/biz/ - Business & Finance

Idk they’re both dogshit

>>49468335
rlc sirs much potential much clients very many money

>>49468335
kek i remember when you iexec shills latched on to LINK's coattails and tried to compare yourselves to us years ago. Man how time flies. amazing how your shitcoin died like I said it would and no one talks about it anymore LMAO

>>49468424
that was then, this is now. which is a better investment today?

rlc is essentially dead
so yeah, chainlink

>>49468335
kek what a blast from the past.
I know toastgirl was holding some lmao

>>49468424
>>49468424
Hey, you latched onto us!

>>49468406
But only one is digital dog shit

>>49468335

>>49468691
Kek. But they on coinbase now my nigga

>>49468691
Outdated numbers. iExec is now on version 7 and has been around for 5 years! Thats it for the positives though.
Marketing is still zero, sidechain is still centralized, ETH holdings are down to 50k, the 2k BTC vanished without a trace.
Users are still 0 because there is nothing to "use".
iExec is basically dead at this point, but they will keep slowly moving the ICO funds into their own pockets and pretend to be working on their project to avoid legal prosecution.

>>49469948
>iExec is basically dead at this point
pretty much this because everyone with talent left the team
they gave us a $20 scamwick for duping coinbase into thinking they had a working product so I cant complain

>>49470169
You cropped out the
>my new car lol

>>49470235
haven't seen this shoop in a while

>>49468335
I legit feel bad for oil baggies. I don't own any but I've been tempted to buy multiple times. The craziest part to me is that this is in fact an outstanding project, but the price has been so horrendous.

>>49470169
The real picture is much more pathetic than the shoop

>>49468335
Chainlink
/thread
Fuck off OP

DOGSHIT SISTERS STAND UP!

>>49470169
nice try, paid shil.

>>49471002
>Outstanding
On paper it is. PhDs with decade long experience in the field. EU funded. ICO fund reserves in ETH worth double the market cap of RLC.
But not having results after 5 years of development is not acceptable. Even worse, for some unknown reason iExec started working on NFTs and oracles, probably because their main use case simply doesn't work.

>>49468424
>us
Imagine marrying your shitty bags, kek. Like it’s your sports team. Normies deserve to get reckT. RLC $100 eoy.

>>49468335
Neither

>>49471641
idk this video kinda sold me, it is features for the marketplace
>https://twitter.com/iEx_ec/status/1531613531770060802?s=20&t=oC-E1djviyGovB7b_4m_QA

Really complicated project. But I guess that’s what you get when a project is actually trying to be a pioneer in a certain field. Thanks for this video. Kinda understand now, also why they are into oracles and nft. Still horrible price though.

>>49468511
Team is growing and they're releasing products. If you're going to lie at least do something that can't be checked in 3 seconds on Twitter

>>49475731
>they're releasing products
which one?

>>49472028
>the worker pools are represented as nuclear power plants
>nuclear power plants have a recycling symbol on them
yeah i'm thinking they could do with a marketing hire

>>49468335
I remember how RLC was basically REQ 2.0 when it came to LINK leeches lmao. Wasn't there even some parity between the 2? Now it's like 100x difference kek

It's the ultimate middle of the bell curve coin

>>49477507
V8

>>49477668
>Now it's like 100x difference kek
It's a 9x difference which isnt much considering LINK has had the limelight for years now

>>49477668
that was then, this is now. Is it worth buying LINK now at 10$ or RLC at .8?

>>49477626
>what is nuclear recycling?
"Nuclear waste is recyclable. Once reactor fuel (uranium or thorium) is used in a reactor, it can be treated and put into another reactor as fuel. In fact, typical reactors only extract a few percent of the energy in their fuel. You could power the entire US electricity grid off of the energy in nuclear waste for almost 100 years (details). If you recycle the waste, the final waste that is left over decays to harmlessness within a few hundred years, rather than a million years as with standard (unrecycled) nuclear waste. However, recycling nuclear waste generally involves performing complex chemistry processes in a radiologically shielded area and can be rather expensive and also generate significant amounts of radioactive material in liquid form."

>>49478846
yes my point was that they are technically accurate but are completely ignorant of the global distaste for nuclear power and the importance of not making negative associations like that in your marketing materials. your post makes me wonder if you were the autist that made the video

>>49478777
Checked buy both but more RLC because higher reward

>>49479622
Dumb asses usually get shot down when they say bad shit about nuclear power sources anyway

>>49480016
You dumbasses said this 3 years ago when Chainlink was rank 75 and RLC was rank 120... guess what?
Chainlink is now rank 20 and RLC is rank 300+

>>49471640
Sounds like you're also married to your bags anon

>>49468335
I never bought RLC due to the cancerous "digital oil" shilling.

>>49480294
They are even handing out anti-stress balls in the form of oil barrels.
This way RLC holders have something to squeeze for stress relief when looking at the price chart.