/biz/ - Business & Finance

CALLING ALL PUMP ENGINEERS
ASSISTANCE NEEDED

RC sold

Clearly he ain't bullish

>>51111999
CHECKED. WAGMI

>>51111964
hedgies get this shit under $10 please, I still want to buy more
>>51112049
damn FUD niggas runnin out of steam fr

>Ringo Kobeni selling his entire stack is bullish

WHERE IS THAT 2PM PUMP I WAS PROMISED

C'mon BaBBY, let's get a nice Friday afternoon pump going. Daddy needs to celebrate something this weekend!

>>51112069
nigga who dat is

>>51112061
Their fud only works on people that haven't learnt how their fud works. They think we're the same boomers it worked on for the last 100 years. Sad when they still keep trying

>>51111111

>>51112092
Cope and seethe. RC is to be trusted and followed right? So, sell BBBY and keep holding GME clearly.

people are so damn clueless
we're still incredibly early
we have the balls to bet big on this and we're gonna make it

imagine getting in on GME at $10 ($2.5 post split)
that's basically BBBY right now

making some smash burgers to get us through the last 2 hours lads, how many patties u boys want on yours?

The size of that volume candle lol desperate for it to be under $10

>>51112086
Brain Chobe?
The activist investor that dumped his bags on you.

>>51112126
>>51112318
yawn.

>>51112366
They haven't quite realised it doesn't work when they announced the upcoming update on the deal they brokered with RC ventures. As I said the same shit that worked on boomers isn't working on us and it frustrates them.

What happens to the price of BBBY if it goes private? What if just buy buy baby goes private?

Would BBBY going private destroy the chance of a GME repeat and cap our payoff at like 2-3x?

>>51112688
Depends what the buy out is, whole or partial but shorts must close a 108% position

>>51112665
yep, their kike tactics don't work and they're afraid. this shit is free money. I'm going on a long vacation after this and these kikes are gonna pay for it.

>>51112688
jewish tricks are always a concern and I guess we’ll have to live with a mere 2-3x

>>51112688
>>51112734
Would a sale or spinoff of that nature prompt a share recall or some other mechanism to force close short positions?

>>51112752
Weak fud.

>>51112688
price will go up to the buyout price and oscillate around it (rather on the downside), hopefully pump engineers can help us stabilize

>>51112802
If it's to go private (Dragonfly buys BABY) then shorts get fuck all but they have to close as I understand under LBO (leveraged buy out) a spin off would be a new IPO & ticker which share holders would get the value of and keep the value of the OG. It's exciting waiting for it whatever happens.

>>51112814
But he (maybe) is buying buy buy baby, not BBBY. They'd just offer the company cash. I'm not sure how it really benefits shareholders in the short term.

>>51112883
in that case bbby becomes debt free and has a lot of cash on hand, with three RC handpicked board memebrs, and is free to pursue their new goals (perhaps this is what they meant by saying "strategic update"?)
https://bedbathandbeyond.gcs-web.com/news-releases/news-release-details/bed-bath-beyond-inc-provide-strategic-update-august-31-2022

>>51112883
Well i wondered this, if they spin off BABY as a new company and then Cohen buys the BBBY remainder and then gets a bunch of physical stores and distro centres as well.

I watched the movie Click last night and had a really great time. It’s a movie about a guy who finds a remote in Bed Bath and Beyond! It’s such a fun movie because the remote he finds is actually not just a remote! It controls time! Its such a quirky concept and I really enjoyed watching it, the fact that he finds a remote that controls time in the “BEYOND” section was such a fun and silly way of saying there is more to just Beds and Baths, there’s also Beyond the Bed and the Bath at Bed Bath and Beyond. I really like how the directors sneakily put that in there, it really added a smooth and cool twist to include a store where many family’s go to get household goods to a very family friendly movie it’s something that we all can relate to. My children after watching were asking to go to Bed Bath and Beyond to find the remote! We all had a cheerful laugh, it was a great time watching Adam Sandler in the New movie Click. A great cinematic performance for any family!

PPPPPPPOOOOOWWWWWWWWEEEEEEEEERRRRRRRRRRR HHHHHHOOOOOUUUUUUUUURRRRRRRRRR!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

>>51112994
POOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO ER Hour

>>51112969
Salomon, is that you?

>>51112688
shorts will need to close so maybe it could squeeze before the buyout is finalized but i guess enough people will paperhand near the buyout price. the buyout price should be well above 30 because RC said a valuation of several billion dollars could be justified for BABY alone.

