/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>25886790
and up up up we go. did they say when this is happening?

not decentralized, not even a blockchain

>>25886832
its scam you retard, dont fall for it

>>25886868
european exchange with 8 licenses.. and MUCH MORE:
fuck off dipshit

>>25886925
all cryptos are scams

>>25886925
LCX is probably the only coin shilled here that ISN'T a scam, retard.

>>25886925
It's a scam on banks. Banks love licensing.

this is a scam, look at the chart and see it for yourself
https://www.coingecko.com/en/coins/lcx
it got pumped and dumped and now some literal who on telegram is trying to pump it one last time. but yeah go ahead and listen to some guy named King LCX see how that works out for you

Brian Armstrong of Coinbase confirmed

>>25887145
look at binance chart in the early phase.
na????????? was it a scam?
holy shit you are so braindead its actually funny

>>25887145
I'm so thankful I'm not you.

>>25887145
Hurrr durrr Line go up, line go down. Pump and dump. Retard alert.

>>25887188
>>25887191
>>25887250
dont say i didn't warn you. anonymous people on telegram hyping their shitcoin and "leaking" this kind of info is not what a professional project does

>>25887351
I was never so comfy.
Shit is looking 100% legit.
just bought more but k

>>25887351
don't say i didn't warn you. anonymous people hyping their fud on a indonesian prostitute ranking forum are definitely the people to listen to regarding professionalism

>>25887391
>>25887458
name any other serious project that does this telegram leak shit
the cringe tiktok videos they do too, like bitconnect did to dazzle the low iqs with song and dance: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZPQFOSeuIK4
paying crypto influencers to shill: https://twitter.com/lcx/status/1258537179300519936?s=21
name ANY other serious projects that do this please
you are as delusnional as xrp people

>>25887592
do you never heard of marketing?
holy sheeet u are the dumbest kid.

>>25886790
source on this claim? looks like a discord tranny p&d scheme

>>25887698
official telegram group.
admin is a verified employee.

>>25887592
no. how about you provide evidence about what they should do instead? you seem to have a lot of understanding about how it works. so rather than just spit baseless fud, how about you provide a counter example to how they should market instead?

>>25886790
>>25886977
>Imply coin has a use
>People flock to it to hoard it hoping prices go up
>Create false hype with meme tech like "Token Burn" so the token is supposedly deflationary
>Ergo inherently increases in value over time from artificial scarcity
>People freak out and hoard even more
>Token performs like garbage on actual market
>Dumped immediately by presellers after it gets Pumped a little
>Fucking useless anyways like GRT
Go away 'jeet.

last chance /biz/

>>25887634
lel great marketing, doing stuff scams do
>>25887767
>no u
great response.

so far no one has given examples of legit projects doing this sketchy shit lcx is doing

>>25887859
>fuds incessantly
>asked for exemplary counter example to provide comparison too
>"lol no im not doing that"
>fuds again

here's your (you)

>>25887992
the next response i get better be an example of legit projects behaving like lcx and not more deflections and no u's
you are the low iqs that fall for scams here, seeing this as something bullish when to anyone with braincells it's a red flag

>>25888085
lol and what the fuck exactly are you gonna do about it if it's not an example? you sound like a 15 yr old lolol

nigger i posted a ton of threads a few weeks ago about this, giving specific evidence from their documents and roadmap in the market pointing out why this is going to go up at LEAST to 10-12c. we even had an insider anon post proof of his position in Lichtenstein and describe what the project is going to do and where it's going.

the burden of proof is on you lol you're just too lazy to actually read about the fundamentals of the project. dyor faggot. for someone bitching about "no u" responses you sure haven't taken any initiative to make this conversation informative by providing a counter example. the burden of proof is on you. the evidence of LCX being successful is apparent all you gotta do is read about the project and its progress so far.

but you're probably just gonna respond with "hurr another no u response I'm not convinced." cool bro. stay poor, miss the train again. your loss. if you're gonna talk shit about something then have details to back it up. cause rn you're just spamming how it won't work and you expect anyone here to be convinced? provide some evidence my guy ffs lol

>>25888306
thanks for the wall of seeth but thats not what i was asking for. keep dreaming about your scamcoins future, many people do that with whatever scam they managed to fall for and never wake up

you vill eat ze fud

>>25888382
complete dumbass. I dont even have any LCX.

>>25888382
>huh huh that's not what I asked for. I'm not convinced. you lose. huh huh keep dreaming huh huh

>>25886790
1. why would anyone on staff reveal something like that?

2. isn't lcx a token for lcx exchange?

3. even if it was true, that has to be YEARS away.

>>25890180
>1. why would anyone on staff reveal something like that?
to make low iqs fomo in
>2. isn't lcx a token for lcx exchange?
yes, and why an exhacnge would list another exchanges token none of these low iqs can answer
>3. even if it was true, that has to be YEARS away.
it will never happen

everything about lcx screams scam

>>25890418
looks like you fucks got btfo lmao. must be hard to be dumb and fall for scams

>>25890611
i was a dumb fomo and fell for it because i wanted to get into a low market asap. but since i have more time on my hands i can actually learn. the more i read about this the more the cracks develop on this bullshit.


uhg i feel like such a sucker. thankfully i got out in time

>>25886925
I’m glad you fell for the FUD it was designed specifically for your kind.

>>25890834
Go fuck yourself retard it’s not fud if it’s true, they lied about the Coinbase listing

all you fucks calling me dumb and shit are awfully quiet now. is it starting to sink in what kind of coin you bought?

>>25890451
>yes, and why an exhacnge would list another exchanges token none of these low iqs can answer
Doesn't coinbase already list UNI though?

>>25886790
>when coinbase
Biggest sell signal.