[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance

View post   
File: 1023 KB, 2400x1350, ef56334b-7f98-4cd6-9853-a0ab5820a810.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
50034444 No.50034444 [Reply] [Original]

> The King is naked

Back in 2017, right after the pico top, CME came out with the idea of a nice Bitcoin future contract to short the hell out of BTC.

Since then the whole market drastically changed.
>If only somebody could name one particular player pushing so hard on derivative and contagon...

Back to CME, the most influential share holder seems to be Capital Research & Management Company ("Research" familiar?) , which is one of many holding in Capital Resarch portfolio that consist of over $2 trillion under management. Below their fee structure as reported by morgan stanley:

>Fees charged to sponsors generally fall within the following ranges:
>U.S. Equity: 0.28% - 0.51%
>International Equity/ Global Equity: 0.35% - 0.56%
>Core Bond: 0.22% - 0.30%
>Municipal Bond: 0.17% - 0.30%

With this fee structure the Company profits over $4 billions just by accounting fees... This might be a kind of profit worth a fight aginst an emergent market class but it isn't enough.

The past 2 years saw new players take the scene in a very fast way, so rapid that should raise many concerns, one among all is how can somebody gain so much level of media exposure, capital and political connections without being involved in some shady shit ?!

Sam loves: liquidations and leverage in general, hase huge level of media coverage, political connections and last but not least is the only one offering so many unbacked leverage products on bitcoin following the CME leadership.

We know he has dirty hands but who are the people pulling the strings ?
CME, Citadel, Robinhood, FTX, Capital Research, POTUS, Circle, SEC. All of them have some kind of collusion degree of connection.


What's your thoughts ?

>> No.50034678

>>50034444
Checked. Also, who knows. All of those you cited are involved, but the mastermind is shady. It's akin to trying to point out who is really pulling the strings of the WEF, or who is pulling the strings of the CIA. Surely it's the elites, but who especially, is unclear. If you truly hate them, stop using centralized exchanges, or if you do, buy coins from them directly like BTC, XMR or whatever, then withdraw the coins to a private wallet. Exchange reserves going down means less price volatility as the bad actors become unable to manipulate the price. Even if you want to argue "but muh low volume volatility", that would go both ways.

>> No.50034994

>>50034678
The mastermind knows about their level of greedness so will punish them with their own contracts that they won't be able to execute.
Thier reputation will suffer irreparaible damage and nobody will evr trust them with money anymore...

Btc game theory in full play here

>> No.50036239

I wish someone with vast knowledge of (((finances))) could say something about the Futures ETFs that they rushed to approve last year.

Why did *they* approve the Futures ETFs but won't approve any Spot ETF?

>> No.50036417

>>50036239
The same reason why FTX offers ICP futures but no SPOT...