/biz/ - Business & Finance

I only own LINK

GRT is basically a reverse Oracle with better scaling and no chance to fuck up. Literally safest play in all of crypto

No to all of your questions

>>49873425
Except it goes down and lags behind when traffic becomes too much.

I bought into this meme in Dec 2020 and I still believe in it so Im wondering if I have a genuine mental illness.

My whole portfolio consists of 100k GRT and 1k LINK.... Actually make that 500 because Bancor kiked me.
Life is pain.
But yes, GRT is the yang to LINK's yin

>>49873371
I hold grt because of cash back coinbase card. I hold link because i bought ico.

>>49873405
Geniuely curious, have you researched grt?

I used to only hold link but for reason I’ve switched only holding grt because it feels more undervalued. But if I’m the only one thinking this, I may be completely fcking this up…

>>49873371
I own a fat stack of link and a suicide stack of grt. Looks good but I don’t have the same kind of faith in the team as with link.

>>49873528
So ur saying u don’t actually have any interest in grt?

>>49873565
Do you own any other coins? Or is grt + link actually some kind of biz thing?

>>49873498
Thanks for the info

I felt like grt + link was a biz thing but then again so was rubic

So I’m just trying confirm it’s still a thing lol

Bump

>>49873556
Yes I agree switching all my link to GRT

For me it's GRT, LINK and HBAR.

>>49873425
>>49873960
Hitman, Omegafucker. Remember.

>>49873589
Bitcoin, otherwise not really. Might get into ROSE but I haven’t researched it enough yet to make a decision. Bitcoin and link are my main exposure

GRT is basically the blockchain of data. It's an unironic top-3 contender in ~2 years.

LINK is a basic bitch oracle with plenty of competition.

This board got totally transfixed on LINK years ago and stopped paying attention, thinking they had "making it" in the bag. This board hasn't done 10% of the necessary research into GRT. (Yes, it should be considered a blockchain itself).

>>49874170
LINK has competition.
GRT doesn’t.
They don’t seem to understand how important that is. GRT IS LIGHTYEARS AHEAD.

>>49874170
>>49874222
It's just an ERC-20 token calm down.

prettty much

link
grt
rose
icp

Sold all graph, inflation too high

>>49874577
but anon don't you know when the free hosted bangladesh rapberry pi gets closed, every dapp is forced to spend trillions and go bankrupt to get the data they need from the graph?

>>49873371
as a blockchain dev i use chainlink and the graph on a pretty frequent basis, but if the last bull run has taught us anything fundamentals and usecase are meaningless

>>49874170
>Yes, it should be considered a blockchain itself
I remember an anon built a 4chan clone on the graph and you needed to pay a tx fee to post, so you posted on the graph's blockchain and paid with GRT? What's the difference from every other L1/L2 ghostchain then?

>>49875203
>those L1/L2 ghostchains work. GRT does not

>>49874170
Nope. the Graph has plenty of competition, in Covalent, but MOST notably in TRUEBLOCKS, that DOES NOT HAVE A TOKEN, NOR WILL IT EVER HAVE A TOKEN (no GRIFTERS) and can do EVERYTHING and MORE that the Graph does, but FASTER, PRIVATELY, LOCALLY, and for FREE.

It's over for you.

>>49873371
>What percentage of stinky linkies are also holding GRT?
They're both ERC tokens-
I'm sure it's possible to analyze the wallets of holders of both tokens and see how many overlap.
I don't know how to do it but I'm sure it's possible. There's probably a webpage somewhere that allows you to measure this.

>>49875351
Lmao get a load of this clown. He truly believes anything in this world is free. Learn some physics clown

>>49875351
Oh gods it's the trueblocks dev again, he's back
Let's see who wins in an autism competition between him and omegafaggot

>>49875693
can we make bets on auger?

They're the same in the sense that both tokens are designed to be cheap. Their systems utility depends on it. No idea why people think they can make money off either.