>>51113145
and RC bought at 15 and had calls at 60-80 so the buyout price should be a lot higher than 15, maybe even up to 60-80

>>51113145
About $60-80 is the ball park idea for the buyout based on the numbers

>>51113182
>>51113209
yeah, i dont think it will be above or equal to 80, because, probably without a real, legal, reason, the SHF would drag ryan to court for sending trading signals, by buying his calls, or some other shit lmfao, i think they will sell off baby only, it wont be a full buyout

>>51113302
Good luck with that, he hasn't done anything, they already are trying and it will be thrown out before it even hits the desk. He sold for this very reason, so he cannot be sued like Musk and SolarCity. I agree BABY is the target, at $800m market cap dragonfly could buy the lot though.

>>51113346
i know, but considering the meltdown in media and how they are trying to drag his name through the mud, i wouldnt count phony court cases out, probably as a last resort type of thing, because the information that the court ruled in favour of RC/rejected the case altogether would be pretty devastating for them

>>51113362
I think the last thing they want is discovery lol 108% short. All this time and it's now coming to the fore front. I know Cohen has to move in the shadows but we're seeing some light finally. I for one cannot actually wait to get some cash to get on with fighting this cost of living bullshittery. I'm not over leveraged but I'd like to pivot into self sustaining asap

How long do we have to hodl for ?

>>51113496
31st at minimum

>>51113496
big dick announcement before market open on wednesday, then there's reg sho T+13 and T+35 in september, also GME earnings report if they're involved with an acquisition (those 1 billion authorized shares could be used for acquisition)

>>51111999
Reporting in, but please explain why they can always pull the halt switch and kill the shit? All the other dd is undeniable, but none of that matters if they have a cheat code.

>>51113449
thats why it would be a last ditch attempt, sue benchod, go all out last time and then throw all their friends under the bus during discovery to get a favourable ruling

>>51112086
Blueberry Jamboni’s third cousin. Lurk moar please.

come on long bros push it to 11 into close

I put in $300 at $10.85 a share. Did I get in too late?

>>51113764
nah thats a decent price. however u could have timed a bit better overall.

>>51113803
I could have sold and bought back in recently on the last run and got a few more shares, but the key is time IN market not timing the market

>>51112802
I'm betting that any spin off attempts will be loaded with debt and whoever buys them will end up with a massive liability.

This is a classic tactic that is centuries old. The question is if the spinoff or the root keeps the debt.

>>51113939
The root will likely keep the debt, which will be restructured. I think Cohen really wants BABY.

I have 400 shares at 25, am I fucked?

>>51114137
Only if you sold

+6% not bad
$30+ next week

>>51114137
thats a grim one to sit with. i made a huge loss aswell as i bought a huge amount around 25 myself which fucked up my average price. took a heavy loss. always take profits lads.

the baggie demoralization here was brutal the past week+. it seriously is nothing but a mental game

>>51114322
demoralization is the only tool the hedgekikes have left. the numbers are all in our favor. fucking hold.

GME is expecting RC to launch a bid to buy BBBabby. Think that's the announcement next week?

IT PROTEIN DRINK FU?

am i about to lose all my money?

IT CHOBANI FU?g

See a bunch of people saying short interest is only 40% :
https://www.reddit.com/r/BBBY/comments/wy9kmq/comment/ilwnlo6/

Wtf I thought it was over 100%?

>>51111964
>in the next week
it was "this week" a few threads ago

>>51112688
>>51112814
>>51113145
>>51113302
Looks like a buyout of bed bath itself rather than just buy buy baby is on the table:
https://imgur.com/a/BvWhFoq

Buying BBBY is the same as buying the baby co because BBBY owns the baby co, right?

>>51115519
Fud harder shill

>>51115586
What is this from?

>>51115606
Leddit:
https://www.reddit.com/r/BBBY/comments/wy4jv8/why_bbby_will_squeeze_higher_than_when_gme/

>>51115623
Ah thats his letter to the board

Ok baggies. Well done. You didn't sell with the rest of the market, you had a good showing on volume, and it looks like an upper and lower band of a consolidation range has been established. Money flow is slightly down but I am leaning towards that being a quirk of the indicator given the broader market sell off. Which BBBY was NOT a part of.

The one thing I find of concern is the volume on the candles with large top wicks vs. the volume on the candles with bottom wicks. This might be nitpicking though.

Looking tight boys, might thrown an iron condor on it and a trigger limit at 11.70 If this doesn't go to the moon it blows up on the launch pad.

>>51111964
kek baggies

>>51114304
>>51114165
Haven't sold yet!

