/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>27779276
Yeah that should fix it, and it'll definitely go back up to $150 haha go for it bro

It’s not going to 150

>>27779276
you should sell and save the 16% you have left
it's not going back up

>>27779322
i will! heck if i buy enough shares at 50, i'll be in the green after everything averages out. thanks!

>>27779276
Is this actually how it works? I also bought in at 300..

>>27779276
You’ve increased your loss. You’re literally paying just to lose it.
>muhh average
Jesus what the fuck

>>27779322
wait a sec. why would i buy in at 50, if it could go down to 20 first? THEN when it goes back up i would only need a couple of shares to cover my loss. i wouldn't even need it to hit that high come to think of it

>>27780379
please stop trading

>>27779276
Just keep it as a reminder of how fucking dumb you were once.

>>27779416
buy high and sell low? maybe yeah. i think my idea might work too

>>27779276
depends on how much you bought or sold at each price.

Assuming you have just enough money to buy twice, once at 300 and once at 50, you lost 150 in value (300-150) and gained 100 in value (150-50), you actual lost 50 dollars in value assuming you bought 2 stocks

>>27781076
this is what i'm saying what better opportunity am i going to have? i just have to buy at this current price the number of shares i bought before. it's not the best, but it's something

>>27779276
GME will stabilize 40 dollar low and 60 dollar high.

If any good came from this faggotry it at least shook the short sellers and now is at an adequate valuation

>>27779276
Buy at $5 for a fuck load of shares. Then bring your per price down. When it moves a couple $$ in 2 years, sell it to break even.

>>27781691
ok but then that makes me even more confident. a 50 share when the max loss is another 10? i can't think of better insurance

>>27779276
you're a retard either way

>>27782041
thank you yes but
>>27781691 says it won't really go below 40 so this might be my best shot

>>27779276
What if instead you bought other stocks that will go up? That would decrease your loss significantly

I payed $250 to get an interest in trading and to increase my hatred for jews.

>>27779276
Just do the math retard lmao
1 Share = $300 when you bought
Hmmm I've lost over half of my investment lets buy more in at $50 to regain some loss
1 share = $50
So now you own 2 shares with an average buy in at around $175
I'm hoping that it "MAY, however UNLIKELY" that it will go to $150.
Sell both shares for $300 Total
So either you are out $350
Or if you get lucky you are out $50

>>27779327
>>27780292
>>27780584
>>27780678

>>27780067 i think these guys are just jealous that i figured out a way to make our money back

>>27779276
OP don't even thing about it, this is going south everyone gave up and you could see todays massive drop.

The day before everyone was holding and the dip was small, but now people are getting bored and dropping out.

The game changed when they stopped trading on the Thursday. That is when it ended

>>27782310
I'm listening... please continue with some sage stock advise, Sir.

>>27782515
we're saying the same thing but you're saying it like it's bad
>>27782310
if i knew which stocks would go up i wouldn't have found myself in this mess

>>27782650
I'll sell you my 137 shares for $1500, today only, Mr. Shekelstien.

>>27782775
I'm saying it factually.
Do you really think its going to moon back to $150?
Honest question.

>>27782881
i think if the worst thing that could happen is that is goes down to 40 it's worth the risk wouldn't you say?

>>27782865
I'm holding one share i got at 100, I know they rigged the game and it's over.

You can't fight the system that they control, I really hope you guys get some miracle that pumps your bags, but They know how to move the market anyway they choose, they have had decades to perfect it

>>27783155
>You can't fight the system that they control
That's true. But there's a limit to how much fuckery they can get away with before they shoot themselves in the foot. I'm watching this and if it hits $25 in the morn my stake is going up to at least 200 shares. They have the gloves off for a reason.

>>27782865
that sounds like a bad offer. but. i feel SO confident that this current price isn't it's resting price that i would GLADLY buy the number of shares necessary to cover my loss. so much so that i would be willing to offer you 60 for them if i was afraid you'd sell them to someone else for so cheap...right...right...???

>>27783590
I don't know if this image was a larp or real, but it shows how far they would go to protect themselves.

$25 i think is a good buy for this stock , I bought this back in March $8 but sold at $10 because it looks like the digital sales are killing the second hand market.

hold until it's $1 and then buy as much as you can.

>>27779276
People really are this retarded huh?

>>27779513
>heck
please go back to plebbit negro

>>27784291
top tier reddit cope

It's going back to 20

>>27783985
i wonder if big companies think like this? probably not
>>27784028
well then worse case scenario i'm out another 25 seems like a small price to pay to potentially cover 250 or at least some of it

>>27782515
This is how melvin got out

>>27784517

>>27779276
You're fucking stupid anon, you really bought into this reddit shit? GME short squeeze was a good plan when it was cheap af at $4. and you shouldve sold at $400 if you were there, and fucked the reddit crowd. But you weren't even there, you decide to go in now of all times? The fuck is wrong with you, invest in something actually profitable dumbass.

