/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>50357032
You have a week

>>50357032
Is that the sui stack?

>>50357144
Yes

>>50357144
1 is enough to regret.

>>50357032
aiming for 8700 barrels. got 5000 now

>>50357032
French dogshit

>>50357032
Imagine not having at least 10k top kek

>>50357032
Why are we mooning oil Chads??

I want 15,000 RLC it's part of my plan. @royalty_crypto on twitter. been doing this for years

>>50358338
cNFT hype for upcoming conference

i accumulated 870 barrels at a way higher price
NSMDO

>>50357032
Only 10,000 people can hold 870 barrels. Its crazy how low the market cap of RLC is.
Soon people will talk that 870 always was the make-it stack and 87 is sui.

>>50359234
This. This has major eth 2017 vibes, from the equal amounts of fud and high iq anons who like the project and iexec ambitions and their tech stack. The golden question is when do you sell. I watched it go to $20 and back down and feel nothing. I know it will far exceed that

>>50359234
>>50359369
what's the price target for this stinker? I have 1k barrels as a flyer but if this is just going to hang around $5 in a bullrun then I don't get the hype

Why would people pick RLC instead of AWS? I'm legitimately confused

>>50359411
I have 40k. I’m selling ~10k when it hits $50 (that would be same rank as utter shit coins in the 10-20 rank), then 5k more at 100 and 5k more at 150 and never selling the rest. Do what you will with this info
>t. Healthcare AI researcher who sees the writing on the wall

>>50359411
If RLC had the same marketcap as Chainlink has now the price would be $34 per barrel.
And thats with Link being at $6.
I think a good time to sell RLC will be at $100.

>>50359444
Some anon wrote up a huge post detailing why iexec AI will change the landscape of computational research and why it is superior to Amazon a couple of days ago.

Hello, could someone explain what this is, I would rather have /biz/ info or explanation over Google's info.

>>50359570
warosu is your friend anon

>>50359496
why did you accumulate 40k and at what average price?

8700 is the make-it stack, no? it seems like a lot of risk

>>50359608
Well I don't understand what you said but I bought 30 so now I can join the fun

>>50359633
Because I’m that certain. Avg price right at stable oil $1. the only risk is opportunity cost if link moons before RLC does and I could have funnelled 40k into link. But RLC is not going anywhere

>>50359677
It’s where you can look up archived threads where high iq autists first shilled RLC.

>>50359444
Because you don't understand what iExec is.

>>50359720
Thank you anon. Your information is priceless

>>50359444
because imagine this, some people don't want their workloads introspected by Amazon

>>50359750
Cheers anon. Simplified tldr version would be iexec aims to do to computing assets what uber did to taxis. But that’s simply just one aspect of their tech.

>>50359825
This is some good shit. I'll be buying more every week. Im reading up on it now but the simplified explanation is great.

>>50359444
Why use smart contracts when Amazon could just host digital agreements?
Why use Bitcoin when central banks will soon introduce CBDCs?
Because there is value in decentralization.

>>50359825
It's a tiny aspect in reality. The computing on sensitive data part is legitimately multi trillions of value possibilities.

>>50359907
This is a great explanation but I think anon fails to grasp the fact Amazon essentially sets any price they want due to the tech giants essentially having a monopoly on hardware needed for high intensive computation, and how few businesses can access such a field due to cost. When regular joe can not only rent idle computation from a decentralized fair market place, AND rent out their data confidentially…. Amazon will be forced to rent out THEIR computation and data via iexec marketplace if they want a piece of the pie.

RLC is the BTC of cloud computing

Intel SGX is compromised though, so the tech underlying RLC is actually not very good

they need to switch out their secure enclave if anybody is going to use this in the future, or become a failed project like Golem

>>50359934
I am fully aware of this. I’m in healthcare. Decentralized and confidential patient data is legit priceless to pharma companies and or businesses. I’m surprised so few realize this

>>50360024
This was addressed instantly by the team. You're wrong.

>>50360024
What's the story with that?

>>50360041
how so? The underlying HARDWARE is compromised, irrevocably

>>50360078
It's not.

>>50360105https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2020/03/hackers-can-steal-secret-data-stored-in-intels-sgx-secure-enclave/

>>50360130
re: the future of SGX

it doesn’t impact iExec worker pools for individuals, as they could be used:
· Without TEE
· With TEE but with older machines that still have SGX
· With TEE using cloud servers that use SGX (Microsoft Azure or other)
· With TEE but with an alternative to SGX (such as AMD SEV or Intel TDX)

and other than that, that's just talking about home machines, not servers on iExec.


