/biz/ - Business & Finance

NOW

>>30106853
Caprice

shes so cute bros...

her anus is lovely

>>30106853
I remember fapping to her decades ago. she's way past 30 and she still barely looks 18. this is what holding nano must feel like.

the jew fears the rejuvinating directed acyclic graph feeless transaction thot.

>>30108234
lol you are closer to the truth than you realize

lmao

I would give 1 BTC for an ass-to-mouth with Little Caprice

and here we go nanoooo, pumping while I watch this slut being assfucked

love u Nano~

>>30106853
Nano is a scam and you know it.
>>/biz/thread/S28856161

Pic. Nano scammers looking for new paypigs aka "investors"

>>30106853

>>30106853
nanoids are the new xrp army but even more annoying. like a cross between xrpeepees and the hex lobotomies

>>30111322
Cope.

>>30106853
>Nano is centralized vaporware.
>Nano foundation shuts down nodes they don't like through a backdoor and/or exploit. Pic.

imagine not getting paid for being a coomer

>>30106853
>It takes only a mild 200-300 tps spam to crash the Nano network. After that, Nano Foundation must send around zip files to node operators to "update" the transaction history.

>>30106853
the czeck street guy got her into porn, it was her first

>>30106853
Only reason why anyone has heard about Nano is that they lied about Nano having 7000 tps (reality was 1% of promised tps) when BTC network was clogged in late 2017. Worse Nano has the absurd business model that they can get suckers to run the network for free, zero compensation whatsoever, and thus have zero fees. Works well when NOBODY is using the crashed tech network. However, if you ask how much it will cost in CPU, IO, bandwidth, hardware etc to run a global network on their plebbit page, /r/NanoCircleJerk, you will be banned within seconds. Same if you ask anything related to their crashed tech, cost analysis for a global network based on volunteers taking all the costs, swindle, corruption and scam. Nano provides zero real-world transparency.

>>30106853
>>30111804
The sad reality behind the vile 7000 tps claim from Nano scammer devs, Jewish grifters and Italian swindlers, was 75 tps. Even today, two years later, Nano scammers can't even muster 10% of what they claimed in 2017.

Lmao the FUD is always the same, in the same order. I can almost predict it.

NANO is more resilient than Bitcoin, and it's getting more & more decentralized. BTFO, biz will buy at $15 in 2 weeks. Community is exploding, normies are buying as soon as they learn about it. You don't like money

>>30106853
>>30111804
>>30111880
It was well known in the community that Nano devs and team were lying through their teeth. Vitalik even tweeted about it

>>30112025
>decentralized
Are you insane? Here;

>All Nano scammers have is criminal and lying devs, plus a horrific shitcoin of a tech trainwreck Nano is wide open for spam attacks, due to your feeless transactions, i.e. volunteers taking all the costs for no reason. No wonder Nano's hysterical core dev Colin is threatening to sue anyone who stress test or spam test Nano. Pic.

Plus
>>30111589
>>30111702

>>30112091
the network is designed to only do that, retard. Of course it can do it fast, it's a pure currency when reps vote on txs as fast as possible to reach finalty.

This is the ONLY design for a scalable currency, BTFO

>>30112159
all FUD, or just false facts. top kek you are convincing no one, LITERALLY NO ONE

>>30106853
>Nano is wide open for spam attacks. The last attack to crash the Nano network had basically no costs. Pic.

how does nano make money?

>>30112216
Cope

transaction go whooosh

>>30111225
>same typical jpg
>checked
>same "Nano is a scam and you know it" line
>checked

>>30106853
>>30112175
>>30112213
You are so stupid that you don't even understand Vitalik's tweet to normies. He is talking about TWO NODES, meaning not decentralized but centralized vaporware functioning as a computer and not as a blockchain.

>scalable
Are you insane? Nano is not free, can't scale, and is wide open to spam attacks. Nano's claim in their whitepaper about unlimited scaling is absolutely rubbish. It's just as crazy as me stating that I will go the moon using my bicycle, proudly claiming that my speed is unlimited, only restricted by my muscle strength and I am getting stronger and stronger for each day, and very soon I will be strong enough to get such a high speed that I will jump to the moon. Ridiculous. Do they have any written plan for 100 000 TPS? Any cost analysis? ETH and other competitors will roll out 100K to 1 million TPS in a matter of months/year.

Nano has done zero cost analysis for 100 000 TPS bandwidth, CPU, and IO. Random volunteers are supposed to take costs involving millions of USD each year, working on the network 24/ with no downtime, holidays, Christmas etc. Nano has done nothing to provide how it is feasible for Nano to reach 100 000 TPS within the next years. However, imagining it's possible, Nanoids admits that Amazon and large operators like them will take all the costs and burdens of operating the system. That's a clear and open single point of failure (SPOF) and is the very reason why people choose crypto currencies over banks and centralized payment systems. That Nano is not able to identify a clear and basic SPOF in their system is worrisome on multiple levels.

