/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>3807612
What tech is Lisk actually developing?

I'm all-in and holding strong since presale
260M links

just sold enough before the dip for the upcoming airswap and request ico's

To expand a bit more:

At this current moment, crypto is relatively zero-sum. With the exception of brief spikes, the market cap has fluctuated between 140-150b for the past two months.

New money is largely non existent at this time. Pre-existing investors are competing among each other. Transfer of wealth. That money will always flow to and from what is new and shiny.

>>3807650

exactly.

>>3807652

you hold 70% of the circulating supply. Nice

>>3807652

The fuck? 260M links. FML... i only have 60k links

I just should fucking sell at ATH

But I was retarded and decide to hodl

3 fucking days straight whales and pump and dump fags earning fortune thanks to trading and lowering LINK price to shit

Then they will move to another coin without giving a fuck, SIBOS conference gonna turn into fucking scam and I won't even have cash to buy mask and bottle of gas to kill myself painlessly

>>3807612
Yeah, you're right. I don't even believe in ETH anymore (as an investment).
It's just BTC, XMR and LINK now. I'm still going to try and flip Request though.

will Sia?
I'm down from 450

>>3807697
do you even know what you're holding? this shit is one of the most undervalued alts the fuck. no exaggeration, seriously you have to be dumb as fuck to buy an altcoin an not invest in LINK

>>3807700

I think WTC can be very successful. Huge updates just released on their subreddit. Quite impressive honestly

>>3807677
1M = 1k, 1MM=1mil

>>3807652
>>3807675
>>3807677
>>3807677

meant 260k

>>3807718
If banks won't adopt it, then all this chainlink jerking off will turn into bloodbath and few anons who sold with smaller loss in mass panic will be the lucky ones

It will never go up after it

>>3807666
Is this some shitty pasta?
Surely this can't be true with all the new money flowing into crypto

>>3807711

Of course not, you were one of the idiots I sold to on that pump. I've got 109k Link and can tell you it's going over a dollar. The question is how far above does it go before it stagnates?

It's a good long term hold, but just buy it now and get ready to take profits by the end of the month.

>>3807745
chainlink isnt just for banks idiot. every dapp can use it. didnt you notice that even request.network is considering using chainlink? are they a bank?

you obviously dont know what its trying to do

>>3807612
Who here all in on UnbreakableCoin?

>>3807612
ETP

>>3807749

Where is your evidence of new money flowing in?

While not the most correlative metric, total market cap has stagnated for 6+ weeks. Unless you have a better way of knowing?

If you aren't all in on Ark you literally hate money

>>3807612
Am I going to make it ?

Dogecoin always recovers, then collapses again, then recovers again, and so on ...

IOTA is the very opposite of "Because ALL valuations in crypto lack substance. This is an entirely hype-centric market. "

the rest, completely true, "muh chinese ethereum", "muh unbank the banked with a cryptocurrency not anythign different than ethereum"

The sad part is crypto doesn't HAVE to be as zero-sum, if everyone would stop being retarded for 5 minutes, start sticking with good coins and not buying something new every week we could all get rich

>>3808080
Red pulse is overhyped anyway. I'll buy your bags at half ico price

>>3808163
>doesn't HAVE to be zero-sum

i don't think you know how things work.

>>3807749
Just look at the market cap see for yourself ya doofus

WE
ARE
LINK MARINES
AND WE ARE NOT SELLING

>>3807612
You're right. I've noticed this pattern just recently and it finally started to make me money.

When i used to hodl i just ended up with bags of coins that went out of fashion and the money flowed away from them into newer shinier things.

Most of crypto space has 0 substance so chasing fads is the way to go really cos thats where the money is

>>3808163
what? everything in life is zero-sum, crypto just moves so fucking fast it's much more obvious.
i'd like to hear your reasoning why it's not though, lol..

>>3807718
Vitalik called it overvaluated last week

where have you been?

don't be deluded, it's done 3x ICO, it's fine. Move on

>>3808152
>Talking down on neo and omg, the two most legit alts while simultaneously praising some refugee shitcoin.