>>49875568
Uh oh. UH OH. Lil bitch boy is mad at his shitty investment going to zero because something better and SIGNIFICANTLY AND PROVABLY CHEAPER is gonna pick him upside down and SHAKE OUT ALL HIS ITTY BITTY SHIT COINS!!!!!

>>49875734
>can we make bets on auger?
I'd rather pay for two assassination smart contracts tbqh

>>49875840
Show adoption or stfu.
Is it cheaper or free. Pick one clown

>>49875779
>designed to be cheap
can you stop with this bullshit?

>>49874029
same here. Just need The Graph to start indexing Hedera and my investing thesis will be complete.

Brainlet here. I'm assuming the future of blockchain is enterprise use for financial services, on this basis I get the concept of the trustless service Link plays. But does taking data off a blockchain need to be trustless? How hard would it be for someone like JPM to build an in-house service taking data off chain for their own purposes? Obviously missing either a) the use-case and/or b) how hard it is to do what the graph does, but it just seems a bit like an unnecessary middleman that could be removed with cash and time.

https://www.blockdata.tech/products/tsunami-api

You're about to find out lmfao

I'm gonna be laughing so hard once you guys lose your ground.

GRT only has first mover advantage. But so did Microsofts internet explore. Look where they are now?

Oh yeah that's right. They don't exist anymore

>>49873371
I hold LINK and PRQ. PRQ has the same potential LINK had back in the day, GRT doesnt because of high mcap and inflation.

>>49876240
Its true.

>>49876186
>GRT only has first mover advantage. But so did Microsofts internet explore. Look where they are now?

oh yeah bitcoin had first mover advantage look where it is now- oh oops

>>49876275
Holding a lot better than all the alts that are down 90%+ lmao. Please sleep on parsiq though I wanna see the rage when we hit $17

SOON GRT WILL FEEL THE WRATH OF PARSIQ. THE TSUNAMI IS COMING.

>>49874222
Nigger parsiq mogs your vc scam.
Btw you need a mcap of 27B to recover ath, goodluck.

>>49876410
Parsiq needs adoption it literally has ZERO. You guys can’t compete with the warchest of GRT. You’re on your way to the shitcoin graveyard

>>49876275
Comparing apples to oranges there buddy.

BTC is a store of value and did not remain rank 1 due to its technological advancements.

There is no utility other than using it as a hedge against inflation. Everyone knows this. Everyone.

Companies that rely on their technology to keep them afloat constantly go under due to competition.

Look what happened with yahoo. They are still around, sure. But is it the main go to for surfing the web?

Not at all. We have google. Sorry buddy, but you guys aren't the google of blockchain

Would you rather trust a 160 IQ Estonian similar to that of Vitalik, or some sketchy middle eastern scammer who parties in San Francisco with your GRT holdings?

>>49876487
>He doesn't know
Haha what a loser.

Neat, now all the PRQ jeets got linked to this thread from their shill group. We only need the subsquid jeets and we'll have all faggots handily in one place.

>>49876186
>Microsofts internet explore.
What is Netscape? You absolute retard.

I'm genuinely interested. What are the pros and cons of GRT vs PRQ? I hold 40k GRT, no PRQ and 2,5k link btw.

>>49876487
Your warchest is diminishing as we speak, once the tsunami cums PRQ will decimate GRT into oblivion.

>>49876570
PRQ has zero adoption. It’s literally a shitcoin scam that these pajeets try to dump their bags on you.
Don’t fall for any of the “it’s listing on ____ exchange soon”
Straight scammers with a vapor ware product

>>49876570
Different usecase

>>49876570
Grt is an indexer. It allows you to search data that's already cum and gone. weak shit that will be obsolete in years to cum. Prq is a LIVE monitoring system that allows you to react to events as they happen.

>>49876651

Oh yeah so Evan Cheng invests in scams?

https://blockonomi.com/parsiq-adds-advisor-investor-evan-cheng-to-team/

Get out of here, lmao. You're a joke dude

>>49876701
Not to mention they have their own historical indexing as well. They are GRT PLUS live monitoring

>>49876719
Isn’t that the same guy who’s an advisor for nebulas? Aka a 3M marketcap shitcoin with no future? What exactly are you getting at?

