/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>26048679
cope

>>26048679
>21.97
its fucking over

>>26048708
cope

>>26048679
it's over

>>26048679
PLEASE DROP BACK
I NEED MY STACK BACK

>>26048679
swingies get the rope

>>26048771

>>26048771
Won't go below 30 within the next couple days, this is it folks.

>>26048856
Burgers are a disgrace

aaaa o well, maybe in the next life?

>>26048679

Ok let's unpack this. Did the bitcoin dominance fall in 2017? Yes, no one (NOT A SINGLE PERSON) is disputing this. What we ARE disputing is the SOLE question, will it happen AGAIN??? This leads me to a SINGLE conclusion. That alt season was a black swan event that happen once (ONE TIME) and there is ZERO patterns indicating that this will happen again. After several years as a crypto trading analysts I've seen ZERO indication, ZERO evidence and ZERO affirmation that the events in 2017 will happen again. And the contendors to my theory have yet to provide ANY evidence to the contrary. This is CLEARLY a desperate attempt for alts to catch up after MONTHS of bleeding. Heck. Even usdc has outperformed link until today. There are plenty of options yielding 5,10,15, even 20% on reliable platforms....for STABLE COINS with VIRTUALLY NO RISK. Again, this takes into account doing NOTHING with your stable coins. (Not to mention the SAP 500, DOW JONES INDUSTRIAL AVERAGE and NASDAAQ have all outperformed link as well.) The "link marines" have had their money stationary since August, 5 months; FIVE (5) MONTHS, to earn less than a FIVE PERCENT (5%) return on investment. When you put bag holding for 5 months for a less then 5% return, you blatantly see that this coin is TOO RISKY TOO HOLD. So you asked if I know how it feels for link to "moon." The answer is yes and no. I know what it feels to hold a solid investment that ACTUALLY does well. But to hold a dying shitcoin and try and justify it was a good decision? No. I can't relate.

>>26049029
Nice pasta, but it's over.