>>51111964
yeah ok next week's announcement will be one of two things
1. the loan is revealed to be a DIP loan. the company states they will file for chapter 11 bankruptcy. equity is zeroed out. senior unsecured may be wiped out, but potentially could be redeemed at 30. every location in the country will hold a 4-5 day inventory liquidation sale.
2. the loan is not revealed to be a DIP loan, but the lending parties already bought up all the senior unsecured notes (they haven't been for sale on the secondary market for about 10 trading days, i checked) and the company announces layoffs, store closures, and an inventory sale, and announces an EGM will be held to ask shareholders to raise equity, indicating that it will likely be impossible to avoid chapter 11 bankruptcy if they vote no.
followed by
2a. shareholders vote no. the company's estimates are correct. chapter 11.
2b. shareholders vote yes, baggies will be diluted maybe 1-to-10 maybe worse, senior unsecured debt is retired (maybe only partially) with the proceeds. over the next quarter, the terms of the aforementioned loan are still too much of a burden, the operation has another disastrous earnings report. another loan is announced: this time it's debtor-in-possession, and chapter 11 is announced simultaneously. there's no sense in hiding the obvious.

>>51112688
>a buyer will show up and pay a premium on the equity only to be saddled with billions in debt
ahhahahahahahaha
hahahahahahhahahaaaaaaa
hahahah
holy shit

>51115951
>I am retarded and don't know what has and is happening
kek shills so out the loop, discord not been updated lately?

>>51115898
3. RC Ventures and BBBY announce an agreement in principle to take BBBY private at $35/share, a deal that values the struggling retailer at nearly $3 billion.

1. Someone pumps 100M into this.
2. A shit ton of ITM options are bought
3. If BBBY goes private, the most (that's if) that ppl will be paid would be 2x the stock price, which looking at how the stocks been this week, around $10-11. Short needing to close? Na these jews all have the inside scoop already so they would have closed their positions. The info (short %) we have is not from last 2 weeks remember.
4. Company decides to buy back shares and later re-issue them.

I guess that's not bad for people who go in around 10-11. But for anyone who go in around high 20s, its RIP.

I dont believe there's going to be any squeeze. Short interest is low, the one guy who held the options sold them, and realistically, HF have stepped up their game after the GME fisaco. No one in this to lose money. Might have to play the longgg game

>>51116130
The short fee is still prohibitively high, Meaning it's hard to borrow so the it's still heavily shorted. There are way easier stocks to short for a fraction of the fee.

>>51116130
>2x 10 is 10
What did he mean by this

Say they announce Monday premarket that BBBY is being taken private at $14/share.

Do shorts have to close immediately or can they extend for months while waiting for the privatization deal to complete?

pros:
- bbby has a smol float, so it can potentially reach meme numbers really quickly during short squeeze
- big announcement coming
cons:
- lack of cultpilled holders like gme
- ???
that only con might even not be relevant, because people will fomo in and wont paperhand, because they missed the gme sneeze and were butthurt about it for two years
ryan really did sell in such a manner to make everyone look at this and ignite the moass basket with something that isnt gme, kek

>>51116663
Just trying to understand how the mechanics of privatization-forced short closure would play out.

>>51116862
Unprecedented times with 108% SI. Guess we find out soon.

>>51112969
Kek I love how my copy pasta is getting posted so much.

>>51117262
Does anyone have proof the SI is over 100%? Seen it posted multiple times but haven't seen proofs

>>51112318
Doesn't this mean that he's gonna missout?

What a paper handed retard.

BBBY is the only stock that didn’t completely shit the bed today and is holding strong. Where are the fudders now?

>>51119195
He is going to be involved in the sale, I'm telling you guys. He had to divest for this person the terms of their agreement that you can look up for yourself to fact check. He's not going to just rug retail or the three directors he put in place.

>>51112086

But there's no way anyone organizing this can benefit from a high price because they don't own any stocks right? Due to conflict of interest laws? So they have a strong incentive to make sure the shorts don't get bled too hard?

>>51119430
yeah as an oldfag GME holder (now all in on BBBY), it's been disappointing to see how many people are basically NPCs. there is some fomo but mostly with small amounts, like people not selling their GME but buying BBBY with their paycheck. people can repeat the words, reg sho etc, but how many people have the mental capacity to fully appreciate what a unique opportunity BBBY is right now.

>>51120679
if you're oldfag, you would own gme. larp

>>51120679
It's literally a GME.2 at this point. All the signs point to a very similar event.

>>51120679
Holding GME and buying BBBY with paychecks is based though. Now that ETH2 is sellable on Coinbase I’m probably gonna cash that in on the next pump up (god please) and throw it all into BBBY. Fuck it I’m convinced at this point, I made 160% flipping and it’s currently below what I sold at. The fact it’s holding so strong despite the market taking a shit is all I really need to see.

>>51120679
>>51120672
>>51116663
I googled what happens to shorts when a company goes private.

Looks like this can actually result in a squeeze. Most notable company squeezing before being taken private was probably Volkswagen:
https://www.warriortrading.com/volkswagen-short-squeeze/

So in principle a squeeze is possible here. But when VW squeezed, about 200% of the float was shorted, rather than 100% like BBBY. Still, that's a lot. VW probably would have squeezed higher but VW's buyers decided to "be nice" and sell some shares cheap to avoid sending hedge funds out of business... Lol hard to imagine BBBY folks willingly doing that today.