And for those following this stuff closely, here's some reading on the improvements we can look forward to in the future of SGX: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?arnumber=9448036


It's actually a positive thing that Intel are looking to make improvements re: confidential computing

>>50360130
Not only the response I posted, but from your own article.
>The difficulty in carrying out LVI attacks isn’t the only limitation. The data the attacks can acquire is also restricted to that stored at the time the malicious code is executed. That makes exploits either a game of luck or further adds to the rigorous requirements for exploitation. For those reasons, many researchers say they’re unsure exploits will ever be used in active malicious attacks.

>>50359677

>>50359608
https://cryptotalleyrand.medium.com/iexec-the-meta-cloud-f6e76493404d

>>50360269
Great post, I haven’t read before.

>>50360130
Now apologize and show me you bought at least 870 right now you fucking fudding retard fag

12k RLC, what am I in for?

>>50361082
At least 1.2m EOY. High end could be around 4m.

>>50361335
will 2022 finally be our year? held this through the pump to 20 because I believe it is worth 200

>>50360024
>Intel SGX is compromised though
Not only compromised but abandoned by Microsoft, it basically doesn't exist in recent updates of Windows 11

>>50361367
Your year was 2021, dumbass. It went from 20 cents to 20 dollars and you refused to sell

>>50361335
no bullshit how do you get to these numbers?

DONT TEASE ME BRO

>>50361488
See
>>50359534

>>50361480

>>50361488
so you really think this shitcoin will pull out a 1000x during a world recession?

when it barely got a 100x during the money printer bullrun?

tell me, are you retarded or what?

>>50361488
Checked and heil Hitler

>>50361636
lol that money is still there and more is being printed retard

>>50361488
>1488
Simply because RLC is guaranteed to go over 100$ and I wouldn't be surprised if it went closer to 400.

>>50361636
Yes, why not? LINK went 100x in a bear market and clearly RLC is a contender in the same regard. If you don't see it that's your own prerogative.

>>50361974
To expand, basically RLC exists in a realm of its own, almost outside of crypto markets itself, as the team develops and networks with important people. It will become the go-to "safe future" investment.

>>50362007
To expand more, lets face it, most of crypto right now is in shambles. Almost 99% of everything is doing nothing new and is a complete scam. iExec is doing something unseen before, being able to compute on sensitive data without losing control and privacy over said sensitive data in a decentralized way. That alone is worth 1T marketcap.

Daily reminder that it’s the same 20 pajeets from some discord that keep shilling this digital dog shit. RLC is garbage. Shit DOG SHIT

>>50362106
>6 year old OG biz coin is muh discord pajeets
You fudders have really devolved over the years.

>>50357868
>French dogshit
>>50357032
Older fag here. OP you realise that the team behind this actually rugged it and spent the money on hookers and blow. This is not fud for fun. This is what actually happened. RLC is completely worthless. What are you doing?

>>50362026
Many of us get it. Those crying dog shit don’t deserve you spoonfeeding them

>>50362122
>>6 year old OG biz coin is muh discord pajeets
>You fudders have really devolved over the years.
>>50362143
>Older fag here. OP you realise that the team behind this actually rugged it and spent the money on hookers and blow. This is not fud for fun. This is what actually happened. RLC is completely worthless. What are you doing?

>>50362122
>You fudders have really devolved over the years.
aren't you ashamed of missing 2 bullruns holding this shit?

>>50362173
>the team behind this actually rugged it and spent the money on hookers and blow.

>>50362145
Spoonfeeding what? If you weren't such a tech illiterate you would know how far this is from being actually usable
Even their documentation is outdated. Some of Docker images they're using are deprecated since 2019

>>50362173
I profitted 50x I think I'm okay

why the fuck would he accumulate this shitcoin when he could accumulate matic that has been mooning and pumping like crazy for 2 weeks straight

>>50362233
>Spoonfeeding what? If you weren't such a tech illiterate you would know how far this is from being actually usable
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G4mRSx2HoKQ&t=1s

KnowledgeX, ONTOCHAIN, and the EEA say otherwise pajeet

>>50362283
>accumulate matic that has been mooning and pumping like crazy
>accumulate
>has been mooning
>and pumping
>like crazy
Why yes I do buy the top and sell the bottom how could you tell?

Still holding and fully confident in my barrels. Team is much more responsive than Link and obviously much less corrupt. As an example, they didnt get a bunch of their own community wrecked because they were in bed with celsius.

