/biz/ - Business & Finance

remember: no feedback

>>49404388
pls let it hit ico price lmao

>The average dividend yield on S&P 500 index companies that pay a dividend historically fluctuates somewhere between 2% and 5%, depending on market conditions.

Sounds good to me

>>49404388
Yes 3%….a day. You’ve been warned, nolinkers will be priced out this year

>>49404388
you still need to add fees. those 20K will run out at some point. Its the fees that matters.

>>49404493
S&P 500 companies don't crash 90% like your shitcoin

if you consider smart contract layer fees(l1/l2), it is not net revenue.

but since the ecosystem is moving into l2, it is getting more profitable every day.

>>49404534
>>49404687
>Rewards NOP between 15k-25k daily in fees
These are official numbers, confirmed by Johnny. Your mental gymnastics won't change that
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z6ejrz0XvQc

>>49404605
Lets just invest in the SP500 thats down 13% so far in the crash, sounds like a plan

>>49405619
Chainlink
>down 80% against usd
>down 95% against eth

>>49404388
3% just flew over my house, I will now put my money in a 0.1% bank instead

>>49405011
PER NODE

>>49405698
>literally who convex finance makes 12x more revenue than chainlink

>>49405720
That would imply ~4 million link rewards daily. Where is the buy pressure then? It's per network you absolute retard

>>49405770
>per network
THERES 1000 NETWORKS FOR PRICE FEEDS ALONE
THEN THERES VRF AND OTHER SERVICES

>>49405735
its related to curve wars, dont underestimate curve wars
but once steak is on the menu, there will be bigger link wars

>>49405950
>Linkie has no idea how his shitcoin works
color me surprised
>>49405975
>but once steak is on the menu, there will be bigger link wars
Network revenue won't increase because you put your tokens to a node

What problem does chainlink solve that the market doesn't already have?

I only have around 250 link, can I nominate those link for staking to someone else like aleph zero does staking or is there no point?

>>49404388
The yearly income is anticipated to rise a lot in the coming years, that's why link will pump and the apy will get even lower. Which ironically will make a lot of idiots sell their bags, good riddance.

We might even get more time to accumulate post stacking

>>49404442
this, i'm not done coomilating yet

>>49405735
>calling convex a literal who project
I can't believe these are the people who duped me into holding chainlink up to 50 dollars and all the way down to where we are now. My God. How did I fall for this shit

>>49404388
3% from legitimate non ponzi staking is a really good deal

>>49406114
are these questions unironically serious or are you bulgarian/a bald defi mallcop?

Omg I can't even, did you ask why? It just is okay.

>>49406194
it's 50 ranks below chainlink

3% is pretty good even at current price.

>>49404388

The number of link jobs has been increasing basically exponentially since the network launched. Do you really think that it will plateau now? As crypto grows and there is no other serious competitor in the oracle space? Even if it were 3%, that would surely grow, or the base value of link would appreciate?

>>49404388
20 000 link rewards.
I have 3000 LPL (or what uset to be 0.12 LP) which means 0,0012 of the total supply.
Does this mean I will be making 20 000*0,0012*(Dollars (or what ever current price) = 192 Dollars a day?
For my second world shithole thats not bad. I might retire based on that and start a family on humble means and maybe improve situation with some side hustle.

>>49406870
Chainlink is defi. Less defi usage = less rewards
https://www.defipulse.com/
Link tvl tanked to 37 billion already

>>49406870
Shush, you'll get the thread deleted for non-fud content if you're not more fuddy

>>49406191
nah, i just hate linkies

>>49406200
And it’s denominated in Link. If it crashes, we get more link per day. It if moons, we will never have to work again. We win either way.

>>49407040
You'll get paid in Link, so if the price crashes, you'll get less $

>>49406987
stop it with the facts, link usage is growing ok? does not matter if defi is dead or if the token lost 90% of its value, putting the whole network at risk

>>49404493
The s&p 500 doesnt lose 90% in a year though kek
How could you be happy about grtting 3% when the asset itself crashes 80% mwaning you lost 77%

>>49407040
This..
3% of 1.00 is fucking 3 cents while 3% of 100$ is 3$ thats a big difference.
Eirher you will be comfy making a stable few thousand a month from your neet nodes or it will be no different from every other shitcoin staking, where you'll be making 20$ a month

>>49407084
Then you get more link to sell later if that’s your thing.

>>49404388
>>49405011
>>49405619
>>49405699
>>49405735
>>49406011
>>49406281
>>49406987
>reminder that brown "people" like the OP are seething and coping on here every single day just because people don't want to sell their link
>he makes dozens of posts a day with 0 impact whatsoever
rent free and all fields, go make another dozen threads lmao

>>49407116
get a load of this faggot
Yeah the s&p doesnt go 100x in three years either, dont worry.