>>3807745
>If banks won't adopt it
Of course banks will adopt a technology that increases transparency and gives more power to its customers...

>>3808276
Hop off of Vitalik's dick and start thinking for yourself.
He's advising Kyber and OMG(what the fuck do they even do?).
People were asking him in the same tweet what does he think about OMG's marketcap of 1 billion and he didn't respond. Fucking pussy.
OMG partners with 5th(fifth lmao) largest something something and Thai(literally who) governent and it went to 1.2 billion.

Now we have LINK and motherfucking SWIFT. Not some ching chong government and fifth largest whatever. If this coin doesn't deserve another 10x, then no coin does.

>>3808311
LINK doesn't do that.

>>3807650
Nothing. It's a scam orchestrated by Binance to attract new users.

>>3808338
I like LINK but you are fucking retarded
Only an American would be this fucking ignorant

>>3808311
it literally allows banks to maintain their infrastructure and still use smart contracts you dumbfuck

its the best of both worlds

>>3808338
>(what the fuck do they even do?).
sigh
>If this coin doesn't deserve another 10x, then no coin does.
yep, you're deluded as fuck
you are probably going to lose all your money holding link

>>3808362
whats wrong with what he said? its true. OMG is fucking overhyped. might be a good investment long term but no way is it undervalued compared to LINK

>>3808362
Ignorant about what?
LINK would be used for transactions all over the world, not inside one government or 5th largest conglomerate.
Plus a shitton of other use cases unrelated to banking, it's literally for everything. It's universal just like Ethereum.

I'm sorry I don't know what they do. OMG is something for payments and Kyber decentralized exchange or somthing?

>>3808403
name another alt that deserves a x10 other than LINK

>>3808403
Nice arguments.

If SWIFT is real, this deserves at least 1 billion.

>>3808420
>deserves
strange word, but i agree

>>3808408
Well I didn't mean LINK isn't undervalued.
I was referring to him talking shit about thai government and the japanese subsidiary bank. OMG is not really overvalued anymore tho. Even bitconnect = an actual ponzi scheme is valued higher than both omg and link

>>3807612
IOTA, ICN, OMG and ICN all don't like substance. None of those compete with link, why are you pretending that means anything?

>>3808411
Yeah LINK is great and I hold it too but just take a minute to research kyber and omg before talking shit about them lol

>>3808452
Ok, I didn't know the specifics. But my point still stands.
Japanese subsidiary bank vs SWIFT, it's not even a fair comparison lol.

>>3808471
I'm didn't mean to say they're shit, I'm saying that LINK has the potential to do the same and more(market cap wise). It's objectively true.

What the fuck does LINK do that's so special that justifies a market cap of more than 125m?

>>3808496
here we go again....

can someone please explain to this newfag who ignored all the other explanation threads? im so tired of these dumbfucks

>>3808523
I seem to remember some shit about an "oracle problem" whatever the fuck that means

>>3808496
Justify and deserve are strong words. What I'm doing is a comparison to other coins relative to what they offer and what LINK offers.
Crypto is a strange market. None of the coins maybe deserve more than 125M but here we are.

>>3807612
>90% of alts DO NOT RECOVER

that includes yours, Linkie

sold all LINK ... for Vechain ... hope it will 3x because it is on hitBTC since few hours! i hope it will work ;)

>>3808523
Why the fuck would anyone spoonfeed gains for idiots? Let them remain poor

>>3808496
Any transaction utilizing the ChainLink network invokes a toll in LINK from the transactor to the oracle node operator(s), meaning that you can set up your own node and stake your own LINK on it to get those delicious high-end LINK tolls from prioritized transactions between any of the ELEVEN THOUSAND banks & financial institutions interconnected through SWIFT and therethrough the rest of the world; a market currently valued at around $1.4 TRILLION.

>do the math

>>3808163
We can't all get rich dummy. The only way to get rich is for you to eventually sell to a buyer. The new buyers are now left holding. How does he get rich?

>>3808618
Stupid linklet here, how much LINK is needed to act as a node?

