/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>24705009
>Security LOL

Unaudited closed source piece of shit

>DEV exit scam #2

>>24705195
Damn you’re on time

>>24705195
Hi, AfterBazar.
Fuck off

Le Original, Sires.

>>24705009
seething pnkers on suicide watch

>>24705009
>security just feels good.
>holds a scam
kek

>>24705009
I like how the bottom part of this pic changes with each new scam attempt

>>24705195
audit's occur, tech builds first???

Why not just join us and make money, surely that's better than spamming all day?

>>24705009
> please don't fud my shitstake sir plz..

nobody gives a shit, cunt. look at link, xrp & smg threads, the herd is always right.
Every XSN thread dies as soon as it gets posted.

>>24705965
>Wants me to buy the bags of an obvious scam of obvious scammers on at least their second scam for a coin that has no value.

Thanks, but I'll pass.

>posw scam

>Fudders post absolute bullshit in the thread, proving that monkeys would outperform them on an IQ test.
>Fudders colorized 2020

>>24707362
>Posting proof of DEV exit scam is considered "fud"

The state of Stakenetters

>Gettin stake nut on by the DEVS

>>24705980
>XRP
opinion disregarded

>>24705009
ftfy

>>24705009
>opening lightning channels (fee)
>renting lightning channels (fee)
>trading amounts limited to your channel capacity
>"click this, click that, slide this, change this, switch that..."
>etc etc

This shit is just way too complex and slow and I seriously doubt it will gain any meaningful traction other than a few tech-obsessed autists

>>24707951
Prove they exit scammed then.
You will not be able to, because it never happened.
>>24708672
Simple Swap UI is not far off and has been being tested in a closed beta for several weeks, it is extremely easy to use.
Someone will probably have a WEBM of it being used.

>>24708869
>Prove they exit scammed he says

The state of Stakenetters

>>24708869
>Prove they exit scammed he says
>Chart goes to zero
>DEVS exited
>Proven SCAM
>DEVS EXIT SCAMMED

The mental state of Stakenetters

>>24708672
Lol, they said the same about btc, it's almost as if it's nascent tech that will mature over time you fuckwit

>>24709066
>Mentioning nascent tech
>Doesn't realize that Stakenet is nascent tech built on UTXO code like BTC

Tech did evolve. It's called Ethereum.

The state of Stakenetters

>>24709130
>Hates XSN but is in every thread
>5 posts by this id

Glad to see you polluting another thread ranjeesh

>>24709276

The state of Stakenetters

>>24709045
The state of fudders larping as retards lmao
You realise that you were able to transfer from PoSW to XSN? Before it went to 0?
You also realise that the project was completely abandoned by it's creators while X9 who were merely contracted to work on a blockchain took over the project and then decided to phase it into XSN?
>>24709130
You realise UTXO isn't nascent or outdated tech it's just a different accounting model? You talk about tech evolving, I won't talk about things like Taproot that allow smart contracts with BTC because you are clearly mentally deficient so I won't expect you to actually know anything besides the old recycled garbage that spastics like you put out every day.
So far you've made no valid points, and mostly lies, then claimed that because you are a lying bullshitter that somehow that reflects on 'Stakenetters' badly. I mean you clearly don't see the irony but it made me laugh inside a bit.
I'll accept that you like ETH, but it's inability to scale on L1 has been very well demonstrated by this point.

>>24709649
>Taproot

LOL at the DEVS literally scanning the internet for anything they can find to 'prove' Stakenet can run smart contracts and then selling it as fact to gullible Stakenetters.

>Believing all the bullshit that comes out of the DEVS asses

Eating the DEVS shit with a spoon.

LOL

>The state of Stakenetters

>>24709649
>You realise that you were able to transfer from PoSW to XSN? Before it went to 0?
You realize the devs ran PoSW to the ground, then airdropped 70% of the minted XSN to themselves, effectively diluting any bagholders stack to 0, and continued like nothing happened?

>>24709763
>Defending an EXIT SCAM by the DEVS
>Being left bag holding a bag of shit by DEVS being defended

The state of Stakenetters

>>24709762
I wasn't aware being well informed about developments on UTXO based blockchains meant that I know nothing and am eating anyone's shit. Also it's not coming out of the devs asses it's a tweet from a BTC mining pool.
>>24709763
>Devs ran it into the ground
I feel like a website hack (not caused by X9) would cause a pretty heavy sell pressure.
Could you show me where you found this information about where you are getting this thing about airdropping 70% of XSN to themselves?
>>24709985
>Repeating the same shit over and over again as if it's going to make any difference to the validity of the argument

Pretty funny how most of the AMA questions are bagholders trying to get answers for the biz "fud". Can't wait to read the devs smoke & mirrors regarding the PoSW scam, constantly delayed roadmap, not being able to run smartcontracts, etc.

YOU KNOW WHAT TIME IT IS

IIIIIITTSSS YANKEE PUMP AND DUMP TIME

gotta pump this piece of shit again, time to rally the discord

>>24708124
I like how XSN niggers think that their "interchain framework" idea is somehow novel when Ripple, Stellar have been talking about interoperability for ages, and Cosmos' entire platform revolves around it

XSN is built on faulty tech (bitcoin) and will soon become completely irrelevant

but its scam time soon

>>24710193
LOL

Devs are in discord posting theoretical bullshit about smart contracts being run on Bitcoin, that still don't address the lack of utility of the coin, and acting as if "IT WAS ALWAYS IN THE PLAN."

LOL

And Stakenetters eating it up. Literally being shit in their mouths and eating it up.

>The state of Stakenetters

>>24710189
>Oh yah....uh Taproot (a tweet that came out today)....that was always in the plan.

>Eat more of my shit and here is a bag of shit for take out

The state of Stakenetters

>>24710435
Taproot has been being developed for ages, been included in Bitcoin Core for months. First of all, I have heard of it before, but secondly why the fuck does it matter if I hadn't? Does it suddenly mean that it doesn't work or something?
kys

>>24710560

Great stuff. On PAPER. Where is the release? Is it ever going to release? Probably not for another 5-10 years at this rate.

>>24710689
>Where is the release?
Release what? All they've got is released right now. Everything else is vaporware at best.

>Stakenet dev asking how to build Stakenet

>>24710560
>DEVS post tweet that was posted today of tech that doesn't add any utility to the coin and doesn't work
>Stakenetters proclaim that it was always in the plan to justify their investment
>No questions asked

The state of Stakenetters

>>24710663
>Fudder: Point A
>Me: Refutes Point A
>Fudder: Point B
>Me: Refutes point B
>Fudder: Point C and Point D
>Me: Could you show me evidence of this, I don't believe this to be true but I don't have evidence of it. Refutes point D
>Fudder: OMG MOVING GOALPOSTS!!!!
So fudsters moving the goalposts, then myself refuting each point individually or asking for evidence about one, is me moving goalposts?
Oh the irony.
>>24710796
There is literally an important feature in closed beta == not released?
>>24710854
>Stakenet dev asks a question about the specifics of a client that they did not develop in order to implement it in their own project.
>DEVS MAKING PROGRESS TESTING ANOTHER ETH L2 CLIENT NOOOOOOOOOO
>>24710854
You are complaining about the recentness of this announcement but it was proposed right at the start of 2018?