Your efforts are all for naught. Not selling, (only the staking rewards, to buy a nice house and funding trips to south america and europe, nigger)

>>49406281
Cope however you want the fact that you don't know what this is really says tons about your knowledge of what goes on in the crypto space.

>>49404388
Ser, pls do the needful.
I am requesting quotations for the following:
>suicide stackie
>make it stackie

>>49404388
Where do you get this number from?

>>49407839
Always have been
1k
10k
Everyone who says otherwise is just bitter old wreck of a man who resents newer buyers because he expected to have made it years ago and feels they must suffer as he did.

>>49408120
Vishnu shines on you my nigger.
Thank you ser.

>>49406881
Are my calculations correct?

>>49408130
Hes lying, trying to get you to buy his bags. Its 10k sui, 100k make it

>>49408044
Multiply daily link rewards by 365 days and current link price

>>49405011
You dumbass. even if that might be, you still have fees.
BTC Rewards are 6.25 BTC per block, but you still have transaction fees paid by users, increasing the total paid to miners.

Service providers and contracts will have to pay LINK to use it. these fees go to data providers. these fees are added to whatever it is SmartContract will use to incentivize Node operators.

fees are based on demand, and can therefore never be set in stone.

>>49408262
>these fees are added to whatever it is SmartContract will use to incentivize Node operators
Sounds completely sustainable

>>49406987

> This anon was born with a congenital condition that renders him unable to zoom out. For only 2$ a day, you can help these retarded individuals get the jpegs they desperately to see multi billion increases in defi usage over just five years

>linkpool earns 1k link daily
HAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHA it's over for linkcucks
https://market.link/overview?searchView=true&searchSection=NODES

>>49408243
Is there a website to see this easily?

I got similar results made from my calculations with Linkpool giving a 5 million yearly income for 10% of the global network revenue.
I am expecting for this income to double in the next 12 months after the release of the new features.

I am so tired of this manipulated market...

>>49408364
chainlink isn't securing every DeFi protocol in existence you retard

>>49408870
No, only the legit ones. Your pajeet protocols are not allowed to have Chainlink

>>49404388
hi chris

>>49407516
Right? It's by design obviously, they can't sell too much of their $0 link all at once, bagholers would get spooked and sell. Instead they have to do the frog boiling method: slowly sell over a long period of time, stringing bagholders along with updates (but don't invest too much work into this, reuse slides etc. as much as possible), take care that the price doesn't move too suddenly. That's how you extract the most money from your followers, it's been happening for a long time now, they got exceedlngly proficient at it.

>>49404388
Yo Chris hows your paranoid delusions today? Whats it today...lizard people? aliens? both? You smart guy educating us simple folk about this shit. Thanks to you I sold my linkies as I dont want to help satan lizard demons take over the world..you the man

>>49404388
the monthly is 1.75M which is about 168M/year bro.

>>49407084
Sorta. The fee is independent of the price of link. Like if you charge 10 bucks for a validation and link is 5 bucks at the time, they pay you 2 link tokens. It’s doesn’t matter what the price of link is from the nodes perspective because they get paid there 10 bucks regardless. The only issue is that they may need to purchase more link tokens as collateral if the price is low. And if the price of link drops after you receive payment but before you sell it then ya you take a haircut. But that volatility is inherent to everything that isn’t a stable coin. You’d have the same issue processing payments in eth or btc.

>>49409122
check daily mouthbreather. 30d is not accurate because of ust crash

>>49405011

I’ve been staking for literally over a year on Bancor. Get with the program, /biz/.

>>49404388
20k daily is TODAYS metric, before staking is released. Let that sink in.

>>49409250
fuck are you gonna do about it pussy bitch. idgaf about daily. only stupid fucking faggots like you care about the daily. i care about monthly and yearly revenue dick munch. i swear to god ill beat your fucking ass gaylord. punch you in your fucking mouth motherfucker fr no cap.

>>49409349
staking will not increase network usage
>>49409357
seethe retard

>>49409357
nigger

>>49409446
yes it will

>>49409446
suck it kid. your the one seething now.your token will never be successful,
>>49409515
your moma

>>49406194
classic anime poster
you hold KDA

>>49404388
Thanks for showing a complete misunderstanding of link staking, idiot

Then why discuss this at all?
https://twitter.com/chainlink/status/1533858002972852224

>>49408364
i wonder how many billion of that TLV came from UST evaporating
the UST going to zero, plus with LUNA imploding likely that spooked a lot of money out of the markets for several months after now

>>49408325
and? does that have anything to do with what I'm talking about? Is bitcoin sustainable? it will also run out of rewards at some point. who the fuck knows, but it has no relevance to the fact that your math is wrong without fees. holy shit. touch grass and have sex

>>49404388
>>49405011

50 million USD is 3% of 1.6 Billion USD.

According to your logic, Linkpool is "staking" 1.6 Billion USD worth of Link annually.

