/biz/ - Business & Finance

Labz??
Skadoosh???
Where are you all?

>masternode scams in 2021
>DASH FORK
>Can't run smart contracts
>posw rugpullers
>3 years and open beta still months away
>3 more years till hydra
>holding $0.40 stablecoin during a bull run
>aggrigator is just the dex linked to the devs personal binance account

M-Mr. StakeNeet please. Spare me some stakies for my village. I still time to acclamated more.
>Scam
>Posw
>Dash fork

>>28682172
Finally, I was waiting a while you know. You're not getting paid for nothing goi.
>>28682213
Kek

>>28682278
>banking on a bitfinix larp from 4chan
>new 4chan larping as an insider, about more liquidity partners

Stakies smoking the hopium

>>28682572
>banking on a bitfinix larp from 4chan
I never said it was bitfinex. But there is indeed liquidity provider partnerships.

>>28682213
nice aggumulate mor, ebin. Berish $0 EOY :DDDDDD

>>28682661

fagot where's the good price?

>>28683221
When did I ever mention this larp in any of my posts?
>>28683240
Shut the fuck up cunt, you're always posting this shit. Just fucking wait to dex release, this isn't a pump and dump project. Now be a good boy and use this time to accumulate more then fuck off.

why are you keeping the price, fagots?

>>28683327

3 more years to wait for the fucker?

No one is ever going to use your shitty DEX. Yield farming is much too profitable.

How much volume is your "DEX" doing. You know, the one that's been out for like 4 years?

>>28683398
Just market sell. I'm sure a lot of people are hoping to scoop up cheap stakies.
>>28683445
Yield farming is a meme. Owning a money printer is better than any yield farm and masternodes already provide 13% Per year just from block rewards.
>You know, the one that's been out for like 4 years?
You mean the one that's been in open beta for 5 or so months?
>How much volume is your "DEX" doing.
>https://orderbook.stakenet.io/monitor/xsn_btc
This week
>$ 776,796.76 USD
This month so far
>$ 1,113,867.06 USD
I'll say it's doing pretty good, considering it's still in beta.

forgot to mention that the devs rugged with PoSW?

>>28683760
You mean saved the investors by taking over and doing a token swap instead of having an ico?

>>28683576
>I'll say it's doing pretty good, considering it's still in beta.
trying to scam newbs that it's actual volume, and not just bots "stress testing" by the devs. Fuck off scammers.

>>28683803
>You mean saved the investors by taking over and doing a token swap instead of having an ico?
>rugs a project
>starts a new project by "swapping" from the rugged project
>*saved investors*
interesting logic

>>28683816
>he doens't know what bot trading makes up majority of all trading volume
Unlike uniswap and other 'dexs' stakenet can actually support high frequency trades because it's on layer 2 which has no gas fees.
>implying HFT aren't real trades
Kys

>>28683816
And also no one questions the fact that this stress testing is only done though one node. It’s literally pointless to continue trading back and forth hundreds of times in one node. We know that works already.

We want stress testing of 1000 different channels, on 100 different nodes. But we all know that’s not gonna happen

team is highly versed in scamming though

>>28683760
>tfw my three masternodes probably won't be enough to make Ulyana my cutie gf.
Feels bad man.

>>28683905
>Unlike uniswap and other 'dexs' stakenet can actually support high frequency trades because it's on layer 2 which has no gas fees.
It can't support any of those. You're claiming vaporware as current releases. No fees? Pretty delusional there
>open channel
>rent channel
>close channel
I guess these are all free? Also it costs gas to add from L1 to L2 you imbecile.

>>28683890
>posw
Kys faggot

https://medium.com/stakenet/stakenet-ama-part-iii-5ee01fd545e3
>Q: Could you clear up the FUD about POSW?

>A: POSW was a business started in early 2016 as centralised Staking website and exchange. It listed many PoS coins people could store on the website and use it as a centralised exchange too. Late 2016 the POSW team decided they wanted their own coin that would be listed on the website and used on the exchange. For this they contracted X9 to develop, build and maintain the POSW coin.

>X9 did as they were contracted too and built the blockchain in late 2016 for the client (POSW). X9 had no involvement in any other activities of POSW such as the Staking website and exchange. The blockchain they were commissioned to build was just a basic PoS Coin so it didn’t have Masternodes, Trustless PoS (TPoS), governance and other features that came once X9 took over.