>>3808523
pretty sure people are just meming hard at this point, bro.

>>3807612

So what you're saying is, holding the 10% of alts that WILL recover is the best hope of going to Lambo land?

Gotcha, but I think some of those you mentioned are 10 percenters.

>>3807652
God damn. Absolutely mad.

>>3808618
> 11k banks with unlimited resources decide to use this infant tech instead of developing their own, just to make you faggots rich

deluded linkies

>>3808618
b4 phags say that LINK is dead without banks, this applies to any smart contract that needs oracle, aka any smart contract that needs data outside the blockchain world.

even request.network is considering using LINK, even etheroll needs LINK etc etc etc god you phags are annoying

>>3807732
Oh... lol

>>3808523
People just literally hate money

>>3808666
nigger why the fuck would they even hold the innotribe competition on 2016 and let sergey present at sibos on oct 16 if they could just develop their own? are they retarded? "yo serg wanna fuck around on ou conference? just wanna have some filler entertainment for our industry leaders cuz why the fuck not"

>>3808666
>>3808780
Lol this. Who are they going to hire to do this? Pull a new team together from scratch and hope it flies or just go with the guy who's been working on it successfully for years and knows the inside baseball on blockchain technology?

>>3808618
No bank is going to use your node because you don't have the information required to validate their transactions.

>>3808834
chainlink is the only innotribe winner to speak at sibos right? rise and the other fag project wont talk?

just how many green flags do these nolinkers need. this is the easiest buy since ETH

Guys the normies on reddit are already catching drift that this coin is going to be big. Start spreading FUD NOW. This video is pretty good at explaining the cons of Chainlink:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gFmKlkhoOXY

>>3808885
WHO TALKED

>>3808856
>afaik: yes

>>3808780
>implying they cant just gather a few hundred millions, hire top developers from working industries, take chainlink idea and develop it into a working product without giving you fags a single penny

we are a decade away at least from banks adopting blockchain & crypto for everyday use

this stuff is just to show how techo progressive they are, always looking into the future bla bla so wealthy investors feel at ease

>>3808843
>this guy doesn't understand how trustless distributed encryption across several link-staking nodes which are cross-referenced to prevent malfeasance or error means anyone can rune a node that banks will use

>>3808905
https://www.reddit.com/r/CryptoMarkets/comments/754h6a/research_chainlink/

Its horrible. The casuals will raise the coin up high and it will surely be a pump and dump if we dont start spreading FUD.

>>3808962
>https://www.reddit.com/r/CryptoMarkets/comments/754h6a/research_chainlink/
Can't stop the rising tide; get in now while you still can cheaply!

>>3808834
lol as if they dont have the $ to hire better engineers than that cult leader Serg

there is a world outside your delusions, Linkies

>>3808885
delete

>>3808957
Unless I'm mistaken nodes have their own API data feeds which is used to make the whole decentralized part function. You can't provide bank valuable information without being a bank.

>>3808987

alright tell us what you're investing in aside from ETH and BTC faggot

>>3808957
>banks will use nodes ran by random fags which happened to buy lot of link early on

nope, not gonna happen sry

>>3809004
>he still doesn't get it
just wait, but don't post pink wojak when we post our Lambos.

>>3809000
when the link fad is over, my investment will begin to get shilled hard. By then you will know

>>3809017
let me guess, OMG? lmao u cryin LINK is stealing the spotlight outside of plebbit?

>>3809026
Why the fuck would i put $ on that piece of shit OMG.

nah, its not been hyped yet. You will know when the time comes. Im not giving you fags any clues

>>3809041
have fun holding your shitcoin bags that no one else appreciates then

>>3809014
so whats preventing banks with unlimited money from buying all nodes from you poorfags

>>3809058
I think that's the whole plan here

>>3809058
>so whats preventing banks with unlimited money from buying all nodes from you poorfags
legit retard?

>>3809053
guess why its not appreciated? because of fomo shit like link, odn, ioc, ark, bat, etc.

you'll cry yourself to sleep in a few months for being so blind

how likely is it that Link hits 20bil market cap in 2018?