>>50357032
Without leaving your house, you could become an AEX Global Ambassador and earn up to $4000

>>50358338
>>50359071
>mooning

>>50362645
And unlike Chainlink iExec isn't selling 500k token on a weekly basis.
They have 50k ETH left, enough for decades of development.

>>50362688
>He will buy AFTER it moons fully
>He WILL stay poor.

>>50359544

you got a thread link?

>>50362913
what do you want to know? there are a ton of videos, articles, and conversation easily searchable explaining the tech
>start at their Youtube:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4IESv4BNw8Q&t=14s&ab_channel=iExec

If CZ is still fucking with this digital dogshit, I want nothing to do with it.

>>50363369
CZ is best friends with Gilles and will be one of the reasons it becomes the next bitcoin.

>>50357144
>>50359805
is RLC a competitor to TRU and ICP in a way?

>>50363817
RLC exists in its own realm. TRU is an unknown shitcoin pipedream and ICP is centralized datacenters parading as a decentralized service.

>>50363297
hm I still have 100 of these. I'm not convinced this is better tech than TRU or ICP but their marketing does look better>>50359234
you mean 100k? 81m circulating supply

>>50363877
alright, that seems to be an organic response. Going to dig into this a bit more and up my stack as a hedge. I just dropped $1000 on BCH last weekend so kinda low rn

>>50363982
The reason why RLC gets fudded is because of the fact that it exists in its own realm. iExec doesn't give a fuck. Just buy a bag, sit back, and watch.

>>50363297

ive read the whitepaper and done my research i hold a small bag but i like anon write ups because they often open insights to things i might not have considered.

eg. did extensive research on icp totally overlooked the fact that price of L1's, drops under a certain threshold, node provides must sell in large quantities to offset the cost for storage, hosting.

G-guys I pray to Gilles everyday and gave him all my money. Ia there something wrong with me?

>>50364468
Same I have dreams of meeting Gilles and thanking him

>>50365400
for what? this shit has pumped once from a coinbase listing and hasn't done anything but dump ever since.
not even trying to fud but that's just the reality of how it currently stands so what are you so thankful for?

>>50365636
I'm grateful for him penetrating me

Anyone else getting these weird sexual dreams about Gilles? They get really intense.

oilers, how longer with the JUSTing continue?

>>50365923
To be fair, iExec did warn us about RLC going to zero.

>>50365636
Because of the incoming inevitable pump to $400

>>50357032
I have accumulated 16k RLC what can I expect by 2023

>>50366255
a noose probably

RLCs holders have only been going up, this is a big indicator for me that something is about to pump big

>>50366287
cute that you think $16k is worth roping over kek

>>50366255
Only 8700 people out of 8 billion can have 10k RLC.

Do the math

>>50366488
who cares? i could make a random shitcoin with a low supply that doesn't give it value. you couldn't even answer why you're hopeful for this project here>>50366252

>>50366724
>funded and endorsed by the EU
>advising the French government in all crypto related topics
>promoted by the Ethereum Enterprise Alliance
>More funding reserves in ETH than the market cap of their own token
Does this sound like a project with a market cap of $70 million, rank 288 on CMC?
RLC will be in the top 50 at the very least within the next 2 years.
Buying RLC this cheap will look absolutely absurd in hindsight.

>>50366798
It looked like a steal in 2019 too when it was partnered with IBM, Alibaba and Intel. Now all 2/3 of these are "out of table" and the price is even lower than it used to be

>>50366816
good point. wow you partnered with X company who cares? it needs to be USED for something or it's vaporware

Jeez you guys make it difficult on a newbie like me just trying to find a sound utility coin. I still can’t figure out if this RLC is the next BTC or total crap. It’s like you guys either completely love it, or hate it. Ah well, I guess I will start small and buy 500.

Any other tips for utility coins? Preferably privacy.

>>50367432
>preferably privacy
Bruh…. RLC. Lol. It’s arguably what’s going to make it pop off. Also, go look at the archives of chatter around eth in its inception. It’s basically identical, some high iq anons shill rlc and relentless trash fud.

>>50367353
It’s being adopted as you fud like a retard. KnowledgeX

>>50367432
Privacy with computations and data combined with a decentralized marketplace is what iExec is.