This whole GME is a trick anyway, most of the early pumping was from hedge funs fucking over other hedgefunds, reddit just caught on while it was happening. But retards now think it was a people's movement or some shit. And after the massive influx of newfags on their app, robinhood predictably shut it down, to avoid a liquidity crisis. But retards think it's MUH EVIL BILLIONAIRES CONTROLLING MUH APPERINO

>>27784895
>it was cheap af at $4. and you should've sold at $400

Dude hindsight is a wonderful thing.

>>27784545
yeah. and then you'd be out an additional 30 a share. that would suck. but if it went any closer to your original buy price you'd be working to cover it from more than one direction

This topic is going to the trashcan lol but fucking tards still trying to give their shit tokens. WTF wrong with you? I don’t want to participate in your fake 500%1500% profit projects. I have poolz and that’s enough for my portfolio. They have NFT - and you still use mining lmao

>>27784701
I'm guessing that happened too. They probably just took the loss on the stocks they couldn't give back. As an institution they aren't letting their emotions dictate their moves, but rather what makes practical sense.

Alright boys, bought 365 shares @ cost average of $13, sold 100 @ 290 apiece so I've got 25k guaranteed profit. I'm holding onto the other 265, planning to dump some at 150 but hold the rest in hopes of bigger gains (either the squeeze or Cohen leadership far into the future.) Thoughts? Am I retarded for not selling at 400?

>>27779276
yes its definitely going to 150. maybe even 300

https://youtu.be/rejpDqQUcV0

>>27781691
>wont go below 40
sorry bro its going below 10 (and then will got back up past 15 maybe to 25)

>>27785204
Just convince yourself that you believe in the company.

>>27779276
I would say this would work with AMC for sure, but GME doesnt really have much going for it, no one knows is their swing to e commerce will be successful. AMC has marvel, avatar 2 and many more HUGE blockbusters lined up for when theatres open, and there are plenty of higher ups in Hollywood that will not let theatres die

>>27785020
WSB was at it back when it was $4. /pol/ knew about atleast by the tuesday of that week cuz thats when i heard about it. assuming OP is on 4chan often and knew about this from here or WSB he couldve been in at $4, if he had a robinhood account or some other brokerage. My excuse is that I didn't

>>27779276
Fren, pls don't take this the wrong way but if you didn't know the answer to this question before buying GME, and if you can't answer it right now in the spot in a few seconds of thinking about it, this game isn't for you, at least not yet. Just find your way out fren, trust me

>>27785304
Can't tell if this is sarcasm. I do legitimately believe in the company, but not to the tune of anything more than a 20b market cap within 2-3 years. Just wondering if everyone on this board thinks all chance of another squeeze/short burn is gone

>>27779327
>>27780292
>>27780584
>>27780678
>>27782289
>>27782515
>>27782310
>>27783155
>>27783590
>>27784028
>>27784175
>>27784274
>>27784291
>>27784339
>>27784517
>>27784545
>>27784701
>>27784895
>>27785020
>>27785156
>>27785208
SO BECAUSE I BOUGHT TWO SHARES THAT'S HOW MANY I WOULD HAVE TO BUY TO COVER MY LOSS BUT FOR SOME REASON I CAN STILL ONLY BUY ONE I WONDER WHY THAT IS ESPECIALLY SINCE THE PRICE IS LOW AH WELL

>>27779276

this is your brain on reddit
not even once

>>27781691
In what world is Gamestop worth 5 dollars per share?

>>27786041

>>27786041
>Just wondering if everyone on this board thinks all chance of another squeeze/short burn is gone

I personally think they have had a week to change the system and implement ways to prevent it. If by some crazy timeline, they still haven't found a way out, I would be shocked.

The market isn't pumping at all even with short selling disabled, it's would take a massive influx of hype to turn this around.

yeah man, buy more stock on a company going to 0

>>27786877
Dubs of truth. Thanks for the opinion anon. This board has been going to the shitter lately, literally just "Hahaha reddit fags are poor now!!!" and shills saying Gme is worthless. You're prob right tho I might just hold for a while, either way I made a nice stack

>>27785204
i know if i were confident that the current price would at least double my thoughts wouldn't be when do i take the rest out, but at what point do i put current earnings in huh

>>27779276
Think about it opie. If you buy 100 shares at $300 and now buy 100 at $50 youve drasically reduced your buy in price per share and thus mitigated losses

>>27779276
>>27779513
>>27780379
>>27780802
>>27781314
>>27782071
>>27782291
>>27782544
>>27782775
>>27783121
>>27783985
>>27784552
>>27785045
>>27786162
>>27788575

>>27779276
Order short it to sub $10, lots of options OP.

>>27779276
Yes. The profit of the 50 going to 150 helps offset the loss of the 300 going to 150

>>27788710
>>27788892
i'd rather live as a crazy retard for 5 minutes than a ego driven midwit for 1000 years. my guess is someone out there much smarter and much wealthier than i also fucked up and bought above 50. what is it do you think they are going to do? nice digits

>>27779276
wait to february 9th if you haven't sold at a loss yet, it's 50/50 that they covered shorts. with all the demoralization of the panic sellers it's very likely that they're cocky and still have doubled down with SI%, this probably fed into their ego even more