/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>24976200
post screens and keep us updated

>>24976200
Me too. From link to BTC. This last few weeks have been really painful

>>24976200
Enjoy 15% tax

swing from the rafters, maybe

>>24976200
Bad career move bro, you missed the top.
At least only do a small amount.

moodys has downgraded Link to junk

Is anyone still holding link? It was my comfiest hold until about October where its just crabbed while everything else has mooned, considering moving it to something else, ever xrp and ltc are mooning while kink does nothing Thoughts?

>>24976200
trying to swing at the bottom. special kind of retard

>>24976730
>thinks we've bottomed out
i'm selling half for grt, these don't seem like ordinary shills

>>24976712
>>24976200
do it so we can pump already

>>24976764
Good move.

>swinging
>swinging link
>selling
>selling the bottom
OH NO NO NO

>>24976327
this

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lhH87Ub0uDc

>>24977443
Everything is taxed anyway so whats the problem?

>>24976200
Checked but you watched it fucking crash over 50% in sats and want to swing NOW?

>>24976764
>from one day to another board is full with grt shills
>not suspicious at all
imagine being this dumb

>>24976764
The time to do that was days ago. YOU HAD 3 HOURS. really though if you sell your link then I hope grt dumps even though I hold both.

>>24976764
>t. grt shill

>>24976200
Buy rope so you swing from your ceiling after as well. Its crazy how many FUD threads there have been the past week. Its like right before we broke $5. The demoralization campaign was in full swing. 5-10 FUD LINK threads at any given time in the catalog.

It makes no sense anyone would sell now its literally the bottom. Lol You missed your chance at $20 but you will get another try at $50-60 in the next 6 weeks or so.

>>24977464

This shit is so based. Pop Anon too.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PIlzkQ1J6KU

>>24977570
jesus christ i'm not selling all of it retard

>>24976200
I understand. I've made this kind of mistake myselt in the past. Pic related is the real world, outisde your adhd gen z head

post screenshot and keep us updated

>>24977610

You probably shouldn't sell any of it. You are likely selling the bottom of LINK to buy the local top of GRT. Idk how much half your stack is but its still a retarded move. If its a shitcoin and in the /biz catalog you are too late.

>>24976200
Honestly this is literally the best time ever to swing and im still going to miss it.

Link has to a rule been doing a fraction of BTC pumps and a multiple of dumps. Lately in fact it's not been doing any of the pumps yet still, like last night at 11pm gmt, exceeds the dumps.

Bitcoin is inevitably due some healthy retrace and when it does it's going to DECIMATE link. I think we'll see sub $10 again but you could without a doubt safely rebuy at $11.

Yet i won't because im wedded to this shite coin.

>>24978437
Do you honestly think what you are trying to do here is effective?

>>24977570
Emotional people like yourself always reimagine the past, it's a very feminine thing I've noticed over the years. The move past $5 came about very suddenly with nothing out of the ordinary preceeding it and no 'FUD campaign'. It was a bit after the whalekiller push past $1 and generally talk was about the 2019 autumn events: sibos, psd2, web 3. There was literally no odd organised FUD and even now there clearly isn't, there's unhappy buyers and gloaters but that's it. The only time we've ever seen organised FUD was earlier this year when BAND was clearly paying shills. You could see that across here, reddit and twitter.

>>24978568
I'm not trying to do anything, I've owned more link than you'll ever see and for much longer. You're just a labile idiot and I'm pointing that out, i don't want you to sell.

>im about to sell the literal bottom, again

>>24978578

There has never been a fud campaign on here. People are just genuinely concerned after Link broke the 1.5 year trend line, and have every right to be. Link is a cult in many ways where negative opinions are not allowed.

>>24978578
>The only time we've ever seen organised FUD was earlier this year
This

>>24977464
just bought 100k because of this

>>24978632
No Band literally did pay people to fud and the giveaway, it was obvious with the "X bad thing happens with link not with BAND" format. It came on out of the blue and was the same across multiple sites.

However you get a really childlike contingent of link holders, probably non white and as a result high estrogen, who try to dismiss all criticism and unhappiness as FUD so they can stay mentally comfortable like the upset anon ITT. I guarantee 99% of the 'FUD' posts she's 'perceiving' lately come from anons all in link, it's always been the way. People get annoyed, obviously, when their risky investment begins to fail and i can agree with them that this time particularly stings due to the hiding team. As i said I'll still hold as i have done for years but i legit think we're going to have a great opening to buy in if you could.

