/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>28946203
Nano is a scam you know it.

Yea i got into crypto so I could touch dirty ass ATMs like a fucking pigeon. I got a phone, don't need an ATM. Do people in the UK have phones?

>>28946203
Nano is a scam and you know it.
>>/biz/thread/S28856161

>>28947172
fuck off scam spam bot. the only scams are the coins charging fees for people to send their own money
>>/biz/thread/S28923017

>>28947647
all the salty replies. fucking kek. miningfags mad.
NANO IS INEVITABLE

I summon the hex bot

>>28947647
Having a "business plan" where volunteers take all the work and costs is a scam.

Having a network wide open to spam, due to no fees, is a scam

Lying through your teeth (Nano team officially) about 7000 tps, reality 75 tps, and later only able to produce 750 tps, is a scam

750 tps as a globel currency for micropayments is a joke and will never function in the real world. You need at least 100 000 tps, Visa has 65 000 tps, and you know it. You Nano scammers know perfectly well that there is no way in hell your shitcoin and crashed tech will be a global currency. It is empirically impossible

You scammers lie through your teeth about Mastercard VP endorsing Nano, pushed by Nano officially, when in reality it was just a small middle manager in a branch office that mildly supported your shitcoin, clearly ignorant of your 750 tps only and wide open for spam problem.

>>28947986
cry harder fag. the market disagrees (classic maxi axiom)

>>28948100
Your Nano team just transferred 2MM Nano to binance. Bitgrail trustees are ready to dump 4MM Nano on the market anytime. Your shitcoin will go to zero.

>>28948194
the coins are still there, retard. now fuck off
https://nanocrawler.cc/explorer/account/nano_3uip1jmeo4irjuua9xiyosq6fkgogwd6bf5uqopb1m6mfq6g3n8cna6h3tuk/history

>>28948194
>Bitgrail trustees
the funds will be paid out in fiat, just like Mt Gox. it's in everyone's best interest for the price to rise, Mt Gox still hasn't paid back everything. it will take years, meanwhile NANO will go ballistic.

>>28946203
>>28947647
>>28947781
>>28948100
Nano scammers spammed the hell out of Plebbit, Facebook, and /biz/ claiming that Mastercard endorsed Nano. Nothing could be further from the truth. It was just a low-ranking Mastercard employee (Mastercard have at least 3200 VPs and 1000 Executive VPs) that said something mildly positive about Nano. It's just as retarded as if a scammer group held shares in a beverage company called Coca Cuck and spammed that a Walmart VP was endorsing Coca Cuck, when in reality it was only the local Walmart manager that mildly said that he enjoyed a glass of Coca Cuck sometimes.

That is how shady and dishonest these Nano scammers are. No wonder, as even their devs/team have a long history of criminal activity and of lying through their teeth to existing and potential investors.

>>28948554
Of course Nano scammers lied on top of lies. There is no way in hell Nano can scale and handle thousands of tps.

>>28948554
no one claimed anything, idiot. retards inferred, that's the game. deal with it. go ahead and commence your spam dump, i'll be chillin watching my gainz.

>>28948554
>>28948705
Australia's local VP business Mastercard suddenly added this to his LinkedIn:

>Disclaimer: My views expressed are of my own.

>>28948262
>>28948515
You're an idiot. They have already sold BTC and ETH, Nano is next. Mt Gox belongs to a totally different legal system. You can't compare. No, you can demand payment in fiat (Euro) or crypto. Are you idiot not informed at all?

>>28946203
>>28947647
Only reason why anyone has heard about Nano is that they lied about Nano having 7000 tps (reality was 1% of promised tps) when BTC network was clogged in late 2017. Worse Nano has the absurd business model that they can get suckers to run the network for free, zero compensation whatsoever, and thus have zero fees. Works well when NOBODY is using the crashed tech network. However, if you ask how much it will cost in CPU, IO, bandwith, hardware etc to run a global network on their plebbit page, /r/NanoCircleJerk, you will be banned within seconds. Same if you ask anything related to their crashed tech, cost analysis for a global network based on volunteers taking all the costs, swindle, corruption and scam. Nano provides zero real-world transparency.

>>28946203
>>28947647
>>28949026
The sad reality behind the vile 7000 tps claim from Nano scammer devs, Jewish grifters and Italian swindlers, was 75 tps. Even today, two years later, Nano scammers can't even muster 10% of what they claimed in 2017.

>>28948716
You Nano fags tried to scam with lies again. Deal with it, scammer.

>>28946203
>>28947647
All you Nano scammers have is criminal and lying devs, plus a horrific shitcoin of a tech trainwreck Nano is wide open for spam attacks, due to your feeless transactions, i.e. volunteers taking all the costs for no reason. No wonder Nano's hysterical core dev Colin is threatening to sue anyone who stress test or spam test Nano. Pic. There is a reason why Nano is not on Coinbase, despite being a fellow US project.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=423.msg3819#msg3819
NANO IS INEVITABLE

>>28950747
So after Nano has been documented as a scam [1], by lying criminal devs and an utter crashed tech and business plan that will never ever funcion in real life (only as a small hobby project with zero load on the network), all you Nano idiot have is spamming the thread with pics. Are you dirty Nano scammers not ashamed?

[1] >>/biz/thread/S28856161