/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>23970080
that's racist

>>23969916
>actually decentralized
>quantifiable security
>first-party oracles
>tokenomics directly tied to profits

>>23969916

Who? You do realize all that matters is the amount of network participants right? Chainlink is a cult and will beat any newcomer

>>23970625

>>23969916

>>23969916
>yeah staking is kinda gay since it puts node funds at risk if they mess up
>It's much better to have a third party cover the oracle insurance, I'm sure the nodes will behave on the insurers' behalf
What the fuck were the API3 retards thinking lol

>>23969916
It makes more sense than chainlink, but I still don't get what it is solving that can't be solved in paying link to some API/data provider.

>>23971756
scratch link out with literally any token you want, including ETH, my bad.

>>23971685
the problem with staking is the exact same reason why they probably chose to not acknowledge it. If the data providers fail to deliver accurate data, you can't prove it deterministically anyhow. In fact, in the chainlink case, it would probably work out where nodes would punish people providing accurate data when everyone else is pulling the faulty data source.

2017 OG linkie here who sold entire bag at $18. Chainlink is ChiCom compromised now with Adelyn infesting shit with chink SJW shit, being associated with BSN, China Telecom etc. They will be blacklisted soon when Trump goes hard on Chinks after re-election. Also they are associated with WEF and the Great Reset bullshit. I hope the project dies at this point, they aren't what I originally anticipated and instead are yet another layer of Jewish control.

>>23969916
you probably don't even understand it lmfao.

>>23971866
>after reelection
trump supporters and nolinkers seething

>>23971813
You can actually, if a false data claim is made, for example, you can escalate it to a wider range of nodes. Provided the majority of the network is honest this would resolve the dispute. That's just one example though, the team has not actually disclosed their method yet, since staking is to be released. But so far we already have the game theoretic deviation from the aggregated mean as warranting penalty.

API3 HAS disclosed their method. Insurance by a third party. And how are THEY going to prove they are honest? Same problem, except now the nodes themselves have absolutely no incentive to behave, kek.

>look how different and more decentralized we are compared to chainlink
>we take it to the ((APIS)) directly
brilliant, right?

>>23971915
>if a false data claim is made, for example, you can escalate it to a wider range of nodes. Provided the majority of the network is honest this would resolve the dispute.

this doesn't work though and cannot deterministically prove that the data is indeed accurate though. It's just the computer equivalent of cultish groupthink.

>>23971897
Dilate

>>23971986
ok.
Address the other stuff? You probably won't.

>>23971897
Also, Biden is recorded as winner of the US election on chain now via Chainlink nodes. Topkek when Trump is re-elected and fat cuck Sergey has to pay out personally to those who relied on his shitty node for that data. He already had to pay out personally when they fucked up the Gold / Silver prices on SNX.

>>23972061
>biden won
>when trump is re-elected

yall make no sense

>>23972097
Solid grasp of US constitutional law there trannychink

>>23972052
it's more just
>soon.jpg
cope. it's been, what, 3-4 years? I'm divested from it and this bitcoin rally confirms this coin is just borrowed time. I have more faith in OP's API3 (which I won't invest in) than chainlink because it architecturally makes sense and is based on provable federation-like designs. it probably won't "moon" but it doesn't have to since it's a utility coin for data providers and purchasers.

>>23972126
what did he mean by this

>>23972196
no one fucking knows. that's why you don't give them (You)'s.
real /biz/tards would be proclaiming that biden won and personally invented the vaccine and would be looking to figure out what that means for their future buys.

>>23972187
>doesn't address the node incentive thing
Play it like you aren't a shiller all you want faggot.

The truth is API3 doesn't solve a single problem it claims Chainlink has, and adds a few extra problems on top just to seem different.

>how to resolve data
How does the insurance "deterministically prove" whether data is accurate?

>in the chainlink case, it would probably work out where nodes would punish people providing accurate data when everyone else is pulling the faulty data source.
Wrong, because that would evolve to a situation where no one stakes and thus the attackers would have a short-term gain and then nothing. Instead they have the option of long-term gain by joining honestly.
And in fact Chainlink has started the network in a centralized KYC fashion to ensure that when other nodes join they can only build up reputation by staking honestly because the existing, starting majority will be honest. So that short term option only becomes available after painstakingly building up reputation.

Ok, now let's look at API3's "solution. Here if a new node joins, there is absolutely ZERO incentive to be honest. That's right, ZERO. We don't even need to get into game theory or anything. No dispute. As for the insurers, you have to be positively mad to insure an oracle network set up like this.

