralized later, i don't believe that. fuck chainlink

>>51267602
there is no "addiction", when you are at the top you cant afford this behavior otherwise you will fall and someone else will take your place, happened many times in history.
thats what they want to avoid.

>>51267605
i have never in my life held the kind of absolute power required to go mad on. it's not projection, its observation.

>>51267618
>we've already established that
Chainlink is nowhere near ready and that the transition from Trust to Truth based System takes time.
>i don't believe that.
nobody cares what you believe since you arent in charge of anything.
>fuck chainlink
then dont buy it, nobody forces you to.
if you want to miss out on the biggest industrial revolution its your problem, not mine.

>>51263842
What does it change?

>>51267626
>i have never in my life held the kind of absolute power
exactly, so you make up your headcanon what it has to be like.
its absolutely not like that tho.

>>51267622
once again, you're applying reason to junkie brains mad with power. the addiction is real so that doesn't work. their junkie brains that will justify anything for the next hit will take the risks. thats why its happened so many times in history and will happen again.

>>51267638
oh and you have held absolute power so you can day what its absolutely not like?

power is addictive. it lights up the same parts of the brain as any other addiction. its been studied. take that observation to its logical conclusion and yes, the people in power behave like junkies. which means they cant be expected to behave like anything else.

>>51267629
if you want to shill for humanities enslavement with some mental gymnastics because you imagine it'll pump your shitcoin that's everyones problem. you're a real piece of shit

>>51267645
>>51267658
as already explained, power is useless if you cant keep it.
>>51267671
Humanity is already enslaved, going from TRUST based enslavement to TRUTH based enslavement is still a huge improvement.
>you're a real piece of shit
ad hominems dont win discussion.

>>51267700
as already explained, they're insane. they'll risk losing their power chasing more. same way a heroin junkie will take more and more heroin until he kills himself.

we're not going from trust based to truth based. chainlink will just reference shit like the associated press and then slap a "verified by chainlink" slogan on it. its not a work in progress, its by design.

did i hurt your feefees calling you a piece of shit? lets hope you are done with the discussion im tired of repeating myself and not getting through to you

Power, especially absolute and unchecked power, is intoxicating. Its effects occur at the cellular and neurochemical level. They are manifested behaviourally in a variety of ways, ranging from heightened cognitive functions to lack of inhibition, poor judgement, extreme narcissism, perverted behaviour, and gruesome cruelty.

The primary neurochemical involved in the reward of power that is known today is dopamine, the same chemical transmitter responsible for producing a sense of pleasure. Power activates the very same reward circuitry in the brain and creates an addictive “high” in much the same way as drug addiction. Like addicts, most people in positions of power will seek to maintain the high they get from power, sometimes at all costs. When withheld, power – like any highly addictive agent – produces cravings at the cellular level that generate strong behavioural opposition to giving it up.

The neurochemistry of power has implications for politics and for political change. Since power activates our neuronal reward systems in the brain and, as such, is addictive, people in positions of unchecked power are likely to lack the self-awareness required to act with restraint or to seek a consensual form of decision making.

>>51267742
>they're insane.
proofs?
>chainlink will just reference shit like the associated press and then slap a "verified by chainlink" slogan on it.
not how it works.

>>51267771
that is how it works
>>The Associated Press will make its trusted economic, sports and race call datasets available to leading blockchains via Chainlink, the world’s largest decentralized network of oracles, enabling smart contracts on any blockchain to securely interact with the AP's real-world data.
https://www.ap.org/press-releases/2021/ap-chainlink-to-bring-trusted-data-onto-leading-blockchains

proofs?
just read
>>51267765
you can't even pretend that doesn't make perfect sense

you've lost this argument

>>51267802
thanks for explaining it, i'm not sure why that guy doesnt understand, a 6 yearold could understand your argument is correct.

>>51267765
>bunch of buzzwords, projections and fanfiction about what he thinks its like to be powerful
>>51267802
>that is how it works
nope, the contract creator can simply chose to include more diverse datapoints into his Smart Contract, or not.
you dont seem to understand the importance of decentralization.