>>49876545
GRT ATH: $2.84
GRT Marketcap at ATH: 3 billion
GRT Marketcap if it goes back to ATH: 28 billion

PRQ ATH: $2.62
PRQ Marketcap at ATH: 260 million
PRQ Marketcap if it goes back to ATH: 370 million

Nothing more needs to be said.

I only hold ETH, BTC, LINK and GRT. Some FTM but that is locked.

If you can get 10000 LINK and 100000 GRT that's enough to make it.

>>49876848
No one asked, no one cares. Same for PRQ.

>>49876651
This guy is absolutely SEETHING!!!!

Your shitcoin is going to 0. Trueblocks makes the Graph obsolete. And GET THIS!!!!

TRUEBLOCKS HAS NO SHIT COIN ATTACHED TO IT!!!!!!

Why??????

BECAUSE it's FREE!!!!

No SHIT COIN NEEDED. Sorry about your total investment LOSS with your piece of shit coin. Imagine "investing" in the Graph.

LOL.

KEEP EATING THAT DICK!!!!!

>>49876701
What is live monitoring on a block chain? Pic very related

>>49876904
You seem to care alot. You get angry the moment PRQ gets mentioned. Rentfree in your head GRTranny

>>49876914
Lmao you think GRT is limited to being a shitty etherscan????? GRT has the capability to service the entire crypto and NON CRYPTO industry. It’s googles indexing on STEROIDS YOU ABSOLUTE IDIOT!!!

>>49876953
Etherscan made easy and useful basically web3 tons of data ro web2 usefulness

>>49877090
UH Oh. Lil bitch boy keeps embarassing himself. Got hooked like a crackhead to the muh "GOOGLE of BLOCKCHAINS" marketing SPAM.

Now a simple autist is gonna make his entire SHIT COIN investment go to ABSOLUTE ZERO!!!

He just can't TAKE IT!!!!!

>>49877161
Bro you’re embarrassing yourself. I’m a avid shitcoin researcher. Pic related. I can spot good shitcoins sub 10M marketcap. I’m telling you right now PRQ is nothing more then a useless shitcoin scam

>>49877090
That's nice and all. But you're not a Graph stakeholder, you're a token holder. And your token got completely obliterated by VC unlocks and inflation. What the Graph does in terms of tech is literally cope

>>49877189
I don't know anything about Parsiq. But that's just YET ANOTHER competitor to your SHIT COIN muh "google of blockchains" garbage that you bought at the absolute PEAK.

Nobody is gonna buy your shit coin bags. You're RUINED. You bought a scam. It's over for you.

Deal with it like a man. Don't come on 4chan whimpering like a pathetic weasel.

>>49874170
>>49874222
>LINK has competition
Statements like this just prove you know nothing about LINK and probably less about GRT. Probably just using LINK to shill your bags.

>>49877235
My average is around 13.8 cents. I’m DCA at the literal bottom. Don’t be mad you have no idea how to trade lmao

>>49877323
Wowsers!!!!

You gonna be a MILLIONSAIRE!!!!!

Nope, you bought into a VC Scam and they RAPED you after you bought at the absolute TOP.

>>49877000
I get angry when a swarm of jeets suddenly invade thread, regardless of the coin we've been discussing and regardless of the shitcoin said jeets try to peddle.
On the other hand, you all seem awfully mad at GRT merely for existing, I wonder why? Maybe because you know your shitcoin will be left in the dust by it? Oh wait yes you're right, two more weeks until the tsunami of diaerrhea is released, and then finally PRQ will moon, same as it happened when it finally got on an exchange. Just hold on two more weeks, you'll make it! Make sure to get a loan to buy more PRQ!

>>49877465
PRQ with 48% total unlocked tokens.
GRT with 85% unlocked tokens.