Additionally API3 IGNORES the possibility of Sybil attack by just pretending it isn't there for them. see pic>>23971948

I mean, at this point I respect BAND more. They just copied LINK, but at least it could have actually WORKED.

>>23971866
So instead of never selling, you just gave away your wealth to the very people you're against

>>23971915
First-part oracles are already far less likely to misbehave because they have their off-chain real-world reputation at risk.

Stakers are aware that their stakes could get slashed in case of an insurance payout. Pic related. Stakers are also governance token holders which means they have a skin-in-the-game incentive to vote for data feed configurations that are less likely to provide faulty data.

>>23971948
If the APIs are exchanges themselves, for example, then there are no red question marks in your diagram.

>>23972187
sergay being in this industry for 8+ yrs with possible satoshi affiliation probably went to the drawing board 9000 times to think the game theory trough

>>23972451
>Additionally API3 IGNORES the possibility of Sybil attack
Sybil attacks won't happen since the nodes are first-party i.e. run by data providers themselves who make it known off-chain. Sybil attack in this context will only occur if these companies collude to fuck up a contract, which is far less likely than a bunch of third-party no-name middlemen oracles.

FUCK OFF CLCG TRANNIES

>>23972655
this is satire, right?

>>23972573
>If the LINK Nodes are exchanges themselves, for example, then there are no red question marks in your diagram.
>KYC oracles are already far less likely to misbehave because they have their off-chain real-world reputation at risk.
>Stakers are aware that their stakes could get slashed in case of an stake payout.

Like I said, exact same problems as LINK with a few extra added on to seem different.

>>23972690
>Sybil attacks won't happen since the nodes are KYC i.e. run by node providers themselves who make it known off-chain. Sybil attack in this context will only occur if these companies collude to fuck up a contract, which is far less likely than a bunch of third-party no-name APIS.

Some entry level fud:

Why only 20% of total supply in public crowdsale?

Crappy mesa platform for token distribution

Team members not on website, because they are ashamed of their past (met on 4chan, have a history of screwing over their employers)

CLCG ouldn't run a Chainlink node for shit, couldn't make a decent market website, got massively cucked by Linkpool.

CLCG has a history of screwing people over with token sales, faking interest.

Timo. That's it.

Then some technical fud:
What's the difference between API3 and Chainlink first party nodes? Many data providers are already running nodes for Chainlink, so I don't see the point in API3.

They say their vaporware Airnode is super easy to deploy. Yet, this depends on third party ethereum services like Infura which gives them a centralized point of failure. They responded to this fud in the telegram saying that the data providers will run their own ethereum node, but if they do that why not simply run a Chainlink node as well?

Also API3 doesn't have a max supply, and inflation will mean you either risk your tokens in the DAO (some random data provider messes up and you lose your tokens) OR your tokens lose their value via the inflation.

Why do they need funding if the airnode is already developed?

>>23972763
>If the LINK Nodes are exchanges themselves, for example, then there are no red question marks in your diagram
Then why don't the existing price data feeds use data directly from exchanges? Instead you have multiple nodes serving data from the same source (CMC, for example).
>KYC oracles are already far less likely to misbehave because they have their off-chain real-world reputation at risk.
who KYCs? sergey?
>Stakers are aware that their stakes could get slashed in case of an stake payout
Chainlink has not made any progress or even described how they will approach staking, which is probably because staking based on outlier removal is the wrong approach.

>>23972848
>CLCG ouldn't run a Chainlink node for shit

>>23972848
>Yet, this depends on third party ethereum services like Infura which gives them a centralized point of failure.

>Let us take an illustrative turn and describe what would happen to an Airnode if Infura went down. Airnode is designed to use multiple Ethereum providers simultaneously, without requiring a load balancer. This means that for an Airnode to go down, all of its Ethereum providers have to go down simultaneously (and it doesn’t have a load balancer as a single point of failure). These Ethereum providers are a combination of centralized or decentralized service providers, plus a private Ethereum node if the provider so chooses to maintain and operate one.

Mobius 2.0

That is all.

>>23969916
>Api3
Literally zeus capital 2.0 see fags never learn see you at 1k

>>23972763
the extra added problem of course being that now you have two parties to possibly bribe: the stakers and the insurance party
two attack vectors instead of one

The insurance can be compromised in order to falsely take the stake of the APIS
The APIS can be compromised in order to screw the insurance providers

>>23972856
>Then why don't the existing price data feeds use data directly from exchanges?
See, LINK could do that, if it was as unimaginative as API3. But Sergey is working towards an actually decentralized network. You wouldn't understand, I guess.

your other 2 "concerns" are extremely laughable since I was copying the API3 approach as in your words, substituted with LINK terms
Just stop, it's becoming embarassing.