>POSW had an ICO for the POSW coin once complete, details and much of the history of POSW can be found here on Bitcointalk: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1695121.0

>X9’s only responsibility at this point in late 2016 and early 2017 was to maintain the POSW blockchain which they were contracted for.

>Around April/May 2017 POSW started having issues with maintaining and managing their Staking website and exchange. They were struggling to keep up with wallet updates for all the coins they had listed and this meant customers were struggling to withdraw their coins from the exchange. Security was always an issue as it was centralised meaning you had to trust POSW with your assets. As the problems grew the founder and owners of POSW essentially gave up trying to keep it running and updated.

>>28683890
>>28684067
>At this point some community members rallied in an effort to keep it alive and X9 started formulating plans and ideas of their own project to push their visions of blockchain tech while they continued to support the POSW blockchain.

>By late 2017 X9 had decided instead of starting from scratch it would be better to build their vision on the POSW blockchain as they had already gained the support of a fairly large community and one of the hardest parts about starting a project in this industry is community building. By already having a community in place it allowed them to start off strong with their support and allowed them to negotiate to take over the POSW website and community channels from the previous owners. Also worth noting that even though POSW had an ICO, X9 were not part of that as they were just contracted to build the blockchain. As such with the takeover any funds raised by POSW during the ICO were not passed along to X9 so they started with a zero balance treasury as the treasury system that was added to XSN had not been implemented at that stage.

>X9 quickly set to work making the blockchain upgrades and eventually completing a chainswap of POSW to XSN in early 2018 and have continued to work on XSN ever since.

>>28683942
>1 node fud
Kys

>https://orderbook.stakenet.io/monitor/xsn_btc
>NUMBER OF CONNECTED NODES
>20

>>28683999

>>28684067
Wall of text to dodge. Notice how they've aligned themselves as "contractors" on XSN as well, and "cannot be held liable for anything"? Exact same thing happened with PoSW. Anyone can still look up the team here: http://posw.io/

>>28683999
Checked nice digits. We all want a cute virgin anon. I'm hoping the linkmarines can do something about this through smart contracts.
>>28684066
>nooo the volume is fake, it's all bots
>noooo it cant support bots

>open channel
>leave channel open
Wow imagine my shock learning you're a fucking retard.

>costs gas to add from L1 to L2 you imbecile.
Pay the gas fee once, then just deposit straight to layer 2....

>>28684252
>noooooo POSW
>SCAM
>noooo don't refute my lies and 'fud'
Kys

>>28684252
>>costs gas to add from L1 to L2 you imbecile.
>Pay the gas fee once, then just deposit straight to layer 2....
You pay gas for every refill from L1 to L2. You don't seem to even understand how this is supposed to work. ______Even if you have a channel open on L2, it costs gas to move more funds from L1 to that L2 channel_______

>>28684425
You replied to the wrong post.

No you don't, with connext you can deposit straight to layer 2. So if you have funds on a cex when you withdraw you can put it straight to your layer 2 address. Lightning network is different but this issue will fixed with submarine swaps. Connext only requires 1 channel which you can top up.

How much longer do you guys expect to be waging? I just got my first job and haven't even started yet, yet I'm already looking forward to retiring soon.

>>28684660
>he isn't already a neet
Anon 12 nodes here. Once we hit $1 im making over $400 usd a week.

How does dex release sound? We will pump hard.

>>28684725
> tfw can't be a neet anymore because I literally spent all of my money on masternodes.
I'm glad you don't have to know this pain.

> How does dex release sound?
So about a month or two more. Very nice.

>>28684520
>So if you have funds on a cex when you withdraw you can put it straight to your layer 2 address.
in this scenario the CEX pays the fee. It's only "free", if the CEX doesn't charge withdrawal fees. If you deposit from you wallet to your Connext L2 channel, you will pay gas. This seems to be a common misconception within the XSN community.

>>28684946
Well at least you have some nodes anon. Honestly it's hard to say how high we'll go in price discovery. Although the amount of fud makes me bullish.
>>28684978
>pays gas once
>trade as much as you want
vs
>pay gas on each trade
Yeah i think i know which platform i'll rather use

>>28685022
Though you claimed refills are gas-free, which isn't the case.

>>28685103
If you're withdrawing from a cex it is.

>>28685174
>If you're withdrawing from a cex it is.
Only if the CEX doesn't charge withdrawal fees. Stop lying already.

>>28683221
the earliest post was in November and Bitfinex added XSN in January, this cannot be a coincidence since the project is 3 years old and Bitfinex had 3 years to list the coin

>>28685275
>stop lying
Coming from the guy spamming the posw crap. Kys.

