/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>27600824
It would appear that we're pumping, sir

30 more cents for ATH. LETS GOOOO

hold on im calling sergey to dump more

dont worry it will go back down to 20 for another week

>>27600824
noooooo i was getting paid a fat bonus on friday which I was going to dump all into link :(

>>27600824
OUT OF MY WAY MOTHERFUCKERS!

IT IS ALREADY DUMPING LMAO I CANT BREATHE WHAT THE FUCK IS WRONG WITH YOU LINKIES???

domp eet

>>27601602
>moves down 10 cents while still less than 50 cents away from ATH
>*shids* ITS DOOMPING *fards in eachothers mouths*
You nolinkers are actually this retarded.

>>27601896
lol, HOPE YOU SOLD!

>>27601896
Make that 20 cents down... and then 30 cents... you get the picture HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

>>27601602
>>27602027
you had 2 years

>>27600824
why is link the most shilled coin on this fucking board.

>>27600824
you were saying?
https://vocaroo.com/1lmkXzAOYAlX

>>27602186
the tech and trust

>>27602347
more like the shill package.

>>27601978
Youre right.... Based on that one phrase "HOPE YOU SOLD" and the fact that it was is all caps, I finally sold all of my linkies. Thank so much for saving me dearest friend. I have seen the light.

>>27602186
Because it solves the biggest problem. The space needs data to function. This was autistically debated to death in ‘17 then we just turned to memery and fudding to pass the long long years from .2 to 20

>t block 478

>>27602186
Welcome newfriend. I'm going to give you a non-meme answer in celebration of the current link pump.
The quick summary is /biz/ is the only place on the internet which caught on to LINK's potential, namely the WEF involvement, as early as 2017. Literal hundreds of anons spent the bear market through 2018 and 2019 pouring their meagre waveslavery income into link and now there are around 1000 anons with 10,000-15,000 LINK and a few hundred more with even bigger stacks.
If you werent here in 2018 it's hard to get across how hard link was actually NOT shilled. Link discussion was mostly debating the endless detail of every last FUD point until the collective autism of biz realised that link was fud proof. This was combined with fud campaigns by holders in order to dissuade buyers and allowing longer accumulation under $1,00, and also to keep redditors out of the loop, just out of pure hatred.
Now LINK is finally mooning, those anons are close to becoming millionaires, as predicted. Most of the OGs have either left biz or are silent lurkers now, only posting to fud or meme.

>>27602422
>shill
yeah, link was literally never shilled. all discussion was organic and majority of holders usually post FUD. if you werent disgustingly new you would know this.

its over. the price cannot mathematically sustain over $25 so i suggest you sell now while you can.

>Mr. Bogdanoff.
>Oui?
>LINK is pumping again.
>Copy that Monsieur Nazarov. We will load ze BTC pomp.
https://www.coindesk.com/visa-anchorage-crypto-apis-pilot-for-banks

>>27603083
yes it can

>>27600824
Me getting rich!

#^

>>27602906
These are the facts.

been holding link since July 2019, when is this gonna reach $1,000? Granted it's been a long way from 2 to 25, but still.

>>27602906
>>27603006
While I appreciate your answer, I've been a silent lurker here for years (not every day or every week, but a steady amount of lurking) and it's always the same link pepe posts spread across the board. It all smells so inorganic. The only LINK posts I can appreciate are the discussions about the actual product, about Sergey and other things revolving the project. But having 5 out of the 10 posts on a page being a meme pepe link just always puts me off of buying it.

>>27602906

In 2018-2019... we were all JSON PARSER.

>>27603513
I'm actually more qualified to talk about this than most anons.I'm employed with a cyber-techno machinations company, I do a lot of security analyst programming type work. Open source, decentralized, APIs, partnerships, you name it. We'd be one of the first companies in line for something like Chainlink, if the decentralized smart contract space had more value over traditional data exchanges. There's a catch though, an underlying flaw more deeply embedded in the bedrock of LINK than the very code itself. The flaw is with the concept, and it's this: Companies won't actually go through the hassle of trusting their data API's through crypto.
Now I can already hear your keyboards going frantic, but hear me out. /biz/ hates banks, and traditional data providers. But actual companies, businesses, and investors do not. There's an old saying you might have heard of: "If it ain't broke, don't fix it!". The idea that any of our bosses would give us the go ahead if we approached them to put our companies valuable data in a smart contract on a cryptocurrency called Chainlink, that they've never heard of, we'd be laughed out at best and fired on the spot at worst. We already have API data buyers and providers we trust.
'But Chainlink is trustless!' I hear you cry, but is that really a good thing? Just listen to the sound of it. Businesses don't want to spend millions of dollars on something that is trustLESS, they want something trustFUL. 'But the reputation system!', doesn't that defeat the whole point of your coin? If companies only trust nodes with high reputation, what's the difference between trusting banks and data providers that already have reputation, but in real life not on a computer screen.
The fact is, LINK is going to share the same fate as ETH will. A lot of 'real world application' hype, with a lot of 'crypto world application' reality. Only, this billion supply coin isn't going to come close to the $1k that Etherum hit. Happy gambling though anons.

