/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>25201411

Link is shit

>>25201411
Do the needful please sir

>>25201411
Is this from the WEF whitepaper? And idk anon, chainlink should be at $50 at the very least with the release of the whitepaper. So strange

>>25201411
>...what gives?

Chainlink subreddit has 25k subscribers. This is the normie consensus and normie awareness indicator

Now compare this to other Reddit crypto subreddits:
XMR - 186k subscribers
Litecoin - 218k subscribers
Stellar Lumens - 114k subscribers

You get the deal.

You have absolutely no idea how obscure token Chainlink is. There is absolutely zero new buyers to this project or "normies flocking in", it is obscure, unknown and barely in the awareness of normie investors

>>25201411
source to this sweet little text?

>>25201557
Sir please this is not of the most importance

>>25201543
and that is why chainlink will fail

>>25201543
but why is it obscure? i don't get it

>>25201411
Whales squezing all the faggots out before we can moon

>>25201543
Fuck.
Anons, do I buy more? Never sold any. Thinking of a 10k buy.

>>25201594
lol, you're retarded if you think that the technical aspect and integration of link will fail simply because it's not followed by a bunch of mouth breathing bafoons

>>25201641
Always buy
Never sell
This is how you make it

>>25201411
>Sergey poised to present his case personally to several billionaire/centa-millionaire Bilderberg-types less than a month away...
which zoom call is this?

>>25201623
Extreme fud campaigns
Literally zero marketing from the team for the past 2 years (it has changed only as of now)
"Hard to get" -problem they are solving
All the price action/gains for it were made during a Bear market/pessimistic phase for whole crypto scene

>>25201673
I never do sell, or consider it.
I came here as a brokefag and bought what I could. Have improved my life a lot since (thanks anons). Continued to DCA but built a little fiat cushion. I'd be just about doubling my stack. If I had this money when I started I'd have made it.

>>25201706
is the marketing thing being done on purpose? and who's doing the fudding? i don't see it on this level against other projects...and, how can the price be relatively stable if a million or more coins are dumped into the market every week?

>>25201982
How new are you?

>>25201982
>is the marketing thing being done on purpose?
You have to go back.
>and who's doing the fudding?
You have to go back.
>i don't see it on this level against other projects
What other projects?
>how can the price be relatively stable if a million or more coins are dumped into the market every week?
Room temp IQ reddit normie detected. You have to go back this place is not for you.

>>25201543
So what you’re saying is we’re still early...

>>25201411
Checked. This is the 411. Those who have been strong and believed will be rewarded greatly in the end - you know it and everyone else knows it too. Get ready. $100+ coming soon.

>>25202324
Very fucking early. Jesus loves you son. Repent and accept Christ into your heart and buy Chainlink. Its god's gift to all of us who are willing.

>>25202338
My monitor sits on old 411vm video tapes. It's a good enough sign, I'm going in anons.

>>25202338
Are you the anon I edited the paper + crayon version for?

>>25202322
i'm new, that's why i 'm asking for help. i actually do feel retarded about this because i have never been in business, don't understand markets. even the terms you use are all new to me but i'm sure it would be difficult for you if you tried the same with my field. so, either help me understand or don't so you can continue to feel superior

>>25201411
CHAINLINK WILL NEVER BE USED OUTSIDE OF LOW VOL DEFI BULLSHIT. *CLAP CLAP CLAP*

>>25202672
>even the terms you use are all new to me
Out of interest how did you find this place?

>>25202672
Just buy LINK bro. It aint that deep.

>>25202417
No, but I saw this and decided eventually it will be added to my others and made larger in physical form and hung on a wall of crypto related art if I ever make it. Thank you very much if this is your work.

>>25202795
i've been on /pol/ for too long, /his/ and /lit/ for pleasure. i've first heard about LINK on /pol/ in 2017 and it sounded revolutionary, but they soon stopped talking about and this place was like reading chinese so i gave up but i'm genunely interested. just looking for guidance

>>25201543
What about twitter?
there it has over a 100k followers

>>25202926
Ripple has over a million on twitter.

>>25202876
It's not, I just helped an anon with a very similar one a while back. Probably was originally made by whoever made that. Phonefagging so can't post it.
>>25202899
DYOR, it's the only way. If you have been here long enough you'll figure it out.
>/lit/
Based anon. Give the white paper a read.

>>25203024
downloaded. will start with that. thank you!