>>23972904
Hi Turdak

Very based thread sirs, imagine not getting a bag of this.

>backed by Placeholder, Pantera, Coinfund, Digital Currency Group, to name a few
>DCG are literally the founders of Grayscale and major investors in Coinbase
>seed investors hold only 10% of the supply, vested for 2 years
>low as fuck initial marketcap for an oracle project (30 mil fully diluted, less than 10 mil circulating supply)
>data feeds governed by a DAO
>oracles run directly by API providers with zero maintenance required,
>feeds use xDAI
>founders have worked directly with Chainlink for 2 years, figuring out its flaws from the inside and basing the design of API3 on that
>ChainLink advisor Jake Brukhman is an early investor
>already connected with a bunch of highly talented DAOs, ready to integrate dapps with it

tell me anon, why aren't you building up a position in this?

>>23969916
(you)

>>23973006
>Sergey is working towards an actually decentralized network
>100% governance controlled by one fat Russian sperg who can dump a 75% of the total supply with one ledger button click

>>23972985
This is very likely btw, that API3 are the same guys as behind Zeus. They falseflagged Nexo, but Sergey never dropped nexo as partners aka it wasn't them. Then suddenly CLCG drops out of Chainlink, real coincidental.

>>23973045
come on, you're not even trying now

>>23973006
>See, LINK could do that, if it was as unimaginative as API3. But Sergey is working towards an actually decentralized
Let me get this straight: you think having several nodes deliver data from the same source makes it more decentralized than getting the data directly from the source? You, sir, are a retard.

>>23973114
Because it is a right. Why would you use a protocol as the foundational layer of DeFi when it has 100% centralized governance

>>23973006
>The insurance can falsely take the stake of the APIs
Oh no it's retarded.jpg

Chainlink will die better buy zcash eth and btc

>>23973018
Nice, what else is in your Burak folder?

this is like the 5th chainlink killer

>>23973018
what phenotype is this

>>23973134
>>23973146
aw, it's back to the same old boring FUD
too bad, I was starting to have fun

Someone give me like five bullet points why this shitcoin is better than my memies

>>23973154
I was only using the words of your fellow API3 defender
>>23972548
>Stakers are aware that their stakes could get slashed in case of an insurance payout

not my fault if he's retarded or misrepresenting your scam

>>23973283
it isn't
even OP doesn't think so

>>23973283
>>23973021

>>23973318
API providers don't stake tardo, only the people who want rewards from the insurance pool

You missed out on LINK, YOU HAD THREE YEARS

stop all this RETARD COPE, i wont even look into API3 because its COPE. A bunch of faggots who were 3 YEARS TOO LATE, UNLIKE ME.

>first party oracles
>dao
Who gives a FUCK
The gains are with CHAINLINK
NOT YOUR GAY FAGGOT SHITCOIN


HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

>>23971866
>they aren't what I originally anticipated
lmao did you think the Fourth Industrial Revolution wasn't worldwide or seomthing?

>>23973423
>you missed out
>the gains are with Chainlink
These statements are at odds

>>23973283
Dyor

Just lmao at you retards who actually think that anything other than Chainlink will dominate the space. I sent this thread to my buddy ChainlinkGod and we had a good laugh about some of the replies in here. He's about to put out a lengthy rebuttal using quotes from the LINK team to point out why API3 just doesn't stand a chance. Get fucked.

>>23973377
you're right, so it should be
>The insurance can be compromised in order to falsely ruin the REPUTATION of the APIS
>The APIS can be compromised in order to screw the stakers

That's even worse, since if reputation is all the APIs have they have internal incentive to ruin the reputation of the competing APIS.
Yikes.

>>23973627
Noooooooo not everyone's favorite Chainlink ambassador the one who scammed an allocation out of DMG and is paid to FUD by Chainlink noooooo not him

>>23969916
>Sergey rugpulls right when API3 is announced
loving every laugh

>>23973627
CLG is a faggot to be desu but these guy are bigger faggots so he has my blessing

Burak is legitimately a brilliant guy, however their whole team is utterly incompetent. Also burak may be smart enough to have identified genuine weak points in links strategy and design, but he doesn't know how to design this kind of system himself, neither is he a coder, he's way out of his depth and the whitepaper is embarrassing. The rest of the team is literal biz anons with zero experience or skills. It's a fucking DAO running on kleros and xdai. This project is a joke and 3m is nothing but shitters like Pantera are incredibly sore about missing out on link.