The team won't suddenly announce something in this christmas week but bitcoin has an extremely high chance of retracing.

>>24978578
You are projecting. Nothing I've said here is emotional. I'm just explaining past events. If anything anyone who is considering selling LINK now to GRT is emotional. You are buying something that went up 700% in 6 days. Its your funeral.

There was absolutely a FUD campaign here you are just outright lying now. Uncleoldfag and his discord trannies were on here saying it would never surpass $5 for months. Schiff said he'd stream his suicide if it went over $5. Over and over again. The same copy pastas over and over. Whalekiller didn't push us up past $1 no one in retail has the funds to affect price action. I was in that thread it was a fun larp.

I've was here when LINK ICO'ed and started buying right after. Great because I'm not selling

>>24978794

You realize most of us are up nearly 50x from strictly holding at a minimum? If you swung ANY of the local tops with some of your stack its probably closer to 100x. This is all during a bear market.

>>24978797
Uncleoldfag and schiff are the same person and if one person posting the same memes with a tripfag to mark them out strikes you as a conspiracy you've discovered then you're just simple.

There wasn't "one" whalekiller thread, there were dozens over weeks and sentiment does have the ability to affect price. I never said whalekiller himself drove the price, more that that period was characterized by those threads. He was a bit of an idiot who talked about grand conspiracies to keep link down and when we broke $1 we'd instantly hit the singularity. Again just an odd response suggesting you're a bit simple, so with the aforementioned high femme tone i think you're probably arab or something.

>>24978902
>Again just an odd response suggesting you're a bit simple, so with the aforementioned high femme tone i think you're probably arab or something.

Its obvious you are trying to bait me and drive the conversation somewhere else because you have nothing. Regardless, the sentiment didn't drive the price up either. LINK is manipulated by large players accumulating with bots. They drive the price action and nothing/no one else. There were tons of pajeets spamming the exact same lines in dozens of threads daily. It wasn't the same person.

They'd literally say

-GOOGLE PROVEN FAKE
-SWIFT PROVEN FAKE
-ORACLE-SOON TO BE PROVEN FAKE

This is was literally every thread about LINK. There was also Detective Anon as well. Lots of tripfags regurgitating the same thing.

Also I'm 75% Northwest European and 25% Irish

>>24979245
> LINK is manipulated by large players accumulating with bots.

Post your evidence. It's unfounded copium. You clearly just want the easy out of dismissing all criticism as baseless fud. All negative chart activity is a conspiracy against you from big institutional players and all criticism is just shilling. Im sure deep down you know that's lazy.

The three examples you give aren't great either, google is still that sad pinned post about a work example and since google has confirmed they've not done more, swift is just the permanent nothingburger and oracle has given us the con job startups and even then only the first half and then the integration that just got dropped without a word. People point these things about because they're bad and important. Wetting yourself and shouting no doesn't somehow improve the material standing of link

>>24979521

There isn’t any evidence. The only argument I used to have was the perfect log trendline on the link/btc weekly , it bounced perfectly for the past 1.5 years. It has broken the line as we know and so far it has dumped even more.

>>24977486
Every swing trade back and forth incurs a 15% tax on the amount you sell if I’m not mistaken.

>>24979521

Its not copium. Basically go research the Wyckoff Distribution method in depth. I also never said negative chart activity, you did. They keep it in accumulation channels and when weak hands are no longer selling they expand the price to create new sellers and rinse/repeat so they are also responsible for positive price action. Also the WEF confirmed SWIFT and Google in their description of Chainlink. Again you literally know nothing and I'm not even insulting you just pointing out the truth. The Oracle integration was never Q3 the pdf says Q3 and onward.

>>24979733
No you explicitly stated a belief that link's charts are manipulated by bots looking to accumulate, only after being called out do you add some weird cope misunderstanding of accumulation there. The WEF mentioned the poc work done years ago, absolutely nothing new. As for oracle you had two powerpoint presentations and one talk, only one said '& beyond' and in fact that was the earliest one.

The accumulation talk you just gave is so markedly bad faith or stupid that I realize this is a waste of time, so well done discussion over.

