/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>25294993
DELET

>>25295052
Undelt. Baby wants gains

>>25294993

buying 100 more link

>>25294993
very based

>>25294993
>data means chainlink
A HEXAGON JUST FLEW OVER MY HOUSE

>>25294993
fake and cringe

>>25294993
This is not related to Chainlink in any way except in your delusional coping -40% mind kek

really grasping at straws here linker

>>25295191
>>25295210
>>25295224
>>25295277
In come the trannys just in time

>>25295392
why yes, I am a discord tranny, how could you tell?

>>25295224
>>25295191
>t. illiterate BAND hodlers

>>25294993
is this the kind of delusion that occurs when one loses 80% of their gains vs BTC? scary shit, you had four (4) months buddy

>>25295191
you better believe it

<---CHAINLINK has been approved by the SEC long time ago

>>25295755
Checked. What a beautiful meme. Is it oc? Never seen it before. Good speed anon

Contributing

>>25294993
FUCKING HAPPENING
EVENTUALLY EVERYONE UNDERSTANDS

>>25295778

>>25295140
WHY DOES IT FEEL SO FUCKING CHAD TO OWN CHAINLINK

>>25295778
>>25295822
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qn1mW27EfCU&t=9m30s
Based

>>25294993
HOLY SHIT THIS CRUMB IS SOFT

Well done OP.

>>25295778
its not the same chainlink retard, this is some random company

Bummmmmmp

>>25294993
didn't read; never buying

>>25294993
There is a saying in my family:
"Thou whose bag holds Link art chosen.
When thou beareth witness to the Great Awakening, the fate of the Link Marines thou shalt know."

I'm still accumulating... yes I missed Link at 1 digit or cents
Only have 700

>>25297870
On the plus side you haven’t been focused on this for the past three fucking years like I have

big if true

>>25294993
Finally some good fucking news, buy LINK now faggots or forever be poor

>>25297870
Same anon. Only have a pathetic stack of 4500
Not even half a fucking suicide stack
I guess I was never meant to make it this lifetime...
Better luck next time for us
Maybe we can get some nice lump sum out of it to pay for like a holiday or a car and get a mortgage

>>25294993
>>25295778
>>25295894
>>25295116
>>25298157

now i feel so stupid for doubting us guys.

so glad i didn't sell.

1000 DOLLARS EOY

You guys are just as delusional as xrptards

I don’t understand how this thread has this many replies when OP has nothing to do with chainlink

>>25298304
Oh anon...
We don’t have time to catch you up

>>25298304

cRipple never did anything except have one scammy “partnership” with Moneygram. Literally made me laugh every time I heard it btw.

LINK. DOES. EVERYTHING.

dude 1k is fud lmao

>>25298566
>t.200 LINK newfag who thinks he will make it

>>25298633
No newfag would post that picture newfag

>>Ctrl F chainlink.. 0 result
Ok buddy

>>25298633
dude nice digits lmao

>>25298434
Name one enterprise using chainlink mainnet right now. Only literally who defi projects are using their price feeds

>>25298304
>>25298677
idiots who dont understand the usecasesfor link.
BOX: let us use eth blockchain
The SEC: we need you to have accurate timely info and you do not
WHO THE FUCK. ON THE ETHEREUM BLOCKCHAIN. IS RUNNING A SERVICE. TO PROVIDE ACCURATE AND TIMELY DATA.

>>25298729
Did you ever do a connect-the-dots puzzle as a child? Do you remember how like halfway through you kind of got a picture of what it might be?

We are 80% done. We've all seen the picture for over a year now. It' s not our fault you're retarded.

>>25294993
Will it be some sort of dex with tokenised stocks or is it just a normal exchang reporting trades at the close on the blockchain? Asking this because if the transactions were made directly on the blockchain then there is no need for link

>>25297959
Lol...soooo true. Wen rich? Today?! Ok ok ok...how bout nao?! Eoy!?