I see in the anon club the strongest and smartest men who’ve ever lived.

I see all this potential and I see it squandered.

God damn it, an entire generation pumping memes, waiting for crypto crashes, slaves with white skin, advertising has us chasing rugpills and onlyfans, working gigs we hate so we can buy subscriptions we don’t need.

We’re the final children of the internet man, no influence or corporate backing

We have no Great war, no Great depression, our great war is a meme war, our great depression are our tinder swipes

We’ve been all raised by the internet to believe that one day we’d all be influencers and silicon valley gods and Alex Jones, but we won’t and we’re slowly learning that fact.

And we’re very very pissed off.

>>51120986
VW actually squeezed during the 2008/2009 bear market too so it's not even impossible for us to see a squeeze while the rest of market dumps.

>>51118486
It's been me the whole time, got a hearty chuckle out of me the first time

Got into bbby at $5 didn't sell a 5x, so while I'm still green all these squeeze plays made me realize one thing. They fucking last a microsecond, gme cultists keep saying a MOASS will take months to finish which I always thought was bullshit to create bagholders.

It seems like it's extraordinarily easy to kill any sort of upward movement, and you're looking at a -50% portfolio within a couple of hours.

>>51123497
When people are looking back on this, last weeks spike will be considered part of this squeeze for bbby, so while you're right about it being shorter, it's also right to consider it as a longer trend. The moass could potentially take weeks to top out just because of different liquidation timelines for different parties.

>>51119097
A 5 second look you lazy fuck, Yahoo has 102% because its slower

>>51111964
It's my first POOOOOOOOOOOOOMP boys
Don't let me down

>>51116120
if suggesting a delusional price anyway, why not go with $420.69?

2 more weeks baggies

>>51123794
>he doesn't know
Uh-oh Stinky

>>51123497
>>51123670
It's true that super long squeezes like the one that brough GME to $400 exist, but I think they're a very rare exception. ESSC, SPRT, ATER, MRIN, AMC, RDBX, and dozens of other r/shortsqueeze shitcos all squeezed for two or three days only (even if they sometimes take a while to bleed out after).

>>51123834
>He still doesn't know

>>51123837
take meds

>>51123845
>take meds

>>51123850

>>51123859
>he still doesn't know though

anons, is it would to sell 1500$ of GME from CS now and jump into BBBY or I should wait with it till annoucement ? I would still hold some GME in CS and then convert BBBY profits into GME.

>>51123881
Don't sell GME for BBBY, just buy BBBY and do it before the 31st

>>51123896
Any reason for not selling part of my GME now ? I believe BBBY will squeeze first.

>>51115718
Excuse me, “bag holder”/ “baggie” is a politically incorrect term. They prefer to be called “stake holders”.

My calls are for 9/30. Is it likely to pop before then, or should I roll them into longer dated ones? I think we're definitely going to get some good news on 8/31 that will impact our price, but I don't know if that will be the start of the end as far as the squeeze is concerned.

>>51123927
HFs may tank price on annoucement

>>51123919
You will lose any long term capital gains tax relief as a burger, as a basket of stocks BBBY going up will bring up GME - when RC bought BBBY look what happened to GME, it shot up as well. BBBY is going to go up but not as much as GME overall, the likelihood is a buyout and not a huge squeeze YET - it is 108% short but you are making a bad decision to sell GME for BBBY - simply buy both.

>>51123935
This. The price will eventually go up when the deal is done but for now you should be stacking both.

>>51123919
That would be a dumb thing to do for many reasons. As others have said, just hold your GME and buy BBBY. If it squeezes first then you can take profits or roll it into more GME, which is now even cheaper thanks to more shorting.

>>51123935
Maybe, but it could also set off fomo buying. If they announce a buyout for example, it's going to go near that price no matter what the SHF do.

>>51123845
>take meds
>instead of
>exercise

Makes you think doesn't it.

>>51124243
I am no longer mentally ill.

>>51123919
>>51123881
GME isn't squeezing again. It already had a few good squeezes, expecting more at this point is just flat out delusional. BBBY on the other hand is showing promise of another squeeze. I shorted BBBY selling ITM calls on the 17th, made a fantastic return buying by my calls for mere pennies on the 19th. I have been keeping an eye on it since. I have been very skeptical of it squeezing again, however yesterdays performance is changing my mind.

If I were a GME baggie I would absolutely get out of it, and put a few shares into BBBY. Do not go all in. While I believe BBBY has squeeze potential I also think it's has the potential to go to 0. Please be responsible with your money we are going into hard economic times and throwing money away is something you could come to regret.