ITT API3 jeets continue to use doublespeak and ignore any comments that btfo
>>23972904
If they were so good at running a node why didn't they make a good website or have a good ico sale? kek

>>23973055
there's an anon posting its Timo Sasa and Burek behind Zeus along with ChainlinkGod and Finrekt. Not sure if they're all involved but since CL dropped CLCG it is very telling.

>>23973715
No tardo. Let me explain
>The insurance can be compromised in order to ruin API reputation
It's adjudicated by Kleros, so no
>The APIS can be compromised
This is a problem with every system including your beloved Chinalink. However API3 has reduced other attack vectors by not having 3rd party nodes

you fucking retard

>>23973836
Flush yourself down the toilet.

>>23973134
you must be kidding if you think data providers won't decentralize too. It will happen after the fall of big data. Let's face it the best big data could do with all that information was to make targeted advertising? kek

>>23973836
The point of this whole thing is automation, where you don't need human input. Doesn't using Kleros just defeat that purpose? And what happens when Kleros jurors are non technical people who don't understand the technicals of the case they're meant to rule on?

>>23973903
Please refer to the Kleros book sir,, do the needful. Please to be doing the own research sirs

>>23973894
>data providers will split themselves into different companies
RETARD ALERT

>>23973966
>I refused to back up my points
Debunked and discarded.

>>23973836
kys Timo the idea is to remove Jewish systems of litigation from our new deterministic systems not add new layers of "governance" then have actual subhumans vote on outcomes they don't even understand.
With link and smart contracts friction is removed and if you don't like it don't get involved in that contract. The user defines the contract. This is how western values survive the great reset: by being hard baked into the contracts. Chinks try and chink you? they don't get paid. It's brilliant. Thank you Sergey

>>23973836
>This is a problem with every system including your beloved Chinalink. However API3 has reduced other attack vectors by not having 3rd party nodes
The Chainlink nodes have reputation AND stake at risk. So yeah, just reputation as put forward by API3 design is inferior

>It's adjudicated by Kleros, so no
Absolutely kek at this. Kleros is basically the one example I suggested here >>23971915
(escalating to more nodes in case of dispute) and it was shot down by one of your fellow pajeets here >>23971986

So you admit to settling for the one option your pajeets already shot down yourself. And I suggested CL COULD use it if they want, but they might very well come up with better.

You like the tardo insult, guess we found out why, tardo.

>>23974023
> data provider mitosis
I said new companies will fill the gap needed to achieve a certain level of decentralization just like with every single gold rush.

>>23972061
Biden is recorded the winner because he is the winner. You MAGA faggots literally cope so hard.

>>23974038
>I suggested an example you're using so it's actually bad
Fucking tardception
>Chainlink nodes have reputation and stake at risk
Yes but the reputation for muh cantdodgethehodgenode is not really comparable to actual companies. Also the staking doesn't exist yet, and probably won't.

>>23974079
Then they will also run their own Airnodes, instead of allowing 3 neetnodes to charge lots to serve their data to a centralized feed

>>23974124
come on now, this is just lazy again
I expect better if you want to keep me entertained.

>>23973903
>what happens when Kleros jurors are non technical people
Kleros literally has technical/non-technical courts. Pls sir do the needful research before posting sir.

>>23974100

>>23974038
>The Chainlink nodes have reputation AND stake at risk
It's been three years and neither is implemented. Toppest of keks!

>>23974168
>does not offer rebuttal
cleverest post you've made in this thread

>>23974124
>>23974161
You really are behind Zeus Capital ain't you. Lmao.
> x will have to do y
airnodes don't exist and probably wont.

>>23974222
yours was not a rebuttal either, you merely pivoted to
>staking is never coming
like this guy >>23974219

Booooring.

>>23974244
No that shit was easily refuted FUD. Nobody who actually knows anything about oracles believed it
>airnodes will never exist
Siri what is a github?

Good talk everyone. We'll reconvene this time next week.

>>23974280
>offers another non rebuttal, saying staking will solve it without it even being described in a white paper
TARDO
A
R
D
O

>>23973477
I promise you the 3 yr hodl returns from chainlink are exponentially larger than any token you own

>>23974219
>>23974321
>>23974308
> dude Zeus Capital was just a joke man lmao
Sage all API3/Zeus Capital jeet threads. This is just Zeus Capital outsourcing their work so they don't have to think for themselves.