>>25202899
TLDR is that this place fudded Reddit and normie forums from buying the token below $1.most anons here bought in from an “insider” named assblaster. Gains massive following and anons here went through ruthless dips. Surreal journey with an organic fan base and growth rate. Look into who ari Juels is. Link is the real deal

>>25203077
Checked

>>25203074
go and read the blog posts on their website anon rather than the white paper which will be replaced soon by an updated one

>news that chainstink is going to be used in every business in every application millions of times a second for the entire world forever and ever as long as civilization exists
>dumps

>>25203077
thank you for the explanation and i'll look into Jules. i recently saw an interview with him and Sergey.

>>25201411
>It feels like Chainlink should be in the $100-$500 range at least based on this news...I mean we're talking about the control structure of planet Earth overtly shilling Chainlink by name for half a year now with Sergey poised to present his case personally to several billionaire/centa-millionaire Bilderberg-types less than a month away......what gives?

Why do you think price has been so volatile? They accumulating. Especially using BTC. Dump the LINK pairing and use BTC to purchase while they are pumping the USD valuation so they can sell it off and normies buy in. LINK's price won't increase until they have their bags packed. Hundreds to thousands of deca-millionaires just became aware of LINK in the last 4 months or so.

>>25201640

Yes

>>25203132
is this the blog you mean, or is there a different one?
https://blog.chain.link/

>>25201543
It makes me so sad. It’ll stay this way. Normies have to first understand blockchain, and all of its pros vs cons, THEN need to learn why a middle ware is necessary. It’s so tiresome.

>>25203132
the wef whitepaper is the new whitepaper. they aren't doing a version 2.0 of the original

>>25203385
that's the page there are so many to read so take your pick. Their YouTube videos are really good but stick to the ones with plenty of views if you're not interested in an integration chat with the developers of a chainlink user.

>>25203459
really? wow that's huge if true

>>25203077
You forgot we also have the best memes

>>25203476
ok, thanks

>>25203227
Comfy hopium

>>25203529
No worries.
https://chainlinkecosystem.com/
https://www.youtube.com/chainlinkofficial
Some more links for you.

>>25203387
my big lesson from my normie career is that people are fucking stupid. blockchain -> smart contracts -> oracles with all their nuances is way too much for most people
one of the biggest shocks this year has been lurking on twitter and seeing 25k+ follower crypto "analysts" and "influencers" having absolutely no idea what they're talking about and yet people eating up what these authority figures have to say

>>25203561
and could you please link the wef whitepaper, i'm reading something on their site but i'm not sure if it's the right one

>>25203459
that's incorrect. ari is working on v2

>>25203608
https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2020/12/the-missing-link-between-blockchain-and-existing-systems/
https://www.weforum.org/whitepapers/bridging-the-governance-gap-interoperability-for-blockchain-and-legacy-systems
The paper is the second link

I still don't get why the tokens needs to have a high value?

The network can function regardless of the price.

Sergey is selling off 1 million tokens a week, clearly the token isn't that crucial for the network to function. 1 billion exists. What if the network can fully function on less than 1 million links. Why would the price increase?

>>25203741
thanks anon

>>25203749
go to reddit if you want people to write you long paragraphs telling you what to think
go to some research and thinking and then come back
hint: explicit staking

>>25203814
So they're basically selling millions of tokens a week into random people in the hopes that these people will eventually stake their stacks? Sounds pretty risky to me.

>>25203827
there's this really good coin called nano which is fast and free, you should look into it

>>25203749
On the off chance you're not a discord fudder:
1) collateral is needed which can be denominated in any value but needs to represent enough to cover a specific contract.
2) protocol guarantees will replace brand based ones ensuring determinism (e.g. infrastructure integrates Chainlink as a key protocol)
3) speculation on a "new" type of asset that provides trustworthy connectivity
Chainlink is basically armored cars for data silos
Feel free to add more

>>25203867
i think to add to this for new redditors: everything will be done in usd on the front, link will not be visible

>>25202338
excellent image

>>25203749
That’s why you need to read it can’t function this way. It is worth what it can secure. Something is up that is for sure. Either it is just all BS or it is massive. There is not middle ground. This week the eyes will open on btc it might go to 35k. Fomo is about to become massive.

>>25201543
That doesn't explain anything. If that was relevant, it wouldn't have reached the top 10 at all.

>>25204029
...