>>51267848
>dEcEnTrALiZaTiOn
holy kek, it will be as faux-decentralized as every other cryptocurrency, including btc with its satoshi rugwallet kill switch. they're all captured from the beginning, and chainlink will most definitely NOT be an exception in practice.

>>51267392
I don't want to know what that word means

>>51267848
>or not
yeah, i'm thinking "or not"

let me try and explain one last time
>exercising power releases dopamine
>the brain addicted to dopamine (the root of all addictions is releasing dopamine either with a substance like cocaine or an activity like sex or exercising power)
>tolerance is developed to the dopamine releasing stimulus, meaning more and more is required to get the fix. more cocaine, wilder porn, more power
>power is a very very powerful addiction
>absolute power turns your brain into a junkie brain
>you will now do crazy shit to get more power

>>51267882
Smart Contracts are not currencies, do you even know anything about the subject? because its seems you do not.
>including btc with its satoshi rugwallet kill switch
doesnt matter because it can be frontrun as anyone can watch the tx pool.
you also have no proof that its a "rugwallet kill switch", so more assumptions from a brainlet who thinks he has it all figured out and doesnt have to post any proof.

>and chainlink will most definitely NOT be an exception in practice.
you dont even know what a decentralized oracle network is or how it works.
go do some research.

>>51267925
https://insight.kellogg.northwestern.edu/article/losing-touch

https://www.oveo.org/fichiers/power-changes-how-the-brain-responds-to-others.pdf

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/286534974_How_power_affects_the_brain

some studies on powers effect on the brain

>>51267935
apparently it works by looking at an associated press database and confirming that yes, the associated press did say that, therefore its true. wow, so trustless

>>The Associated Press will make its trusted economic, sports and race call datasets available to leading blockchains via Chainlink, the world’s largest decentralized network of oracles, enabling smart contracts on any blockchain to securely interact with the AP's real-world data.
https://www.ap.org/press-releases/2021/ap-chainlink-to-bring-trusted-data-onto-leading-blockchains

>>51267925
>>51267939
thats how it works for the NPCs, the higher circles of power know that this is not sustainable and of course they suffer from it too, thats why they change the system from Trust to Truth.
if they dont then their empire will crumble, this is something they want to avoid.

>>51267947
again, you can use multiple oracles and datapoints for your smart contract.
you dont have to depend on a single source of data.
AP is one oracles of many.
more oracles = more security for your smart contract

>>51267962
they're addicts, they don't think clearly. those with the most power will be the most junkie brained. at this point you're just being willfully thick not to grasp this. they will risk losing their power to get more power, they cannot help themselves.

>multiple datapoints.
like reuters, the associated press, cnbc, abc, cnn, new york times, washington post, etc etc ALL THE NETWORKS its true because chainlink verified they all said it now you have to accept it as true because "verified by chainlink" is the new "fact check"
SCAM

>>51267986
>like reuters, the associated press, cnbc, abc, cnn, new york times, washington post, etc.
there will be thousands of different oracles from all kinds of sources and nobody forces you to include the AP or cnn oracle into your Smart Contract trigger.
Smart Contracts are permissionless and open source, the Smart Contract creator can make them however he wants. you could easily make a Smart contract thats doing the opposite of what the "globohomo" outlets say. its fully customizable.
>"verified by chainlink" is the new "fact check"
if you build it that way sure, but you dont have to.

>>51268022
you don't have to, but they will

chainlink doesn't automagically prove something as true. it just links "trusted sources" to a smart contract. thats it.

>>51268028
>but they will
its open source and permissionless. you seem to have lots of trouble figuring this out.

>>51268028
and guess what, any use of chainline by the wef, they're gonna use sources vetted and trusted by the wef. you're not moving from trust based to truth based. its still trust based because chainlink isnt fucking magic it cant discern what is true and what isn't

>>51262173
The WEF is just a scapegoat for simpletons who want easy answers to hard problems. In 5 years time it won't be the WEF you are angry with but some other group of shadowy elites, just like it used to be the Bilderberg group which no one cares about anymore.

You are all wasting your time getting angry at nothing.

