/biz/ - Business & Finance

If it's the real bitcoin, why isn't it just called bitcoin? check and mate

>>29983462
it is called bitcoin. the exchange cucks named it wrongly

>>29983408
Craig told you not to hodl bsv. Spend your bsv now and help build the bsv economy, loser

>>29983462
>>29983513
>>29983574
only green ID
That is what it means to make it, to hold Bitcoin Satoshi Vision

>>29983815
You're not supposed to just "hold" Bitcoin Satoshi Vision. Spend your BSV now!

Yes I do, it is about to break 50k again

roll green

>>29983408
Craig is a con artist
his claims are invalid
can't wait for him to go to prison and get sued to death while he is there.
gonna start filtering these threads.

>>29983574
no he didn't, he said to build something to make it grow, not to spend for the sake of it
he's hodling millions of bsv

X5 FOR SOME WEEKS, THAT IS ABOUT PEARL ENQ

>these faggotsidiots can’t realize it and still try to mine their trash shitcoins
>I am not a tard who believes in this shill
>multiminer that is future for everybody

>>29983574
>>29983967
yeah.
mainly because when you did hodl this piece of shit, you might start noticing its 50%+ less worth than you paid for the trash

>>29984231
He told you it's not a hodl coin and to stop gambling on it. Spend your bsv now before Calvin dumps on you again, idiot.

>>29984509
i'm not giving away bitcoin at this price anon

>>29983408
Reminder that

BTC is 10x from March 2020
BSV is -30% from March 2020

>>29984950
that means BSV will 500x from now on, to catch up with the fake bitcoin

>>29984950
what chart are you looking at
it's up more than 2x
at least compare it to the dollar like you're doing with btc you unscrupulous faggot

>>29984876
The real BitCoin is not for hodling you stupid asshole. If you are hodling then you aren't helping the BitCoin economy!

>>29985163
BSV was at a high of $260 in March 2020. It's literally at $180 right now..

How is that 2x? Are BSV bagholders really this stupid?

>>29985033
cope

>>29985533
oh so you're being unscrupulous again, btc only 5x since then
faggot

>>29985804
>BTC is either 5x or 10x from march 2020 local low
>BSV is either -30% or 2x from march 2020 local low

The market decided bro. Nobody believes in Craig. I'm so fucking sorry.

Maybe tell your boss to spend more time signing using the satoshi keys and less time trying to bully people using lawyers. But he might fire you if you question him on that.

>>29985804
hes also not mentioning, bsv is near 60% down on last years high.

>>29986077
cope poorfag. you will miss out on bitcoin, TWICE

>>29987293
so, by your use of the tiresome non-response 'cope', I take it you then have no actual argument or excuse as to why this piece of shit should be plunging in value?
The market has spoken.
Your coin is trash.
enjoy poverty.

>>29983408
Yeap I am
21 for now
210 if BTC goes back up

>>29983408
>an actor
>a shitty one at that....

>>29987934
context, link, anything ?

>>29988595
its from 'The Satoshi Affair' by Andrew O'Hagan, as commissioned by nChain themselves. Somewhat unwisely.

>>29989003
So no context then.
I mean why in the world would N-Cahin publish a book that shows that Craig is not who he says he is. Calvin has said he spent millions on investigating if Craig Wright was actually Satoshi.
Find it hard to believe that quote is the full context.

>>29989643
>no context
so go read the fucking thing you womble, its only a longform article rather than a book. nChain commissioned this originally as part of their PR campaign to 'launch Satoshi'. tbf, I doubt they either knew at that point, O'Hagan was this good a journo, or that creg was such an obvious fraud flake. I think it was shortly after the failed BBC proof session, from which the article dates, creg started holding scissors to his neck and threatening self-harm should he be forced into further attempts at public signing demos. At that point, a wiser man than Calvin may well have decided, his '$30m decision' was indeed a write-off.

>>29990197
So please explain to me how your snippet proves he is not Satoshi ?

Then explain to me why he filed Bitcoin on his 2009 tax returns and how he owned the Bitcoin.com domain in 2007.

>>29990367
>he owned the Bitcoin.com
let me guess, he lost the password?
was this the domain he 'proved' he owned with a forged receipt that included products that didn't yet exist, or, was that another one entirely? As to his Tax Returns, afaik, there were people in Australia still wishing to discuss those further with him. They were in the process of raiding his house when he fled. tldr, he's full of shit, end of.