Pic Nano hodler getting assraped since January 2018 by the Nano Devs, Italian scammers, and the market, buying some more, while screaming:
"2 da moooOooooooOooon!!!"

>>30112259
>>30112262
Nano scammers are unable to debunk anything. All you have is ad hominem and hysteria. Your vaporware shitcoin is going to zero and your devs are pathological liars and scammers. Deal with it.

>>30112377
there are 200-500 nodes doing the consensus retard, that's factual. It scales with representatives hardware and internet, it does by ORV design retard. Same lines "nano has done zero cost analysis for 100 000 TPS bandwidth" lmao...

Stop FUDing like a retard, you had 2 years ffs

>>30112505
Vitalik was talking about your lying devs 7000 tps lie, psycho. How stupid are you Nanoid scammer?

>>30106853
Nano 1c EOY

>>30112505
>It scales with representatives hardware and internet,
It does not moron. It has structural failures. That's why you idiot dev can't even muster 10% today of what they lied about in late 2017.

>>30112578
Nano reached 1500 CPS on live main net, decentralized and all. Transactions go whoosh, enjoy spamming the network, normies buy the coin, it's going to 100 this cycle. You are a money hating retard

Cope.

>coin I hold starts getting shilled with girl pics
that's it, it's over, I'm selling all my bags

>>30112621
Only for a very short time, right? Not sustainable for a longer period. Plus, as a Nano investor, you are so stupid that you clearly believe CPS is the same as TPS. It is not.

Nano scammers realized that providing 5% of what they lied about in 2017 was pathetic and would definitely scare away normies, so they implemented CPS to hide it. 2 CPS = 1 TPS, so what you Nanoid scammer is bragging about is only 750 TPS, roughly 10% of what they lied about in 2017. Worse, that is only peak and not sustainable.

>>30112025
>decentralized
Are you insane? So how large a portion of the initial Nano distribution did Colin and his friends have? 60%? 70%? Any question regarding hard data related to Nano's initial distribution will get you insta-banned on discord, plebbit etc. They moved millions around on Bitgrail, both before and after bankruptcy. Colin refuses to answer any questions and giving empirical data regarding distribution, and he and his friends have been dumping Nano into oblivion since Jan 2017

Colin said he would release a financial statement for Nano Foundation some months ago. Of course, he lied. At least he now is saying a big fuck you to the desperate and moronic Nano community publicly. He is using Nano Foundation's money in private lawsuits, slushing money to George Coxon - buying her crashed companies and paying corruption money to Espen Enger, so he would protect them from any lawsuit from the Bitgrail Victim group.

>>30112762
though it's completely sustainable... some dude spammed the network for weeks and it worked well with perceived slowdown for users. Tx still sent/received in <1s. I know it, I was there, don't have to believe retards on this board.

+ You are retarded, CPS is much stronger than TPS because it's transaction with finalty. NANO CPS = BTC TPS. Almost the same... Worst FUD kek

>>30106853

Nano is doing great I am gonna date her after my gains from Mochimo.org and Nano and also DAO

>>30113076
>>30113318
No, you have never ever had a full-scale spam attack. You have had some super weak 100-200 tps attacks and a multitude of your nodes went offline, stopped to synch etc. Your shit tech does not work. Pure vaporware.

>You are retarded, CPS is much stronger than TPS
You are a tech-illiterate moron. "Stronger" what the hell are you talking about?
>NANO CPS = BTC TPS. Almost the same... Worst FUD kek
You idiots are not competing with BTC. That's old tech but proven to be secure, unlike Nano. You have not earned BTC's secure reputation, not even close. You idiots must realize that you are competing with the best new tech in crytpo and they are beating the hell out of your crashed vaporware tech.

Nano's tech is crashed and will never ever be a global currency with 200-600 tps, wide open for spam attacks. Minium for a global currency is 100 000 tps, Visa has 65 000 tps and is not calibrated for serving the unbanked and micro-payments.

Constellation has zero fees and has solved the scaling problem. Only those with mass usage must pay the nodes, while private citizens have no fee on their transactions. Thus they also have avoided the spam problem. Unlike crashed tech trainwreck Nano.

Solana can do 50 000 tps and the average free per transaction is $0.00001. Fees are not a problem.
https://solana.com/

Disclaimer, I have no Solana as I did not like their distribution.

Bitgrail trustees are ready to dump 4 million Nano on the market. That shit will go back to sub 1 USD and then just fizzle away.


Even former Nano core dev Zack Shapiro has no faith in this shitcoin. He explains in pic why Nano is unable to compete with BTC, and will fail. Nano is a scam.