>>50367647
>KnowledgeX
Another literal who startup that just wants to reap development funding & grant rewards. Same happened to HBAR, ROSE, ONE, LINK, NEAR, SOL, etc. and they had hundreds startups and projects while iExec has 1 (one), but I guess everything is always different for deluded RLCucks

Btw I used to be one of you. Bought at 30 cents and held all the way up to 20 dollars then all day way down to 3 dollars before I realized it was years away from any adoption and sold

>>50367895
It's about to start. The writing is on the wall. If you don't see it that's okay, but I feel sorry for you.

>>50360027
There's a data storage that will also organize and making our lives simple in a way we can benefit more. I'm referring to Geeq data.
>>50361082
Seriously?
>>50361367
When?

>>50367964
?

>>50367895
Solana is scam

So this shit basically already delivers on what ROSE dangled as a carrot on a stick with the Cypher paratime as far as secure data tokenization? Redpill me on ROSE vs iExec so I can know if I'm understanding this correctly.

>>50368081
Seriously? I minted NFTs from honeyland and its floor price has risen and people were bagging more. I just paid 2.5sol for each egg.
>>50367839
Horizen and keep are better than this

I just don’t see how this coinbase pump is relevant for where RLC is. All coins are down, right? So shouldn’t the project’s promise at this point of time be decisive? So my question is: is the project itself as good as some of you say it is. As for price: I’m just glad to have a nice entry option.

Was too busy accumulating BitDAO tokens you cuck
>enjoy getting your funds gangfucked

>>50368168
Good morning sers

>>50368022
Meds now. Or English lessons

>>50368022
Is that legit

>>50368118
Why gaming

>>50368376
Poor guy.
>>50368404
Dyor if you want to know. Innovations are what I'm also getting interested about.

>>50368554
What time is it in New Delhi?

>>50368425
Fuck, you're asking like a kid. GameFi is one way to earn passive income in this trying times. Google and youtube are your starting point stupid rat.

>>50368655
This is funny

>>50368153
>As for price: I’m just glad to have a nice entry option.
Yes the entire market died and RLC is super volatile cause low supply

>>50357144
Enough to make you kys once Gilles goes on a tranny&cocaine binge again, yes.

>>50362026
to expand even more: 0 users in 5 years. Its a dogshit coin with pajeets shilling it since 2017 here. They get a few newfags in, rug them in a PnD, rinse repeat. Get fucked with your vaporware coin, anyone longer than a few months here knows its a money funnel for Gilles & Co to lead a nice live on their ICO funds

>>50369442
>>50369420
You had 6 years, it's over for you if you don't have a bag this year. Pretty cheap all things considered.

>>50365400
He is thanking you for his new I8

>>50363877
>RLC exists in its own realm. TRU is an unknown shitcoin pipedream and ICP is centralized datacenters parading as a decentralized service.

HAHAHAHAH pajeet, if you're going to scam these noobs, at least keep ICP out of ya mouth.
RLC exist on Ethereum side chains as an erc-20 derivative like a parasite, that only accrues value for the Eth-Network. RLC is a white paper token with nothing to show for, launched in 2017, still residing on ETH, no roadmap needed just fabricate some partnerships, the noobs will buy.

>>50370915
ICP will never recover. You lost your money.

>>50369485
I sold in 2021 because they don't have ANY customers to show in 5 years of supposedly being the "best computing coin sir". pathetic shit show of a project and low effort shill as usual

>>50371175
I don't think you understand RLC. It is a platform that isn't live yet. They have multiple different companies being paid to use the tech for their own usecases. Once live, that platform will be populated with providers and requesters (buyers). So what are you saying, it isn't live yet? No shit. Is it being used in the testnet by dozens of different companies, yes. Is it going live this year? Yes.

>>50372021
So after 5 years and 5 versions, it’s still not live? Just stfu and post pics of Nelly so I can fap.

>>50367432
Link, Eth, Bat
Simple as

>>50372079
its V7 now already
Look at this piece of shit: https://dapps.iex.ec/
And shills always say "next version is adoption version, this time its different" and then after release and 0 customers "broooo its just a prank, NEXT version will be adoption version."

>>50362122
really is low IQ fud. it’s really disappointing.

>>50372436
>https://dapps.iex.ec/
hmmmm

>>50372436
5 years for a face swapper

>>50357032
So annoying thread, normies all around, I am sure a lot of brainlets on this board dont even have their wallets connected to a privacy platform that can safeguard their wallets from public view

>>50370915
Utter retard. RLC is chain agnostic. Go invent an amazing chain and RLC will come

>>50357032
Am I gonna make it, bros?