>>49409446
>staking will not increase network usage

but won't it increase token price? Since it'll be more scarce

>>49409192
Sounds like a complicated scheme to pad the USD/LINK price point metric

>Grayscale chainlink trust crashed -35% today
tick tock linkies

>>49408120
Why are newfags lying like this? Suicide stack was always 10k and LINK was always 100k. You top buyers coming in and pretending that 10k is a make-it stack are fucking pathetic

>>49406881
no one tell him

It's over for you linkies, the jig is up.

Okay so...
227.72k LINK rewards over the last week.
52.14 weeks in a year.
~$7.75 per chainlink at time of calculation.

227,720 * 52.14 = 11,873,320 LINK rewards / year
11,873,320 * $7.75/token = $92,018,236

So the chainlink network is making ~$92mm / year if we extrapolate the results of last week? it's ~$165mm if you use the monthly metric?

>>49410100
lmao how is it complicated?

>>49410254
The higher you put the suicide stack amount, the lower you think the price of Link will go

>>49410992
substract the cost of gas which is $119k daily = 43 million yearly
chainlink revenue is exactly 50 million yearly

>>49411573
what the fuck are you going to do about it pussy. you sure are spending a lot of time trying to convince these faggots to not buy. eat a sack of baby dicks, gaylord.

>>49411573
And there's 1 billion token so that's 5 cents per year revenue per token. A suicide stack will get you $50 a year congrats on this linkies

>>49409446
>i have no idea what staking explicitly entails to how chainlink operates at a fundamental level
on a scale of 1 to 10, how demoralized are you

>>49409250
>there's not at least 1 gigacrash in crypto every single year

>>49411573
>>49411728
>I have no idea wtf I'm talking about!

>>49411573
That was also my calculation and the reason they delayed staking.
But this is also why the release of staking is bullish.
This is the current income, and it has been affected by the release of new features and adoption through increased efficiency and decreased costs.
A x2 in income every 12 months from this point should not be impossible.
The next increase would put it at 100 million income per year.
This is starting to be interesting.
There is also an exponential adoption curve passed a certain point where the increase in use is very quick.

>>49404388
i rember when people didnt even think main net would ever come out...

then bam main net is out and price shot up to like 1.90

i thought i was so fucking rich lol

best pump of my life.

>>49411728
>>49411728
>>49411866
Pretty please, post source for the claim that "chainlink revenue is exactly 50 million yearly".

I could use a good laugh.

>>49405770
>>49405720
NOP literally means NOde OPerators you dunce.

>>49411946
https://market.link/overview here
basic math

>>49411988
>https://market.link/overview
>LINK Rewards by Network
HAHAHAH

>>49411995
But anon, you posted figures that Linkpool alone is making $50 million per year.

>>49412018
Network on this page means chain you clown.

>>49412102
linkpool makes less than 3 million yearly

This is insanely bullish and anyone who does not understand it is a complete retard and will miss generational wealth.

>>49412148
And they're profitable.

were people expecting scam yields like Luna?
I hope it really does go down so I can move my bags to it.

>>49412265
i think this is just what everyone who understands anything was expecting and hoping for.

>>49412242
>cope
they can make 0,01% and still be profitable. but nobody wants to stake shitcoin with apy like this

>>49412383
>apy
What APY?

>>49412233
>>49412333
wtf checked

>>49412389
3% if half of circulating supply is staked

>>49412148
It should be closer to 5 millions now.
I used their metrics for my calculations.
Their initial goal was to get 10% of the global network.

>>49412435
But anon, the current Link rewards are being generated without a single Linkie being staked.
Staking is not needed for the current version of mainnet, which is extremely limited BECAUSE there is no staking yet.

Staking is about to blow open the network to new nodes, new use cases, new user protocols, new end users, etc.

Chainlink are about to release a ton of info on how this all works. Strap in Linkies

Linkies btfo, it's going to 50 cents after release which is still a fucking 500 millions mkcap for.

>>49411038
newnigger detected.
make it and suicide stacks never change. its 100k and 10k. anything else is nulinker bagholding cope.

OG's made it on the last run.

>>49412497
he's arguing in bad faith
>>49412904
shut the fuck up tranny bitch

>>49410254
>>49412904
was always 1k and 10k

in 10 years wholelinkers (1.000 LINK) will make it

>>49408657
Bro if you're right then holy fuck a few of us are gonna have the problem of roo much money kek

>>49404388
3% of $1000 is still over 400% returns per year if you buy now.

>>49410159
No it didn't
https://www.coinglass.com/Grayscale

I have like 60k$ worth of link and I have no idea if it's a scam or not lmao

>>49412148
Who is the top unmarked node mogging all the others?

>>49414770
sergey's personal bigmac price feed

>>49404388
Can we stop considering network rewards as an APY and start thinking of it as EPL (Earnings Per Link)

>>49412904
How big is your hole after 5 years of dilation?