>>24979885
>The WEF mentioned the poc work done years ago, absolutely nothing new.

This is false. They didn't refer to the PoC and said SWIFT was working with them.

>No you explicitly stated a belief that link's charts are manipulated by bots looking to accumulate, only after being called out do you add some weird cope misunderstanding of accumulation there.

The charts are manipulated by bots that are accumulating. That is what Wyckoff's Distribution method shows, signs of how big players paint the charts while accumulating.

I would suggest anyone who wants to understand what is going on with LINK should research Wyckoff Distribution. There is a reason this shill no longer wants to "discuss".

>>24976200
Just do it your sacrifice might be what it takes to summon to golden bull.

>>24980003
based doing good work dispelling this retarded FUD. According to Wyckoff we are pretty close to the next cycle right?

>>24980003

Well you are just saying it “shows accumulation” without actually providing proof and just telling us to read about wyckoff distribution.

>>24979633
no. im calculating how much i spent and how much i have and the positive difference i will pay tax on. i will not pay tax to put me at a loss or even just to break even. fuck that. fuck you. take it out of my ass.

>>24980196
Yes we are moving to Phase E soon which is the last pump before an extended distribution cycle. After this one the next would probably not be until June.

>>24980273

Do the research yourself nigger. I literally gave you the pamphlet put it in the time.

>>24976200
look at this dag buying link when its crabbing and missing the 20x on graph

>>24976200
You better be fucking joking. Incase your not I really dont want to see any pink wojaks from you tomorrow, this is the most bottomed out link has ever looked

>>24976327
15%? If you held longer than a year, yeah. But if he was unemployed and made less than 40k then capital gains taxes are 0% in 2020. Also could Jew his way to 0% with some clever and legal tax loopholes if slightly more.

Stinkers losing faith, the dream is dead.

>>24980451
Whats your estimate for the next distribution top? Do you hold anything besides link?

>>24976200
https://youtu.be/TRXdxiot5JM

>>24980724

Its kind of hard to call now. You have wait until it starts to unfold for the most part and then start looking at shorter time frames. I'd imagine nearing $50. Wyckoff itself doesn't give metrics for price targets just shows when heavy players are dumping funds into something. I'm 95% LINK and 5% 0Chain as my moonshot.

>>24976200
Just hodl and earn more fiat to buy btc with.

>>24980807
ty. More fundamentally does it make sense to long link and stake it once available to the public if no money is needed? I basically do not plan to sell for the next years, whats your take on this "strategy"?

Something with swingies and the rope.... i've forgotten

>>24980917

I have 10K LINK I'm never selling and will stake once possible. It will continue to appreciate nicely over the next decade and staking will cause the value to increase in a positive feed back loop. The rest of my holdings I sell when I think we have reached a local top and then I buy back in lower. If we hit an ETH type run I might get burnt but I generally ladder my sells and buys so it shouldn't be too bad. I'm assuming the end of 2021 to early 2022 will be a blow off top.

>>24976200
Why would you swing what is likely the bottom? Swing at $20, sure, but not now.

I'd just look at API3 if I were you. LINK has yet to correct 75%, which is about $5. Q1.

>>24981020
Makes sense. Thank you and we shall make it.

>>24980003
I mean the WEF literally did just refer to the PoC. I don't advocate swinging but you're full of shit as well.

>>24981196
source?

>>24976200
Checked
Not going to lie, this thread is getting me excited
I wish everyone in hear that's saying they'll sell actually sell instead of being larping retards

>>24981196

https://www.fintechfestival.sg/sponsors2020
SWIFT is literally one of the sponsors

https://www.fintechfestival.sg/speakers?name=sergey

Sergey Nazarov is the co-founder of Chainlink, the leading decentralized oracle network, used by enterprises (SWIFT, Google, Oracle), blockchain and DeFi teams (Aave, Synthetix, and many others).

Working with leading banks, insurance companies and large technology firms on the creation of “universally connected smart contracts”, gives him a unique perspective on what is required to bring smart contracts forward for enterprise adoption. Currently, 80%+ of smart contracts require external data feeds such as market prices, IoT events, and shipping data. These smart contracts need a secure reliable way to connect to this off-chain data, the capability Chainlink uniquely provides.

SWIFT is also used as an example in the WEF white paper recently released.

>>24976712
>kink
coomer spotted

>>24981147