FEEL THE SQUEEZE!

>>51124596
What a fucking snake. How do you cope with being such an awful person? I really hope you die.

>>51123497
this is myopic
$30 will look like a bargain in hindsight
the dump back to $10 was just the shorts doubling down
if you bought GME at $40 in february 2021 before it shot up to $350 you made a very smart choice despite it being overpriced compared to BBBY

>>51123881
consider the fees from selling on CS and they'll mail you a check if you don't have a bank account linked. consider transferring back to a broker from CS.

>>51123919
i'm incredibly bullish on BBBY. do what you want to do, don't get bullied by the peer pressure from GME cultists. not everyone has a big income so that they can buy BBBY without selling GME.

The squeeze already happened you fucking retards.

>>51124783
Why? Where do you think the calls that people buy come from? the Options Fairy? Somebody has to take on the risk and sell the options that other people want to buy. Why is it bad if I seek a profit in a trade but not the person who buys what I am selling? That's why we are in the market right? to make money? Wishing harm on people is seriously bad karma.

I hope you find prosperity and a happy life anon.

>>51124783
Based and anyone that convinces shills to kill themselves is doing God's work pilled. They are scum and I hope they do it in private away from others rather than in front of their family like cowards, but they should all go out and buy a gun and blow their brains out in the woods to feed the wildlife and soil.

Listen to me, you dumb motherfuckers, because this is all you need to know - BBBY has been on REG SHO for nine days so far. It is still on REG SHO for Monday which will make it ten days. At thirteen days, forced covering starts. It had 1.2 billion in trading volume the week before this past one for a stock that only has 60 million shares tradeable and 80 million in existence in totality. It was in a massive swaps contract that has since been blown up because the company is no longer going to be bankrupt, and the insane volume was that contract being unwound. Every single one of those failures to deliver has to be handled starting this coming Thursday and continuing out for the next several weeks. If you bought BBBY in the last couple of weeks, you're not holding shares, you're holding a contract for difference on a failure to deliver that was fraudulently created and issued as a share through abusing the locate to borrow system. This WILL squeeze, probably to at least a couple hundred bucks with the potential to go much farther. Part or all of the company is getting bought out by GME because RC is in the process of turning it into the next Amazon.

Enjoy the practice MOASS with BBBY, the real one with GME is coming soon. And Fidelity, if you're out there reading this like I know at least one of your interns is, if you fuck this up or halt buying/selling of shares or close out my BBBY position, you can kiss me using you as my bank after GME MOASS good fucking bye. Keep it clean frog.

>>51124596
>being this uninformed
couldn't be me

>>51124874
Cool story bro, tell us anotther

>>51124972
GME is easier to open a new short on than BBBY.
My money is on BBBY squeezing again

>>51125009
As I said, being this uninformed about GME is laughable

>>51125035
BBBY goes first. GME goes higher. AMC goes never. That's the gist, buckle up and enjoy the ride.

>>51125035
What's your cost basis on GME? You bought near the top and have been holding all this time haven't you? Or did you get in early but failed to cash out with DFV and are just bitter you missed the elevator to the top?

>>51125055
>hurrr durrr you must have bought at the ATH cos I said so
See this is why whatever you say is laughable, sweeping assumptions, appeals to emotions. Just cringe bro

>>51125057
>they're so scared of it they shill against it in unrelated threads
>it's offtopic to do so and they still don't care, proving they're not a legitimate person but another shill in a farm somewhere pushing sentiment
I really, really hope they finally do it and kill themselves as it's what they deserve. GME will squeeze to heights never before seen, and BBBY going first will put enough pressure on the system to make sure it happens.

>>51125084
It's the fact BBBY will sell off BABY and the remainder will go private is the worst the that could happen to them for swaps, which is why we saw billions traded in a week. The money generated from all this will likely go straight into GME and will cause another round of fomo when news of what RC is planning breaks, post earnings. You are correct, they have to shill against it in anything related to it. LRC is another great example, only retards and shill post anti-gme sentiment in those subs, even after partnership was announced. Anyone that calls BBBY or loopring a "distraction" is in damage control or denial of reality. LRC when mass adoption via the GS market happens and / or forced buying of NFTS by short sellers requiring to buy them for dividend purposes will see both ETH and LRC go up massively. BBBY is 108% short (publicly) and will be uncontrollable after Wednesday. Due to basket swaps the price goes up on GME because they cannot control the price via risk swaps any longer using it. The FED just fucked them all with SPY tanking hard and will continue to do so.

My only regret is not having more cash to plow into both from Monday, but I have a sizeable position GME and a small one in BBBY right now and I think if things had been different I wouldn't have a position in either so I am happy I do.

>>51124921
Soon, my friend. Very soon they will.