>>3809058
is that supposed to be FUD? the banks can buy all my links if they want at $5 to $20

just take your 2 digit IQ along with your unknown shitcoin that no one appreciates

>>3809068
>>3809069

and you think they will pay you big bucks for your nodes?

they'd rather build their own system, trust me

>>3809088
Would that be cheaper though

>>3809088
>they'd rather build their own system, trust me
I'd never trust a retard

>>3809088
> they'd rather build their own system, trust me
da fuck? whats wrong with their current system then? why the fuck would they build another centralized solution

youre a legit retard bro, the shitcoin you are probably talking about is shit tier based on your arguments

>>3809093
it will never reach that point. If they start developing now they wont have to buy your stupid nodes in the future. Big fat bankers plan decades ahead

>>3809108
i think you linkers are so fomo'ed that you cant see beyond your current profits

if blockchain is inevitable, banks will build their own private blockchain instead of giving you fags any more $. They will never use Link so that you nobodies can become millionaires

>>3809117
>tard still don't get it
dude what happened? you fell on your head or something?

>>3809153
Just like they built their own computers instead of using IBM's products

>>3809155
whatever asshole

enjoy your link bags, dont say i didnt warn you

>>3809189
>actually comparing IBM to ChainLink

deluded Linkies...

>>3809193
no seriously, you don't seem to understand what LINK is even about.
maybe you should read the whitepaper first before trying to come up with arguments.
you're just making a fool of yourself by spouting retard shit, don't be that guy.

>>3809202
>why stock vending machines with premade products when you could make your own food and put it in there
>why buy cars from a dealership when you could just build your own
>why go to the theater to watch a movie when you could just direct one yourself
Come on lad.

>>3809206
>retarded shit
>OMG 11000 BANKS ARE GONNA USE LINK BUY NOW

seriously... the tech is at infant state. If it is promising and inevitable, hundreds of new ChainLinks will pop up with well financed experts shitting on link's primitive tech.

So what im trying to say is. Maybe Link tech will be adopted in the future, but it wont be the ChainLink you fags got $ invested in, so forget about lambos

>>3809248
>comparing simple joes like us with mega wealthy banks

stop, anon...

>>3809258
You are right. Like how Bitcoin was quickly dethroned once people realized this whole decentralized currency thing was promising.

All hail DGB and it's superior transaction speeds.

>>3809258
>never invest in anything because you might be wrong
Get back to flipping burgers before your boss catches you on your phone.

>>3809248
he doesn't understand what LINK is

>>3809258
dude, read the whitepaper already. its not only about banks.
LINK is the future.

>>3809258

Dude you obviously will NEVER get it. You just cant comprehend with your shitty IQ.

We should have stopped replying to you the moment you said this

>>3809058
>so whats preventing banks with unlimited money from buying all nodes from you poorfags

>>3809275
>>3809278
>>3809283
>>3809289

ok here is your chance to shut me up forever.

Is this shit patented? If everyone started to use it, would it inevitably mean profits for early Link buyers, even if the product being used is not ChainLink ?

>>3809328
last thing, think about it

what company invented the computer, mmh? where is it now? exactly...

>>3809328
dude seriously. read the whitepaper, it answers all your questions.

or check their site´at least and read it.
https://link.smartcontract.com/

>>3809328
You literally entered the thread calling everyone a deluded linkie.

You have no desire to know anything. You already know about Chainlink. You are doing this on purpose and are being intentionally retarded for your own reasons.

I can only imagine what drives you to do what you do but know you are incredibly transparent. Nobody is actually as thick as you pretend to be.

Ripple is going to die as well by the way.

>>3809368
The personal computer? Wozniak

>>3809328
> is this shit patented?

you still don't get it do you? are BTC and ETH patented faggot? in decentralized systems the network is more important. its very difficult to beat first movers for that reason faggot

>>3807612
Substratum gonna be gen 3

>>3809041
Blocknet

>>3809380
I think he is legit tho, probably one of these clueless people who come to /biz/ and ask where to invest their 100 bucks into.