>>23974321

Sirs, I object Sirs. Sir!

REMEMBER WHEN THESE CLCG TRANNIES TRIED (AND FAILED) TO SCAM /BIZ/?

https://yuki.la/biz/13288430

OH NO NO NO HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

>>23974308
>Siri what is a github?

Chainlink became irrelevant after the announcement of API3

>>23974513
>removed september 3rd
it's right on your screencap

>>23974576
suck my dick sasa you gipsy whore

>>23974502
lel

>>23974614
post 4 inch dick pls :)

>>23974664

>>23974424
I own chainlink

>>23974774
explain to me this tranny obsession on biz. i thought it was ironic now i'm learning that it's not. is your brain rewiring because you can't get a real woman to love you?

>>23974502
What the hell is CLCG?

>>23974874
because it's funny, now explain to me why you'd think people on biz wouldn't see through your shit when it already failed so spectacularly the first time

>>23974897
>early linkies bored on biz when link was still stealth mode
>one anon starts a thread, 'maybe we can help speed up chainlink adoption and create a biz company'
>dozens of motivated biztards getting together on discord, sharing resumes and spit balling ideas
>turns out most biztards are well educated and successful professionals
>biz meme company takes shape, becomes chainlink consultancy group
>elect a Finnish loser as their ceo but their cto is a 300 IQ autistic PhD college professor
>try to launch their own token, massive failure and backlash on biz because one of their guys announced he was shorting link on Twitter the day before, henceforth known as Timo the tranny, reputation destroyed before they even started
>despite all the hate and no money they actually still try their best to build their little api marketplace, reasonably successful development for a team of literal biz tards but there's no adoption
>one of their guys become employed by chainlink officially, another becomes a telegram janny, their lawyer also starts a DAO backed by openlaw, they're running a node...
>chainlink launches grant program, gives money to all the ecosystem companies, but vlc is weirdly absent
>turns out they not only stopped working on it, but they were actually building a competitor to chainlink
>et tu, brute
>rebranded as api3, trying to run a token scam once again now that normies are aware of oracles
>now trying to smear link to prop their scam up
>it's a fucking governance token that runs on kleros and xdai (lol)
>get funding from pantera (joey krug, a retard who missed out on link early but kept investing in failures)
>desperately trying to viral market on biz but no one is falling for it

>>23975082
>No, it is the VCs who are wrong
Thank you for your concern about my financial well being, I appreciate the effort you have put in and will stay well clear of the API3 (ticker $API3) token for sure sir,,,

>>23975212
which one are you? ari the kike? midhav the pajeet?

>>23975082
kek that's hilarious. No wonder all these API3 threads have the same inorganic and distasteful, almost vitriolic feel about them

>>23975082
this.

>>23975248
>they hire third worlders
Thank you for your concern about my financial well being sir,,

>>23975534
>hire
nice disinfo, it's the core team

Jesus christ, can everyone on this board just fucking kill themselves

>>23971986
You also can't prove that two computers are receiving eachothers msgs, yet the internet works. Something can be solved to such degree that it works, without it being mathematically rigorous.

>>23975082
those clcg faggots are behind that api3 shit?
what happened to honeycomb? i remember them absudly larp shilling that here

>>23975873
consensus on continuous data != consensus on discrete data

>>23969916
>i-it just makes more sense sirs

>>23971813

>JP MORGAN node reports wrong data
>most other nodes report different data
>JP morgan lose collateral, reputation for future jobs, and their PUBLIC reputation is harmed and it is a scandal.

You have no fucking idea how chainlink works if you think it needs some autism level of "proof of reality" bullshit which crypto nerds like vitalik think is even possible.

Link network is a raw and core capitalistic system which is why it will work

>>23972451

ignore him. he doesnt even know what a fucking sybil attack is. We have literally hit a point were newfags are using the OLDEST 2017 tier fud for Link without even knowing the technical terms for it or that this was already done literally 3 fucking years ago

>>23969916
Pnk and api3 are partnered

>>23971915
Which third party is going to insure trillions of dollars worth of derivatives?

It's also like API3/Zeus Capital haven't read Life After Google by George Gilder and believe that big data will still be around when the blockchain economy takes over.
http://library.lol/main/29159A58F576A6FE1B0DE7FEE250BAF9

>>23975082
How does this Joey krug keep his VC fund afloat? Room temp IQ can outperform using basic common sense. How’d he make his money in the first place? It’s interesting people who make a lot of money because they have talent at doing 1 thing and then they decide to become hedge funds and straight shit the bed.