Please shill your shitty tokenomics elsewhere with 40% of your tokens held by the team. Have fun getting dumped on shitidiot

>>49877981
I’VE STUDIED A LOT OF COINBASE LISTINGS THE LISTING CONFIRMED PHASE IS WHERE THE BULK OF THE PUMP HAPPENS. I AM TARGETING $17 PRQ MINIMUM WITHIN THE NEXT 24 HRS. IT WILL COOL DOWN FROM THERE UNTIL ACTUAL LISTING. THIS IS THE USUAL TREND

>>49878144
1.5 cent IPO. Enjoy getting dumped on idiot

>>49878144
You should be targeting your head with a loaded gun and pull the trigger so you can end your suffering

>>49878209
But my suffering is so delicious.

>>49877244
This

>>49877981
>Calls us jeets
>Try to use LINK to shill GRT
There isnt a bigger jeet tactic than that.

GRT and PRQ price pumps will be correlated and similar. Either one is a good play, the only downside PRQ has compared to GRT is name recognition and possibly less functionality/not filling the same market need. GRT is the safer play and PRQ is the gamble play, either one is easy money but I'll stick with my GRT bags.

>>49874222
>LINK has competition.
>GRT doesn’t.
parsiq

>>49877189
QNTs price is fucking insane now compared to 2018. You'd better be rich as fuck now. Post lambo Mr. Moneybags. Give a downtrodden shitposter some hopium.

>>49878469
is normal trick

>>49873425
reverse oracle is a pretty retarded way to think about it

The brainlet way to explain it is:
>chainlink puts data from the real world on the blockchain
>the graph takes data from the block chain to use in the real world

>>49873371
I hold 10k LINK and 100k GRT, appropriately with respect to their maximum token supply

It's a simplistic heuristic, but lets go with the "muh LINK gets data on chain, GRT gets data off chain" idea.

What is the future? Is the future on-chain or off-? Is data flowing onto the chain or away from it?

LINK, as an "oracle" only exists as a temporary intermediary during the time that data *doesn't* exist on-chain natively. There are still plenty of boomer corporations out there that need something like an "oracle" to make their data available to blockchain networks.

But what about when most/all organizations popping up natively put their data on a public blockchain? What about when most/all public information already exists on chain?

We're only ~10 years away from such ubiquity.

LINK is TEMPORARY. This is why all of their muh partnerships are companies your aunt has heard of. It's a scaffolding to help the boomers into the blockchain world.

GRT is the data infrastructure of that new world. It is so far more important than LINK that the blinded Sirgay followers of this board cannot even comprehend it.

>>49878757
>What is the future? Is the future on-chain or off-? Is data flowing onto the chain or away from it?
>LINK, as an "oracle" only exists as a temporary intermediary during the time that data *doesn't* exist on-chain natively.
you are the most brainless person in this thread. congrats on this. seriously.

>But what about when most/all organizations popping up natively put their data on a public blockchain?
how? how will something like the weather get "natively" put on the blockchain by an "organization"? be specific as to not appear even more brainless

>>49878757
Thanks for this, just sold all my LINK.

>>49878858
>how? how will something like the weather get "natively" put on the blockchain by an "organization"? be specific as to not appear even more brainless
Literally blockchain-integrated hardware? Are you daft?

>>49873463
"It" goes down because its free hosted service is centralized, but it's being killed off in a few months.

>lags behind when traffic becomes too much.
Details?

>>49878757
LINK is still needed to verifiably relay data to smart contracts anon. This is precisely the reason why the two projects are partnered to begin with.

Look, Ill hand it to you Graph fags as a PRQ holder. You do have more adoption and you do have more clients (for now), but none of this matters. You're not a Graph employee, you're not a stakeholder, you dont hold stocks of the company, you hold a token. So the only way you benefit from all of this, is through the token.

But your token is so massively fucked up that your marketcap will be 24 billion higher if you were to go back to your ATH, do you know insanely much that is? The arguments of "Graph does this better, Graph has this much more" are completely irrelevant. You're a tokenholder.