>>3809400
he thinks its only about banks or some shit and does not see where the road actually leads to.

>>3809380
You linkies are calling everyone not buying your shitcoin a retard. You spammed the board non stop for weeks already.

I know most of you dont actually believe in the tech and will dump as soon as rises a bit.
You play on the tech ignorant with your buzz words. Most of you are after quick profit, you dont give a fuck about blockchain and its possible uses

>>3809434
Your skepticism is admirable, but there's such a thing as too much skepticism. Just saying.

>>3809434
>i dont knw what none of these words mean quit scammin dummies like me
Then don't fucking buy it we don't care.

>>3809400
banks can put supercomputes on each city making you first movers irrelevant. They can take this tech and patent it and make it private for their own profit, not yours. Then force all small banks and business to use it.
Just like everyone uses windows instead of linux

>>3809452
ah but you do want us to buy, you do care

without buyers where are your profits?

>>3809457
>banks can put supercomputes on each city

>>3809469
I really don't. In fact, I would prefer if you didn't.

>>3809474
care to explain the link tech with your own words without saying just read the white paper?

lets see if you understand what you're invested in

>>3809328
https://patents.justia.com/inventor/sergey-nazarov

Turns out it is patented.

>>3809457
You sir are the biggest retard in the fucking world
>banks can put supercomputes on each city

>>3809488
it would be more interesting and fun if YOU would explain what YOU think LINK is about.
so please do tell us.

>>3809501
explain the tech, faggot. Lets see who's the retard

why is it so revolutionary

>>3809517

>>3809496
>Day of SIBOS
>SWIFT: Good job, Sergey. You knocked them dead. We do have the patent for chainlink, right?
>Sergey:

>>3809532
yeah thats all you fags can come up with

none of you actually understands what this shit does. Im out

>>3809446

Linkbros can you confirm these patents are owned by sergey?

>>3809512
Essentially it allows the blockchain to have access to standardized information outside of itself. Why is this difficult? Because there are so many ways you can get around it. Why is it useful? Because the blockchain is actually retarded; it knows nothing about anything. Oracles essentially allow outside information into the ecosystem.

>>3809517
link.smartcontract.com/whitepaper
I'm not gonna spoonfeed you you nigger so you're gonna have to read it yourself

>>3809539
but you're actually the one who doesn't understand as you clearly didn't do your own research or bothered reading the whitepaper.
its not my job to sell you something, i'm just here to talk about my investment with fellow bizbros

>>3809539
Thank god. Please don't come back next time.

>>3809535

about once a week I stumble upon something on biz that has me laughing hysterically for about 10 minutes

this was that thing

>>3809570

so confident on your investment you Linkies are, you get so mad with a little fud lmao

>>3809535
underrated

>>3809626
>banks can put supercomputes on each city

>>3808955

Despite all the retarded shit you said in this thread, you do have a point here.

Omise has customers and partnerships worth billions
Last month they just partnered up to the fifth largest banking conglomerate in the world which happens to be a member of the enterprise etherum alliance

Yep... all potential for omg has come and gone
No future... not still in very early speculative stage for investors

>link fags this attached to their first moon mission
Cute

>>3809735
Accelerationism will fix the free market

>>3809452
Then stop fucking shilling you cunts

>>3809774
You're right, I'm sorry. I'll tell the guys to stop.

>>3809735
yeah i didnt really think much before typing on this thread

i just want this three things answered by linkfags

why does a system which connects the outside world data with the etherum blockchain needs its own wealth carrying token, the price of which
is subject to market instability?

why arent the Etherum developers programming this shit directly into their blockchain without the need of some third party program ?

what if Eth goes down and is replaced by better tech? where does that leave ChainLink?

>>3809823
> what if Eth goes down and is replaced by better tech? where does that leave ChainLink?

JUST. gtfo out fag. If you at least researched one bit about chainlink youll find out it already supports ETH, BTC, and Hyperledger

gokillyourself

>>3809840
ahh linkie this mad. Ofc it supports eth its a fucking eth token

answer the other questions

>>3809823

1-Meme magic, the devs know there is more money to be made this way. It makes complete financial sense to ride the hype train. Can't blame them for that.