>>50378312
If you’re ok with 1.6million before taxes

>>50357032
just buy KENSHI and save yourselves

>>50378312
Absolutely. We all need to keep buying on Coinbase and take the coins of the exchange so the price on Coinbase moons harder than binance, creating that arbitrage rift which will create a massive spike in price again.

Coinbase does not have nearly as many coins as binance.

>>50378356
I was hoping more for 3.5 million before taxes, so I'll just stack 20k RLC. Thanks for the advice
>>50378865
based horder. It's been a stable coin the last few months, so I don't mind throwing all my money into it for now. I'll either gain generational wealth or not be able to travel for the next two years. easy trade.

Too busy accumulating ZHAO which looks like a quickie pump and dump. Don't have time for delusional eternal holding.

>>50379817
>I was hoping more for 3.5 million before taxes, so I'll just stack 20k RLC. Thanks for the advice
It makes sense to go all in an get as much as possible anyway at these levels. I doubt it goes lower. I'm all in

>>50357032
Why 870? I can sell my CRO at a loss right now and get around 850…

T. Poorfag

>>50382444
Checked
Because only 10,000 people can have 8700
100,000 people can have 870

It's pure math

>>50378865
ok blair LMAO
yes keep buying rlc while it dumps
great plan

also anyone notice the pajeet tier marketing on twitter after every post? whats up with that?

>>50382546
It's not dumping and I'm not blair. You pajeets come up with the shittiest FUD because there is no real fud and everyone knows it.
The community is way bigger now maybe thats why twitter pajeets are on every post

>>50382596
>>50382546
ahem

>>50383133
Yes the community is way bigger now which includes multiple countries. Japan, brazil, etc all have iExec communities now.

>>50383133
Imagine having lower IQ than the pajeets by thinking this is bearish

>>50383133
Oh lord

>>50383498
>the pajeets are coming
its time

>>50367432
>Preferably privacy.
For privacy coins, you could look up Monero, Secret, and Zcash. You could explore other privacy solutions like Railgun, Keep and Mina Protocol too.

>>50383133
what's iexec though

>>50384897
The decentralized marketplace that is going to change computing and data forever

>>50357032
What's with the influx of RLC shilling lately?

>>50385827
holders have been going up since the EEA report

>>50372110
ETH has advanced over the years and a lot of hacks occur on the smart contracts built on it which have posed a serious problem for mass adoption. However, we now have privacy protocols that can encrypt sensitive data that could be harmful in the hands of hackers. Pretty innovative.

>>50385827
>He isn't aware
NGMI

>>50386188
what's the EEA anon

>>50387432
https://twitter.com/iEx_ec/status/1542172293421473795

>>50378431
What's unique about this? I'd rather buy RAIL which would increase in value as privacy protocols gain more adoption.

>>50382444
Racist

>>50372110
Eth and Bat are good. But for privacy I prefer Railgun which is more efficient and is multichain.

>>50384897
Hope it blooms

>>50386311
Don't sound so certain anon

>>50357032
I'm not accumulating any asset right now. But I'm looking to get virtual lands on the metaverse as a long term investment, a few celebrities and athletes are already doing it.

>>50357032
It's over Gilles

What’s changed, what are we looking forward to?

>>50357032
New launch alert.

He is not a man, he is the darkness that dwells within men. From the darkest layers of the human shadow, comes a creature, a thing, a void within existence itself - lest some fear his name - The Coomer. The Coomer lurks within all of us, waiting to consume.

From the creator of AMB3RT()RD, Launching at 6PM EST tonight on PancakeSwap, Coomer Inu (TICKER: COOM) - buy or he will conSOOM you.

Join the TG for instructions:

t me /CoomerInuBSC

>>50392248
nothing

>>50392248
the cNFT prototype that Gilles is going to discuss during his speech at EthCC
NFTs aren't meant to be public, they are meant to keep data private even through execution and sharing. Think: Decentralized IDs. You will be able to KYC an exchange without the exchange actually viewing (and storing) your information. The identification will still be verified, but without the risk of it being sold to some fancy Nigerian

>>50378431

God would you people fuck off with this already? No one’s buying this shit, everyone knows this is inorganic crap. The sad part is that you retards paid some graphic designer to make what’s in your pic, while real projects have their memes made for free by this board. I almost feel bad for you

holy shit people are still shilling this garbage? you retards have been at this for 3 - 4 years now

>>50393064
do you understand how long it takes to develop good tech? keep buying your inu

>>50363577
CZ has been doing a lot lately. Came across news about his plans to have sports NFTs to bring more adoption from the world of sports.