And I though you were supposed to hate CEX's "and they become obsolete with XSN"? Now you're saying a part of the core functionality is tied to routing your money through a CEX (that doesn't charge withdrawal fees)?

>>28685300
>Coming from the guy spamming the posw crap. Kys.
None of that is lies, those are the facts. You've been caught lying multiple times in this very thread. Either you're blatantly trying to make this look better than it is (lying), or you simply don't understand how it's supposed to work.

>>28685359
>11 posts by this ID
i think you forgot to change your IP rajeesh

>>28685359
Never said that nigger. What happened to you posw spam?
>>28685448
I haven't lied, i never specifically said the things you are accusing me of. Now you on the other hand having been lying about the devs being scammer and spamming the posw crap.

>>28682028
>ask for FUD
>get absolutely BTFO you spend 17 posts seething
Kek. I love biz

>>28684254
>Pay the gas fee once, then just deposit straight to layer 2....
how is this not lying?

>>28683576
>You mean the one that's been in open beta for 5 or so months?
>>How much volume is your "DEX" doing.
>>https://orderbook.stakenet.io/monitor/xsn_btc
>This week
>>$ 776,796.76 USD
>This month so far
>>$ 1,113,867.06 USD
>I'll say it's doing pretty good, considering it's still in beta.
trying to insinuate that there is actual trading happening on the "DEX", when if fact it's just devs testing on 1 centralized node.

>>28685665
>btfo
>spam posw fud spamming faggot
Kys retard nigger.
>>28685786
>pays gas fee on withdrawal
>it goes straight to layer 2
>no more gas fees
Must be hard being a retard.

>>28685881
>trying to insinuate that there is actual trading happening on the "DEX", when if fact it's just devs testing on 1 centralized node.
Ip switching nigger confirmed. Wtf is this >>28683942 ???
You already got btfo here >>28684165

>>28685665
>20 posts seething now
Kek. Keep going opie

i sold my xsn to buy other shitcoins because it was crabbing and now the shitcoins are crabbing too and its hard to buy xsn

>>28686077
>replying to yourself
>2 post by this id
Cope harder retard.
>>28686193
>he sold xsn for shitcoins
Ngmi

>>28685899
>>pays gas fee on withdrawal
>>it goes straight to layer 2
>>no more gas fees
>Must be hard being a retard.
You initially claimed that after opening an L2 channel, deposits from L1 to that channel are free, which isn't true. You're either intentionally or unintentionally talking about a completely different scenario.

2.5 MN, will that be enough to make it?

Seems like you're having trouble grasping the concept, so maybe jopark can help.

>>28686654
Yes. You may need to wait for hydra though to 'make it'.
>>28686655
Already answered your shit earlier son.

>>28686655
imagine investing in a project that you reply 16 times to fud, you are probably holding posw and forgot to change it to xsn and are now salty about the project

Conclusion: XSN doesn't solve shit, and OP is a liar.

>>28687110
>17 post by this id
>posw fud
>masternode governance fud
Kys

>>28685786
Kind of obvious that you're just twisting his words.
It's clear he said that once it's on L2 you can trade without retarded gas fees. Gonna buy some just because of how desperately you try to fud.

>>28687110
What is this picture supposed conclude?
Dumb nigger, lmao.

>>28686850
Damnit, how long will I need to wait?

>>28688062
Hydra will probs come out this year, im hoping either q3 or q4. But if the price goes up enough you'll still make it before hydra from block rewards.

>>28688062
you wait as long as you have to but when it does run up it will be too late

>>28682028
>https://orderbook.stakenet.io/monitor/ltc_btc
Why are there 0 trades for the LTC orderbook?

>https://orderbook.stakenet.io/monitor/eth_btc
When are we going to see ETH<>BTC trades?

>https://orderbook.stakenet.io/monitor/xsn_eth
When are we going to see XSN<>ETH trades?

>https://orderbook.stakenet.io/monitor/usdt_xsn
When is XSN going to be tradable with USDT?

>https://orderbook.stakenet.io/monitor/btc_usdt
Why is USDT<>BTC trades inactive?

Please answer them honestly, no "soon" or changing goalposts.

>>28688803
>copy and paste from the other thread
Why do you do this?

>>28689175
>Doesn't answer my question
t. bags must be heavy

>>28689472
You questions were already answered in the previous thread. Clearly you're not asking them in good faith since you copy and pasted it in the other thread too.