[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance

View post   
File: 113 KB, 303x463, 1509820862907.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4196866 No.4196866 [Reply] [Original]

tell me a good reason why you haven't invested on this guy

>> No.4196907

>>4196866
Because SmartContract isn't a publicly traded company and ICOs are not investments.

>> No.4196920

>>4196866
Because he has already heavily invested in himself.

>> No.4196960
File: 101 KB, 303x463, milliondollerman2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4196960

>> No.4196971

>>4196920
invested heavily would have been funnier you mong

>> No.4196989

>>4196960
hey man it isn't nice to Photoshop someone to make him look fat

>> No.4197040
File: 941 KB, 1940x2296, aaa.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4197040

>>4196989
his name is Sergey Paulson

>> No.4197101

>>4196960
/ourguy/

>> No.4197127

>>4196866
seems like he got that mcdonalds partnership too.

>> No.4197146

>>4197040
kek

>> No.4197221

>>4196866
wow, he's really treating his body like a toilet...

>> No.4197233

Money belly let the stress get to him

>> No.4197236

I have a bit of my portfolio in link too (bought at ICO) but I have 1 simple question to you bagholders:
Why should 1 LINK be worth 20c? Why 30?
The project is a great one based on an idea that's not really original but an interesting attempt to tackle the centralized oracles.
But don't forget there are other ways to accomplish tasks on the blockchain where the “oracle problem“ is not even relevant.
I know you are all bagholding and trying to shill this token but please answer this simple question: Why should it rise in value?

>> No.4197246
File: 214 KB, 404x411, 1508189109735.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4197246

>>4197236
Because people will trade with it. duh

>> No.4197399
File: 309 KB, 504x398, u wot m8.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4197399

>>4197236
>But don't forget there are other ways to accomplish tasks on the blockchain where the “oracle problem“ is not even relevant.

what the fuck are you trying to say?

>> No.4198460

>>4197236
Basically, no high value use case or high value institution wants to use oracles to do their transaction because they are not secure and tamper-proof. That's why you'll never hear about banks want to do remittance with CENTRALISED oracles, this is basically the ORACLE PROBLEM which DECENTRALISED SMART ORACLES solve.

>> No.4198495

thanks money belly you have the biggest bones