>>49878469
>GRT is the safer play and PRQ is the gamble play
Do the opposite of what /biz/ says. So GRT is the gamble. Got it.

>>49878757
>muh
You're a jewish shill.

>>49873371
>Is the Graph as an important piece of the decentralized world as Link?
If you took every single other piece of the decentralized world that is not chainlink and combine them, they will not be as important as link

>>49879947
Unlike Parsiq, The Graph isn't a company. The core service is a decentralized protocol, and the token is necessary for that protocol to function.

The companies supporting that protocol are paid with the token to fund their work on it. People working within the ecosystem who aren't among the core companies are funded by grants in the form of the token. Fees are collected in GRT, which stakers earn through active participation in the protocol necessary for it to function properly. GRT holders are indeed stakeholders of the protocol within this apparatus, and their financial interests are largely aligned with the teams as such. The token is the financial lifeblood of the ecosystem, and the protocol cannot function at scale without decentralization. All parties involved have a vested interest in the long-term financial health of the token, though the team cannot explicitly say this for regulatory reasons.

Compare that with Parsiq, which is a private company that issued a token. Bagholding Parsiq does not entitle you to a share of that company or benefits that come with share ownership; you are providing liquidity to an unapologetically centralized operation. They've created a little onchain tokenomic playground so holders earn some interest on their bags and don't dump so eagerly, but it could just as easily operate as a SaaS company without the token.

>>49878757
Oracles will forever be needed to write real world data on chain, and those oracles will be provided by LINK because of adoption, network effect and first mover advantage.
Speaking of which...
>>49879947
And GRT tokenholders will earn passive income from actual usage, while PRQ tokenholders are simply participating in ponzinomics and are the current greater fool and their entire bear market business strategy is invading threads to shill their totally awesome new tsunami api that releases in just two weeks.
We'll see how these coins will pan out a year from now.
Spoiler: both will lose another 99%.

>>49880625
>>49881207
You guys still dont get it. You're completely ignoring token supply and marketcap. I dont know if you're just plain stupid or ignore it on purpose because you know it completely fucks over baggies.
Only dumb dogcoin normies ignore marketcap and coin supply. So that tells me just about the level of intelligence GRT holders have.

>>49881545
Funny you say that, because gambling on low mcap shitcoins is exactly dogcoin normie tier, and even more fun if you consider that PRQ operates on BSC.
You should be having a realization any moment now.

>>49881874
Whatever you need to tell yourself to make you feel better. GRT will never go over 1$ ever again. You got VC dumped by a kike CEO. Enjoy life

>>49881545
Unlike Parsnips who seem more interested in a moon mission to dump on new bagholders, revenue and growth thereof is what most interests long-term GRT holders, and this is not impacted by token price, supply, or market capitalization. It is, near-term, advantageous for the price to be where it is as the liquid supply will be drained and re-staked that much more quickly by customer buying pressure, because bear market investors and prospective indexers can buy a larger share of the supply than they otherwise would, entitling them to a proportional share of the revenue.

The Graph dominates the space for its use case, created a gold standard for data indexing which even competitors have begun to imitate, and continues to expand its addressable market, refining its product's performance and capabilities all the while. All this means long-term is more data indexed, more queries served, and more fee revenue distributed to stakers.

In short, the difference between what motivates investments in PRQ and GRT on /biz/ is capital gains vs generational cashflow. Linkies have a similar time horizon and mentality to GRT holders, except their protocol's specification does not include delegation afaik, and they seem to be more knowledgeable in general.

Remember kid, 4 in the PINK, 1 in the LINK

>>49873371
I’m 9k in the red my initial on GRT but also have a very nice stack of Link.

>>49881995
>Whatever you need to tell yourself to make you feel better. GRT will never go over 1$ ever again. You got VC dumped by a kike CEO. Enjoy life
If you're going to FUD, don't use 2020 FUD material. Thanks.

Just bought 10k GRT. Is this enough for a sui stack?

>>49885237
Yes 10K is the sui stack

>>49885237
No 100k is the new sui stack