>>25298304

>>25298836
Tellor, band, mobius, api3, certik... And the old slow expensive centralized kyc oracle, chainlink

>>25299133
>api3
opinion discarded. they dont even have oracles yet of any kind.

>>25298843
You sound like what xrptards have been saying for 2 years. Take your pills and make a link schizo thread

>>25294993
Cringe bullshit

>>25299338
No I don't. I've been calling XRP a scam since 2017.

>>25299338
I don’t think xrp jeetz ever even knew why xrp was valuable. I’ve been here for 5 years and I still have yet to have anyone able to break it down to me.
I just always assumed it was a bunch of retards falling for their expensive marketing
On the other hand, I can clearly understand the value in the link token and the network itself from listening to sergey talk for a few minutes.

>>25295052
Yes. It's fantastic that LINK is so far behind in cap to the other top 10 coins. It's fucking awesome that it's 30+% away from regaining its old place. Be careful. This could turn into a NEO situation. Once a coin or token falls far from grace, it cannot gain high enough daily volume to break free of wash traders and scammers. No one will be the one to burn their stack to break their grip.

>>25294993
2021 is going to be insane for LINK.

I know that anyone with 10k+ will make it but I'm starting to wonder if make it stack will really be 1k in a few years.

>>25300500
Checked!

>>25294993
wow, this is epic. once LINK hits three (3) US Dollars I will consider buying due to this great news!!

>>25295191
yes

>>25294993
I'm actually more qualified to talk about this than most anons.I'm employed with a cyber-techno machinations company, I do a lot of security analyst programming type work. Open source, decentralized, APIs, partnerships, you name it. We'd be one of the first companies in line for something like Chainlink, if the decentralized smart contract space had more value over traditional data exchanges. There's a catch though, an underlying flaw more deeply embedded in the bedrock of LINK than the very code itself. The flaw is with the concept, and it's this: Companies won't actually go through the hassle of trusting their data API's through crypto.
Now I can already hear your keyboards going frantic, but hear me out. /biz/ hates banks, and traditional data providers. But actual companies, businesses, and investors do not. There's an old saying you might have heard of: "If it ain't broke, don't fix it!". The idea that any of our bosses would give us the go ahead if we approached them to put our companies valuable data in a smart contract on a cryptocurrency called Chainlink, that they've never heard of, we'd be laughed out at best and fired on the spot at worst. We already have API data buyers and providers we trust.
'But Chainlink is trustless!' I hear you cry, but is that really a good thing? Just listen to the sound of it. Businesses don't want to spend millions of dollars on something that is trustLESS, they want something trustFUL. 'But the reputation system!', doesn't that defeat the whole point of your coin? If companies only trust nodes with high reputation, what's the difference between trusting banks and data providers that already have reputation, but in real life not on a computer screen.
The fact is, LINK is going to share the same fate as ETH will. A lot of 'real world application' hype, with a lot of 'crypto world application' reality. Only, this billion supply coin isn't going to come close to the $1k that Etherum hit. Happy gambling though anons.

>>25300938
Nice pasta

>>25300004
token price has never, ever, in the history of crypto affected development of a token you complete retard. i don't think it is possible for a person as dumb as you to exist in the world

>>25296406
but chainlink (the crypto that discuss every day) has been been approved by the SEC. double retard, go die

>>25301304
>token price has never, ever, in the history of crypto affected development of a token

>>25301304
It effects the possibility of speculators retiring off of their "wise" investments. We're providing a price floor for token development but it's absolutely asinine to think that we'll see a great ROI from here if LINK slips to where some institution would have to be willing to burn 10s of millions to shatter the grip of manipulators should the token fall out of favour.

It's cool that you get off simping for Sergey though and derive such pleasure from LINK's continued development.

holy shit you desperate losers are still doing the breadcrumb thing? How many "breadcumb" threads have there been where nothing came of them, it must be in the hundreds, your coin has had years of development with 100s of millions of dollars going to the developers and nothing to show for it, link is pathetic and anyone who still believes in it are like the schizo XRP bagholders who think it will come back.