/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>29143208
It's not too late anon, BNB will get to $500 minimum

>"binance" "chinese communist party"
In crypto where the name of the game is coordinated groups manipulating uncoordinated groups. Because you are part of the uncoordinated group, you need to learn to examine things and predict outcomes in a cold and logical way, on an individual level.

Even pol and gif, where people are too busy being racist and jerking off to worry about shills getting their money (instead of just their time), have a constant and instant awareness of this stuff

>>29143397
>>29143543
Seethe

>>29143397
>>29143543
>>29143208
>>29143328
>>29143208
>>29143602
Oops forgot about IDS

Biz gets more "honey" than "spice" because of the expectation that victims will literally send them money. People are better at dealing with adversity, or spice, than honey. The kind of person who sees his millionth "BLACK COCK PLOWS YOUR WHITE GIRLBOI ANUS" thread on gif and recognizes that actual black people are not to blame for the threads, can waltz into biz, see a "ETH IS DEAD BOIS IM MAKING BANK SUCKING CENTRALIZED GLOBODICK MMM MMMMHMMM YUMMM" and be totally unprepared for it. The honey is, I am becoming rich, and you will become rich too. The spice is a banal inversion. It is softer and sweeter than the kind of shilling that happens elsewhere. Only the coming pink wojaks, and focused humiliation, will help these ones learn the lesson.

I'm saving your posts for a Binance Shill Hindsight general once bnb does what it is destined to do and the victims are in a more impoverished and impressionable state.

Schizo thread

>>29143712
>doesn't know how ID's work
It's me you jackass I am posting as the OP because I am him, bumping my thread.

>>29144261
>>29143602
>>29143328
Once you have seen it once you have seen it a million times. There are keywords for punishments that get used when trying to crack consensus against posts like mine. They call it schizo, as per that strategy, but it is simple pattern recognition and they are banking on your social instincts to override the intellectual process within you.

>>29144288
>>29144495
Yes I am OP samefagging

Personally, I think the pajeets do it better than the chinks as there is a sort of mutual understanding between uncoordinated posters and pajeets that the token in question is a p&d, and you are gambling on the timing. The western contractor method is different and less cooperative. They literally just assume you are stupid, insult you when you are bad, and praise you when you are good, like a dog. Worst case senario they crash your thread with abusive images because it is persisting and it is in their interest to have you associate "undesirable thoughts" with horrible images. The pajeets really, spiritually, are better. I hope their country eats the ccp's foot off.

>>29144893
Sure. No one writes the way I do so it's kind of useless. It's because compared to you I am a powerhouse of streamed consciousness and I already know exactly what I am trying to say, and how I will say it, before I even begin. It produces identifiably unique and genuine posts whereas you can only produce short neg retorts and pre-established meme phrases.

>"Control is key

>Unstated but implicit in Mu’s comments is that a two-tiered digital currency system would not lessen the state’s control of China’s economy. The PBOC digital currency would remain a central bank currency “guaranteed by the central bank’s credit,” he said. It would not affect the way existing monetary policy is implemented, or “have a negative impact on the real economy.”

>Nor would it impact existing “anti-money laundering” (AML) or “countering the financial of terrorism” (CFT) regulations, asserted Mu.

>Finally, Mu also contended that “commercial institutions will pay the full amount and 100% of the reserve to the People’s Bank of China.”"

https://modernconsensus.com/regulation/asia-australia/chinese-central-banker-says-digital-yuan-coming-soon/

https://modernconsensus.com/regulation/asia-australia/binance-official-chinese-stablecoin-close/

These comments made 1.5 years ago. Tree is close to bearing fruit.

>>29145562
If you think the Chinese Communist Party just "let binance go" and that it's a-ok now, and you not involved in an attempt to siphon your money to their backyard pool, you are being ignorant and are rewarding a small group of people for making bold moves against you based on the theory that it doesn't matter because you are too stupid. It works pretty well, too. It's really sad.

https://blockonomi.com/binance-beijing-office/

>When Binance launched in 2017, it was headquartered in China — the long-time home of an array of leading Bitcoin startups, including Bitmain.

>But, when the country announced that it had intentions to ban cryptocurrency trading, the now prominent cryptocurrency upstart moved a majority of its operations out of China in search of greener pastures. It eventually settled in the “blockchain island” of Malta, where regulations around cryptocurrency firms, namely exchanges, are a lot more clear and relatively lax.

Consider the above links showing 2019 chinese announcements of interest in digital yuan conversion and expansion of control. Imagine thinking the financial control freaks running China just "let binance go its merry way" right before deciding to go in this direction. I want to laugh but NOT ENOUGH OF YOU ARE LAUGHING WITH ME and that is just plain depressing.

>>29144897
that just means pajeets are better at psywarfare than whites

https://cryptobriefing.com/sec-chinese-crypto-threat-us/

>The U.S. Director of National Intelligence has reportedly written to the SEC airing concerns over China’s influence in the digital currency space.

>Chinese President Xi Jinping has long advocated for blockchain technology’s disruptive potential. In October 2019, he delivered a speech outlining his intentions to “embrace digital finance” as part of a move to gain an “edge over other major countries.”

Shit does not happen in a vacuum. Come on biz.

I don't have anything against chinese people but I would never invest in a business based in China.
I buy chinese products because they're cheap and work fine for a little while but I would never and I mean NEVER put my money in chinese hands.

Scams have evolved but the economy has not, you can't save everyone OP.

>>29147394
No it just I like them better, specifically because they are worse at it, because they approach you as a real human they are trying to scam. Also you misunderstand what I mean by "western contractors" but the identity of the cogs in the machine is pol talk and I am talking about the biz side of it; uncoordinated posters on biz being scammed into a centralized project by shills and wash volume.

>>29147789
Same. I can't blame anyone for being the race their born, but I won't let that stop me from criticizing groups that are born this way or that either. People try to conflate that with racism and I am so far from caring anymore. I just want to help other people get a clue and race narratives are only a barrier to that. Makes pol-like sentiments easy for simple people to adopt and spread but it weighs things down for people who care about groups and motives based exclusively on power.