>>23969916
is this the same project as clg that completely failed on their goals and ditched their investors?

I repeat, can all the incel anime fapping faggots rope themselves immediately.

>>23976406
> PNK/API3/ZeusCapital are all involved in fudding link and backstabbing the team
Trust Steve
Trust Thomas
Trust Ari
From dark to light

>>23976711
I think CLCG being zues Capital is a high probability actually. Occam's razor

>>23975082
oh shit fren I had no idea Timo and the Honeycomb faggots were behind this
that makes it even more hilarious

>>23975647
You first Timo

>>23977042
Sergey obviously thinks so. Look how professionally they handled the situation by refusing to give Burek Sasa and Timo gibs
Still strange Nexus was so intent on advertising you could short link

>>23976711
>Trust Thomas
Boom! Your silver is now gold. Congratulations anon, you've made it

>>23977323
holy fuck ebin times

>>23977313
yeah, whoever wrote the zeus fud had an encyclopedic knowledge of the project. does make you wonder about clcg
in saying that, there were a few too many coincidences around nexo. if it wasn't them then they got false flagged

>>23971866
>Also they are associated with WEF and the Great Reset bullshit.

Are you seriously bitching about their Chinese marketing arm and WEF? Clearly, you're LARPing because you had THREE FUCKING YEARS to come to accept blood on your hands for investing in the project that will enslave humanity.

For the jeets saying that staking, TEE and many more things are not yet in place or "live". There is a good reason why not. Part 2 coming in a minute.

>>23977494
Yeah anon if you think whoever was behind Zeus knew shit about Chainlink you're the brain let here

>>23973146
Hahahahahaha stay poor

Thank you come again! (in an indian accent). Fuck off with your 3mil api3 bullshit. Obvious scam, and you have no good argument against why it would be better then link.

i dont understand a thing. i have 100 link 100trb 100band

where to buy this? when exchange?

>>23969916
When is this shit coming out?

>>23977619
>>23977662

This is unnecessary, just post the full thing.

>>23977974
Sorry. It was my OC xD

>>23977662
Same VCs that backed Arbitrum are backing this. They can direct Arbitrum to favor this shit over LINK. We're back to asking why the fuck didn't Sergey buy Arbitrum to own layer 2? Especially with the amount of capital he's cut out of our hides.

>>23977974
Posted over a year ago? Lul

To put things in perspective for all you fud brainlets, API3 getting to the same value as BAND is a 20x from IDO. Thank you for being so concerned for my financial welfare

>>23978111
Source or larp

>>23978178
BAND was pumped by CZ for washtrading you brainlet
But sure take your chances with these retards. Make sure to get out in time and happy gambling.

>>23978111
>We're back to asking why the fuck didn't Sergey buy Arbitrum to own layer 2?
because layer 2 has loads of competition and Arbitrum already got cucked several times, Sergey definitely made the right choice (if he even ever considered it)

L2 will be a minor thing on top of Eth2 anyway

where do i buy this tranny scamtoken

>>23978118
yes they have been growing chainlink for a year or so now since mainnet

>>23978111
Doesn’t mean shit. Sequoia also backed BAND. And look at those bag holders now

Really comfy in LINK now Sergey kicked the trannies out

>>23977634
did you read it though? it was an impressive piece of work. lots on the xag/xau mishap etc. it was a clever mix of fact, fiction and misdirection.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gish_gallop#:~:text=The%20Gish%20gallop%20is%20a,or%20strength%20of%20the%20arguments.

>>23978839
DRNS isn't a meme anon so no I didnt. But I heard it was just rehashed fud.
Gish Gallop is exactly the style of debate used by these trannies though. And every time their argument was refuted they would just.ignore then move on to the next point.

>>23978939
to some extent rehashed but ive been here since sept 17 and as i say this was professionally done, on a different level. nothign left out, if biz had collectively put something out it wouldn't have been far off it.

>>23973757
The less chainlink smartcontract limited has in their coffers the more bullish it gets since once they run out that means sergey can't dump anymore and I just want sergey to stop dumping on my dreams every single day just let me be rich please I have 950 chainlink I just want $950,000 I've waited 3 years please sergey please

>>23979286
yeah dumping now is way better for optics later on. imagine if they held 65% at $100, the recent 1m dumps are a good thing. and of course they're actually using it to expand