>>51268073
>its still trust based because chainlink isnt fucking magic it cant discern what is true and what isn't
>it cant discern what is true and what isn't
thats up to the Smart Contract creator, its up to him to figure out which sources he needs to include so its not too biased in one direction or another.
only with decentralization you can solve this problem.

>>51268097
wef are not shadowy elites. its nearly every head of state, nearly every head of every major corporation and ngo. you can claim they're puppets and thats plausible. but their agenda is this issue, and the fact that they do have the power to do what they say they're going to do.

>>51268103
and when the smart contract creator is the wef?
think about it
decentralized across all the sources the wef trusts.

>>51267986
> its true because chainlink verified they all said it now you have to accept it as true because "verified by chainlink" is the new "fact check"
No you made this part up. Your mom will continue to believe that the vaccine has zero side effects because Andersson Cooper tells her so, not because Chainlink verifies that he says so. Your smart contract, that knows to sell all your Pfizer tokenized stock whenever A Cooper states that will trigger because Chainlink verifies he really said that (again).

>>51267162
Chainlink doesn’t make any judgments about whether the source is speaking the truth, only whether the on-chain data truthfully reflects the source data.

You’re a turbomidwit of the highest order.

>>51268124
If you don’t trust the contract, then don’t use it lol

>>51268124
>and when the smart contract creator is the wef?
sure why not, they will use these smart contracts like everyone else and they too will want to avoid too much centralization and they have to because they need to keep each other in check.
as already explained they want the new system to be stable, balanced and prevent one party gaining too much power over the others. it has to be sustainable and controlled otherwise things will crumble and they wont be as comfy anymore.

>>51268199
exactly or just fork it, fix it and make it a better service.

>>51268189
>>51268199

you're the idiot who said the wef will use chainlink to move us from a trust based world to a truth based world.

>>51268213
or maybe you're the idiot who has been claiming the wef will use chainlink to move from a trust based world to a truth based world. fucking idiotic wishful thinking.

they don't care if it crumbles, they don't care about being fair or stable or balanced, they are mad with power and they will risk losing everything to gain more power. its game of thrones out there, they keep each other in check through blackmail and murder. each one of them wants to be the one to gain the most power and a system where they can't do that so well isn't in their interests. they're all junkie brains addicted to power willing to risk their lives to get more power to get that power fix. absolute power has junkie brained their minds so hard they are like meth addicts on steroids times a thousand. you are a wishful thinking naive idiot to think chainlink will save us and bring truth to the world through the wef. thats fucking retarded

>>51268214
What a bizarre non sequitur

>>51268254
>"muh game of thrones its like muh marvels out there!!"
stick with your capeshit, you dont know how anything works.

>>51268214
What do you want the truth about, anon? Any verifiable fact, any method you prefer for verification, it can be delivered in actionable format to your smart contract via Chainlink DONs. What part is it you have trouble grasping?

>>51268293
your theories about what will happen have been insanely naive. the wef is worried about too much centralization so they're gonna use chainlink to move us to a truth based world. even though thats not how chainlink works or how power addicted junkies work.

>>51268189
>Chainlink doesn’t make any judgments about whether the source is speaking the truth, only whether the on-chain data truthfully reflects the source data.
Exactly this.

>>51268306
i'm talking to the retard who think the wef is going to use chainlink to save the world. so fuck off if you're not that guy. as if the wef would use chainlink in that way. follow the conversation retard

All of you supporting these evil retards will have the ending of Caucescu. You're not a “genius”, you're not “beyond good and evil” you're an evil retard and you will pay for it.

WEF CHADS WE WON

>>51268120

>WEF CHADS WE WON

>>51268120

>WEF CHADS WE WON

>>51268120

WEF CHADS WE WON

>>51268120

>>51268327
>evil
Smart contracts that are externally aware are a very effective tool that can be used for both good and evil.
This is true for literally every major invention in human history.

>>51268325
>78 posts by this id
You don't have the right to call anyone retarded.

>>51268338
oh ho ho
retard
79 posts

>>51262239
>YApyeFud
>Ya paye Fud
Sick ID get anon. Jeets be out here getting paid to fud.

>>51268366
I'm holding xrp, link, icp and all that shit but I don't like their association with wef. Should I drop them or take profit and fuck off? I mean what one can do at this point we're all desperate for money.