>>27603498

I bought in at .91-1.16... LINK will never be a rocket but a long term hold that continues to crush ATH's.

>>27603513
This is what we call fud, and it is precisely so idiots like you don't buy in

>>27603513
>not every day or every week
ngmi

>>27603513
>not every day or every week, but a steady amount of lurking
Imagine not browsing biz for hours each day, ngmi
>and it's always the same link pepe posts spread across the board.
Bullshit have you been lurking here. We had regular 300+ reply threads with insights, research and so on throughout 2018/2019. It's your own fault you didn't notice them.
>But having 5 out of the 10 posts on a page being a meme pepe link just always puts me off of buying it.
Good, you weren't meant to make it.

>>27603669
I fundamentally disagree. We've never seen it in a bullrun. We don't know the answer. I do agree that long term number go up

Is it too late to buy links now? Should I gamble on some shitcoin instead? Note that I am poorfag

>>27602906
I bought in last year when it first peaked to $12. When it dumped to $10 i felt like such and idiot i stopped buying crypto for a bit and forgot about it.

WHOS LAUGHING NOW BIZ?!?!?! YOU COVET MY STINKY LINKIES!!!!!!

>>27603513
nobody cares if you buy retard.

>>27603513
>It all smells so inorganic
If you can't tell the difference between pure autistic obsession and pajeet shills then no wonder you ngmi

>>27604152
what is so different about say the linkspam and RSR shilling?

>>27603513
kek you are literally this pasta

>>27603958
People were asking if it was too late to buy at 2, 4, 8, 11, 14, 18, 22, and now 25.

People will continue asking this same question at 50, 100, 250, 1000.

>>27604381
People answered your question already.

>>27602906
Do not listen to this man, he’s in league with Chad o’fork of Microsoft and most likely Jason parser.

>>27604381
1. The same anons "spamming" LINK are the ones fudding it as well.
2. the LINK cult was actually strongest during the bear market, with genuine interest and even obsession maintained when link dumped to 20c. /biz/ was slow as fuck in 2018 yet linkies still congregated here to share insights, research, fud discussion and so on.

Every new shitcoin shill tries to meme their coin as the "next link". they even copy&paste our memes and change the logo to their shitcoin. the thing is, you cant force memes.

>>27604422
It's literally all true

well grandpa, keep holding your ancient meme coins
I don’t buy these shitty coins, I have xsn on my portfolio
If this retards believe in that dump this is their problem.
Layer2 DEX is the future.

>>27604425
Yeah I'm actually putting all my gains from other coins into link as it has proven to be very stable.

>>27603868
We're in a bullrun right now and it got crushed in sats.

>>27604425
2018:
>is 10k link enough to make it?
2019:
>is 5k link enough to make it?
2020:
>is 1k link enough to make it?

****YOU ARE HERE****

2021:
>is 100 LINK enough to make it
2022:
>Is 10 LINK enough to make it?
2023:
>is 1 LINK enough to make it?
2024:
>is 0.1 LINK enough to make it?

And so on.

>>27605143
I know you're new and enthusiastic about this space, but please stick to lurking for at least 4 months.

>>27605143
>>27605387
Ooopsie wrong pair

>>27604422
God I love arin so much

Nice pump you got there linkies. Still dwarfed by Eth, but eh, what can you do

>>27603513
Huh.... That's weird, it's almost like I've heard this before somewhere....

>>27603218
>tfw you read this in bizonacci style in your head
many keks but also pain for my bro 'nacci

are we still early for link? Honest answers please. I mean, if link could actually reach eth prices in 5-10 years I'd still consider that early.

>>27606063
Yes. The chinks just announced they are integrating link into their BSN smart city project.

>>27606063
>10 years
how can anyone hold for 10 years?

>>27605926
I mean it’s $25 and this faggot hasn’t bought yet after lurking for years... it’s not like he’ll ever get more than 50-100 LINK at this point anyways...

>>27605777
Checked. Percentage wise they're both at 120%.

We just switched timelines, can you Anons feel that?

>>27602906
Was it the team shilling? Or need to pool to buy at ICO?

>>27605926
>like NANO or Vechain
lmfao

>>27606450
rare yellen

>>27605233
GOD CHRIST

>>27606463
Yes, the team shilled it exclusively on /biz/ because everyone knows that we're capable of moving the markets.
Brainlet.