>>29990639
>was this the domain he 'proved' he owned with a forged receipt that included products that didn't yet exist, or, was that another one entirely?
Proof please

>As to his Tax Returns, afaik, there were people in Australia still wishing to discuss those further with him.
Again, proof. From like this year. not 2015.
You haven't kept up with it have you ??

>>29991228
>hold scissors to neck and scweamss NOOOO!!!
I've got nothing I need to prove. Why don't you go ask creg to PROVE he's Satoshi instead? Publicly, inarguably? Instead of running round trying to scam Gox scam wallets now - like, wtf. Its not like, it take anyone else more than 5 minutes to do. BUT, they'd need to actually have the keys first. Wouldn't they.

hate kikes

what about a fun flight from planet earth when the GSX does x10 ??
doDO NOT spend your effort on erc20 tokens, if you want money - join GSX and receive $$$

>>29991484
You may not like Craig Wright, but he signed with Satoshi’s keys to Gavin Andresen with a freshly unboxed laptop and did similar signings for Jon Matonis, Ian Grigg, Stefan Matthews and Calvin Ayre - none of which would be easy to fool, and none of which have retracted their claims.
The direct successor of Satoshi Nakamoto as lead developer on the Bitcoin project was Gavin Andresen.
Gavin Andersen explicitly said that Craig Wright signed a message using the private key from Block #1 of Bitcoin. Time was spent on a careful cryptographic verification of messages signed with keys that only Satoshi should possess.
So who do we trust? A 4chan anon or the lead developer of Bitcoin BTC?
https://youtu.be/gTPcm4zCJIg?t=6

>>29991742
>A freshly unboxed laptop
After refusing to sign on Andresen's, because..?
And where did this 'freshly unboxed laptop' come from?
Oh. An nChain assistant produced it! In Covent Garden, at 18:00. Good Assistant!
Andresen also later admitted he was probably 'bamboozled'
Now, If I wanted to prove I was Satoshi?
I would sign publicly. No rabbits, hats or bullshit.

>>29992092
>After refusing to sign on Andresen's, because..?
LOL really ?

>And where did this 'freshly unboxed laptop' come from?
From the store.

>Andresen also later admitted he was probably 'bamboozled'
Did he deny Craig was satoshi ? Nope.
This was after he got his Github credentials taken away the next day and harrased for month with actual death threats for the video I showed here. In the end he never denied Craig Was Satoshi.

Now do Jon Matonis, Ian Grigg, Stefan Matthews and Calvin Ayre.

>Now, If I wanted to prove I was Satoshi? I would sign publicly. No rabbits, hats or bullshit.
Who cares what you would do. Craig won't and can't sign for many reasons. One of which is the fact that it would put him in contempt of court if it affected the price of BTC in the Kleiman case.
and that is just one reason.
Here are a BUNCH more.
https://youtu.be/dC0wwFJ7cHM

>>29987693
>>29988595
>>29989643
>>29990367
>>29991228
>>29991742
t. mental defective loser

>>29992474
Bottom line is that nobody believes Craig is Satoshi and nobody is going to believe him since he's lied so many times already.

>>29992474
>put him in contempt of court
horseshit - not like, he hasn't already been sentenced to jail for contempt, or anything. cregs respect for courts knows no beginning. A trait which will prove costly, latest rest of Kleiman trial. Assuming he even bothers showing. Which he probably shouldn't, given he can only make shit worse.

>>29992659
>>29992572
So no proof. Got ya

> been sentenced to jail for contempt
citation please

>A trait which will prove costly, latest rest of Kleiman trial. Assuming he even bothers showing. Which he probably shouldn't, given he can only make shit worse.
LMFAo ok . The tears will be delicious. The Klieman's already said he has the keys..
Mr. Blockstream troll.

>>29993046
tiresome, people demanding proof all the time. Isn't it.
You obviously know enough about this to know, all this is true anyway. Why bother.

>>29993046
he can't even post on bitcointalk....thats how much of a fraud he is....

>>29983408
Shouldn't this guy be investigating the murder of Laura Palmer?

>>29993616
You are kidding right ?
But people like TillKoeln run scam after scam after scam on there.. ad infinitum.
Please it's politics.

>>29983408
I am the real Satoshi Nakamotor

follow dex for Justliquidity
don’t make quick push
>put 500$ on farming
>waited a month
>increase to 1500$ staking pools
fees so low, rofl don’t cry about gas on erc

>>29993526
Ah ok. I didn't know that. I'd have to read the whole court records to decide.
I do know he worked many year on Blacknet and wasn't happy with the outcome.