>>51268333
holy checked and based

>>51268317
>even though thats not how chainlink works
you dont seem to understand how Chainlink works or what Smart Contracts are, instead of making brainlet assumptions you should do some more research into the topic.
its pointless to discuss this with someone clueless.

>>51268320
well, this is one way you can set up your contracts. You could set up an oracle network of political analysts tasked with determining if Biden stole the election, feed their output as an input to a bigger DON of statistical experts who weighed the political viewpoint together with indications from statistical anomalies, etc etc. Will this necessarily produce the ultimate truth about the election? No. But it will produce a consensus based answer. A Chainlink DON is in nature similar to a jury. It's a mechanism for producing bias free consensus, which is the closest thing we have to actionable truth for things that are not directly measurable. We know juries don't produce infallible truth, but it's good enough that we throw people in prison over it. DONs won't produce infallible truth either, but it should produce consensus using a mechanism that doesn't introduce exploitable bias, which is good enough for smart contracts to act on it. Or is it? That's where you come in, unlike with a jury, where you don't have the option to not accept a trial with the system we have if you're accused, you are quite free to decide which smart contracts you think trigger on objective enough truth.

>>51268400
One thing Chainlink would provide in that scenario is undeniable public proof of exactly what was posted on-chain, when, and by whom.
Nobody would ever be able to deny or edit after the fact.

>>51268366
I went and read some but you're so poorly informed it's just pathetic. You're clearly not a shill either. Just a retarded anon who spends more time making up shit in his replies than researching what he is talking about.

>>51268387
there are other projects

>>51268396
>>The Associated Press will make its trusted economic, sports and race call datasets available to leading blockchains via Chainlink, the world’s largest decentralized network of oracles, enabling smart contracts on any blockchain to securely interact with the AP's real-world data.
https://www.ap.org/press-releases/2021/ap-chainlink-to-bring-trusted-data-onto-leading-blockchains
>you can add as many oracles as you want
oh really? and how many will the wef add that aren't vetted as trusted sources by the wef. chainlink will not bring truth from a wef smart contract. thats now how chainlink works
>>51268414
wow, confirmed that a wef source said the thing they're supposed to say. fuck wow the future is saved
>>51268418
you're clearly some smug little shit with no argument and you can fucking gargle my balls slut

>>51268445
>oh really?
yes, its a decentralized oracle network.

>>51262173
>To become a member, a company must turn over a minimum of $5 BILLION USD every year.
I thought it only cost 10k annually?

>>51268414
Yes. When a DON is tasked with delivering a fact for which the verification method is generally uncontroversial, slashing cheaters/failing nodes is straightforward. The interesting thing about Chainlink DONs is that it scales up to less obviously verifiable facts, say “who really won the election” - what you have to be able to fully rely on then is not the ultimate truth of the fact, but that you and a counterpart can agree on the method to arrive at a conclusion, and that you both can verify this method was followed. That’s in the end what Chainlink offers, but you can’t blame their marketing department for getting a bit carried away. Consider how our jury system is generally marketed to us (and we’ve already bought it, and aren’t really looking actively for alternatives), it’s all “Truth, Justice, American Apple Pie!”

>>51268445
>80pbtid
Woah

>>51268445
>wow, confirmed that a wef source said the thing they're supposed to say
Yes. Literally yes.
It's therefore all the public to see, and nobody can deny or alter this afterwards, meaning the WEF can be held accountable for their shit by literally anyone with internet access for all eternity.

>>51268473
woop de fucking doo
the world is saved
chainlink confirms the wef source said what the wef told them to say and NOBODY CARES

>all the oracles confirm, vaccines are safe and effective, verified by chainlink oracles at the associated press and reuters
>ah ha now they can never say they didn't say that
>we win the world is saved!
fucking dumb

>>51268488
You don't have the slightest clue about the very basics of what Chainlink even does, yet you just spent 80 posts and many hours whining about Chainlink.

>>51266085
>>51267125
same jew

>>51268498
Chainlink oracles would record all claims made about vaccines for all posterity without the ability to censor, delete, block, edit, memory hole, ...