2-Good question.

3-Very unlikely. Ethereum's value comes partly from the fact that it was the first to do what it does, same reason as why Bitcoin is king even if there is better tech nowadays.

>>3809892
>Eth value comes partly from the fact its the first

Fine, but eth main purpose its not like btc (store of value), so it is poised to go down as better tech arrives.
If there is better tech than Eth for its job, people wont keep using it cause 'it was the first', unlike btc which has a single job

Looks like link is on the increase despite the bitcoin sign...very bullish and blows OP fud out of the water. The same can be said for NEO, it's due to hit $100 this year. Sorry for you fuckers

>>3809934
except OP wasnt fudding lol, do you even read?

I sold my Link to buy OMG. How fucked am I?

>>3809823
> why does a system which connects the outside world data with the etherum blockchain needs its own wealth carrying token, the price of which is subject to market instability?

because ChainLink isnt only for Ethereum. Like i said, it even supports HyperLedger now.

if it used ETH as its native token and Hyperledger blows the fuck out of the Ethereum platform in terms of usage, then ETH's token price will plummet.

so even though ChainLink would be widely used, the node operator's profit would take a hit.

Get it now faggot?

>>3809988
so what if a new blockchain tech appears with its own Link tech programmed into it?

bye bye ChainLink, no need for your useless tokens

>>3810004
only a faggot keeps using "what if" scenarios. where is that blockchain tech huh?

> what if x crypto gets replaced in the future

what a stupid argument, chainlink is your only choice with a working product dumbass

>>3810004
You're right. Maybe it's better to not buy any LINK at all. :(

>>3809978
According to palm beach, not at all. $70 price target. Might take a while but it'll get there.

>>3810004

>why buy shares in this "facebook" thing. what if a new social medium comes through and makes it obsolete

>>3810023
lol ETH is already a couple of years old. This is computer science we talk about, which advances really fast. Now that crypto is getting this much attention, its not a matter of IF but WHEN the Eth killer will arrive.

Who knows, maybe its already being worked on

>>3810045
So true. Now that Microsoft is around there's no point in investing in Apple anymore. Might as well sell it all and go back to work.

>>3810063
ChainLink is older than ETH dumbass....... do your fucking research I'm not going to answer any more dumb questions

>>3810045
>implying you wouldve had the vision to invest on Facebook at its earlier stages and not on its other 10s of competitors.

>>3810045
>>3810067

facebook, Apple and Microsoft are already well established. Chainlink could go to zero in a month and you all know it. I bet half of you shit your pants each time the price does free fall

>>3810063
>lol ETH is already a couple of years old.

>>3810091
> facebook, Apple and Microsoft are already well established. Chainlink could go to zero in a month and you all know it. I bet half of you shit your pants each time the price does free fall

lmao you really are a dumbass arent you? you counter your own arguments.

CHAINLINK. IS. OLDER. THAN. ETH.

faggot

>>3810004
This project is 4 years in the making if somebody manages to produce a better solution out of the blue I'll be buying a lot of that too

>>3810091
What is even your point anymore you stupid mother fucker? Never take risks because there's a chance you will fail? Yeah, we get it. Thanks. Don't invest in promising tech because it might get replaced eventually? Okay, got it.

>>3810123
>>3810111

my point is learn what the tech does and why its useful. Dont invest on the TOKEN, but the IDEA.

The token could go to zero overnight, while the idea could live on thru other projects.

So learn what the tech IS, then look if the tech is being developed elsewhere.

Get it now, faggots ???

>>3810160

> So learn what the tech IS, then look if the tech is being developed elsewhere.

Hmmm ok chainlink tech is good.

Hmmm ok chainlink has no competitors with a working product. They are years ahead of them.

The fuck is your point?

>>3810160
You're the one that refuses to read the whitepaper m8.

