/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>50704785
It also has a founder with 65% of the supply that is dumping aggressively. He could bring it to literally 1c tomorrow by selling 1/4 of his stack

you were supposed to buy under $1 when we told you to back in 2018 and then sell over $40 when we told you to back in 2021. it wasn't hard

Can you shut the fuck up? It's the same people that spoke at the last two cons, there is no fucking partnerships. Get it through your heads, this is ANOTHER failed shitcoin. $50 -> $5 after 5 years. It's over, MOVE THE FUCK ON

>>50704785
when you can earn passive income just by staking it will

>>50704785
At least animal coins do what they are supposed to do. Can you imagine releasing an animal coin and saying, "yeah, this isn't dumb or funny or whatever yet, but in 5 years we'll release a roadmap on our plans on how we will make it dumb, but without any kind of solid timeline," and then you have to hold your not dumb or funny animal coin for 5 years? And then you invite some big wig to go give talks about how your generic animal coin is going to be really dumb, everyone will think it's the dumbest thing ever, just wait, oh I dunno, a couple or twenty more years and then it will be the gold standard of dumb animal coins and everyone will meme about it then? Would you buy a token like that, or just buy some utility coin?

it's way overbought because of all the bagholders constantly shilling it. There's tons of other stuff with better upside potential, even if link pumps that just means other stuff is pumping more.

>>50705908
noLinkers are notoriously bad at coming up with striking analogies. You are no exception, sadly.

>>50705579
This. 10k was always the suicide stack and 100k was always the make it stack. Anyone with a 100k stack could have cashed out for $5M this bullrun which is the number everyone on /biz/ agrees is the ultimate make-it amount.
Over the years a lot of gullible retards joined the ranks and of couese they were easily duped into thinking that they weren’t late and that it was going into the hundreds of dollars

>>50706005
10M is the MINIMUM to make it.
Unless you live in Zimbabwe

>>50705558
i unironically don't understand why stinkmarines don't understand this
a startup token with completely lopsided distribution has none of the benefits of blockchain and none of the protections of tradfi stocks either

>>50706064
because it isn't true. retard

>>50706028
A monkey could squeeze out 5% annual returns from it, which would be $250k per year. A $250k passive income will let you live comfortably almost anywhere in the world

>>50705951
also this. normalfags never understand marketcap. you want to invest in asymmetries
"muh fat man in plaid shirt who eats mcburgers is relatable to me" is not an investment thesis

>>50706064
Yet other projects with higher inflation rates don't seem to experience the same negative price effects as Chainlink. Weird

>>50706090
i guess this is an answer, in a way... you newfags don't even know how to use etherscan, much less query balances yourself

>>50706100
retard alert. distribution != inflation
it's about concentration of supply, not about emission rate
decentralization... ever heard that word, in the tiktoks and youtubes you take investment advice from?

>>50706135
>guis... every token sirgay dumps is directly trucked over to binance and sold... trust me
>no listen, every token materialized from thin air by governance token xyz through "staking" at percentages per month is kept fair and square in the participating wallets... they are not selling, why would they? if they keep their newly gained tokens they will earn even more stake! Distribution != inflation after all.
What a compelling concept. So maybe the fed was right, and the 2020 distributions of stimmys didn't inflate the M2 after all?

>>50705999
>>50706100
>>50706222
trips dubs trips
ive got no horse in this race but i aint arguing with those digits

>>50706064

Why do juvenile faggots like yourself these days feel the need to precede everything with ‘literally’, ‘ironically’, and “unironically”?

Couldn’t Sergey find an institution to buy these tokens and hold them instead of dumping them on exchanges? If institutional adoption is supposed to be as robust as advertised I would think there would be a line out the door of large players eager to buy without having to move markets. Seems like a win/win to me.

>>50705999
>>50706100
>>50706222
c-checked...

>>50704785
The only way to save this coin is to hope sergay chokes on a big mac

>>50706441
unironically literally this, except ironically