>>25204029
Exactly, something is up. There is simply no single fucking way we’re at $11usd while btc violently moons. I was gonna sell it all for btc but fuck it I’m going to sit and see what happens here. I’m just curious as fuck all of a sudden.

>>25204029
Link has relatively few large scale investors.
Xrp has huge amounts of small scale investors.
The small scale are coming to link once they hear about it but the large scale aren't going to xrp ever

>>25204102
The hopium is who knows they announce fucking staking and we finally get our singularity and violently moon to catch up. Maybe that happens in Feb not sure but the parabolic charts showed feb. or you cap this and it makes me look stupid and deluded as fuck

>>25204109
Why are xrp idiots not getting into link

In the end they became the meme themselves

>>25203827
Risk would be trying to operate your business only to have it shut down for some imaginary disease with a high rate of recovery.
>>25203901
this. why not use x token / usd instead fud is ignoring the fact that LINK is hardbaked into the backend of the link oracle network which is itself backend infrastructure. You will have fiat gateways people will use without even knowing they're using the link token.
4) Proof of reserve = no more Jewish fractional reserve tricks and limited rug pull insurance too I guess
5) Provable randomness for NFTs and games / gambling etc
Each of these is basically a huge opportunity for web3 integration and milestones in their own right.
Still waiting for everyone to wake up and see things differently.
https://linkmyri.de/
Remember this project won the hackathon and it's literally the rental car killer app kek.

>>25201543
>Stakenet 1.1k members
Holy fuck we are so early
>Link rank 1
>Xsn rank 2

>>25203387
After years of being told that bitcoin is a scam normies just become maxipads and then call every Alt a scam.

>>25204102
The fud vs Link is also out of this world. The staggeringly dedicated army of fudders that remind you of the CCP trolls on /pol/. Zeus Capital. The report they wrote is way beyond what any human being would do unless they were being paid good money to do it.
What other project is fudded anywhere near this hard?

>>25204396
Why is the anti fud not strong enough though. There is so much $ to be made. We just lost 4x vs btc. I’ve lost potential for 1.5M I would have easily paid 100k for the anti fud so why the fuck is that so weak??

>>25204438
Because the fudders are more dedicated. I've seen the anti fudders counter them until they got frustrated talking in circles.
It's easier to keep up being a troll or bad actor than it is being an honest defender of something.

>>25204396
Wef co-authors papers with chainlink , this is all you need to know about how deep the rabbit hole goes.Fudders do not want low iq retards to get rich this easy.

>>25204152
Some will but most will go to btc for the time being.
Its no coincidence that xrp crashes as btc pumps.
Once btc settles down then link will recover

>>25204438
because anti fud is not needed. fudders can stand on their head throwing shit around and scream from the top of their lungs this wont stop link.

it will work out like this
1) big company suddenly out of no where has 6-10% increase in profit
2) other big company will be "wtf was that"
3) they look into it find out it was because they integrated Chainlink
4) they themself HAVE TO integrate Chainlink to stay relevant
5) cycle continues

>>25204491
Dude I myself would have easily paid 100k. That means others would have paid 1M. Like wtf is going on. For who is it worth like 50-100M dollars just to Fud link

>>25204519
>>25204544
It's a fucking bizarre timeline, I'll give you guys that

>>25204396
“Zeus Capital” paid an ungodly amount of money to have their tweets promoted nonstop. it was so bizarre that they’d financially back it so heavily if they had no incentive to do so. it actually increased my confidence in chainlink as a project.

>>25204134
>Maybe that happens in Feb not sure but the parabolic charts showed feb
tfw Sergey is waiting for February to announce because that's what the magic meme charts told him to do

>>25204544
If you hold link then you know that fud is a good thing.
At wors it will delay the inevitable moon and on the way it will give you chances to accumulate.
There isn't much reason to anti-fud.
Just let the manipulation play out and capitalise on the way

>>25201543

>>25204599
Wouldn’t be hard to find out how much they actually paid right. Was it actually ungodly like 10M+ or just ya like 10k

>>25204607
Isn’t any reason to anti-fud? For reals? There are millions riding on it. There’s all the reason in the world. A project isn’t just guaranteed to succeed like wtf do you mean

>>25204396
XRP

>>25204693
you are too new
is any other project at the 'family roundtable'
https://www.coindesk.com/swift-sibos-blockchain-contest-winners
look at the wef stuff

>>25204396
Stakenet.

>>25204693
Relax, if you have a stack then you have already won.

>>25204605
> he thinks Sergey is in control