>>3810160
Oooohhhh I see now

>>3810211
The dumbass motherfucker is probably invested in Metaverse which doesnt have a product lmao

>>3810160
>Dont invest on the TOKEN, but the IDEA.
How else you meant to do it you consistently purposely stupid fuck

>>3810178
what makes you so sure it has no competitors with better programmers and more financing working on it right now? have you really looked into it? mm?

ChainLink 4 years on the project. Working product being used by who?

If its so revolutionary, companies wouldve been all over it before you even heard about fucking Link. They wouldve bought all Link as soon as it was available, before you even read about it on this fuckin board.

These neckbeards thinking they can outsmart multinational corps lmao

>>3810239
> If its so revolutionary, companies wouldve been all over it before you even heard about fucking Link. They wouldve bought all Link as soon as it was available, before you even read about it on this fuckin board.

You fucking retard lmao. i had enough literally nothing is going through your neanderthal skull

Ahahahahaah another LINK shill thread.

3 fucking years to make a 10 minute presentation and they say that LINK is not vapor wave.

Alts may not recover, if you buy shit, if you buy product that actually exist and solve real problem NOW, like MTL that is releasing the Alpha on October 30.

>>3810247
Whatever. We'll see who's the neantherthal in the future..

keep following Serg like the cultists you are.

I bet none of you understands how this link shit works (or if it does), but only pretend to attract more clueless idiots

>>3810239
>keeps making up hypothetical situations for a concrete scenario

Fucking newfaggots and babbys first ICO, LINK has this board at terminal fucking circlejerk levels

>>3810247

>4 years on the project
>working product

care to show me some examples of real life use for real life problems? i mean, 4 years is a lot of time, there should be hundreds of programmers making use of it

>>3810289
im gonna save this thread

will spam it next year to remind you linkies how retarded you sounded

>>3810338
Do it, and write up a smart contract so it's mandatory

>>3810308
Let's not forget that they are too busy workijg on their already finished and workijg product for a little 30 minute presentation to put out any news

>>3810387
http://lmgtfy.com/?q=nda

>>3807612
s-splinter....

>>3810427
Proof there is a nda? Or just making things up again like muh Morgan Stanley

>>3809933
>Fine, but eth main purpose its not like btc (store of value), so it is poised to go down as better tech arrives.

In theory. In practice, it clearly doesn't, otherwise Neo would approach Ethereum's price.

>>3809535
lol

Yea, though I look upon the dips, I neither wail nor gnash my teeth, holding fast through temporary 10% losses in value, fully confident of 1,000% increases in value in the coming year.

>>3809535
>>3809621
>>3809691
>>3811310

>https://patents.justia.com/inventor/sergey-nazarov

>when noLINKers get BTFO

>>3809535
I don't get it.

>>3811485
Look at his face: if you cannot read his expression in this context as "uh, goddamnit, I cannot believe I forgot to patent this," then you are deeply autistic; if so, please create a new coin or token for us to play with.

>>3808258
It's gone up 44% in the last two months you absolute buffoon.

>>3811326
we all know that the SIBOS will be about "Bridging DLT and SWIFT messaging with SmartContract.com" right?

https://www.sibos.com/conference/conference-programme/bridging-dlt-and-swift-messaging-smartcontractcom-innotribe-industry

THE PATENTS ARE ABOUT FUCKING MESSAGING.

HUGE

>>3808224
>>3808269
>>3808635
He is right though, When he says *we* I take if he means all of us already in the game. Yes, new people coming in won't be able to get rich. If we can create a coin with slow steady growth over months, not P&D central peaks and lows. Then Normies can be convinced to jump in.


But it's not realistic, market is too jittery. It's kind of like the prisoners dilemma, everyone can make gains if no one is too greedy and piles tons of money into a single coin with the intent to flip it after some rise.


Yes, it's zero sum eventually, but it could be non zero sum for all involved at a certain point.

Exchanges need to remove order books and depth charts. All they do is facilitate manipulation.

>>3808258

>>3812178
You sound like the Amish.