>>27606334
I would wager a fair amount of 2017 autistic orginalfags have been hodling since then.

Can you newfaggots just market buy so we can keep going, thanks.

POOMPA

>>27600824
cringe wtfwt pic

>>27606656
>not exclusively using 4chan for "grassroots" internet meme campaign

>>27602906
top 500 wallet saying hellooo

Just going through some old caps I got and came across this kek

I wish I bought in earlier but I can't complain too much about a 1.5k stack. Feeling pretty good right now all things considered.

>>27600824
OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

>too much caffeine
>listening to distorted sped-up trance
>link pumping
life's good (tm)

$25.50 keeps getting rejected, getting dangerously close to ATH and we know how tough that always is.

>>27603629
It's an old meme but it checks out

>>27605926
amazing

the insights of linkies are unparalleled

AAHHHH DO I SELL WHEN IT PASSES ATH OR NOT???!!!


I don't wanna get caught in the inevitable correction lads...

>>27608646
Don't cry when you get left behind like everybody else

>>27608646
>inevitable correction
Never sell link retard.
If it dips you buy more.
Swingies get the rope.

>>27608646
If you insist on being a faggot swingie watch Benjamin cowen to learn to do it properly
Even then you’ll probably fuck it up unless you pay for his premium list

>>27605926
Is that talking about LINK or XRP? Because I could pop into XSG and see the same type of shit. Not a great argument desu.

>>27609648
I have the premium list, he doesn't give swing signals.

>>27600824

Linkies have not yet learned how to embrace their Schwabish roots. And I think we are going to be part of the throes of that transformation, which must take place. Link is not going to be the monolithic sergeyposters that they once were in the last decade. The Schwablord is going to be at the center of that. It's a huge transformation for Chainlink to make. They are now going into a Schwab mode, and schizos will be resented because of our leading role. But without that leading role, and without that transformation, Chainlink will not survive.

>>27600824
Partnership with the singularity confirmed

>>27602906
I miss all the shadow fork cube variants. Anyone have a dump of them somewhere?

>>27609941
He has the risk metric which you time your sells against

>>27610419
try not to talk about all of the shadow forks that have causing chainlink to dump

>>27602906
%99 of people bought at 4 sold at 3

>>27609941
whats the risk level for chainlink at 25.50?

Aaaaand that concludes our scheduled PnD, hope you enjoy the slow bleed back down.

>>27606825
yes

>>27603629
>Le FUD to buy cheaper
you are the same guy that spread FUD about bitcoin back in 2013
dum retard

>>27610608
0.66 at $26

>>27611030
Return to whence you came

>>27611469
I’d ask you to post screenshots of his premium list link charts but I almost feel bad since he’s so cool

>>27606063

I think Link is still worth buying at this point, it's one of the best gambles in crypto. Guaranteed $100 imo

>>27606328

No they haven't. Literally.

>>27610502
Take your meds

>>27600824
how do people make these kinds of memes? is this what the 500k dumps go towards?

>>27611673
give him $100 if you like him so much faggot lmao

>>27606470
>05/31/18
this market was a lot different back then

>>27611766

https://medium.com/irisnet-blog/irita-hub-completes-the-mainnet-integration-of-chainlink-oracles-on-bsn-c66f4aa36abc

>>27607411
2017 OG's actually underestimated Link's sphere of dominance; we didnt foresee Ari, town crier, arbitrum, one-time pad protection, the Klaus Schwab connection, etc etc, just to name a few. At this point, its more like a 10k stack is fuck you money, a 1k stack is a make it stack, and a 100 bag is a suicide stack ASSUMING you hodl until at least 2026

>>27611469
thats pretty good, i wouldn't swing link until its above 1000 dollars and a risk level above .8

>>27602906
this except i bought 5k link in the same month in december 17
havent bought
just helf

>>27605926

>>27611990
kek

>>27611673
He is a dickhead ripping off his customers for shitty risk metrics. Does he call it yes or no. And you gullible fools pay him. Why does he need paying if he such a hotshot. For fuck sake. The information is free stop paying for it

>>27615435
Shut up loser

>>27604918
>Every new shitcoin shill tries to meme their coin as the "next link". they even copy&paste our memes and change the logo to their shitcoin. the thing is, you cant force memes.

This is one of the most bullish factors surrounding LINK. People know that comparing yourself to LINK is akin to comparing yourself to gold. What most of these pajeet/chink scammers don't realize is its not effective if you understand what LINK is about. It will just trick those who missed the gain and are still looking for the next big thing, which unironically is still LINK.

>>27611469
What has the lowest risk right now, LINK, ETH, or BTC?

>>27603513
2017 neets are conditioning new buyers into hodling until the mythical 1k so they can be dumped on and hold their bags.