>>51125151
Gigabased take fren. I have about a thousand shares of the one true stonk and about a hundred of BBBY, the former is all direct registered save for a handful with my broker to let go for quick money before they liquidate the position. I have all of my BBBY with my broker because I just don't think it'll go high enough to be worth liquidating the position (reputable brokers can handle it hitting a couple grand before that's necessary and while it theoretically could go higher than that I doubt it will) and I want to be able to roll those gains into as much GME as possible the second it happens, minus enough money to tell my job to fuck themselves to death as I will never be returning. I have a small LRC position as well as some IMX but both are peanuts compared to everything else, I mostly just wanted a wallet for staking purposes because once it rips it's going to be worth a shitload.

This is all going to be extremely based and I cannot wait. Been working 70+ hours a week for a year now to accumulate as much as possible.

>>51124243
exercise doesnt help with schizophrenia

>>51125213
I see holding LRC as holding BTC before people heard about it, they are doing things in the future that will be massive - tokenized stock markets and be your own bank - which in itself is enough for institutions to try their hardest to mitigate it. I chuck the odd bit of mining cash into it weekly, which isn't much but it's basically free money for me now. I have over 1300 shares of GME and only about 30 BBBY though I might liquidate some ETH I have to buy like 5 more, I am tapped out right now due to bills for my car otherwise I would buy a crap load more of BBBY but if it doesn't work then I am unable to repair the car so #1 rule - don't invest what you can't afford. I wish I could have put more in but if I hadn't been in the position I am then I wouldn't have had the time to understand the play, hell I probably would have been caught up in AMC due to the media pushing of it. I could have made a bit of cash on it and dumped on the idiots holding that originally but it always came across as a fucking awful idea to me and I would have been bogged the moment I bought to chase a pump.

>>51125213
>This is all going to be extremely based and I cannot wait. Been working 70+ hours a week for a year now to accumulate as much as possible.

I see, you aren't just financially invested, but emotionally invested as well. For your sake I hope it works out.

>>51125327
no one cares what you think faggot

>>51125354
Can you afford to be wrong about GME and BBBY? What happens if you are wrong? How much would a loss like that set you back? How many hours of wage slaving lost would that be?

You can't afford to be wrong can you? That's a very scary place to be, especially with the storm that's coming on the horizon.

>>51125400
You don't seem to understand what an asymmetric bet is.

>>51125400
>he still thinks anyone cares what he says
LOL. LMAO EVEN

>>51125327
For your sake I hope you know to aim for the brain stem rather than straight up through the roof of the mouth.

>>51125400
ok keep shorting it faggot

>>51125615
You apparently still care enough to reply.

>>51125541
If that reflects your actual position then that's managed risk. Nothing wrong with that.

>>51125708
It's kind of concerning how frequently your posts reference acts of suicide, you should consider getting help.

>>51125726
Bigger premiums to collect than GME and BBBY right now. Way bigger. I am actually contemplating a long on BBBY now.

>>51125774
>Laugh at shill
>B-But you care enough to reply
>laugh more
kek what an actual faggot

>>51125774
I have no time or empathy left for people that blatantly shill investment narratives, the world would literally be better off without them. Anyone with half a brain can see that this is going up in the near future, and it's been literal years of dealing with manufactured sentiment of the most vulgar variety you can imagine with GME and that's thus far carried over to a large extent with BBBY. It is a multi-billion dollar campaign including mainstream media sources outright lying. I just don't care anymore, and I hope people that engage in that kind of behavior realize what absolute void of integrity inhabits their soul. I've been told to kill myself multiple times by shills, so they can get it right back at this point, and if them stooping to that level was what let me know this and other investments were the right play then I hope the same behavior in kind will be what lets them know they're fucked - whether they're actually short the investment and shilling to save their own ass or just getting paid to do it being mercenary cuckolds. Fraud earns the eighth level of hell. I hope they get there as soon as possible, it's what they deserve.

>>51123497
Look at the history of the Volkswagen squeeze. Start by looking at >>51121002. It went on a while and would have gone on even longer but they gave away their shares at a discount to bail hedgies, likely because everyone in those positions has some kind of incriminating compromising material on them.

When the squeeze happens there will most likely be more than one day.

Also this post's pic related gives the perspective of a well-experienced mergers and acquisitions expert. Spoiler: he thinks an estimate of $15b is too low.

>>51123834
Were they being acquired/taken public? It's important to compare similar things when possible. So don't just compare to other squeezes. Compare to squeezes that occurred when a company was taken private or acquired with more than 100% short interest. Like Volkswagen >>51121002

I was very skeptical of this but the more I look at it, the more I like it.