>>3807718
How is it undervalued when mcap is already more than 100m?

lorem ipsum

greed is essential for growth, everyone steals to improve

envy is the best source of motivation

power will always have casualties

>>3812442
$1.4 trillion moves through SWIFT annually at this time, but there are only a billion LINK tokens total; eventually, after about a decade, when market cap scales accordingly, price per LINK should increase by approximately 1,400%.

You have no idea what you're talking about. Neo wont recover? Wtc wont recover? Piss poor attempt at shilling link just end yourself

hope is a hell of a drug

>>3808338
>He's advising Kyber and OMG(what the fuck do they even do?).
hes working on omg, not advising. there is a difference :^)

>OMG partners with 5th(fifth lmao) largest something something
5th largest banking conglomerate in the world :^), number 5 banking group in the world.
#5
banking group
in the world

omise already has customers/partners totaling worth in the billions btw

nice fud retard, stop posting any time

>>3810004
>so what if a new blockchain tech appears with its own Link tech programmed into it?
"Link tech" doesn't need its own blockchain. At all.

1) It's a standalone decentralized network, plug&play. This makes it very low-threshold. This is an advantage.
2) Chainlink can be used on multiple blockchains. In case you don't know, this is also an advantage.
3) the bigger the underlying blockchain, the more reliable the Chainlink proofs. This is likewise an advantage.

And again, Chainlink doesn't need its own blockchain in any way, shape, or form.

If you say things like "what if a blockchain with Chainlink tech comes?", that means you have VERY limited understanding of what Chainlink is and does.
You better educate yourself or you're going to miss out.

>>3810239
>what makes you so sure it has no competitors with better programmers and more financing working on it right now?
Take a look at the whitepaper and who co-wrote it.
It's also peer-reviewed.

>Working product being used by who?
Well the Chainlink v1.0 network was literally just finished, and already SWIFT is using it as a proof of concept.

>If its so revolutionary, companies wouldve been all over it before you even heard about fucking Link.
Again, the network itself is in its infancy right now, but already back in 2015 the WEF (look them up) was mentioning Smartcontract(s).com:
http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_GAC15_Technological_Tipping_Points_report_2015.pdf#page=24
(google the key words if you don't trust the link)

>These neckbeards thinking they can outsmart multinational corps lmao
But LINK is working with multinational corps.

>>3810308
>care to show me some examples of real life use for real life problems?
I'll give you two very specific examples.
(Ask me why I mentioned these two specifically)

1) a DLT platform managing ISO 20022-compliant bond instruments
2) an ISO 20022-aware Smart Oracle settling coupon payments off-ledger through ISO 20022 payment messages over SWIFT

>>3812621
faggot

>>3812608
>and already SWIFT is using it as a proof of concept.

Fucking deluded Linkies. A CONCEPT is something that does not yet exist. How can SWIFT be using something that doesn't exist?

Jesus CHRIST you're retarded.

>>3812684
The term I used was "proof of concept".

The sole fact that there is so much talk (good and bad) about LINK made me buy 100k just now.

>>3807612
Dear OP
Remember
Your mom will not recover, when Im done with her!
Stop talking shit, only for the reason to, buy the dip.

>>3808191
you're fucking dreaming, salty no pulse

>>3812684
proof of cocncept means the concept can be demonstrated and proven viable, numbnuts

what is chainlink?

>ChainLink is blockchain middleware that allows smart contracts to access key off-chain resources like data feeds, various web APIs, and traditional bank account payments.

>By providing smart contracts secure access to these key resources, ChainLink allows them to mimic real world agreements that require external proof of performance and need to make payment in widely available payment methods e.g. bank payments.

what problem does chainlink solve?

>Smart Contracts are unable to communicate with external resources on their own. Data feeds, any/all APIs and traditional bank payment systems are all inaccessible to smart contracts without blockchain middleware like ChainLink.

>This limitation is inherent in how smart contract data is secured on a blockchain, and is due to the way that consensus is reached by miners around blockchain-based transaction data, this limitation will remain for all smart contracts for the forseeable future.

>The way this problem is traditionally solved is through the use of a blockchain middleware called an "oracle", which is the role ChainLink plays in the smart contract ecosystem.

ITT: people who cant see the forest through the trees