>>51268498
>The past never had been altered. Oceania was at war with Eastasia. Oceania had always been at war with Eastasia.
If you can't see the implications here you are ngmi.

>>51268523
and is that how the wef will use it? no, they will only use oracles linking to data from wef trusted sources. that does fuck all to save the world.
>>51268525
then they're not gonna use it for shit like that. if they want to memory hole it then they're not gonna use an oracle on it. maybe you do use an oracle on it, but nobody gives a fuck

>>51268551
Yes that's how they'll use it.
Everything they post on-chain using Chainlink is there forever, for all to see.

look chainlink is fine. before the retard link shills jump on me. my complaint is with the retard who thinks the wef wants to use chainlink to save the world. thats whats retarded here, they're not going to use chainlink for that, they dont care about truth

>>51268563
based righteous autist loudly proclaiming reason and truth in the face of shills and delusional utopians

any use of chainlink by the wef will be for bad purposes. so they can slap a "verified by chainlink" slogan on their disinfo. so they can say "mutiple sources confirm this and verified by chainlink" and then when you say its a lie people will look at you funny and say "but its verified by chainlink, multiple sources"

>>51268563
>84 posts of incoherent nonsense
>before the retard link shills jump on me
Kek

"the chainlink can't lie, its truth!"
thats what the normies will say, because no matter how many times you explain to them that all chainlink does is verify that a source said that thing doesn't make it true, they won't get it.

>>51268576
absolutely spot on total coherence fucking veritas truth bombs of pure logic

>>51268525
Yeah Orwell didn’t count on blockchains. The ministry of truth is going to have a heck of a job recalculating all those hashes every time it wants to edit the past.

>chainlink is decentralized and trustless
yes but...
>and it says here, vaccines safe and effective, verified by chainlink
yes but...
>so take your meds schizo, a trustless decentralized truth oracle confirmed it
but thats now how it...
>decentralized means its true you fucking retard

>>51268582
Nobody will be confused because all the sources are always explicitly stated.
It's literally just you that's this retarded.

>>51268601
not really, they just need over 50% of the stake on eth 2.0, they'll have that.

>>51268612
Right, I meant on a PoW chain.

>>51268607
>nobody will be confused
oh really? nobody will be confused with how chainlink works? really? every normie in the world is gonna wrap his little peanut around the oracle problem?

>normie blood literally running down the streets thanks to the vaccine
>nooo le evil WEF cant just murder innocent normies reeeee
cope harder fags

>>51268621
well chainlink runs on eth, which will be pos. link said theyre not going to support proof of work

>>51268633
Chainlink is Blockchain agnostic.

>>51268625
> Biden: there’s no recession
> (bought) Fact checkers: Yes Biden really said that.
> Biden’s PR department: fact checkers prove that there’s no recession
If this little trick worked, and people were really as dumb as you think, they wouldn’t have waited for oracles to pull it, it would have worked just as well with snopes and correct the record.
Now, people may be fairly dumb, and snopes may be stooping pretty low on a regular basis, but not quite that dumb.

>>51268633
Fortunately that doesn’t matter, we just occasionally write the hash of eth or whatever real chain eventually replaces it to a message on the Bitcoin chain.

>>51268625
Everyone will clearly see exactly what sources are being used, and none of them will say "Chainlink".

>>51268651
no, its an eth token
it doesnt run on solana. you want to use the eth proof of work version after fork ok but thats not supported by chainlink devs and wont work on chainlink nodes so set it up yourself but dont expect the wef to use it.

also how much data does chainlink really store on chain?
>Oceania was at war with Eastasia. Oceania had always been at war with Eastasia.
the wef oracle will have several trusted sources saying that, linking that off chain data by chainlink, so that if any one of those sources change their data it will show. but if all the sources change that data hey now its still oracle confirmed, all the sources are still saying the same thing. problem not solved

the idea you autists think wef is going to use chainlink. kek
delusional retards

all chainlink does is confirm that all the sources are pulling the same data, it doesnt store the data itself. control all the sources the oracle is pulling from, maybe it still registers that the data has changed, but since it doesnt store the data itself who cares.