>>51123944
>You will lose any long term capital gains tax relief
You'd have to do the math to decide for yourself whether you'd make more money taking the extra 10-20% tax pain vs potentially multiplying your money many times over. My rule of thumb is I only sell and take the capital gains hit if I expect the bet to pay off more than the 10-25% (depending on your tax bracket) that I immediately lose to taxes from selling.

If you have $100k in gains and you are going to owe $20k in a year or $40k if you sell right now then the difference is 20k...

Would you rather have $100k - 20k = $80k in a year or sell and potentially end up with multiple times that if there's a squeeze? Personally I vastly prefer to sell and gamble on multiplying my money way higher but that might just be my preference.

>>51126069
I'd rather keep my GME and buy BBBY because the point of both of these plays is liquidity or lack thereof and any selling free's up real shares the desperately need. How do you not get this?

>>51126104
Good point, thank you. I'm still new and haven't gotten all the facts nor mapped out their implications yet

>>51125922
There's been more than one squeeze on GME.

>>51126180
>he thinks these are squeezes
Holy fucking cope

>>51126104
This. I'm not selling GME to buy BBBY. I'm just buying BBBY. Honestly felt weird putting a different ticker in my broker trading app. Has anyone direct registered their BBBY? I'm thinking about sending some of mine to AST but I don't know if I can execute sales from there or would need to transfer back to my broker first.

>>51126289
>Has anyone direct registered their BBBY?
yes, but the numbers are low right now, I have seen some major positions outside of DRS (ATS not CS) so who knows how much retail own but it's well over the float

https://www.byebyeshorts.com/

when BBBY is going to squeeze ? days ... weeks .... months ... ? Any predictions ? GME is "moass tomorrow" since two years.

>>51126392
2 weeks sir

>>51126392
Assuming it stays on REGSHO into next week, forced covering would start on Wednesday and continue through the next 22 business days the market was open. All the synthetic shares created by abusing the locate to borrow system (collectively referred to as "FTD's" or failures to deliver) have to be bought back to close them out, and that's not even getting into the whole 109% of the float has to be bought back to cover proper short positions. GME has been a long wait for a variety of different reasons, BBBY is going in the next month or so.

>>51126424
I was buying GME for 200$+ because "moass tomorrow" and I could wait and buy for 70$. I was bagholding because "moass tomorrow" and I missed lots of run ups. I wonder if same will happen with BBBY. HFs happened to be much more powerful and resistant that most expected.

>>51126199
I locked in gains on the first 3 squeezes, What exactly would I be 'coping' for there? That I had to pay cap gains on easy money? Big deal.

https://www.reddit.com/r/BBBY/comments/wz5ltc/bbby_back_in_top_10_gamma_squeeze_leaderboard/

>>51126439
Any chance for HFs to postpone it or roll it back ? If its free and sure money why there is whale-FOMO at 10$ ?

>>51126478
The price action and events are nowhere near similar to GME imo.

Gme hasn't had an acquisition to FORCE shorts to cover. Volkswagen's 2008/2009 is the one I compare to and I don't own any gme.

>>51126693
The first thing you must understand is that there is a set of rules for retail that is followed to the letter, then there is a set of rules for institutions and hedge funds that is made up as the game goes along and is subject to change with no warning.

>>51126563
Again, cool story bro go post in the GME general then.

>>51126693
Hedgefunds and shorts don't have any 11th hour magic bullet to make the pain stop, no. It'd have to be some extraordinary shit yet again like what happened during the GME sneeze in January of 2021 - marking the stock as being position closing only (which they can only do once all FTD's have been repurchased to close them out, meaning the price would still rip). Maybe if it runs high enough you'd see some brokers liquidating positions but that'd take some truly insane price action to start happening. All in all I doubt it gets PCO'ed as that would sincerely piss off everyone that's followed all of this from the beginning and probably push some to the breaking point, and worse than that and far more impactful than that, even the average rube would see yet another stock getting fucked with to that manner and start losing faith in finance as a whole. There was already a not insignificant amount of people leaving it entirely and liquidating retirement accounts after everything that happened with GME.

The market is already burning and was smoldering before that for more than a year. Do the powers that be really want to risk undermining faith and thus power behind USD by allowing more fuck shit to occur? Do they want to undermine the economy with mass protests at minimum? Or do they just slaughter the golden calf of the market and heave it up as an offering, when it's already about to fall over and die from the cancer ripping it apart unseen to the untrained eye? Anyone with a brain kills the calf, even if the kid that raised it threw himself in front of it the first time they tried. That's about as succinct as I can make of an explanation. Even if there was interference it wouldn't stop the price from going way up and it couldn't be done until the failures to deliver had been resolved, of which there are literal billions, dozens of times the actual number of shares, with a shitload of people all watching and informed this time around.