>>30113076
>some dude spammed the network for weeks and it worked well with perceived slowdown for users
Insane lie. It took virtually nothing to cripple your Nano network and make it unusable. And this with virtually zero load on your network. There is no way in hell Nano will be a global currency ever.

>>30111589
here comes the resident nanofudder with his 50 posts of debunked horseshit

>>30114067
>debunked horseshit
Try to debunk a single post, Nano scammer. Do it. You are the most nasty and stupid community in crypto. No wonder as most of you are scammers from the retarded and now-defunct Bitconnect community. Pic related.

>>30114272
you know exactly what you're doing, it's called gish gallop
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gish_gallop
so no, I don't intend to engage in rational debate with someone who is arguing in bad faith (and coincidentally lost a shitton on bitgrail lmao). if the network is so shitty and it takes nothing to cripple it, DO IT FAGGOT, short it and bust it right now and prove yourself right.
>inb4 your bullshit "altruism" copout
you're pathetic

>>30114418
That's why I said find ONE post that you can debunk. Surely you can do that Nano scammer. Ryte? YOU are debating in bad faith, knowing perfectly well that you will just ramble on about the facts presented have been debunked, and just present the lie and then just run the hell away giving some sad excuse why you can't give a single link or debunking. Pathetic Nano scammer. You are by far the worst community in crypot. Pic related.

>>30112025
>decentralized
Insane statement. Nano has some of the worst distribution in crypto. For many, Nano Foundation dumping Nano worth 300 000 USD on Nano bagholders each month sounds insane. Well, not so much when Colin is using funds from Nano Foundation to fight private messy divorce and slander accusations in court.
https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cacd.746752/gov.uscourts.cacd.746752.1.0.pdf

Has Colin completely lost it? Insane statement in a legal document:
> (In layman's terms, at present, it [Nano] is the Cadillac of cryptocurrency.)
>On 28 January 31, 2018, the periodical Medium declared that it "is objectively the best pure cryptocurrency"

After dumping like a madman, Colin claims to have only 5-6 million Nano left.
Colin is angry that confidential information were leaked from this lawsuit and confidential settlement agreement:
https://decrypt.co/6396/nano-cryptocurrency-seeks-dismissal-170-million-rescue-fork-lawsuit

From Nano Foundations/Colins lawsuit:
>They tell their customers 'if you really believe in Nano ..... go to this small exchange in Italy that we don't know anybody and we have nothing to do but we completely vouch for him and he's running a legitimate exchange', we're gonna [sic] give him the Nano, he's gonna [sic] give us money every time he sells a Nano, he's gonna [sic] take half and we're gonna take half, we're gonna [sic] get rich and then one day there's gonna [sic] be an exit scam and then you're gonna [sic] be out $150 million."
> Mr. LeMahieu and the other Nano developers face the prospect of a jail sentence in a current Federal action

>>30114650
>one post:
let me start with the first one then.
>>30111589
your claim:
>Nano foundation shuts down nodes they don't like through a backdoor and/or exploit
the node in question was shut down through an open RPC port and literally anyone, including you and me, could have taken it down because it was inappropriately configured. therefore this is not a backdoor, just the spammer failed to configure his own node. your claim that this was done by someone from NF is speculation at best, therefore consistent with your gish gallop strategy. I know this might be hard for you but if you apply some logic, if the spammer knew he will be shut down by NF like that, he would simply continue to do it to prove that they are indeed shutting him down after configuring his RPC port appropriately. guess why it didn't happen and the spam is continuing even as we speak, but the network is handling it perfectly.

you also didn't answer my question
>if the network is so shitty and it takes nothing to cripple it, DO IT FAGGOT, short it and bust it right now and prove yourself right.
why don't you do it? why doesn't literally anyone do it?

are yo makingtrying to talk about the income of erc20 tokens? saw gas? such abnormal fees against Apollo's native blockchain, you fuckers

>>30112025
>>30115000
>"Uhhhhh Nano, the CEO and the head guy at Nano [guess he is talking about Zack Shapiro] who holds 90% of the Nano at like $15 it was worth $1.4 billion, I think it's down to like $4, so I think it's only worth like $400,000,000 now. Uhhh, he got divorced from his wife last year. He decided that he was ready. He deserved better because he was now rich. She took all the money. And then, the financial affidavit, she, they, argued about how much the Nano was worth and what the Nano was. But I will tell you this: he said it had value and he said that he believed it was going up and he believed it was a security cause [sic] he put it on his security side of the affidavit."

Coline whined and demanded this information not to be made public. However his claim is absurd:
>Mr. LeMahieu is a private citizen.
A CEO of a foundation that at one point in time had a multi-billion dollar market cap and hundreds of thousands of "investors" is not a "private citizen".

>>30115115
Cope