>>51268691
not only that they think wef will use link to save us from trust based systems and save the world with the power of decentralized trust. peak delusion

linktards suffer from main character syndrome

>>51268691
> you pathetic nerds really think anyone will use your little “Internet”?
Heard it all before

>>51268717
decentralized truth i mean
as if multiple sources confirmed saying the same thing means its true

>>51268690
>the wef oracle will have several trusted sources saying that, linking that off chain data by chainlink, so that if any one of those sources change their data it will show. but if all the sources change that data hey now its still oracle confirmed, all the sources are still saying the same thing. problem not solved
You have absolutely no clue what you are talking about. You're just some autist that likes to theory-craft and discuss future dystopias. Cool and all, but this is not the place for it. Plenty of Sci-Fi forums where you can write to your heart's content.
>92pbtid
>Hasn't got the slightest idea how any of the shit he is talking about works

>>51268717
Make up your mind anon. Either Chainlink is such a good tool the powers that be will use it to further enslave us, or it's shit and all Linkies are deluded for thinking it will be ever used for anything. Can't have it both ways.

>>51268690
>no, its an eth token
nope its Blockchain agnostic, you can easily move the token to another network.

>>51268730
IF they use it then it will be to further enslave us. big if

>>51268738
who cares. congrats you can hold your linkies on another chain. its only used as payment for link nodes

>>51268739
Convenient.

>>51268748
its blockchain agnostic, it can serve any network.
its not depending on Ethereum at all.

>>51268739
>WEF using Chainlink bad because globohomo domination
>WEF not using Chainlink bad because haha no legacy adoption for linkies hahaha

>>51268779
this thread is werid FUD
I bought more LINK.

>>51268779
Yeah, didn't take long to prove that the 100pbtid anon isn't arguing in good faith. Who could've thought? Also a nice little moving of goalposts here >>51268748

>>51268779
wef is bad and if they used chainlink they would use it in a bad way because they're bad

if they dont use chainlink great

>>51268805
``moving the goalposts? you're claiming moving your linkies to another chain somehow solves something. im pointing out it doesnt because the actual nodes are on eth 2 smart contracts sooo. you're the one arguing in bad faith and you know it you little shit

>>51268847
Chainlink is a major advancement, it can be used for both good and bad.
Billions of people have been murdered thanks to the egregious use of the wheel, does that mean the wheel was an immoral invention?

>>51268863
mt argument this entire time was about the wef using link because someone said they would and it would be great. then link shills piled into the argument to defend link even though i told them thats not the context of the argument

>>51268726
retard wef isn't going to using chainlink and if you think otherwise, consider yourself as deluded as xrp baggies

>>51268908
Every single reply I made to you was in response to you directly fudding Chainlink.

the shills saying the wef is great because the wef will pump their link bags are awful people

>>51268944
follow the conversation to its source

>>51268943
>industry adoption bad
Did you sperg out like this over ETH as well?

Also, even if WEF is the supreme evil, isn't the right thing to do here to try and profit off them?

>>51268956
Every single reply I made to you was in response to you directly fudding Chainlink.

>>51268956
>Just read all of my hundred and one ramblings bro

>>51265394
101 Dalmatians by this ID.

>>51268592
And righteous. Don't forget righteous.
>>51268956
I followed it. Daresay I liked it. Thank you for your coherent choice of words in a meaningfull order. It's a first in years for me to this degree, as you, clearly, made the soulless seethe and project their lost minds onto you this hard.
They are not able to discern how truth is creative, it seems. They align themselves to the dictated sequences and follow it to the point they're never grasping the finer notes because they do not conclude any thing, they make-believe anything. Small limbs of the power-hungry illusionary thief, which for now remains their percieved master.

If power, a thing I truly feel is and will remain an illusion, only made tangible by belief, truly was true, truth remains, it is only a matter of the willingness of man to follow his own heart to find what is meaningful to him, as meaning only can be derived from alignment to the true source of creation, which is something they grasp not, with minds filled to the brink of hate and resentment, mostly undirected, sometimes directed at something, they think they can profit from. Haven't seen shit being deflected this well in a long time. Good sport.

>>51269821
Cringe