>>51126693
There already has been

>>51125941
SPRT and RDBX were being acquired, no idea what the SI was tho

>>51126439
so early October, I can live with that

>>51126686
no (You) after an hour? do you people even understand what you are seeing. it moved up 464 places since the last update because the gamma ramp is being built back up again after the rugpull. it's incredibly bullish.

>>51127506
have a you

>>51124965
I like this, but what stops them from halting and inserting talmudic magic into the mix? We have tons on more eyes on this compared to jan21, but still.

>>51127656
thanks

>>51128002
See >>51126966
tl;dr it's possible they could mark it as position closing only or force liquidate positions, but the former only happens once FTD's have been closed (way too many to cover especially with 109% short interest on the float proper) and the latter only happens if the price reaches truly retarded levels (several grand a share threatening brokers with insolvency and posing a systemic risk). In either scenario longs still win, and with the added coverage and eyeballs the risk of redpilling huge swathes of the population including uninformed rubes is really high. Which nobody that's somebody wants happening.

>>51128099
lol no offense intended that wasn't the pic that i meant to use i just went by the filename

>>51123794
Have you been sleeping under a rock? Kek retard.

>>51126392
dude, you dont want to know how much money i made with gme. and i fomo'd in at 120 in january 21. my personal moass happened and i am quite happy with it

>>51128385
>made a 3x at best
>is a moass
no

>>51127506
Thread being slow is a bullish signal. I'll sell when the baker has to bake 2 or 3 threads a day from all the attention. Means even this pajeet board is onto this play.

>>51128218
their discord hasn't been updated

If there actually is a buyout Wednesday what would the share price be? $25?

>>51128218
i dont read schizo ravings

>>51128780
>Official SEC filing are schizo ravings
MY

FUCKING

S
I
D
E
S

>>51128753
It's hard to say. The idea of them spinning Buy Buy Baby off sounds tough because I am sure some of their debt has it collateralized correct? Their lenders aren't going to let them just cleanly spin-off a profitable section of the company and leave them bagholding.

>>51128787
seeing things when they're not there is classic schizophrenia, yes
someone says hello and you read way too much into it

If I buy ONE stock, how profitable would that be? I have 15 dollars

Lets say they take the stock private at 35-40 a share.

What the fuck happens to my Jan calls at 80?

>>51129324
how does at least $16 sound?

>>51129523
Promising

Is it monday yet?

>>51129365
There's precedent for a squeeze even when a company goes private as shorts still need to close. I'm probably gonna stick to something closer to the money though.

oh no no no

>StoP TaLkInG aBouT RyAn CoheN
>Meanwhile RC ventures brokers deal

>>51129365
>>51130131
And by this I mean Volkswagen squeezed during the nasty 2008/2009 bear market during a hostile takeover. It had something like 200% of its float in short interest though and the fact it was a hostile takeover rather than having the cooperation of the company being shorted - BBBY is probably cooperating with potential buyers.

So not the same but it has some similarities like the short interest being over 100%.

>The VW squeeze is nothing like BBBY's current situation, in my opinion. Porsche was openly committing a hostile takeover, and bought somewhere around 74% of the voting shares on the open market. BBBY Board is likely negotiating with private equity

>Can you explain how that changes the mechanics of shorts needing to buy more than 100% of the float before the acquirer does? I think you're right but there was some serious interference in VW's case as Porsche acted against their own interests to bail out hedge funds. Even still, it squeezed to the point of becoming the most valuable company on the planet. I don't see how they are different in kind, only in degree. Seems like a similar rocket, just with maybe 1/4 to 1/2 the fuel. If BBBY only goes 5% of the way that VW did - only 5% of the way to being the most valuable company in the world - that's still an incredible squeeze.

https://www.reddit.com/r/BBBY/comments/wz9cou/comment/im15c3r/

Which redditor is right guys

Why people are buying shares and not buy duplicate of RC calls for Jan 23 ? Is there any risks with these calls ?

>>51130971
yes because options are dumb, buy shares

>>51131006
why dumb

>>51131242

>>51131326
oh nice to know, thanks bro

>>51131326
Depends on your options being underwater.

Mix of shares and some options probably not bad especially if you keep the option strike prices somewhere reasonably close to a potential buyout offer.

This shit can squeeze beyond the buyout price when shorts start closing their positions, see >>51130789

>>51131399
I agree but it's risk you don't need

Bump

>>51111964
BBBY will be the first stock I ever buy when market opens tomorrow. what can i expect?

>>51133438
To not be able to buy because tomorrow is Sunday and the market is closed.

>>51133468
oh, sry i am new kek.

Friendly reminder that wagmi, shills glow, and BBBY will literally 10x. Don't get discouraged if we go off Reg SHO, GME was on Reg SHO twice and it didn't pop significantly until the second time. But when it did it went 15x to its current price

>>51133685